DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy

Posts Tagged ‘comet’

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

New meteor shower points to a future close encounter

A pair of astronomers monitoring an all-sky camera got a surprise (PDF) when they checked data from last February: a half dozen meteors all seemed to come from the same spot in the sky, indicating they all had a common origin. After doing some calculations, they found that they probably come from a parent comet with an orbit that’s at least 53 years long. Moreover, the orbit of this comet crosses that of the Earth, meaning we may have a close encounter with this object sometime in the future.

And because I can sense the oncoming panic on the web over this news, let me break it down for you. I’ll give you the science (which is cool), how we know this unseen comet may be potentially, um, interesting, then the reason you don’t need to run around in circles screaming (spoiler: it’s rude to others nearby, but also unnecessary).

But just to be up front: should you panic? Nope. We know there are objects out there that could hit us in the future sometime. This comet is in many ways just another one. As I’ll point out below, we pass through lots of meteor streams, so there are plenty of other comets that could hit us. I know, I know, that doesn’t sound reassuring, but think about it: how often is the Earth hit by a comet? Not very often, despite having a few on the list of Potentially Hazardous Objects. So having one more we know about out there isn’t great, but in reality doesn’t really make things any worse for us.


Meatier showers

That picture above is one of the meteors in question. You can see the streak as the tiny bit of rock (probably the size of a grain of sand) glowing as it rammed through the Earth’s atmosphere at about 35 km/sec (22 miles/sec, or nearly 80,000 mph). If you go out on any dark night, you’re bound to see the random meteor or five. But meteor showers are when we see lots of them in a short time, and they occur when the Earth passes through the dust debris left behind by a comet.

Most comets are dirty snowballs: dust, pebbles, and boulders held together by ice (water ice, but also frozen carbon dioxide and other things we normally think of as gases). This makes comets the litter bugs of the solar system, shedding material when the Sun warms them up and turns the ice into gas. The vapor blows off, and the looser material forms a ribbon or stream that stays more or less along the same orbit as the comet.

If the path of the comet intersects the orbit of the Earth, we plow through that material at the same time every year. (more…)

Share

July 28th, 2011 7:00 AM Tags: CAMS, comet, Eta Draconids, impact, meteor shower
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, DeathfromtheSkies!, Pretty pictures | 39 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

NASA’S SDO captures final moments of a comet streaking across the Sun

It’s not known how many comets orbit the Sun in our solar system, but the number may be in the trillions. They spend a long, long time in the deep reaches of the outer solar system, only occasionally plunging toward us. If they pass near a planet their orbit can be changed, and some wind up on paths that take them so close to the Sun they burn up. These are called sungrazers.

That is what NASA’s Solar Dynamic Observatory saw on the evening of July 5/6, 2011. This has been seen many times before, but this is the first time one has been seen streaking directly across the Sun’s face!

Here’s the video (I recommend watching it in HD — at least 720p –to make the comet easier to spot):

Did you see it? The whole event took about 20 minutes to unfold, and is seen here highly compressed in time. This is no perspective effect; that comet really was just above the Sun’s surface, and most likely impacted the Sun or disintegrated from the heat. Astronomers are even now going over the data from the event to see if they can determine the comet’s fate.

On the NASA Sun-Earth news site is more information, and a very cool video from SOHO showing the comet’s approach to the Sun.

Credit: NASA/SDO


Related posts:

- Amazing video of comet on a solar death dive
- Ten Things You Don’t Know About Comets
- The Sun lets loose a HUGE explosion
- Ten Things You Don’t Know About the Sun

Share

July 7th, 2011 12:53 PM Tags: comet, SDO, Sun, sungrazer
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, NASA, Pretty pictures | 24 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Rosetta’s cometary goal now in sight

Rosetta is an amazing probe launched by the European Space Agency. In 2014 it will go into orbit around the comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, and actually deploy a lander to sample the surface!

That rendezvous is still years away, but the target is now in sight: Rosetta has returned its first image of the comet.

