Tag: citizen science

Amateur planet hunters find a world with a four star rating

By Phil Plait | October 15, 2012 9:30 am

A new exoplanet – a planet outside our own solar system – has been found, and it’s pretty cool for two reasons: it was found by amateur planet hunters, and it’s in a four-star system!

OK, first, the planet: called PH-1, it’s bigger than Earth, about six times our radius, or about half the diameter of Jupiter. The mass isn’t well known, but may be as high as 170 times our own mass, though far more likely it’s closer to 20 – 50 times our mass. That makes it closer physically to Uranus and Saturn than Earth, so it’s likely a gas giant. It’s also hot, with a probable cloud-top temperature of 400+ Celsius (800+° F). Even if it has Earth-sized moons they’re likely to be too hot to be hospitable. And since it’s 5000 light years away, we’re not headed there any time soon, anyway.

But the more interesting thing about this planet is its host stars: PJK-1 orbits a binary star, two stars that orbit each other (like Tatooine, if you like). Six other planets are known to orbit binary stars, but PH-1 is even cooler: the binary star is itself orbited by another binary pair much farther out, making it the first planet found in a four-star system.

So we have two stars orbiting each other, orbited by a planet, and also orbited by two other stars which orbit each other. Yegads.

But it gets better yet. This planet was not found by professional astronomers! It was discovered by two amateurs who participate in the Planet Hunters program. This project was started by astronomers using the orbiting Kepler Observatory, designed to stare at 100,000 stars and look for dips in light from them as any potential planets orbiting them block their light. These transits show up in graphs of the stars’ brightnesses, and actually our human eyes and brain are pretty good at picking them out. Planet Hunters puts Kepler data online for anyone to go in and poke around.

The two citizen scientists, Kian Jek and Robert Gagliano, are listed as authors on the scientific paper recently published. I love this: the digital nature of these data make it far, far easier to analyze the science than it was in the past, and also easier to get the data out to people. Because of this, we have an explosive growth in these kinds of projects. Planet Hunters is great, but then so is Galaxy Zoo, Moon Mappers, Ice Hunters, and so many others. You can find several of these collected at the CosmoQuest website.

And a word about this new planet; this isn’t the first planet found by Planet Hunters, but it’s the first ever found in a quaternary star system. In the image here, the central binary is the big blob in the middle, and the second pair the elongated double-blob to the lower left. The planet is far too close to the middle stars to be seen here – its orbit is smaller than Earth’s around the Sun, far smaller than a pixel in this image at that distance.

The central binary is made up of a bluish star hotter and brighter than the Sun, and one that’s cooler, fainter, and redder. The second binary is made of one star much like the Sun, and another dinky red one. Their distance from the planet – about 150 billion kilometers – means they’d both still be very bright, with the brighter of the two almost as bright as the full Moon as seen from Earth. What a sight that would be! The second star would be hard to pick out in the glare of the other, but with binoculars you could spot it.

Not that anyone could, since the planet is hot enough to melt tin and assuming it had a solid surface to start with. Still though, it’s not hard to imagine a smaller planet orbiting that binary farther out, in a cooler, more life-friendly position. And we know such a planet exists; Kepler recently revealed a planet orbiting a binary star at the right spot to have liquid water as well. Like PH-1, that planet is probably a gas giant, but it might have big moons…

And this shows us once again that nature just loves to make planets, even ones in really weird places that at first may seem inhospitable for planet formation. But there it is.

Every time we find a strange planet like this, it fills me with hope that the ultimate goal of this work is close: finding an Earth-sized planet in the habitable zone of another star. We’re getting closer every day to that announcement, I think. In fact, I strongly suspect that planet is already sitting in the Kepler data, faint and hard to tease out, but just waiting to be found.

Go sign up for Planet Hunters. Maybe you’ll be the one to find it.

Image credits: Haven Giguere/Yale; Keck Observatory/Megan E. Schwamb et al.

Related Posts:

Two exoplanets discovered by "citizen scientists"
YOU can find extrasolar planets
Astronomers discover a wretched hive of scum and villainy (and the followup, Exoplanet news Part 4: More wretched hives of scum and villany)
Kepler finds a planet in a binary star’s habitable zone

Smash galaxies together… for SCIENCE!

By Phil Plait | November 30, 2009 9:26 am

galaxyzoomergerMost people think that science is done by, well, scientists. Men and women in white lab coats buzzing away in a lab somewhere.

There are a lot of stereotypes in that description, but the important thing to note here is that science can be done by anyone. You don’t need to be in a lab or at the eyepiece or up to your knees in pond scum to be able to make important contributions to science.

In fact, with all the digital data coming down from telescopes, just in astronomy alone there are marvelous ways anyone can pitch in. Galaxy Zoo is just such a "citizen science" project — you can classify galaxies at home, on your computer, perusing their vast database of starry island universes. It’s highly addictive — over 50,000,000 galaxies have been classified by the public so far!

And now the folks behind Galaxy Zoo (including my friend Chris Lintott) have a new product that will eat up all your spare time: Galaxy Zoo Mergers. Instead of normal workaday galaxies, this new project displays two or more galaxies undergoing violent collisions, many of which will one day result in the two merging into one bigger galaxy. Our own Milky Way has suffered through many such mergers, growing over time to its present size. Mergers are a basic process in galaxy evolution, and are vitally important to study.

In GZM, you are shown a collision image, and you can fiddle with various parameters in a computer model of the event, eventually trying to get your model to look like the actual image. You can change the galaxies’ masses, direction, speed, angles, and number of stars in the simulation — and it uses real physics to determine the shapes of the galaxies as they interact gravitationally! As you tune the simulation, the result is displayed in real time so you can see how well you’re doing (and I’ll note it ran smoothly, even on my three-year-old Mac laptop). Here’s an example I played with:


As you can see, I didn’t do too badly. By making the left galaxy lower mass and changing the direction and speed of the collision, I was able to get a simulation that is reasonably close to the real image.

I’ll note that while it’s not too hard to get started, it does take a little bit of patience — but after only a few minutes I was colliding away. And if it’s not easy to start, it’s impossible to stop. Like Galaxy Zoo itself, this is the crack cocaine of the internet. If you value your spare time away from the computer, you may not want to get involved with this!

I of course mean that in the best way: merging galaxies is fun. There is something ultimately cool about letting billions of stars interact over vast scales of distance and time… and there is real science here. By creating a database of such events, scientists can use the data to look for trends. Are most collisions at certain angles? That might imply how the galaxies collide when they are in clusters, gigantic collections of thousands of galaxies. Are the mergers high speed, low speed? Are the victims wildly disparate mass galaxies, or usually two of roughly the same mass? What are the highest and lowest speeds of collision?

All of this is important to know. The more basic info we get about collisions, the better we can understand them. For scientists studying collisions, it’s almost hopeless to get enough simulations for this, but by crowd-sourcing it they get all that for free. The data from Galaxy Zoo indicate that people are quite good at classifying galaxies with only minimal training (done right there on the site in a couple of minutes), and we can hope the same is true for mergers; they’ll run tests to make sure.

So everyone wins here. Scientists get data they can use to understand the Universe, and the public has the knowledge that they are contributing to that understanding… and having fun all the time.

Science! I love this stuff!

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!


See More

Collapse bottom bar