DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy

Posts Tagged ‘globular cluster’

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

The new VLT Survey Telescope delivers spectacular images

[Update: I originally had called this the Very Large Survey Telescope, but have learned it's actually the VLT (for Very Large Telescope) Survey Telescope. I've corrected this in the title and below. I like my less-redundant name for it better, but it's best to be accurate.]

The European Southern Observatory is an agency that governs some of the best telescopes on the planet, and they just added a new eye on the sky: the VLTe Survey Telescope (VST), a 2.6 meter ‘scope in Chile. There are lots of telescopes of similar size dotting our planet, but what makes this one special is its huge field of view — a solid one degree across, twice the diameter of the Moon on the sky – and the resolution of the camera: a terrifying 268 megapixels!

When you put that together, you get some dazzling pictures, like this one of the globular cluster Omega Centauri:

[Click to englobulenate to a 4000 x 4000 pixel 13 MB image, or grab yourself the internet-choking 14,540 x 14,540 pixel 280 MB version.]

Omega Cen is one of the largest globular clusters of the 150 or so orbiting the Milky Way galaxy, a collection of hundreds of thousands or even millions of stars all orbiting the cluster center willy-nilly like bees swarming around a hive. Telescopes like the VST will allow astronomers to survey these clusters quickly and deeply, which is important because it’s sometimes difficult to know what stars are in the cluster and which happen to be in the background or foreground. You have to get a good census of cluster membership before moving on to studying how old the stars are, what they’re made of, and how they behave. Since globulars are among the oldest objects in the Universe and are tied with galaxy formation, understanding them leads to understanding a great deal more.

VST also took this spectacular picture of the star-forming region M17, also known as the Omega nebula:

(more…)

Share

June 8th, 2011 7:32 AM Tags: ESO, globular cluster, nebula, Omega Centauri, Omega Nebula, VST
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures | 27 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Spectacular and sparkling, but what is it?

Globular clusters are among the most spectacular of objects in the entire night sky. Compact balls of hundreds of thousands of stars, well over a hundred orbit our galaxy at various distances. When viewed by Hubble, the result is nothing less than jaw-dropping:

[Click to embiggen, and please do; I had to crop the image to get it to fit and the full-size version is even more spectacular!]

This view of Terzan 5, as it’s called, is gorgeous! The thing is… Terzan 5 may not really be a globular cluster. Sure, it’s a cluster, and it’s globular, but it may not be what we usually think of as a globular cluster.

When I read the press release for the picture, the name Terzan 5 looked familiar. So I searched my blog, and found I’ve written about this object before. That post was about a ground-based Very Large Telescope picture of the cluster, seen here. The picture looks odd because Terzan 5 lies in a very crowded region of the Milky Way, lousy with dust. That interstellar junk tends to scatter away blue light, making objects look redder. The dust blankets across Terzan 5, but is thicker in one half than the other, making that side redder than the other.

Terzan 5 itself is also unusually dense, with stars packed in it more tightly than is usual for a globular cluster. Not only that, but studies have shown the stars in the cluster appear to fall into two different age groups; one significantly older than the other. That’s weird. (more…)

Share

May 23rd, 2011 7:19 AM Tags: globular cluster, Hubble Space Telescope, Terzan 5, Very Large Telescope
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures | 17 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Sparkly

When I was a young Bad Astronomer, one of my favorite night-sky targets for my telescope was the globular cluster M5, an easy-to-spot fuzzy jewel in the southern sky. Over the years I must have taken a look at it a hundred times, my telescope barely resolving a few of the brighter stars in it.

Of course, with Hubble, the view is significantly better:

Holy scintillating jewelbox! [Click to englobenate, or grab the 3150 x 3150 pixel version.]

M5 is a collection of at least 100,000 stars, all orbiting each other like bees around a beehive, held together by their mutual gravity. It’s located about 25,000 light years away, and is something like 150 light years across. It’s one of more than 150 such clusters of stars orbiting our Milky Way galaxy.

