<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: James Webb Space Telescope&#039;s primary mirror is ready to go!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt B.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339234</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339234</guid>
		<description>Ball Aerospace? Neat, I&#039;ve applied to a few jobs there. Never got a response, though.

If anything goes wrong with the mirrors, I&#039;d expect it to be that they switched some between the inner and outer rings or oriented them wrong. But I&#039;m sure they check all that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ball Aerospace? Neat, I&#8217;ve applied to a few jobs there. Never got a response, though.</p>
<p>If anything goes wrong with the mirrors, I&#8217;d expect it to be that they switched some between the inner and outer rings or oriented them wrong. But I&#8217;m sure they check all that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letter 4: John Mather urges Minnie to use her imagination &#124; Lindau Nobel Community</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339233</link>
		<dc:creator>Letter 4: John Mather urges Minnie to use her imagination &#124; Lindau Nobel Community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339233</guid>
		<description>[...] Bill’s special point is that he knows a set of tools really well, and it relates to knowing a telescope really well. You seem a bit concerned that you won’t be able to learn enough about telescopes without touching them. I have that feeling too, but I think we are more and more able to experience things we can’t see or touch. After all, astronomy is all about things we can only see from immense distances! I’m writing this on a computer controlled by an operating system I’ve never seen, running on hardware I’ve never seen, based on quantum mechanics that hardly anyone understands, and nevertheless at least a billion people know how to use computers. I’m working on a giant telescope that for years existed only in the imagination, along with a few documents and viewgraph packages, and now two of the four instruments are delivered and all of the mirrors are finished. [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bill’s special point is that he knows a set of tools really well, and it relates to knowing a telescope really well. You seem a bit concerned that you won’t be able to learn enough about telescopes without touching them. I have that feeling too, but I think we are more and more able to experience things we can’t see or touch. After all, astronomy is all about things we can only see from immense distances! I’m writing this on a computer controlled by an operating system I’ve never seen, running on hardware I’ve never seen, based on quantum mechanics that hardly anyone understands, and nevertheless at least a billion people know how to use computers. I’m working on a giant telescope that for years existed only in the imagination, along with a few documents and viewgraph packages, and now two of the four instruments are delivered and all of the mirrors are finished. [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Animal Mother</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339232</link>
		<dc:creator>Animal Mother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339232</guid>
		<description>2018 is a looong way off and JWST is going to be on the chopping block every fiscal year. It&#039;s a HUGE money sink and I believe the chances of it actually launching are less than 50%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2018 is a looong way off and JWST is going to be on the chopping block every fiscal year. It&#8217;s a HUGE money sink and I believe the chances of it actually launching are less than 50%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339231</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 07:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339231</guid>
		<description>@ ^ Robin : Well, yes, that&#039;s true and a good point.

Although I guess if the &lt;i&gt;Apollo&lt;/i&gt; spacecraft were able to go to the Moon they might&#039;ve been able to get to L2 too, right?  But then possibly not back again assuming they needed the Moon to whip them around and change their course so much rather than being able to decelerate to a stop, and turn around without it? Not sure.

People were and still are talking about future human spacecraft visiting Mars and  some asteroids in person so you&#039;d think / hope we could find solutions to those problems.

&#039;Spose I should&#039;ve said &lt;i&gt;&quot;if only we had developed the spacecraft ..&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  leaving out the &lt;i&gt;&quot;still&lt;/i&gt;.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ ^ Robin : Well, yes, that&#8217;s true and a good point.</p>
<p>Although I guess if the <i>Apollo</i> spacecraft were able to go to the Moon they might&#8217;ve been able to get to L2 too, right?  But then possibly not back again assuming they needed the Moon to whip them around and change their course so much rather than being able to decelerate to a stop, and turn around without it? Not sure.</p>
<p>People were and still are talking about future human spacecraft visiting Mars and  some asteroids in person so you&#8217;d think / hope we could find solutions to those problems.</p>
<p>&#8216;Spose I should&#8217;ve said <i>&#8220;if only we had developed the spacecraft ..&#8221;</i>  leaving out the <i>&#8220;still</i>.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339230</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 15:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339230</guid>
		<description>@Messier (#44):

