<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Astronomers find a galactic nursery 12.7 billion light years away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: conincalgary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330707</link>
		<dc:creator>conincalgary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 23:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330707</guid>
		<description>12 billion years ago, wouldn&#039;t everything have been much closer together?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>12 billion years ago, wouldn&#8217;t everything have been much closer together?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tribeca Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330706</link>
		<dc:creator>Tribeca Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 02:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330706</guid>
		<description>Silver beetles in front of the camera lens perhaps, or is that Lennon-McCartney reference too obscure or irrelevant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silver beetles in front of the camera lens perhaps, or is that Lennon-McCartney reference too obscure or irrelevant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: forrest noble</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330705</link>
		<dc:creator>forrest noble</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330705</guid>
		<description>When the James Webb goes up I expect our vista to be full of such clusters that will seem to be farther apart than our neighborhood clusters.  My expectation is that this same kind of observation, but in finer detail, will have some galaxies appearing to be as old or older than the Milky Way.  Maybe at that time they will finally start to realize that the Big Bang is the wrong cosmological model.  But first I expect there will be a number of valiant attempts to greatly increase the age of the universe according to the Big Bang model.

After a few years, however, maybe by about 2020-25,  I expect they will be considering  alternative cosmological models that would allow for a much older universe. Maybe ten years after that the BB may no longer be the prevailing model in cosmology because of observations like this one, but in much finer detail.  This is my prediction. The distant universe is the same as the local universe even though is some ways it presently appears to be different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the James Webb goes up I expect our vista to be full of such clusters that will seem to be farther apart than our neighborhood clusters.  My expectation is that this same kind of observation, but in finer detail, will have some galaxies appearing to be as old or older than the Milky Way.  Maybe at that time they will finally start to realize that the Big Bang is the wrong cosmological model.  But first I expect there will be a number of valiant attempts to greatly increase the age of the universe according to the Big Bang model.</p>
<p>After a few years, however, maybe by about 2020-25,  I expect they will be considering  alternative cosmological models that would allow for a much older universe. Maybe ten years after that the BB may no longer be the prevailing model in cosmology because of observations like this one, but in much finer detail.  This is my prediction. The distant universe is the same as the local universe even though is some ways it presently appears to be different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330704</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 02:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330704</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know about how many photons are collected from such a galaxy to make an image like this one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know about how many photons are collected from such a galaxy to make an image like this one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liath</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330703</link>
		<dc:creator>Liath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330703</guid>
		<description>Thank you John</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cloudchaser Sakonige</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330702</link>
		<dc:creator>Cloudchaser Sakonige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330702</guid>
		<description>Today. Astronomers find a cluster of galaxies 12.7 *billion* light years away. Tomorrow. Young earth creationists say that &quot;The data is flawed, misinterpreted, false or there&#039;s something else wrong with it because it does not verify our wishful thinking.&quot;

/believes there is a God that created everything, but is not blind to scientific fact</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today. Astronomers find a cluster of galaxies 12.7 *billion* light years away. Tomorrow. Young earth creationists say that &#8220;The data is flawed, misinterpreted, false or there&#8217;s something else wrong with it because it does not verify our wishful thinking.&#8221;</p>
<p>/believes there is a God that created everything, but is not blind to scientific fact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330701</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330701</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;I think I recall reading of Patrick &lt;strike&gt;Moroe&lt;/strike&gt; &lt;/i&gt; [D&#039;oh! Typos!  - ed.]&lt;i&gt; &lt;b&gt;Moore&lt;/b&gt; doing an informal experiment once to see how many M45 stars people could see unaided eye – the average being six.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Aha! Found it &amp; found I&#039;ve misremembered :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;How many of the Pleiades can you see with the naked eye? I once carried out an experiment, enlisting the help of viewers of my television programme &lt;i&gt;The Sky At Night&lt;/i&gt; and found that the average number was indeed seven, though some people could see more. The record is reputedly held by a nineteenth century astronomer named Eduard Heis, who could count nineteen.&quot;
 - Page 156 &lt;i&gt;&#039;Patrick Moore&#039;s Passion for Astronomy&#039;&lt;/i&gt;, P. Moore, Brunel House, 1993.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

So my apologies. I got it wrong and most people *can* after all see seven stars in Messier 45.

Although I wonder when that experiment of Moore&#039;s was conducted and how much light pollution has increased since. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><i>I think I recall reading of Patrick <strike>Moroe</strike> </i> [D'oh! Typos!  - ed.]<i> <b>Moore</b> doing an informal experiment once to see how many M45 stars people could see unaided eye – the average being six.</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Aha! Found it &amp; found I&#8217;ve misremembered :</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;How many of the Pleiades can you see with the naked eye? I once carried out an experiment, enlisting the help of viewers of my television programme <i>The Sky At Night</i> and found that the average number was indeed seven, though some people could see more. The record is reputedly held by a nineteenth century astronomer named Eduard Heis, who could count nineteen.&#8221;<br />
 &#8211; Page 156 <i>&#8216;Patrick Moore&#8217;s Passion for Astronomy&#8217;</i>, P. Moore, Brunel House, 1993.</p></blockquote>
<p>So my apologies. I got it wrong and most people *can* after all see seven stars in Messier 45.</p>
<p>Although I wonder when that experiment of Moore&#8217;s was conducted and how much light pollution has increased since. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hdhondt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330700</link>
		<dc:creator>hdhondt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 05:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330700</guid>
		<description>@Liath, from one old geezer to another

Galaxies that are &quot;close&quot; to each other, as they are in a cluster, do not move away from each other. The gravitation within the cluster keeps them together, and as they travel around the centre of mass of the cluster, they can bump into each other.