Oh, very cool! The top image is the wide angle shot, showing a densely-populated star field toward the center of our galaxy; from Rosetta that’s the direction to the comet. The second image zooms in a bit, and you can see some distant stars and nebulosity. The bottom one has been processed to remove the stars, and the nucleus of Churyumov-Gerasimenko stands out.

Note that this image was taken when Rosetta was still 163 million kilometers (100 million miles) from the comet — that’s more than the distance from the Earth to the Sun! That’s why it took a total of 13 hours of exposure time to see the comet in these images; it’s still extremely faint from that great distance.

(more…)

Share

June 9th, 2011 11:03 AM Tags: asteroid, comet, comet Churyumov-Gerasimenko, Lutetia, Rosetta, Steins
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Space | 9 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Stardust snaps close-ups of a second-hand comet!

A philosopher once asked, "Are we human because we gaze at the stars, or do we gaze at them because we are human?" Pointless, really… "Do the stars gaze back?" Now that’s a question.
-Narrator, "Stardust"

Late last night, the NASA mission Stardust flew within 178 km (110 miles) of the nucleus of the comet Tempel 1, seeing it up close for the first time since July 2005! Here’s one of the better images from closest approach:

[Click to embiggen.]

Wow! The whole flyby sequence has been posted on NASA’s Stardust site (and Emily Lakdawalla at The Planetary Society blog has created a nifty animation of it too).

Ian O’Neill, from Discovery News, posted a nice animation of it as well on YouTube:

To give you an idea of what you’re seeing here, the comet is roughly 7.6 x 4.9 kilometers (4.7 x 3.0 miles) in size.

So, why did NASA fly Stardust past this comet? Ah, set the way-back machine for 5.5 years ago…
(more…)

Share

February 15th, 2011 2:33 PM Tags: comet, Deep Impact, Stardust, Tempel-1
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures | 39 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

The Top 14 Astronomy Pictures of 2010

Use the thumbnails and arrows to browse the images, and click on the images themselves to go through to blog posts with more details and descriptions.