And it’s old: it’s probably been around for 12 billion years. Yikes. I hope I look as good when I’m that relatively scaled age.

I don’t have much to add here; I’ve written about globulars many times (see Related Posts below), so instead I’ll simply let you soak in its beauty… and note that despite my best efforts, I couldn’t seem to work in an Ultimate Computer reference in this post’s title. You may pull out the plug, Mr. Spock!

Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA


Related posts:

- Scattered jewels in the core of a cluster
- A buzzing beehive and a dying star
- A distant sparkling eruption of diamonds
- Alien clusters invade our galaxy!

Share

May 2nd, 2011 1:38 PM Tags: globular cluster, Hubble Space Telescope, M5
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures | 28 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Scattered jewels in the core of a cluster

I love all the Hubble images of nebulae and galaxies, but sometimes you need a palate cleanser, an image clean and simple. Like one, say, full of the stars of NGC 288:

[Click to englobularclusternate.]

NGC 288 is a globular cluster, which are usually tightly-packed spheres of stars. NGC 288, though, is looser, with stars dispersed more throughout. This image from Hubble actually resolves the stars even in the core, where they tend to overlap in denser clusters. From 30,000 light years away — half the diameter of our galaxy! — this is a pretty decent feat.

The image is not exactly true color: blue is blue, but orange starlight is shown as green here, red represents near infrared light, and what you see here as orange is actually from the reddish glow of hydrogen. Confused? Yeah, sometimes astronomers color things oddly to make some characteristics clearer. In this case, the colors represent different mass stars. Medium mass red giants look yellow in the picture, and blue stars are more massive. The fainter stars are ones that are still happily fusing hydrogen into helium like the Sun does. However, those stars are much lower mass than the Sun, and have longer life spans.

And there’s more: If you look carefully, you can see fuzzy orange objects poking through the stars. Those are distant background galaxies! They’re probably hundreds of millions of light years away.

We think most globular clusters like NGC 288 form their stars all at once, making them really nice laboratories for studying how stars grow old and die. Since we can be pretty sure the stars are all the same age, it’s one less thing we have to worry about when trying to understand them! Simplification can be nice… in science and in beauty.


Related posts:

- A buzzing beehive and a dying star
- It’s full of stars!
- Alien clusters invade our galaxy!
- Vampires and thrillseekers rejuvenate dead stars

Share

March 18th, 2011 7:00 AM Tags: globular cluster, Hubble, NGC 288
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures | 36 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

A buzzing beehive and a dying star

When I was younger, it was pretty common on clear nights to see me at the end of my driveway with my telescope. And one of my favorite targets to observe was (and still are) globular clusters: hundreds of thousands, and sometimes millions of stars all bound together in a tight ball due to their gravity. And one of the best of those is the fabulous M15… and when it’s seen by Hubble, well, it’s simply spectacular:

Holy wow! Click to englobulenate – I had to shrink the image a lot to get it to fit here, so as gorgeous as this is it’s a shadow of the higher-res version… or the ginormous full-res one!

M15 is relatively nearby as globulars go, about 35,000 light years. Over 150 of these objects orbit our galaxy, and so some are quite far away. Not only is it close, but M15 is also fairly densely-populated, its stars orbiting each other like bees around a beehive, making it a pretty easy target for amateur astronomers. It was one of the first things I’d go after once it got dark in the autumn, and it would appear as a fuzzy ball in my 25 cm ‘scope. Of course, when you aim the 2.4 meter mirror of Hubble at it, well. You can see for yourself.

This false-color image is a combination of two pictures; one taken in visible light (colored blue; in reality the filter used let through yellow and red light), and the other in near-infrared (colored red). That selects out redder stars; the brightest ones are red giants, stars nearing the ends of their lives, and the fainter ones are lower-mass stars that are still busily fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores.

