<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATE on the big UK fireball</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:12:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al Feersum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341996</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Feersum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341996</guid>
		<description>I find it odd that no-one has yet speculated on how &lt;i&gt;bad&lt;/i&gt; this could have been.  Sure, it may have been a tiny lump of rock skimming the atmosphere, &lt;i&gt;but nobody saw it coming&lt;/i&gt;.  What if it were a 50 metre nickel-iron asteroid?  Or 100-200 metre M type?  What kind of damage would it do if it actually hit us?

Sure, if it hit the land it&#039;d be pretty unpleasant, especially in an area of seismic instability, but 2/3rds of the Earth&#039;s surface is water, or ocean, so there&#039;s effectively a 2:3 chance of an ocean splash.  In a big enough basin, this is going to produce a huge tsunami...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it odd that no-one has yet speculated on how <i>bad</i> this could have been.  Sure, it may have been a tiny lump of rock skimming the atmosphere, <i>but nobody saw it coming</i>.  What if it were a 50 metre nickel-iron asteroid?  Or 100-200 metre M type?  What kind of damage would it do if it actually hit us?</p>
<p>Sure, if it hit the land it&#8217;d be pretty unpleasant, especially in an area of seismic instability, but 2/3rds of the Earth&#8217;s surface is water, or ocean, so there&#8217;s effectively a 2:3 chance of an ocean splash.  In a big enough basin, this is going to produce a huge tsunami&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UN BOLIDE PRIS EN EXCES DE LENTEUR &#183; EXO-CONTACTS</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341995</link>
		<dc:creator>UN BOLIDE PRIS EN EXCES DE LENTEUR &#183; EXO-CONTACTS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 07:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341995</guid>
		<description>[...] avancent la possibilité qu&#8217;il puisse s&#8217;agir d&#8217;un astéroïde géocroiseur, c&#8217;est-à-dire un corps sur une orbite proche de celle de la Terre et qui coupe [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] avancent la possibilité qu&#8217;il puisse s&#8217;agir d&#8217;un astéroïde géocroiseur, c&#8217;est-à-dire un corps sur une orbite proche de celle de la Terre et qui coupe [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marco Langbroek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341994</link>
		<dc:creator>Marco Langbroek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341994</guid>
		<description>@ #12 Michael Wallis:

The Israeli objects are launched in a 144 degree inclined orbit, which *never* brings them over the UK or Belgium.
This was 100% *not* a satellite (the object was too fast any way, in addition to the unlikely retrograde earth-orbit character)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #12 Michael Wallis:</p>
<p>The Israeli objects are launched in a 144 degree inclined orbit, which *never* brings them over the UK or Belgium.<br />
This was 100% *not* a satellite (the object was too fast any way, in addition to the unlikely retrograde earth-orbit character)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341993</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341993</guid>
		<description>The behavior of this fireball appears to have some similarity with this one observed in 1860:

http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/06/the-forensic-astronomer-donald-olson.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The behavior of this fireball appears to have some similarity with this one observed in 1860:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/06/the-forensic-astronomer-donald-olson.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/culturelab/2010/06/the-forensic-astronomer-donald-olson.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tommy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341992</link>
		<dc:creator>tommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 08:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341992</guid>
		<description>i believe this traveled north east to south west if you look at the second video on this site http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0922/met...r-ireland.html  and then compare it to google maps http://maps.google.ie/maps?hl=en&amp;ll=...12,308.57,,0,3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i believe this traveled north east to south west if you look at the second video on this site <a href="http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0922/met" rel="nofollow">http://www.rte.ie/news/2012/0922/met</a>&#8230;r-ireland.html  and then compare it to google maps <a href="http://maps.google.ie/maps?hl=en&#038;ll=" rel="nofollow">http://maps.google.ie/maps?hl=en&#038;ll=</a>&#8230;12,308.57,,0,3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Wallis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341991</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Wallis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341991</guid>
		<description>A note on retrograde satellites ....

Israel has launched a few satellites using domestically produced launch vehicles. Because of their proximity to, and political differences with, their neighbours, launching eastward was not reasonable. They launch them northwestward, out over the Mediterranean Sea.