Every year, thousands of incredible images of the sky are taken from observatories on the ground and in space, from spacecraft, and from amateur astronomers. And it seems that the people who make these images are getting better with time, creating nothing short of art. <br /><br />And every year picking my favorites for the Top Ten list gets ridiculously harder. I fret about this each time (just as I did for the Top Tens of <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/15/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2009/" target="_blank">2009</a>, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/" target="_blank">2008</a>, <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/12/13/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2007/" target="_blank">2007</a>, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/23/top-10-astronomy-pictures-of-2007-runners-up/" target="_blank">the 2007 Runners up</a>, and <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/27/the-top-ten-astronomy-images-of-2006/" target="_blank">2006</a>). But I've never seen <em>anything</em> like 2010; I went through over 1000 pictures, and even when I was merciless it was hard to get it down to 30. The agony of picking 10 was too much.<br /><br />So to heck with it. I chose 14. Why? Well, for one thing, <em>it's my list</em>. But I also want to find images that are not only beautiful, but also tell a scientific story... as well as one that finds that spot in your brain that simply <em>pops</em> with wonder and awe.<br /><br />This year, I found so many with that quality to them! So why limit myself? Some of the ones I chose may at first seem simple, or inelegant, but I picked them because they're more than just a pretty shot. They're telling us something wonderful and fundamental about the Universe. Astronomy is one of the handful of sciences which can appeal to both our eyes and our brains... as you'll see here. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">10</span> <strong>14</strong> times over.<br /><br />Use the slider bar at the top to browse the images and get a brief description underneath, and click the big images themselves to go to a more thorough article. But whatever you do, make sure you click through to the higher-resolution versions of these images, because it's only there you'll get the full, incredible view they deserve.<br />Globular clusters are hundreds of thousands of stars packed into a tightly jammed ball, each orbiting the cluster center like a bee circling a hive. <br /><br /><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/27/a-distant-sparkling-eruption-of-diamonds/" target="_blank">NGC 6934</a> is one such globular, a single example of more than 150 that orbit our Milky Way Galaxy. It's 50,000 light years, such a great distance that its magnificence is greatly reduced, making it not much more than a fuzzy blob through most telescopes... unless you happen to have the Hubble Space Telescope at your command. Then this bustling city of stars becomes a dazzling jewel.<br /><br />This image is false color; what you see as blue is actually taken through a red filter, and what looks red is actually <em>infrared</em>. Astronomers sometimes do this with two-filter images, to help our eyes separate out the colors.<br /><br />In this case, it shows that most of the stars in the cluster are probably lower mass than the Sun, still fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores, but a few have aged to the point of becoming red giants, swelling up and cooling off. Such is the fate of our Sun in a few billion years... and studying distant globular clusters like NGC 6394 helps us understand how how our nearest star will someday die. I picked this image because it's a relatively unheard-of but beautiful cluster... and I love the way the stars look like jewels. <br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1023a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA, Hubble, NASA</em><br />The Cassini spacecraft has been orbiting Saturn since 2004, and has been featured frequently both on my blog and in these Top Ten lists. Its views of the ringed planet and moons has been nothing short of spectacular time and again.<br /><br />This shot reminds me why. The moons of Saturn orbit it almost all on the same plane, so Cassini sometimes sees them near each other in the sky. And if things play out just right, they even pass directly in front of each other.<br /><br />That's exactly <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/22/two-alien-worlds-superposed" target="_blank">what happened here</a>: icy Rhea, Saturn's second largest moon, is seen here superposed on the giant moon Titan. Despite catastrophic appearances, they were in no danger of collision: Titan was over a million kilometers from Rhea when Cassini snapped this shot. Note that Rhea is covered in craters big and small, while Titan's thick atmosphere blocks us from seeing its surface directly. Do you also see the ring of material apparently floating above Titan? That's a haze layer composed of hydrocarbons like methane, ethane, and even benzene. Titan's atmosphere is twice as thick as Earth's!<br /><br />Note also that Titan is three times larger than Rhea and is in fact comfortably bigger than the planet Mercury; it's truly one of the most aptly-named worlds in the solar system.