<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubble peers in on a galactic snack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zyggy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341624</link>
		<dc:creator>Zyggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 23:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341624</guid>
		<description>Cool Pic!

I was wondering, though...  The blue bit at the bottom has kind of a &quot;butterfly&quot; shape reminiscent of NGC 6302 (and others, I&#039;m sure). I was kind of under the impression that these type of structures have one massive construct (black hole, etc) at the center and the butterfly shape is the result of various magnetic and gravitational forces acting on the surrounding gasses (like the polar emissions of some black holes).

Do we know if there is a black hole or some other object at the center of that nebula?

~Zyg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool Pic!</p>
<p>I was wondering, though&#8230;  The blue bit at the bottom has kind of a &#8220;butterfly&#8221; shape reminiscent of NGC 6302 (and others, I&#8217;m sure). I was kind of under the impression that these type of structures have one massive construct (black hole, etc) at the center and the butterfly shape is the result of various magnetic and gravitational forces acting on the surrounding gasses (like the polar emissions of some black holes).</p>
<p>Do we know if there is a black hole or some other object at the center of that nebula?</p>
<p>~Zyg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341623</link>
		<dc:creator>CB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341623</guid>
		<description>@ Other Paul
Indeed!  But what really blows my mind away is Edwin Hubble being able to resolve individual stars in Andromeda (3 million ly away) back in the 1920s.  After recovering from that mind-blow, being able to resolve stars 3 times as far away seems pretty natural.  Hubble didn&#039;t have the Hubble, after all. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Other Paul<br />
Indeed!  But what really blows my mind away is Edwin Hubble being able to resolve individual stars in Andromeda (3 million ly away) back in the 1920s.  After recovering from that mind-blow, being able to resolve stars 3 times as far away seems pretty natural.  Hubble didn&#8217;t have the Hubble, after all. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Other Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341622</link>
		<dc:creator>Other Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341622</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;... 9 million light years away. That’s close enough to resolve individual stars ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Is anybody else kinda mindblown by this rather casually emitted statement? Stars aren&#039;t &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; big, yet our instruments can resolve &#039;em at that utterly ridiculous distance. Sometimes one forgets what clever little monkeys we are. And in case that sounds like hubris, we&#039;re pretty unlikely to be the brightest bulb in the bunch ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230; 9 million light years away. That’s close enough to resolve individual stars &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Is anybody else kinda mindblown by this rather casually emitted statement? Stars aren&#8217;t <em>that</em> big, yet our instruments can resolve &#8216;em at that utterly ridiculous distance. Sometimes one forgets what clever little monkeys we are. And in case that sounds like hubris, we&#8217;re pretty unlikely to be the brightest bulb in the bunch &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Messier Tidy Upper</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341621</link>
		<dc:creator>Messier Tidy Upper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 02:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341621</guid>
		<description>@1.   Pete Jackson asked : &lt;i&gt;&quot;Can this galaxy eventually evolve into a spiral galaxy?&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Well it can merge with one and become part of a spiral I think! ;-)

But otherwise, I don&#039;t think so .  My understanding is that spiral galaxies form via large clouds of gas collapsing and spinning in a particular way and this mostly happened fairly early on cosmologically and requires a particular set of circumstances.  Don&#039;t think any spirals are still forming today and large scale galaxy mergers usually &lt;i&gt;(always?)&lt;/i&gt;  result in elliptical type galaxies being produced instead - although I could be mistaken here.

Great image and write up.  :-)

PS. I was indeed briefly &quot;fooled&quot; or at least wondering about the fuzzy blue cluster of stars at the bottom there being a  background galaxy in its own right!  Cheers BA. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@1.   Pete Jackson asked : <i>&#8220;Can this galaxy eventually evolve into a spiral galaxy?&#8221;</i></p>
<p>Well it can merge with one and become part of a spiral I think! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But otherwise, I don&#8217;t think so .  My understanding is that spiral galaxies form via large clouds of gas collapsing and spinning in a particular way and this mostly happened fairly early on cosmologically and requires a particular set of circumstances.  Don&#8217;t think any spirals are still forming today and large scale galaxy mergers usually <i>(always?)</i>  result in elliptical type galaxies being produced instead &#8211; although I could be mistaken here.</p>
<p>Great image and write up.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>PS. I was indeed briefly &#8220;fooled&#8221; or at least wondering about the fuzzy blue cluster of stars at the bottom there being a  background galaxy in its own right!  Cheers BA. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infinite123Lifer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341620</link>
		<dc:creator>Infinite123Lifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:22:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341620</guid>
		<description>&quot;In a trillion years or so, we’ll see who has whom over for dinner.&quot;

I do wonder who will be hosting the cannibalization  . . .  Can someone turn on Deep Thought?