If you look to the left and a bit below the cluster’s center, though, a blue glow sticks out among all the red. If you do grab the seriously super high-res version of the image, you get a much better look at it. I’ve zoomed in on it here. It’s clearly not a star; the blue halo is much larger than any star image, and you can see the rim on the left hand side is bright. What gives?
(more…)

Share

February 15th, 2011 7:00 AM Tags: globular cluster, Hubble Space Telescope, M15, Pease 1, planetary nebula
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures | 26 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

The Top 14 Astronomy Pictures of 2010

Use the thumbnails and arrows to browse the images, and click on the images themselves to go through to blog posts with more details and descriptions.

Every year, thousands of incredible images of the sky are taken from observatories on the ground and in space, from spacecraft, and from amateur astronomers. And it seems that the people who make these images are getting better with time, creating nothing short of art. <br /><br />And every year picking my favorites for the Top Ten list gets ridiculously harder. I fret about this each time (just as I did for the Top Tens of <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/15/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2009/" target="_blank">2009</a>, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/" target="_blank">2008</a>, <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/12/13/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2007/" target="_blank">2007</a>, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/23/top-10-astronomy-pictures-of-2007-runners-up/" target="_blank">the 2007 Runners up</a>, and <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/27/the-top-ten-astronomy-images-of-2006/" target="_blank">2006</a>). But I've never seen <em>anything</em> like 2010; I went through over 1000 pictures, and even when I was merciless it was hard to get it down to 30. The agony of picking 10 was too much.<br /><br />So to heck with it. I chose 14. Why? Well, for one thing, <em>it's my list</em>. But I also want to find images that are not only beautiful, but also tell a scientific story... as well as one that finds that spot in your brain that simply <em>pops</em> with wonder and awe.<br /><br />This year, I found so many with that quality to them! So why limit myself? Some of the ones I chose may at first seem simple, or inelegant, but I picked them because they're more than just a pretty shot. They're telling us something wonderful and fundamental about the Universe. Astronomy is one of the handful of sciences which can appeal to both our eyes and our brains... as you'll see here. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">10</span> <strong>14</strong> times over.<br /><br />Use the slider bar at the top to browse the images and get a brief description underneath, and click the big images themselves to go to a more thorough article. But whatever you do, make sure you click through to the higher-resolution versions of these images, because it's only there you'll get the full, incredible view they deserve.<br />Globular clusters are hundreds of thousands of stars packed into a tightly jammed ball, each orbiting the cluster center like a bee circling a hive. <br /><br /><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/27/a-distant-sparkling-eruption-of-diamonds/" target="_blank">NGC 6934</a> is one such globular, a single example of more than 150 that orbit our Milky Way Galaxy. It's 50,000 light years, such a great distance that its magnificence is greatly reduced, making it not much more than a fuzzy blob through most telescopes... unless you happen to have the Hubble Space Telescope at your command. Then this bustling city of stars becomes a dazzling jewel.<br /><br />This image is false color; what you see as blue is actually taken through a red filter, and what looks red is actually <em>infrared</em>. Astronomers sometimes do this with two-filter images, to help our eyes separate out the colors.<br /><br />In this case, it shows that most of the stars in the cluster are probably lower mass than the Sun, still fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores, but a few have aged to the point of becoming red giants, swelling up and cooling off. Such is the fate of our Sun in a few billion years... and studying distant globular clusters like NGC 6394 helps us understand how how our nearest star will someday die. I picked this image because it's a relatively unheard-of but beautiful cluster... and I love the way the stars look like jewels. <br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1023a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA, Hubble, NASA</em><br />The Cassini spacecraft has been orbiting Saturn since 2004, and has been featured frequently both on my blog and in these Top Ten lists. Its views of the ringed planet and moons has been nothing short of spectacular time and again.