We&#039;ve never had manned spacecraft that could reach Sun-Earth L2.  L2 is about a million miles beyond Earth.  There&#039;s also the issue of getting men back from there and keeping them save from the radiation of deep space, capabilities none of our manned space craft have ever had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Messier (#44):</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve never had manned spacecraft that could reach Sun-Earth L2.  L2 is about a million miles beyond Earth.  There&#8217;s also the issue of getting men back from there and keeping them save from the radiation of deep space, capabilities none of our manned space craft have ever had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wouter Lievens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339229</link>
		<dc:creator>Wouter Lievens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 13:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339229</guid>
		<description>Space Mirrors of Catan, heh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space Mirrors of Catan, heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339228</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339228</guid>
		<description>Great news - can&#039;t wait till first light for it! :-)

@3.   Ian  : &lt;i&gt;&quot;Phil, I thought this project got scrapped due to budget cuts!? This is supremely good news.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

If I remember right, the JWST certainly came pretty close to becoming a budget casualty. I&#039;m glad it wasn&#039;t but its going to be pretty nerve-wracking considering there&#039;s only one &lt;i&gt;James Webb &lt;/i&gt; great space robot observatory with just so much invested and so many hopes and possible science resting on a single launch going smoothly and successfully and being as designed once orbiting as (#43) Daniel has noted.

I so wish there were at least two of these - preferably a whole production line of &#039;em - and we still had the spacecraft  to visit and repair  them if need be. The consequences if something
were to go badly wrong I really hate to think about. :-(

Then again, as with the &lt;i&gt;Curiosity&lt;/i&gt; rover if we dare mighty things .. 8)

@10.   thetentman asked  : &lt;i&gt;&quot;When is this scheduled to launch?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It&#039;s Wikipedia page - linked to my name for this comment - says 2018.


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news &#8211; can&#8217;t wait till first light for it! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@3.   Ian  : <i>&#8220;Phil, I thought this project got scrapped due to budget cuts!? This is supremely good news.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>If I remember right, the JWST certainly came pretty close to becoming a budget casualty. I&#8217;m glad it wasn&#8217;t but its going to be pretty nerve-wracking considering there&#8217;s only one <i>James Webb </i> great space robot observatory with just so much invested and so many hopes and possible science resting on a single launch going smoothly and successfully and being as designed once orbiting as (#43) Daniel has noted.</p>
<p>I so wish there were at least two of these &#8211; preferably a whole production line of &#8216;em &#8211; and we still had the spacecraft  to visit and repair  them if need be. The consequences if something<br />
were to go badly wrong I really hate to think about. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Then again, as with the <i>Curiosity</i> rover if we dare mighty things .. 8)</p>
<p>@10.   thetentman asked  : <i>&#8220;When is this scheduled to launch?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s Wikipedia page &#8211; linked to my name for this comment &#8211; says 2018.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339227</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 06:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339227</guid>
		<description>Are they sure this time? Its gonna be kind of hard to send up a corrective lens with no shuttle ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are they sure this time? Its gonna be kind of hard to send up a corrective lens with no shuttle <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken (a different Ken)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339226</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken (a different Ken)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 03:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339226</guid>
		<description>#41 @Melf_Himself: Because a 20+ foot wide payload fairing makes for a frightfully expensive launch vehicle... The mirrors and sun shields all fold up into a nice little bundle for launch and transport.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#41 @Melf_Himself: Because a 20+ foot wide payload fairing makes for a frightfully expensive launch vehicle&#8230; The mirrors and sun shields all fold up into a nice little bundle for launch and transport.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melf_Himself</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/08/20/james-webb-space-telescopes-primary-mirror-is-ready-to-go/#comment-339225</link>
		<dc:creator>Melf_Himself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2012 02:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52978#comment-339225</guid>
		<description>Phil, why are the movable segments needed? Is this to correct for the optics of the telescope itself? Is it because it&#039;s too hard to make a mirror that large that is optically &#039;perfectly&#039; shaped?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil, why are the movable segments needed? Is this to correct for the optics of the telescope itself? Is it because it&#8217;s too hard to make a mirror that large that is optically &#8216;perfectly&#8217; shaped?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-25 08:29:26 -->