<br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=4136" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute </em>The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been circling the Moon since June 2008, taking incredibly high-resolution images of our neareast astronomical neighbor. It's photographed craters, ancient lava beds, mountains, and cliffs, but <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/05/24/lunar-boulder-hits-a-hole-in-one" target="_blank">this image</a> really stands out to me: it shows a house-sized boulder which rolled down a hill and landed inside a crater like a golf ball at a Putt-Putt course!<br /><br />The left side of the picture is a hill which goes downhill to the right. The landscape flattens out in the middle, and you can see bits of rubble and debris from landslides at the point where they meet. A billion years ago or more, something must have dislodged that gigantic rock, setting it rolling down the hill. Not being round, it bounced along in the Moon's 1/6th gravity, leaving ruts dug into the powdery surface. It slowed when it hit the flatter surface, and almost came to a stop just past that 60-meter (200 foot) crater. But it must have teetered backwards (see how that last rut goes past the rock?) and then slid down into the crater itself, where it finally came to a stop.<br /><br />It's easy to think that the Moon is mostly dead and unchanging, but when you look more closely - really, <em>really</em> closely - you'll see evidence of a dynamic world, with subtle beauty and fascinating structures. And we've only explored a tiny fraction of it. What else is there to see in the remaining 36 million square kilometers? <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/227-Hole-in-One!.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University </em><br />Whenever a new type of instrument is used to examine the skies, surprises are guaranteed. And when the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) started scanning the heavens in 2010, it returned one amazing view after another. My favorite by far <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/11/17/warm-dusty-rings-glow-around-a-weird-binary-star/" target="_blank">is this one</a>, showing NGC 1514, a dying star shedding material.<br /><br />This image, in the far-infrared, is very different than optical shots of the nebula, which show it looking more like a disk. It's not certain just why this object has these two rings, but it's likely that dust ejected from the dying star is slamming into gas previously thrown off. That older gas is most likely in an hourglass shape, common in such objects. Perhaps the dust is hitting the inside of that hourglass figure, making the rings. Maybe it's a different reason entirely. We don't know! <br /><br />And that makes me happy. Mysteries are fun, and new telescopes are bound to add to them, while solving others. WISE was designed to do a survey, which means it looked at anything and everything in the sky. A lot of what it found will have to be followed up with bigger telescopes. But until we get another powerful far-infrared telescopes, some of these weird objects will just have to wait to reveal their secrets.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/multimedia/gallery/pia13346.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em> Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA</em>This isn't a microscopic photograph of a bacterial culture! It's actually of rolling, hummocky dunes near the north pole of Mars. Taken with the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's powerful HIRISE camera, the normally grey basaltic sand of the dunes is covered with pinkish dust literally made of rust - iron oxide.<br /><br />What makes <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/11/another-dose-of-martian-awesome/" target="_blank">this image</a> so bizarre, though, are the dark, parallel tendril-like features scattered throughout. What the heck are <em>those?</em> One clue is that they always seem to stretch downhill, as if something is flowing. Another can be found in the tendrils located left of center and down a bit: there's a fuzzy pink oval emanating from one of them. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/files/2010/01/hirise_avalanche.jpg" target="_blank">Under magnification</a>, you can see it's a dust cloud... the debris raised up after an avalanche of sand on the Martian surface!<br /><br />Those tendrils are from the darker material under the pink sand. When dry ice under the surface warms up in the summer, it disturbs and dislodges the gray basaltic sand around it. This slides downhill, creating these weird, hair-like features. It's no surprise that some people mistook them for some form of life on the Red Planet! But I don't see the need to make up fantasy-based scenarios for pictures like this one, when we can see that Mars is fantastic enough.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007962_2635" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona</em>The Sun is a common target for astronomers both professional and amateur. It's so big and bright that you can really see a lot of detail, and every year a lot of pictures of it hit the 'net. You can get jaded from them all.