<br /><br />This shot reminds me why. The moons of Saturn orbit it almost all on the same plane, so Cassini sometimes sees them near each other in the sky. And if things play out just right, they even pass directly in front of each other.<br /><br />That's exactly <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/22/two-alien-worlds-superposed" target="_blank">what happened here</a>: icy Rhea, Saturn's second largest moon, is seen here superposed on the giant moon Titan. Despite catastrophic appearances, they were in no danger of collision: Titan was over a million kilometers from Rhea when Cassini snapped this shot. Note that Rhea is covered in craters big and small, while Titan's thick atmosphere blocks us from seeing its surface directly. Do you also see the ring of material apparently floating above Titan? That's a haze layer composed of hydrocarbons like methane, ethane, and even benzene. Titan's atmosphere is twice as thick as Earth's!<br /><br />Note also that Titan is three times larger than Rhea and is in fact comfortably bigger than the planet Mercury; it's truly one of the most aptly-named worlds in the solar system.<br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=4136" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute </em>The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been circling the Moon since June 2008, taking incredibly high-resolution images of our neareast astronomical neighbor. It's photographed craters, ancient lava beds, mountains, and cliffs, but <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/05/24/lunar-boulder-hits-a-hole-in-one" target="_blank">this image</a> really stands out to me: it shows a house-sized boulder which rolled down a hill and landed inside a crater like a golf ball at a Putt-Putt course!<br /><br />The left side of the picture is a hill which goes downhill to the right. The landscape flattens out in the middle, and you can see bits of rubble and debris from landslides at the point where they meet. A billion years ago or more, something must have dislodged that gigantic rock, setting it rolling down the hill. Not being round, it bounced along in the Moon's 1/6th gravity, leaving ruts dug into the powdery surface. It slowed when it hit the flatter surface, and almost came to a stop just past that 60-meter (200 foot) crater. But it must have teetered backwards (see how that last rut goes past the rock?) and then slid down into the crater itself, where it finally came to a stop.<br /><br />It's easy to think that the Moon is mostly dead and unchanging, but when you look more closely - really, <em>really</em> closely - you'll see evidence of a dynamic world, with subtle beauty and fascinating structures. And we've only explored a tiny fraction of it. What else is there to see in the remaining 36 million square kilometers? <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/227-Hole-in-One!.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University </em><br />Whenever a new type of instrument is used to examine the skies, surprises are guaranteed. And when the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) started scanning the heavens in 2010, it returned one amazing view after another. My favorite by far <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/11/17/warm-dusty-rings-glow-around-a-weird-binary-star/" target="_blank">is this one</a>, showing NGC 1514, a dying star shedding material.<br /><br />This image, in the far-infrared, is very different than optical shots of the nebula, which show it looking more like a disk. It's not certain just why this object has these two rings, but it's likely that dust ejected from the dying star is slamming into gas previously thrown off. That older gas is most likely in an hourglass shape, common in such objects. Perhaps the dust is hitting the inside of that hourglass figure, making the rings. Maybe it's a different reason entirely. We don't know! <br /><br />And that makes me happy. Mysteries are fun, and new telescopes are bound to add to them, while solving others. WISE was designed to do a survey, which means it looked at anything and everything in the sky. A lot of what it found will have to be followed up with bigger telescopes. But until we get another powerful far-infrared telescopes, some of these weird objects will just have to wait to reveal their secrets.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/multimedia/gallery/pia13346.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em> Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA</em>This isn't a microscopic photograph of a bacterial culture! It's actually of rolling, hummocky dunes near the north pole of Mars. Taken with the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's powerful HIRISE camera, the normally grey basaltic sand of the dunes is covered with pinkish dust literally made of rust - iron oxide.<br /><br />What makes <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/11/another-dose-of-martian-awesome/" target="_blank">this image</a> so bizarre, though, are the dark, parallel tendril-like features scattered throughout. What the heck are <em>those?