<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaw-dropping Moon mosaic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325332</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325332</guid>
		<description>Absolutely stunning image Andre - well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely stunning image Andre &#8211; well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DLC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325331</link>
		<dc:creator>DLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 02:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325331</guid>
		<description>Very well done!
but... why did you darken out the part where the NWO secret moon base is ? I mean, how can we carry out President Gingrich&#039;s plan to make the moon the 51st state if we can&#039;t see where the Enemy put it&#039;s base ? maybe we could just email them that now all their base are ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very well done!<br />
but&#8230; why did you darken out the part where the NWO secret moon base is ? I mean, how can we carry out President Gingrich&#8217;s plan to make the moon the 51st state if we can&#8217;t see where the Enemy put it&#8217;s base ? maybe we could just email them that now all their base are ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Beautiful Cosmos: Our Moon &#171; Anton Nordenfur</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325330</link>
		<dc:creator>The Beautiful Cosmos: Our Moon &#171; Anton Nordenfur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 11:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325330</guid>
		<description>[...] yeah, I got the tip from Phil Plait&#8217;s blog. Follow it for more fantastic pictures, news and thoughts on astronomy. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] yeah, I got the tip from Phil Plait&#8217;s blog. Follow it for more fantastic pictures, news and thoughts on astronomy. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre vd Hoeven</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325329</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre vd Hoeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 22:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325329</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s purely a visual effect. The image was not stretched in any way. It&#039;s probably because of the oblique view...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s purely a visual effect. The image was not stretched in any way. It&#8217;s probably because of the oblique view&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoffeeCupContrails</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325328</link>
		<dc:creator>CoffeeCupContrails</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 20:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325328</guid>
		<description>Love the bumps on the horizon! Followed that all the way to the south.

Do the craters down south look a little... stretched? Artifact of the processing or a natural optical effect? Maybe, just the lighting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the bumps on the horizon! Followed that all the way to the south.</p>
<p>Do the craters down south look a little&#8230; stretched? Artifact of the processing or a natural optical effect? Maybe, just the lighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Herschel's back garden</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325327</link>
		<dc:creator>Herschel's back garden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325327</guid>
		<description>If you used this technique and just took pictures of the terminator region over a month you&#039;d be able to create a picture of the moon with &quot;modelling&quot; all over it. With a &quot;natural&quot;  view, such as this one, lots of detail is missing where the sun is approximately overhead.

Of course it would be quite tricky because you would also have to correct for the moon wobbling around during the course of a month.

Has anyone ever produced an image like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you used this technique and just took pictures of the terminator region over a month you&#8217;d be able to create a picture of the moon with &#8220;modelling&#8221; all over it. With a &#8220;natural&#8221;  view, such as this one, lots of detail is missing where the sun is approximately overhead.</p>
<p>Of course it would be quite tricky because you would also have to correct for the moon wobbling around during the course of a month.</p>
<p>Has anyone ever produced an image like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bandwidth Bandito</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325326</link>
		<dc:creator>Bandwidth Bandito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 03:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325326</guid>
		<description>Hey wow, I think I can see my moonbase from here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey wow, I think I can see my moonbase from here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre vd Hoeven</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325325</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre vd Hoeven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325325</guid>
		<description>Thank you all so much for your nice responses.

Larry: I have it available on A1 poster, that shows a lot of details.... :)

Ken: deconvolution is not really sharpening, but bringing out the details that are there, but are a little blurred. You&#039;re right you should be very careful with this....

Marisa: I think you make it too easy here. I admit that with the right conditions and equipment the imaging is not to hard, but processing after wards is still quite a big job. Making the images and mosaicing cost about 6-8 hours al together. Besides that it took about 1,5 hours of imaging with carefully making overlapping images, and making sure not to miss a single part.... It&#039;s not too difficult, but it really costs a lot of time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all so much for your nice responses.</p>
<p>Larry: I have it available on A1 poster, that shows a lot of details&#8230;. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Ken: deconvolution is not really sharpening, but bringing out the details that are there, but are a little blurred. You&#8217;re right you should be very careful with this&#8230;.</p>
<p>Marisa: I think you make it too easy here. I admit that with the right conditions and equipment the imaging is not to hard, but processing after wards is still quite a big job. Making the images and mosaicing cost about 6-8 hours al together. Besides that it took about 1,5 hours of imaging with carefully making overlapping images, and making sure not to miss a single part&#8230;. It&#8217;s not too difficult, but it really costs a lot of time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zAmboni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325324</link>
		<dc:creator>zAmboni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325324</guid>
		<description>Awesome shot!

I&#039;ve done a bunch of mosaics and know how much of a pain it can be to process them :). This shot easily outclasses my best, but Andre does have a bigger scope and way better camera than I do!.

The key is seeing conditions (how steady the air is) and have a camera that can capture enough good frames to stack. Light pollution is not a factor because the moon is so bright.

I think it is sad that more people don&#039;t do more moon imaging. The moon can be boring in that it always shows the same face and is unchanging.  Most of the people who have large scopes and good cameras rather image the planets than take the time do so some lunar imaging. But when they turn their scope to the moon instead, the results can be fantastic!

I like to image the moon, but it is usually on nights that the seeing is bad enough that it isn&#039;t worth trying to image the other planets.  That is why my images aren&#039;t as sharp as what Andre was able to get.

Below is a link to the best image I have gotten with my scope/camera....and you can see it is nowhere as near as sharp as the one posted above.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/zamb0ni/5951994503</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome shot!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a bunch of mosaics and know how much of a pain it can be to process them <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> . This shot easily outclasses my best, but Andre does have a bigger scope and way better camera than I do!.</p>
<p>The key is seeing conditions (how steady the air is) and have a camera that can capture enough good frames to stack. Light pollution is not a factor because the moon is so bright.</p>
<p>I think it is sad that more people don&#8217;t do more moon imaging. The moon can be boring in that it always shows the same face and is unchanging.  Most of the people who have large scopes and good cameras rather image the planets than take the time do so some lunar imaging. But when they turn their scope to the moon instead, the results can be fantastic!</p>
<p>I like to image the moon, but it is usually on nights that the seeing is bad enough that it isn&#8217;t worth trying to image the other planets.  That is why my images aren&#8217;t as sharp as what Andre was able to get.</p>
<p>Below is a link to the best image I have gotten with my scope/camera&#8230;.and you can see it is nowhere as near as sharp as the one posted above.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zamb0ni/5951994503" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/zamb0ni/5951994503</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asombroso mosaico de la Luna [ING]</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dropping-moon-mosaic/#comment-325323</link>
		<dc:creator>Asombroso mosaico de la Luna [ING]</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 20:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=45429#comment-325323</guid>
		<description>[...] &quot;CRITEO-300x250&quot;, 300, 250);         1 meneos    Asombroso mosaico de la Luna [ING]  &#160;    blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dr...&#160; por corda hace [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &quot;CRITEO-300&#215;250&quot;, 300, 250);         1 meneos    Asombroso mosaico de la Luna [ING]  &nbsp;    blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/03/09/jaw-dr&#8230;&nbsp; por corda hace [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-18 17:34:46 -->