Identifying the ground track of the object would prove valuable as the inclination of intersection might yield a path backwards for the UK, over Belgium, towards the Middle East.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A note on retrograde satellites &#8230;.</p>
<p>Israel has launched a few satellites using domestically produced launch vehicles. Because of their proximity to, and political differences with, their neighbours, launching eastward was not reasonable. They launch them northwestward, out over the Mediterranean Sea.</p>
<p>Identifying the ground track of the object would prove valuable as the inclination of intersection might yield a path backwards for the UK, over Belgium, towards the Middle East.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cairnos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341990</link>
		<dc:creator>Cairnos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 21:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341990</guid>
		<description>Oh, come on. It&#039;s clearly a UFO that ran into a US secret chemtail spraying plane. It&#039;s sadly obvious how all these &#039;astronomers&#039; are part of some vague, ill-defined conspiracy being paid off by &#039;Big Alien&#039; at the behest of Obama to somehow support global warming hysteria for some reason which probably involves taking our guns away.


Back in reality, pity things like this always seem to happen on the opposite side of the darn planet from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, come on. It&#8217;s clearly a UFO that ran into a US secret chemtail spraying plane. It&#8217;s sadly obvious how all these &#8216;astronomers&#8217; are part of some vague, ill-defined conspiracy being paid off by &#8216;Big Alien&#8217; at the behest of Obama to somehow support global warming hysteria for some reason which probably involves taking our guns away.</p>
<p>Back in reality, pity things like this always seem to happen on the opposite side of the darn planet from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A.J.Rimmer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341989</link>
		<dc:creator>A.J.Rimmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341989</guid>
		<description>Photos of it from Mandal, Norway.

http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/--Meteoritten-lyste-intenst-og-knallgront-6999353.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photos of it from Mandal, Norway.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/--Meteoritten-lyste-intenst-og-knallgront-6999353.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/&#8211;Meteoritten-lyste-intenst-og-knallgront-6999353.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Andrews</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341988</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341988</guid>
		<description>@SkyGazer The Mythbusters experiment doesn&#039;t debunk relative speeds adding because although they combine their speed they also share the damage between the two cars.

Marco&#039;s solution seems inprobable. Given that it had a  1 a.u. orbit which the earth caught up with while it was at perihelion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SkyGazer The Mythbusters experiment doesn&#8217;t debunk relative speeds adding because although they combine their speed they also share the damage between the two cars.</p>
<p>Marco&#8217;s solution seems inprobable. Given that it had a  1 a.u. orbit which the earth caught up with while it was at perihelion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SkyGazer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/09/26/update-on-the-big-uk-fireball/#comment-341987</link>
		<dc:creator>SkyGazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=54329#comment-341987</guid>
		<description>&quot; if each is moving 100 km/hr then the resulting collision speed is 200 km/hr relative to either car&quot;

Euh... didn´t the Mythbusters do an episode were they smashed a car with 60 miles an hour into a wall? And then another (same make and model) with 120.
And then to see if two cars headon, each going 60 would make the same damage as a 120 into a wall.
And didn´t they find out that each car after the 60 headon looked just like an 60 into wall afterwards.
Might be that I have the 60´s and 120´s wrong, but that´s because you do things in miles and we in proper km´s in the subtitles. But that´s not the point, point is that it simply doesn´t add up.
But maybe that´s due to crumple zones, which meteorites don not posses. Earth does in a way due to it´s atmosphere.

So maybe the Mythbusters should go up there and throw some stones. I´m sure they wouldn´t mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; if each is moving 100 km/hr then the resulting collision speed is 200 km/hr relative to either car&#8221;</p>
<p>Euh&#8230; didn´t the Mythbusters do an episode were they smashed a car with 60 miles an hour into a wall? And then another (same make and model) with 120.<br />
And then to see if two cars headon, each going 60 would make the same damage as a 120 into a wall.<br />
And didn´t they find out that each car after the 60 headon looked just like an 60 into wall afterwards.<br />
Might be that I have the 60´s and 120´s wrong, but that´s because you do things in miles and we in proper km´s in the subtitles. But that´s not the point, point is that it simply doesn´t add up.<br />
But maybe that´s due to crumple zones, which meteorites don not posses. Earth does in a way due to it´s atmosphere.</p>
<p>So maybe the Mythbusters should go up there and throw some stones. I´m sure they wouldn´t mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2013-05-24 00:35:37 -->