</em> One clue is that they always seem to stretch downhill, as if something is flowing. Another can be found in the tendrils located left of center and down a bit: there's a fuzzy pink oval emanating from one of them. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/files/2010/01/hirise_avalanche.jpg" target="_blank">Under magnification</a>, you can see it's a dust cloud... the debris raised up after an avalanche of sand on the Martian surface!<br /><br />Those tendrils are from the darker material under the pink sand. When dry ice under the surface warms up in the summer, it disturbs and dislodges the gray basaltic sand around it. This slides downhill, creating these weird, hair-like features. It's no surprise that some people mistook them for some form of life on the Red Planet! But I don't see the need to make up fantasy-based scenarios for pictures like this one, when we can see that Mars is fantastic enough.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007962_2635" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona</em>The Sun is a common target for astronomers both professional and amateur. It's so big and bright that you can really see a lot of detail, and every year a lot of pictures of it hit the 'net. You can get jaded from them all.<br /><br />Which is why <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/28/the-boiling-erupting-sun/" target="_blank">Alan Friedman's solar portrait</a> blew me away when I saw it. It's actually a composite of two pictures: the outer limb of the Sun combined with a seperate shot of the Sun's disk. Not only that, he inverted the shot of the disk, essentially taking the negative. It gives the Sun a fuzzy, eerie appearance, and startled me when I saw it. I've never seen the Sun displayed in quite this way, giving it a beauty and delicacy I wouldn't thought possible. It's truly the most amazing picture of the Sun I've seen this year. And don't miss Alan's <a href="http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/not_the_great_pumpkin2.html" target="_blank">close-up shots of the limb</a>, either!<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/not_the_great_pumpkin.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Alan Friedman, used with permission.</em><br />I've been doing this a long time, and I've seen it all: galaxies and planets, gas clouds and moons, stars being born and stars dying... but when I saw <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/06/awesome-death-spiral-of-a-bizarre-star/" target="_blank">this picture</a>, I knew there were yet surprises in the sky.<br /><br />When I saw this I literally gasped out loud; I had never seen any structure in space like it. And when I read what it was, my amazement did not decrease: it's the dusty wind of a dying star. <br /><br />The object, called AFGL 3068, is a binary star, two stars in an 800-year orbit around one another. One of them is a red giant, a star near the end of its life. It's blowing off massive amounts of dark dust, which is enveloping the pair and hiding them from view. But the system's spin is spraying the material out like a water sprinkler head, causing this giant and delicate spiral pattern on the sky. And by giant, I mean giant: the entire structure is about 3 <em>trillion</em> kilometers (about 2 trillion miles) across.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1020a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA/NASA &amp; R. Sahai</em>For over two centuries asteroids were just points of light in telescopes (hence the term <em>asteroid</em>, which means "starlike"). Until recently, that is: we're a spacefaring race now, and we can send our robots to sniff out these giant rocks up close... and in July, the European Space Agency probe Rosetta flew past the asteroid Lutetia, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/" target="_blank">returning amazing close-ups of the rock</a>. <br /><br />This picture, <a href="http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002579/" target="_blank">which I borrowed from my friend Emily Lakdawalla at the Planetary Society Blog</a> (I fiddled with the contrast and brightness a bit to bring out the darker side) was taken at closest approach. Lutetia is about 130 km (80 miles) across, and is the largest asteroid we've visited. You can see it's a lumpy, battered, rock, pitted with craters. The details are stunning: giant boulders held by the weak gravity dot the surface, parallel grooves mark stress fractures in the surface (or secondary deposits of material ejected from impacts?), and shadows highlight the contours. <br /><br />We're just beginning to understand the nature of asteroids - and given that every now and again one of them pays Earth a catastrophic visit (just ask the dinosaurs) - it's good idea that we learn as much about them as we can.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Rosetta/SEM44DZOFBG_0.