<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q&amp;BA: The Science of Science Fiction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324558</link>
		<dc:creator>tracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 01:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324558</guid>
		<description>The sound gets out of synch with the video at about 23:30  ... but it gets back into synch by 25:30 somehow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sound gets out of synch with the video at about 23:30  &#8230; but it gets back into synch by 25:30 somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Have A Pen &#187; Why Polar Satellites?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324557</link>
		<dc:creator>I Have A Pen &#187; Why Polar Satellites?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324557</guid>
		<description>[...] Phil Plait the Bad Astronomer explains the purpose of polar satellites in this Q&amp;A. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Phil Plait the Bad Astronomer explains the purpose of polar satellites in this Q&amp;A. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: François Cartier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324556</link>
		<dc:creator>François Cartier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 01:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324556</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil,
I also missed the web chat on Google+. I would have asked you about one of my favorite sci-fi shows : Space 1999. Would a catastrophic nuclear blast send the moon out of its orbit? If so, would it leave the solar system or be &quot;grabbed&quot; by another planet with big gravitional pull like Jupiter (in the event it passes close to one of those planets, of course; one thing I learned from you, is that space is huge)?? And since we are loosing the moon, what would be most likely effects on Earth?
Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil,<br />
I also missed the web chat on Google+. I would have asked you about one of my favorite sci-fi shows : Space 1999. Would a catastrophic nuclear blast send the moon out of its orbit? If so, would it leave the solar system or be &#8220;grabbed&#8221; by another planet with big gravitional pull like Jupiter (in the event it passes close to one of those planets, of course; one thing I learned from you, is that space is huge)?? And since we are loosing the moon, what would be most likely effects on Earth?<br />
Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike burkhart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324555</link>
		<dc:creator>mike burkhart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324555</guid>
		<description>I frist saw Starlost when a local station put it on at 11:00 , by the way it had Walter Koneg (Mr Cheackov) in two episodes  Wormholes have been popular in Science fiction lately ,in Star Trek the motion picture a warp engine imbalance creates a wormhole the Enterprise go thro and  pulls an Asteroid  into it. In the Transformers  the evil Deceptacons build  &quot;space bridge&quot; witch is a wormhole  to go form Earth to Cybertron (cartoon) . As for Close Encounters of the thrid kind , they have come out with a  three disk pack that includes : The theater version,the speceial Edition, and the directors cut .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frist saw Starlost when a local station put it on at 11:00 , by the way it had Walter Koneg (Mr Cheackov) in two episodes  Wormholes have been popular in Science fiction lately ,in Star Trek the motion picture a warp engine imbalance creates a wormhole the Enterprise go thro and  pulls an Asteroid  into it. In the Transformers  the evil Deceptacons build  &#8220;space bridge&#8221; witch is a wormhole  to go form Earth to Cybertron (cartoon) . As for Close Encounters of the thrid kind , they have come out with a  three disk pack that includes : The theater version,the speceial Edition, and the directors cut .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324554</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324554</guid>
		<description>@Narvi, thanks, those are also very good examples. I love Dr Who and Torchwood but these pseudoscience elements really annoy me! @Gary Ansorge, did you mean Deinococcus radiodurans, also known to his close friends as &#039;Conan the Bacterium&#039;? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Narvi, thanks, those are also very good examples. I love Dr Who and Torchwood but these pseudoscience elements really annoy me! @Gary Ansorge, did you mean Deinococcus radiodurans, also known to his close friends as &#8216;Conan the Bacterium&#8217;? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324553</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324553</guid>
		<description>5.   Mikey

Staphylococcus radiofurans is one bacteria that not only survives hard radiation, but thrives in a radiation intensity about 5000 times more intense than what would kill an average human.

&quot;Cleaning up&quot; cesium 137 would really only be useful at the source, before it had a chance to become diluted by the environment. Heavy neutron bombardment would then be one way to accelerate the decay process and make it harmless(more or less). Most of the radio nucleotides formed by such irradiation last only seconds to minutes,,,

Side note: We are already experimenting with micro organisms that concentrate heavy metals at toxic dumps into insoluble forms. Combining these organisms with the radiation resistence of radiofurans would potentially allow us to clean the environment of such contaminants. Someday,,,

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.   Mikey</p>
<p>Staphylococcus radiofurans is one bacteria that not only survives hard radiation, but thrives in a radiation intensity about 5000 times more intense than what would kill an average human.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cleaning up&#8221; cesium 137 would really only be useful at the source, before it had a chance to become diluted by the environment. Heavy neutron bombardment would then be one way to accelerate the decay process and make it harmless(more or less). Most of the radio nucleotides formed by such irradiation last only seconds to minutes,,,</p>
<p>Side note: We are already experimenting with micro organisms that concentrate heavy metals at toxic dumps into insoluble forms. Combining these organisms with the radiation resistence of radiofurans would potentially allow us to clean the environment of such contaminants. Someday,,,</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: puppygod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324552</link>
		<dc:creator>puppygod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324552</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;a) Would aliens, bombarding the Earth with radioactive meteors (good tactic for obliterating a planet) actually be able to live in a highly radioactive environment? If all life on the surface of the Earth were wiped out by radioactivity, could another life form take it’s place?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sure, why not? We know that there are extremophiles here on Earth that can survive even in cooling pools for spent nuclear fuel. So it is possible for some forms of life to colonize hypothetical irradiated Earth.