<br /><br />Which is why <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/28/the-boiling-erupting-sun/" target="_blank">Alan Friedman's solar portrait</a> blew me away when I saw it. It's actually a composite of two pictures: the outer limb of the Sun combined with a seperate shot of the Sun's disk. Not only that, he inverted the shot of the disk, essentially taking the negative. It gives the Sun a fuzzy, eerie appearance, and startled me when I saw it. I've never seen the Sun displayed in quite this way, giving it a beauty and delicacy I wouldn't thought possible. It's truly the most amazing picture of the Sun I've seen this year. And don't miss Alan's <a href="http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/not_the_great_pumpkin2.html" target="_blank">close-up shots of the limb</a>, either!<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/not_the_great_pumpkin.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Alan Friedman, used with permission.</em><br />I've been doing this a long time, and I've seen it all: galaxies and planets, gas clouds and moons, stars being born and stars dying... but when I saw <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/06/awesome-death-spiral-of-a-bizarre-star/" target="_blank">this picture</a>, I knew there were yet surprises in the sky.<br /><br />When I saw this I literally gasped out loud; I had never seen any structure in space like it. And when I read what it was, my amazement did not decrease: it's the dusty wind of a dying star. <br /><br />The object, called AFGL 3068, is a binary star, two stars in an 800-year orbit around one another. One of them is a red giant, a star near the end of its life. It's blowing off massive amounts of dark dust, which is enveloping the pair and hiding them from view. But the system's spin is spraying the material out like a water sprinkler head, causing this giant and delicate spiral pattern on the sky. And by giant, I mean giant: the entire structure is about 3 <em>trillion</em> kilometers (about 2 trillion miles) across.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1020a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA/NASA &amp; R. Sahai</em>For over two centuries asteroids were just points of light in telescopes (hence the term <em>asteroid</em>, which means "starlike"). Until recently, that is: we're a spacefaring race now, and we can send our robots to sniff out these giant rocks up close... and in July, the European Space Agency probe Rosetta flew past the asteroid Lutetia, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/" target="_blank">returning amazing close-ups of the rock</a>. <br /><br />This picture, <a href="http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002579/" target="_blank">which I borrowed from my friend Emily Lakdawalla at the Planetary Society Blog</a> (I fiddled with the contrast and brightness a bit to bring out the darker side) was taken at closest approach. Lutetia is about 130 km (80 miles) across, and is the largest asteroid we've visited. You can see it's a lumpy, battered, rock, pitted with craters. The details are stunning: giant boulders held by the weak gravity dot the surface, parallel grooves mark stress fractures in the surface (or secondary deposits of material ejected from impacts?), and shadows highlight the contours. <br /><br />We're just beginning to understand the nature of asteroids - and given that every now and again one of them pays Earth a catastrophic visit (just ask the dinosaurs) - it's good idea that we learn as much about them as we can.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Rosetta/SEM44DZOFBG_0.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/RSSD/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA &amp; Emily Lakdawalla</em><br />Speaking of asteroid collisions, in January 2010 the automated skywatching telescope LINEAR spotted what looked like a comet orbiting the Sun in the inner asteroid belt, just beyond the orbit of Mars. It looked decidedly odd, so Hubble was pointed at it... and what it saw was so bizarre it caused a big stir in the astronomical community: the aftermath of a violent collision between two asteroids in space!<br /><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/02/hubble-captures-picture-of-asteroid-collision/" target="_blank"><br />The picture</a> is unprecendented: an X-shaped streak of light with a dramatic 50,000-kilometer-long tail sweeping away. Apparently, an asteroid roughly 150 meters or so across - which you can see as a point of light at the upper left tip of the X - was hit at high speed by a smaller rock only a few meters across. The smaller object was vaporized by the energy of collision, which would've had the same yield as an atomic explosion!<br /><br />The tail is from sand-grain to pebble-sized debris from the explosion moving away due to pressure of sunlight, which acts like a very gentle wind on the particles. The other line of the X is probably from a piece of rubble ejected off the main rock, leaving its own trail of debris behind. Judging from changes in the debris shape over time,<a href="denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:timeline: http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/P2010A2_0.html" target="_blank"> the collision probably happened in February or March 2009</a>, but the asteroid was up during the day at that time and was unobservable. It took several months to discover it, and a few more to understand what this strange object was telling us. <br /><br />Collisions like this are estimated to happen roughly once per year in the asteroid belt, but the distance makes them very hard to observe. Hopefully, as more survey telescopes come online, we'll see more of these spectacular events. <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2010/07/image/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/">NASA</a>, <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/">ESA</a>, and D. Jewitt (UCLA)</em>One glance at this picture lets you know why M51 is commonly called The Whirlpool. At 23 million light years away, it's visible through binoculars (barely; I always have a hard time spotting it), so when you point something like Hubble at it you know <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/02/revisiting-the-whirlpool/" target="_blank">you'll be getting an incredible view</a>.