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/RSSD/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA &amp; Emily Lakdawalla</em><br />Speaking of asteroid collisions, in January 2010 the automated skywatching telescope LINEAR spotted what looked like a comet orbiting the Sun in the inner asteroid belt, just beyond the orbit of Mars. It looked decidedly odd, so Hubble was pointed at it... and what it saw was so bizarre it caused a big stir in the astronomical community: the aftermath of a violent collision between two asteroids in space!<br /><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/02/hubble-captures-picture-of-asteroid-collision/" target="_blank"><br />The picture</a> is unprecendented: an X-shaped streak of light with a dramatic 50,000-kilometer-long tail sweeping away. Apparently, an asteroid roughly 150 meters or so across - which you can see as a point of light at the upper left tip of the X - was hit at high speed by a smaller rock only a few meters across. The smaller object was vaporized by the energy of collision, which would've had the same yield as an atomic explosion!<br /><br />The tail is from sand-grain to pebble-sized debris from the explosion moving away due to pressure of sunlight, which acts like a very gentle wind on the particles. The other line of the X is probably from a piece of rubble ejected off the main rock, leaving its own trail of debris behind. Judging from changes in the debris shape over time,<a href="denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:timeline: http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/P2010A2_0.html" target="_blank"> the collision probably happened in February or March 2009</a>, but the asteroid was up during the day at that time and was unobservable. It took several months to discover it, and a few more to understand what this strange object was telling us. <br /><br />Collisions like this are estimated to happen roughly once per year in the asteroid belt, but the distance makes them very hard to observe. Hopefully, as more survey telescopes come online, we'll see more of these spectacular events. <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2010/07/image/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/">NASA</a>, <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/">ESA</a>, and D. Jewitt (UCLA)</em>One glance at this picture lets you know why M51 is commonly called The Whirlpool. At 23 million light years away, it's visible through binoculars (barely; I always have a hard time spotting it), so when you point something like Hubble at it you know <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/02/revisiting-the-whirlpool/" target="_blank">you'll be getting an incredible view</a>.<br /><br />This gorgeous shot is actually a composite of four different filtered images by Robert Gendler, an accomplished astrophotographer. The original release, done in 2005, was of course beautiful, but Robert took a stab at it and was able to make it even better. <br /><br />The Whirlpool is actually two galaxies interacting with one another. The spiral galaxy is nearly face-on, and you can easily trace the magnificent arms, laced with red gas clouds forming new stars, and dark lanes of dust created when stars are born and when they die. The other galaxy is the orange blobby one, a dwarf irregular. It may have already passed through the bigger galaxy twice, and will eventually merge with it. We think all big galaxies grow by consuming smaller ones in this manner. In a few hundred million more years there won't be two galaxies left to see, just one somewhat bigger one. Our own Milky Way Galaxy probably underwent a similar event many times!<br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1577.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /> <em>Image Credit: NASA, Hubble Heritage Team, (STScI/AURA), ESA, S. Beckwith (STScI). Additional Processing: Robert Gendler</em>There are two pictures this year that made my list that aren't strictly astronomy, but I couldn't resist. The first is this one, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/20/the-green-fire-of-the-southern-lights/" target="_blank">the aurora australis</a> - the southern counterpart to the northern lights - as seen from above by astronauts on the International Space Station. <br /><br />Charged particles from the Sun stream along the Earth's magnetic field, guided to the north and south poles, where they crash into our atmosphere and generate light. The color of the light depends on the molecule or atom hit; in this case, the green glow is due to oxygen. <br /><br />Although the particles generating the light tend to be 80 - 160 km up (50 - 100 miles), the space station is even higher. This view is also well off to the side; the astronaut who took the picture was looking at the limb of the Earth, several thousand miles away. All in all the color, perspective, and the amazing glowing stream combine to make this a lovely and decidedly unearthly photograph from space.