A dying bloom in space

By Phil Plait | February 17, 2012 7:00 am

I love a good coincidence. On Monday morning, I posted a gorgeous picture of the planetary nebula Abell 31, an object formed when a dying star blows off its outer layers in a series of winds which collide with each other. I mentioned that these nebulae are usually symmetric — Abell 31 happens not to be because it’s moving rapidly through space, and the gas through which it moves is compressing one side of it. But events like that are not the norm; most planetaries show stunning symetric features… like Henize 3-1333, as you can see in this nice Hubble image of it:

[Click to ennebulenate.]

It looks like a flower, doesn’t it? The petals you see are actually sculpted lobes of gas. I’m guessing it undergoes periodic episodes where it blows out gas in focused beams, which then move outward and form those features as they plow into gas previously blown out by the star. It’s a guess, but it fits what’s known about the inner regions of the cloud near the central star. There’s a thick disk of material surrounding the central star, something like 30 billion km (20 billion miles) across, far larger than our solar system. Every six years or so, the central star appears to dim, which may be due to the inner part of the disk itself becoming unstable and puffing up, blocking the light. This disk may also be responsible for shaping the outflow of the gas from the star, forming those petals.

If you’re wondering just how much material the star is blowing out, it turns out to be about the mass of the Earth every year! That’s a tiny fraction of the star’s mass, but it blows out this much every year for thousands of years. Eventually that wind will turn off, and all that will be left is the very hot (30,000° C or about 55,000° F) core of the star, which will then cool over the next few billion years. Long before then the expanding gas around it will dissipate, and all that’ll be left is a very diffuse cloud of material that will mix with the ethereally thin matter between the stars.

Well that, plus images like this one. And, of course, the knowledge we’ve gained studying how stars die.

Credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA


Related posts:

- A dying star with the wind in its hair
- Another nearly perfect circle in space!
- Tears of a dying star
- The knotty halo of the Cat’s Eye

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures

Comments (3)

  1. Very pretty! :)

    And the science behind it makes it all the more fascinating and wonderful. No mystery lost, but rather intense appreciation for what I am seeing.

  2. Spaceman Spiff

    Sorry — but why is the remnant core of the star so cool? I presume that you are referring to the emerging white dwarf, and these reach effective surface temperatures of typically 100,000 K or more, depending on the mass.

  3. @^ Spaceman Spiff : You’ve got me puzzled because I can’t see where the BA says the central remnant star is cool at all there. On the contrary the BA writes :

    Eventually that wind will turn off, and all that will be left is the very hot (30,000° C or about 55,000° F) core of the star, which will then cool over the next few billion years.

    Which is pretty much spot on isn’t it? I guess if you wanted to quibble you could note that it takes a lot more than just a couple of billion years to cool off although ‘cool” is arelative term as I guess is “few” too. The BA also describes the central star as dim – based on its size and obscuring material.

    Van Maanen’s Star – a nearby white dwarf (click on my name for more details) – was thought to be extremely ancient around ten billion years or so as are even cooler white dwarfs found in globular clusters among other places yet even the coolest is still thousands of degrees Kelvin. White dwarfs eventualy fade to black dwarfs in theory but I don’t think we know of a single such example although admittedly they’d be rather hard to detect!

    I suppose the BA could be referring to the planetary nebula as cool or using the word in its colloquial sense somewhere but I’ve re-read this post a few times and can’t see a coolness reference matching either of those so, as I said, you’ve got me puzzled with this.

    @1. Larian LeQuella : Well said and seconded by me. :-)

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »