DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy

Posts Tagged ‘Galaxy Zoo’

Galaxy Zoo interview Meg Urry

I was very pleased to see recently that my old friend Meg Urry was interviewed by the Galaxy Zoo as part of their She’s an Astronomer segment. Meg is a terrific person, doing great work both scientifically and for women in astronomy, so you should head over there and see what she’s up to.

Share

May 4th, 2010 2:35 PM Tags: Galaxy Zoo, Meg Urry
by Phil Plait in Astronomy | 3 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Smash galaxies together… for SCIENCE!

galaxyzoomergerMost people think that science is done by, well, scientists. Men and women in white lab coats buzzing away in a lab somewhere.

There are a lot of stereotypes in that description, but the important thing to note here is that science can be done by anyone. You don’t need to be in a lab or at the eyepiece or up to your knees in pond scum to be able to make important contributions to science.

In fact, with all the digital data coming down from telescopes, just in astronomy alone there are marvelous ways anyone can pitch in. Galaxy Zoo is just such a "citizen science" project — you can classify galaxies at home, on your computer, perusing their vast database of starry island universes. It’s highly addictive — over 50,000,000 galaxies have been classified by the public so far!

And now the folks behind Galaxy Zoo (including my friend Chris Lintott) have a new product that will eat up all your spare time: Galaxy Zoo Mergers. Instead of normal workaday galaxies, this new project displays two or more galaxies undergoing violent collisions, many of which will one day result in the two merging into one bigger galaxy. Our own Milky Way has suffered through many such mergers, growing over time to its present size. Mergers are a basic process in galaxy evolution, and are vitally important to study.

In GZM, you are shown a collision image, and you can fiddle with various parameters in a computer model of the event, eventually trying to get your model to look like the actual image. You can change the galaxies’ masses, direction, speed, angles, and number of stars in the simulation — and it uses real physics to determine the shapes of the galaxies as they interact gravitationally! As you tune the simulation, the result is displayed in real time so you can see how well you’re doing (and I’ll note it ran smoothly, even on my three-year-old Mac laptop). Here’s an example I played with:

galaxyzoo_merger

As you can see, I didn’t do too badly. By making the left galaxy lower mass and changing the direction and speed of the collision, I was able to get a simulation that is reasonably close to the real image.

I’ll note that while it’s not too hard to get started, it does take a little bit of patience — but after only a few minutes I was colliding away. And if it’s not easy to start, it’s impossible to stop. Like Galaxy Zoo itself, this is the crack cocaine of the internet. If you value your spare time away from the computer, you may not want to get involved with this!

I of course mean that in the best way: merging galaxies is fun. There is something ultimately cool about letting billions of stars interact over vast scales of distance and time… and there is real science here. By creating a database of such events, scientists can use the data to look for trends. Are most collisions at certain angles? That might imply how the galaxies collide when they are in clusters, gigantic collections of thousands of galaxies. Are the mergers high speed, low speed? Are the victims wildly disparate mass galaxies, or usually two of roughly the same mass? What are the highest and lowest speeds of collision?

All of this is important to know. The more basic info we get about collisions, the better we can understand them. For scientists studying collisions, it’s almost hopeless to get enough simulations for this, but by crowd-sourcing it they get all that for free. The data from Galaxy Zoo indicate that people are quite good at classifying galaxies with only minimal training (done right there on the site in a couple of minutes), and we can hope the same is true for mergers; they’ll run tests to make sure.

So everyone wins here. Scientists get data they can use to understand the Universe, and the public has the knowledge that they are contributing to that understanding… and having fun all the time.

Science! I love this stuff!

Share

November 30th, 2009 9:26 AM Tags: citizen science, Galaxy Zoo, mergers
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science | 18 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us