-----
How the Universe Works is awesome, not as awesome as your hat Phil but still an awesome episode nevertheless.

I feel wonder every time I think about space and whats out there.  E-V-E-R-Y single time!  The show left me in grand, a glorious state of mind.  I needed a break and so I found the show and just sat back and zoned out . . . but because of the show it was more of a zoning in zoning out ITMS.  Just left me feeling good and thinking about Kepler and our history and all the other Earths and well you know . . . your basic amazement.

BTW Phil you bet your house in that episode but don&#039;t ever bet the hat ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In a trillion years or so, we’ll see who has whom over for dinner.&#8221;</p>
<p>I do wonder who will be hosting the cannibalization  . . .  Can someone turn on Deep Thought?</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8211;<br />
How the Universe Works is awesome, not as awesome as your hat Phil but still an awesome episode nevertheless.</p>
<p>I feel wonder every time I think about space and whats out there.  E-V-E-R-Y single time!  The show left me in grand, a glorious state of mind.  I needed a break and so I found the show and just sat back and zoned out . . . but because of the show it was more of a zoning in zoning out ITMS.  Just left me feeling good and thinking about Kepler and our history and all the other Earths and well you know . . . your basic amazement.</p>
<p>BTW Phil you bet your house in that episode but don&#8217;t ever bet the hat <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tracer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341619</link>
		<dc:creator>tracer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341619</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a &lt;B&gt;second wave of star formation&lt;/B&gt; going on in a &lt;B&gt;dwarf&lt;/B&gt; galaxy?

This is incredibly good news!  For the longest time, the only types of galaxies with multiple generations of stars in them -- that I knew about, at least -- were the spiral galaxies like our own.

The gas and dust clouds that form second- and third-generation stars tend to have enough heavy-element enrichment (from the death throes of the biggest and earliest-dying first generation stars) to allow for the formation of large, rocky planets.  And large, rocky planets mean potential EARTHLIKE planets.

More kinds of galaxies with potential Earthlike planets means we might have greater odds of meeting green-skinned alien space babes!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a <b>second wave of star formation</b> going on in a <b>dwarf</b> galaxy?</p>
<p>This is incredibly good news!  For the longest time, the only types of galaxies with multiple generations of stars in them &#8212; that I knew about, at least &#8212; were the spiral galaxies like our own.</p>
<p>The gas and dust clouds that form second- and third-generation stars tend to have enough heavy-element enrichment (from the death throes of the biggest and earliest-dying first generation stars) to allow for the formation of large, rocky planets.  And large, rocky planets mean potential EARTHLIKE planets.</p>
<p>More kinds of galaxies with potential Earthlike planets means we might have greater odds of meeting green-skinned alien space babes!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zafod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341618</link>
		<dc:creator>Zafod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:08:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341618</guid>
		<description>Great pic, I don&#039;t see any gravitational lensing effects on the spirals.  Is it that they are not far distant enough for the effect to be seen or isn&#039;t the galaxy massive enough to produce the effect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great pic, I don&#8217;t see any gravitational lensing effects on the spirals.  Is it that they are not far distant enough for the effect to be seen or isn&#8217;t the galaxy massive enough to produce the effect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cosmicJC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341617</link>
		<dc:creator>cosmicJC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341617</guid>
		<description>After observing pictures like this, it seems absurd to suggest life doesn&#039;t exist elsewhere in our astoundingly large universe.

Simply amazing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After observing pictures like this, it seems absurd to suggest life doesn&#8217;t exist elsewhere in our astoundingly large universe.</p>
<p>Simply amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete Jackson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/19/hubble-peers-in-on-a-galactic-snack/#comment-341616</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 13:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=52996#comment-341616</guid>
		<description>Nifty pic! The color gradient from (younger) blue stars near the center to (older) red stars in the outskirts is obvious.

Can this galaxy eventually evolve into a spiral galaxy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nifty pic! The color gradient from (younger) blue stars near the center to (older) red stars in the outskirts is obvious.</p>
<p>Can this galaxy eventually evolve into a spiral galaxy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-25 01:05:36 -->