<br /><br />This gorgeous shot is actually a composite of four different filtered images by Robert Gendler, an accomplished astrophotographer. The original release, done in 2005, was of course beautiful, but Robert took a stab at it and was able to make it even better. <br /><br />The Whirlpool is actually two galaxies interacting with one another. The spiral galaxy is nearly face-on, and you can easily trace the magnificent arms, laced with red gas clouds forming new stars, and dark lanes of dust created when stars are born and when they die. The other galaxy is the orange blobby one, a dwarf irregular. It may have already passed through the bigger galaxy twice, and will eventually merge with it. We think all big galaxies grow by consuming smaller ones in this manner. In a few hundred million more years there won't be two galaxies left to see, just one somewhat bigger one. Our own Milky Way Galaxy probably underwent a similar event many times!<br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1577.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /> <em>Image Credit: NASA, Hubble Heritage Team, (STScI/AURA), ESA, S. Beckwith (STScI). Additional Processing: Robert Gendler</em>There are two pictures this year that made my list that aren't strictly astronomy, but I couldn't resist. The first is this one, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/20/the-green-fire-of-the-southern-lights/" target="_blank">the aurora australis</a> - the southern counterpart to the northern lights - as seen from above by astronauts on the International Space Station. <br /><br />Charged particles from the Sun stream along the Earth's magnetic field, guided to the north and south poles, where they crash into our atmosphere and generate light. The color of the light depends on the molecule or atom hit; in this case, the green glow is due to oxygen. <br /><br />Although the particles generating the light tend to be 80 - 160 km up (50 - 100 miles), the space station is even higher. This view is also well off to the side; the astronaut who took the picture was looking at the limb of the Earth, several thousand miles away. All in all the color, perspective, and the amazing glowing stream combine to make this a lovely and decidedly unearthly photograph from space.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS023&amp;roll=E&amp;frame=58455" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/Expedition 23</em>Space near the Sun is mostly empty, devoid of gas and stars. But travel 7500 light years in the direction of the constellation Carina and you'll slam into one of the largest and most complex star-forming regions in the galaxy: the sprawling Carina nebula. Massive stars being born there blast out radiation and winds that sculpt the surrounding material, creating weird and wonderful shapes. <br /><br />So what better way for astronomers to celebrate the Hubble Space Telescope's 20th year in orbit than to use it to take <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/27/hubble-celebrates-20-years-in-space-with-a-jaw-dropper/" target="_blank">a huge mosaic of Carina</a>? This astonishing portrait shows the towering pillars of gas and dust being eaten away by cosmic erosion; the narrow, focused jets of material blasting away from stars eating away at their cocoons; ribbons and sheets of compressed gas lighting up space; and the nascent stars themselves as they turn on for the first time. <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic1007a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br />
<p><em>Image credit: NASA, ESA, M. Livio and the Hubble 20th Anniversary Team (STScI)</em></p>
<br />This is the second of the two not-strictly astronomy pictures in this list, and is also taken from the International Space Station. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/13/twilight-of-the-shuttle/" target="_blank">It shows the Space Shuttle Orbiter <em>Endeavour</em></a> just minutes before docking with ISS. Both the ISS and Endeavour were orbiting the Earth at 8 km/sec (5 miles/sec), passing into the dark side of the Earth, essentially experiencing sunset - which they do 18 times a day!<br /><br />This image is beautiful, of course, showing the layered colors of sunset as seen from 350km (210 miles) above the Earth's surface. But this picture is also a metaphor for the Shuttle itself: this was the second-to-last mission of the <em>Endeavour</em>, and in fact the last misson for the Orbiter will be the last mission for the entire fleet: after that flight, the Space Shuttle program will be finished, the Orbiters retired, and an as-yet unnamed rocket system will take over. In the meantime, American astronauts will hitch rides on Russian rockets, as well as on the Falcon 9 rocket from the private company SpaceX, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/12/03/spacex-to-launch-dragon-capule-december-7/" target="_blank">which recently had a wonderfully successful test flight</a>. <br /><br />As for the Shuttle... the last launch of <em>Endeavour</em> is scheduled for April 2011, when it really will fly into the sunset for the last time.