Computer simulations have been done on galactic collisions, and some can easily be found on the web. In fact, Phil posted one a couple of years ago: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/08/07/galaxy-smash/ . As to exactly what will happen when we collide with Andromeda. I think there are far too many unknown variables to give even an approximate answer.

Gravity is indeed the weakest force, but it&#039;s also the only one that is always attractive. Electric charge, for example, comes in two flavours which we call positive and negative. In any object there are almost exactly as many positive as negative charges, so the total charge is zero. With gravity that does not happen, more mass always adds to the attraction.

If Dark Energy rules the universe in the distant future, this may change: there may come a time when gravity is no longer strong enough to keep clusters together. Even further into the future, Dark Energy may rip galaxies apart, then stars, and eventually even atoms.

I can&#039;t wait to see what will happen after that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Liath, from one old geezer to another</p>
<p>Galaxies that are &#8220;close&#8221; to each other, as they are in a cluster, do not move away from each other. The gravitation within the cluster keeps them together, and as they travel around the centre of mass of the cluster, they can bump into each other.</p>
<p>Computer simulations have been done on galactic collisions, and some can easily be found on the web. In fact, Phil posted one a couple of years ago: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/08/07/galaxy-smash/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/08/07/galaxy-smash/</a> . As to exactly what will happen when we collide with Andromeda. I think there are far too many unknown variables to give even an approximate answer.</p>
<p>Gravity is indeed the weakest force, but it&#8217;s also the only one that is always attractive. Electric charge, for example, comes in two flavours which we call positive and negative. In any object there are almost exactly as many positive as negative charges, so the total charge is zero. With gravity that does not happen, more mass always adds to the attraction.</p>
<p>If Dark Energy rules the universe in the distant future, this may change: there may come a time when gravity is no longer strong enough to keep clusters together. Even further into the future, Dark Energy may rip galaxies apart, then stars, and eventually even atoms.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see what will happen after that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330699</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 04:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330699</guid>
		<description>@ ^  BTW. There&#039;s some suggestion that one of the &quot;seven sisters&quot; stars may have faded and become less easily visible in historic times. Pleione a Be type - for emission - &quot;shell star&quot; is, I&#039;m fairly sure,  one  candidate for the &quot;missing Pleiad.  Although looking at its entry on Kaler&#039;s site &lt;i&gt;(linked to my name here.)&lt;/i&gt; apparently it switches from normal to Be star in a repeating cycle.

Kaler suggests that the misisng Pleiad is instead Celaeno which is one of the fainter of them although Sterope - is very faintest named &quot;sister&quot; and could also be the Lost Pleiad which, Greek legend has it, hid in shame because she married a mortal whereas the others married gods or something. Another version has it Pleione as the mortal mother of the other eight named Pleiads with Atlas their father being the Titan who holds up the world. :-)

I think I recall reading of Patrick Moroe doing an informal experiment once to see how many M45 stars people could see unaided eye - the average being six.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^  BTW. There&#8217;s some suggestion that one of the &#8220;seven sisters&#8221; stars may have faded and become less easily visible in historic times. Pleione a Be type &#8211; for emission &#8211; &#8220;shell star&#8221; is, I&#8217;m fairly sure,  one  candidate for the &#8220;missing Pleiad.  Although looking at its entry on Kaler&#8217;s site <i>(linked to my name here.)</i> apparently it switches from normal to Be star in a repeating cycle.</p>
<p>Kaler suggests that the misisng Pleiad is instead Celaeno which is one of the fainter of them although Sterope &#8211; is very faintest named &#8220;sister&#8221; and could also be the Lost Pleiad which, Greek legend has it, hid in shame because she married a mortal whereas the others married gods or something. Another version has it Pleione as the mortal mother of the other eight named Pleiads with Atlas their father being the Titan who holds up the world. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I think I recall reading of Patrick Moroe doing an informal experiment once to see how many M45 stars people could see unaided eye &#8211; the average being six.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/05/07/astronomers-find-a-galactic-nursery-12-7-billion-light-years-away/#comment-330698</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 01:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=48520#comment-330698</guid>
		<description>@5.   KaneHau :

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;(P.S. to Messier Tidy Upper – just to clarify to others, Subaru Telescope is not affiliated with the car company bearing a similar name.)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ooops, yes. Sorry that wasn&#039;t supposed to be product placement at all just an observation.

@12.   jayscheuerle Says:

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Unfortunately, Subaru (the car co.’s) badge only contains six stars! The six sisters?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Most people can only see six stars, it takes very good eyesight to see more. Try counting them next time you see the Plieades and see.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@5.   KaneHau :</p>
<blockquote><p><i>(P.S. to Messier Tidy Upper – just to clarify to others, Subaru Telescope is not affiliated with the car company bearing a similar name.)</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Ooops, yes. Sorry that wasn&#8217;t supposed to be product placement at all just an observation.</p>
<p>@12.   jayscheuerle Says:</p>
<blockquote><p><i>Unfortunately, Subaru (the car co.’s) badge only contains six stars! The six sisters?</i></p></blockquote>
<p>Most people can only see six stars, it takes very good eyesight to see more. Try counting them next time you see the Plieades and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-06-19 15:23:33 -->