&lt;blockquote&gt;b) The Iscandarans (the good aliens) produce a cure for the radiation-saturated Earth. Is there any way to instantly negate radiation, even theoretically? Would it be possible to use scientific theory to ‘cure’ places like Chernobyl and the Japanese disaster of a few years ago? Is that just technology so advanced that it would seem like magic? Or is it just fantasy?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, not fantasy, but close to magic, imho. Problem with places like Chernobyl isn&#039;t so much radiation itself but rather source of said radiation. It&#039;s all about contamination and isotopes. For example, during Chernobyl steam explosion a lot of Cesium 137 was spread all around and now it&#039;s everywhere - in dust particles, in the soil, in the groundwater. It&#039;s there and still emits radiation with almost steady rate, and with half-life of 30 years it will take some time until it will reach background radiation level. The only conceivable way to stop it would be to bind it chemically (or, I don&#039;t know - with nanorobots) and then remove mechanically. It&#039;s conceivable, but needs a lot of work and much more advance tech levels than we have at our disposal - we are basically talking about terraforming here.

Or, alternatively, we can summon our magic-level tech and transmutate Cs-137 into stable isotope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>a) Would aliens, bombarding the Earth with radioactive meteors (good tactic for obliterating a planet) actually be able to live in a highly radioactive environment? If all life on the surface of the Earth were wiped out by radioactivity, could another life form take it’s place?</p></blockquote>
<p>Sure, why not? We know that there are extremophiles here on Earth that can survive even in cooling pools for spent nuclear fuel. So it is possible for some forms of life to colonize hypothetical irradiated Earth.</p>
<blockquote><p>b) The Iscandarans (the good aliens) produce a cure for the radiation-saturated Earth. Is there any way to instantly negate radiation, even theoretically? Would it be possible to use scientific theory to ‘cure’ places like Chernobyl and the Japanese disaster of a few years ago? Is that just technology so advanced that it would seem like magic? Or is it just fantasy?</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, not fantasy, but close to magic, imho. Problem with places like Chernobyl isn&#8217;t so much radiation itself but rather source of said radiation. It&#8217;s all about contamination and isotopes. For example, during Chernobyl steam explosion a lot of Cesium 137 was spread all around and now it&#8217;s everywhere &#8211; in dust particles, in the soil, in the groundwater. It&#8217;s there and still emits radiation with almost steady rate, and with half-life of 30 years it will take some time until it will reach background radiation level. The only conceivable way to stop it would be to bind it chemically (or, I don&#8217;t know &#8211; with nanorobots) and then remove mechanically. It&#8217;s conceivable, but needs a lot of work and much more advance tech levels than we have at our disposal &#8211; we are basically talking about terraforming here.</p>
<p>Or, alternatively, we can summon our magic-level tech and transmutate Cs-137 into stable isotope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narvi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324551</link>
		<dc:creator>Narvi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324551</guid>
		<description>@Gary: I&#039;d like to add another example to your list of supported pseudoscience in the Doctor Who universe. In the Torchwood episode about fairies (&quot;Small Worlds&quot;), it&#039;s revealed that the Cottingley Fairies were real.

They also claim that Houdini believed they were real. In real life, he knew they were fake, and spent quite some time trying to convince his friend Arthur Conan Doyle of that fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Gary: I&#8217;d like to add another example to your list of supported pseudoscience in the Doctor Who universe. In the Torchwood episode about fairies (&#8220;Small Worlds&#8221;), it&#8217;s revealed that the Cottingley Fairies were real.</p>
<p>They also claim that Houdini believed they were real. In real life, he knew they were fake, and spent quite some time trying to convince his friend Arthur Conan Doyle of that fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Li</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324550</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324550</guid>
		<description>Red matter was just strangelet matter - which of course is highly theoretical at best...  And perhaps they could have used it better...  But that&#039;s Hollywood for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red matter was just strangelet matter &#8211; which of course is highly theoretical at best&#8230;  And perhaps they could have used it better&#8230;  But that&#8217;s Hollywood for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara Li</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/02/27/qba-the-science-of-science-fiction/#comment-324549</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara Li</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45170#comment-324549</guid>
		<description>Red matter was just strangelet matter - which of course is highly theoretical at best...  And perhaps they could have used it better...  But that&#039;s Hollywood for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Red matter was just strangelet matter &#8211; which of course is highly theoretical at best&#8230;  And perhaps they could have used it better&#8230;  But that&#8217;s Hollywood for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-18 07:21:19 -->