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1592.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA</em>Choosing these images every year is tough, but this year there was one shot so outstanding that as soon as I saw it, I knew it would be Number One!<br /><br />This jaw-dropping picture - an insanely huge mosaic of 32 pictures taken by astrophotographer and amateur astronomer Rogelio Andreo - is Orion... <em>the whole constellation!</em> [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/5258701469/sizes/o/" target="_blank">Here is a higher-res version</a> - 4000 x 2600 pixels! - hosted on Flickr, or <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2010/10/22/orion-from-Head-to-Toes.html" target="_blank">you can get it from his site itself</a>.] If you look carefully you'll spot the familiar stars: orange Betelgeuse in the upper left, blue-white Rigel on the lower right, and his famous three belt stars in the middle.<br /><br />If you have trouble seeing the pattern of stars, it's not surprising.  Rogelio used filters that show stars, but which also accentuate the vast amount of hydrogen gas in this part of the galaxy. The glowing nebulosity almost outshines the stars themselves!<br /><br />How about a short tour? There's a lot to see:<br /><br />At the top of the picture is the Lambda Orionis nebula, the huge red cloud straddling Orion's shoulders. The blue star roughly centered in it is Lambda Orionis itself, a massive, hot, young star that is so brilliant it's ionizing the entire nebula... which is dozens of light years across.<br /><br />Lower down, a vast red ring of gas starts just above Orion's belt and swings down to just above his knees. That's Barnard's Loop, a spherical bubble of gas formed as one massive star after another exploded deep in the heart of Orion, each sending out octillions of tons of gas at speeds of thousands of kilometers per second! This material screamed outwards, slamming into and sweeping up the ambient gas in the region. This eventually snowplowed all that material into the bubble, which is heated today and glowing due to the still-thriving massive stars inside it. The Loop is about 300 light years in diameter - 3 <em>quadrillion</em> kilometers (2 quadrillion miles)!<br /><br />In the center of the loop is perhaps the most famous gas cloud in the sky: <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2009/09/19/orions-Deep-Field--Belt-and-sword.html" target="_blank">the great Orion Nebula</a>. It's 1500 light years away, yet easily visible to the naked eye; the Sun would be an invisible dot at that distance! But the nebula is churning out young stars which light up the gas, making this one of the brightest examples of stellar nurseries in our galaxy. If there are aliens in other galaxies looking our way, the Orion Nebula would be easily visible as a Milky Way landmark.<br /><br />Above the great nebula and to the left a bit, hanging down from the leftmost star (Alnitak) is a straight line of gas, excited by the star. Superposed on that is a dense, dark globule of dust and molecules in <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2008/12/27/horsehead-Nebula-Ic-434.html" target="_blank">the uncanny shape of a horse's head</a>, as if the galaxy is playing a cosmic game of chess. <br /><br />And finally, I must note the long, bluish nebulosity just to the right of Rigel at the bottom of the picture. When flipped upside-down, it becomes obvious why this is called the <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2009/11/16/witch-Head-Nebula-and-Rigel.html" target="_blank">Witch Head Nebula</a>! The resemblance to a witch is pretty amazing. Funny, too: when seen sideways it looks like a running ghost, and you'll see it sometimes called that as well. The perfect nebula for Halloween.<br /><br />Any one of these pieces of Orion are shot so beautifully by Rogelio that they would deserve to be in this list, but all together... <strong>WOW</strong>. I mean, <em>seriously</em>. I've seen Orion a bazillion times; it's up in the south after sunset all winter long, and has so many wonderful objects in it that every amateur astronomer makes it a familiar destination for the telescope. I can't tell you how many times I've observed various nebulae in it, scanned it with binoculars, or just gazed at it with my own two eyes, soaking in its pattern and colors. <br /><br />But I have never, <em>ever</em>, seen it like this. This picture has beauty, clarity, depth, sharpness, and most importantly sheer stunning <em>breadth</em> that makes it truly one of the most amazing astrophotographs I have ever seen. It's also a first: this is the first time I've picked an image by an amateur astronomer (as opposed to one from a professional observatory or spacecraft) for the number one slot. This photograph earned it.<br /><br />Congratulations to Rogelio for this incredible work of art, my Number One pick for the best Astronomy Picture of 2010. <br /><br /><strong>Get the stunning super-high-res version <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/5258701469/sizes/o/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Rogelio Andreo, used by permission</em><br />


Share

December 14th, 2010 7:01 AM Tags: asteroid, aurorae, Cassini, comet, globular cluster, Hubble Space Telescope, ISS, LRO, Lutetia, Mars, Moon, mro, Orion, planetary nebulae, Rhea, Rogelio Andreo, Rosetta, Saturn, Space Shuttle, Space Shuttle Endeavour, Sun, Titan, WISE
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Pretty pictures, Science, Space, Top Post | 113 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

A comet creates its own snowstorm!

NASA has just released new results and images from the EPOXI spacecraft’s visit to the comet Hartley 2 from November 4… and like the previous ones, these are absolutely stunning jaw-droppers. What scientists have found is that the comet’s solid nucleus is sitting in the middle of a veritable snowstorm!

epoxi_hartley2_snowballs

Wow! Most of those dots are not stars: they are actual snowballs, frozen matter that has been ejected by the comet itself! They range in size from a few centimeters to a few dozen across, so they really are about the size of snowballs you’d use in a snowball fight… or to make a snowman. But I wouldn’t recommend it: a lot of that material is not frozen water, it’s actually frozen carbon dioxide, or dry ice.

epoxi_hartley2_snowflakesAs I wrote a few days ago, the comet nucleus — the solid part of the comet at its heart — is only a couple of kilometers across, and composed of rock, water ice, and dry ice. As the nucleus gets close to the Sun, the dry ice turns directly into a gas and spews out of vents in the surface. These plumes of material shoot out, enveloping the nucleus to become the fuzzy head of the comet, and stream away to form the tail.

But we’ve never been close enough and had good enough images to see just what these plumes look like in detail… until now. It’s not just gas, but actual chunks of ice flying out from the nucleus! The comet, for all intents and purposes, is having its own cosmic snowball fight. As you can see in the cleaned picture on the right (click to ensublimate) the comet is sitting in a cloud of thousands, millions of these snowflakes.

How awesome is this?

In fact, so much material is blowing out from the comet that the nucleus is able to cast a shadow in space:

epoxi_hartley2_shadows

Oh my. How lovely.

But there’s far more than just gorgeous pictures. (more…)

Share

November 18th, 2010 1:00 PM Tags: comet, EPOXI, Hartley 2
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures, Top Post | 29 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Ancient ice, wet and dry, from deep inside a comet

The comet Hartley 2 has come and gone, and the NASA mission EPOXI is also moving on after an exceedingly close flyby of the comet’s solid nucleus. The pictures we got were fantastic and beautiful… but their real power comes from coupling them with spectra.

hartley2_closeup

In the picture above — an enhanced version of one of the images taken during the space probe’s flyby — you can see fan-like emission coming from the comet’s nucleus. These are jets; sprays of material coming out of the nucleus. Comets are made of rock and ice, and when the comet nears the Sun, the heat can turn that ice directly from a solid to a gas. This gas then shoots out from pockets on the nucleus, creating these jets. The EPOXI team (including my old boss, Don Lindler!) made a fantastic animation from a series of observations showing these jets in action.

But what are these ices made of? Lots of things we normally think of as liquids or gas (water, ammonia, carbon dioxide, and so on) exist in comets. In many comets, we see lots of water, and in fact the Swedish satellite Odin detected about 200 kg/sec (440 pounds per sec) of water coming off Hartley 2! So is water powering these jets?

hartley2_irplotWe can find out… using spectra. By breaking up the light from an object into its component colors, we can learn all manners of things including what it’s made of. EPOXI did just that with the jets streaming from Hartley 2, and while it did find water, amazingly, it found a lot more carbon dioxide!
(more…)

Share

November 15th, 2010 7:00 AM Tags: carbon dioxide, comet, EPOXI, Hartley 2, water
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, DeathfromtheSkies!, Science, Space, Top Post | 33 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »




    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS
      • Obi Wan better watch his back
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station
      • Mars craters are sublime
      • OK, one more eclipse shot
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff



       Twitter



      Follow Me on Pinterest



       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station | Bad Astronomy
      • Mars craters are sublime | Bad Astronomy
      • OK, one more eclipse shot | Bad Astronomy
      • Saturn, surreally | Bad Astronomy
      • SpaceX Dragon on its way to the ISS! | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us