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS023&amp;roll=E&amp;frame=58455" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/Expedition 23</em>Space near the Sun is mostly empty, devoid of gas and stars. But travel 7500 light years in the direction of the constellation Carina and you'll slam into one of the largest and most complex star-forming regions in the galaxy: the sprawling Carina nebula. Massive stars being born there blast out radiation and winds that sculpt the surrounding material, creating weird and wonderful shapes. <br /><br />So what better way for astronomers to celebrate the Hubble Space Telescope's 20th year in orbit than to use it to take <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/27/hubble-celebrates-20-years-in-space-with-a-jaw-dropper/" target="_blank">a huge mosaic of Carina</a>? This astonishing portrait shows the towering pillars of gas and dust being eaten away by cosmic erosion; the narrow, focused jets of material blasting away from stars eating away at their cocoons; ribbons and sheets of compressed gas lighting up space; and the nascent stars themselves as they turn on for the first time. <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic1007a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br />
<p><em>Image credit: NASA, ESA, M. Livio and the Hubble 20th Anniversary Team (STScI)</em></p>
<br />This is the second of the two not-strictly astronomy pictures in this list, and is also taken from the International Space Station. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/13/twilight-of-the-shuttle/" target="_blank">It shows the Space Shuttle Orbiter <em>Endeavour</em></a> just minutes before docking with ISS. Both the ISS and Endeavour were orbiting the Earth at 8 km/sec (5 miles/sec), passing into the dark side of the Earth, essentially experiencing sunset - which they do 18 times a day!<br /><br />This image is beautiful, of course, showing the layered colors of sunset as seen from 350km (210 miles) above the Earth's surface. But this picture is also a metaphor for the Shuttle itself: this was the second-to-last mission of the <em>Endeavour</em>, and in fact the last misson for the Orbiter will be the last mission for the entire fleet: after that flight, the Space Shuttle program will be finished, the Orbiters retired, and an as-yet unnamed rocket system will take over. In the meantime, American astronauts will hitch rides on Russian rockets, as well as on the Falcon 9 rocket from the private company SpaceX, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/12/03/spacex-to-launch-dragon-capule-december-7/" target="_blank">which recently had a wonderfully successful test flight</a>. <br /><br />As for the Shuttle... the last launch of <em>Endeavour</em> is scheduled for April 2011, when it really will fly into the sunset for the last time.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1592.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA</em>Choosing these images every year is tough, but this year there was one shot so outstanding that as soon as I saw it, I knew it would be Number One!<br /><br />This jaw-dropping picture - an insanely huge mosaic of 32 pictures taken by astrophotographer and amateur astronomer Rogelio Andreo - is Orion... <em>the whole constellation!</em> [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/5258701469/sizes/o/" target="_blank">Here is a higher-res version</a> - 4000 x 2600 pixels! - hosted on Flickr, or <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2010/10/22/orion-from-Head-to-Toes.html" target="_blank">you can get it from his site itself</a>.] If you look carefully you'll spot the familiar stars: orange Betelgeuse in the upper left, blue-white Rigel on the lower right, and his famous three belt stars in the middle.<br /><br />If you have trouble seeing the pattern of stars, it's not surprising.  Rogelio used filters that show stars, but which also accentuate the vast amount of hydrogen gas in this part of the galaxy. The glowing nebulosity almost outshines the stars themselves!<br /><br />How about a short tour? There's a lot to see:<br /><br />At the top of the picture is the Lambda Orionis nebula, the huge red cloud straddling Orion's shoulders. The blue star roughly centered in it is Lambda Orionis itself, a massive, hot, young star that is so brilliant it's ionizing the entire nebula... which is dozens of light years across.<br /><br />Lower down, a vast red ring of gas starts just above Orion's belt and swings down to just above his knees. That's Barnard's Loop, a spherical bubble of gas formed as one massive star after another exploded deep in the heart of Orion, each sending out octillions of tons of gas at speeds of thousands of kilometers per second! This material screamed outwards, slamming into and sweeping up the ambient gas in the region. This eventually snowplowed all that material into the bubble, which is heated today and glowing due to the still-thriving massive stars inside it. The Loop is about 300 light years in diameter - 3 <em>quadrillion</em> kilometers (2 quadrillion miles)!<br /><br />In the center of the loop is perhaps the most famous gas cloud in the sky: <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2009/09/19/orions-Deep-Field--Belt-and-sword.html" target="_blank">the great Orion Nebula</a>. It's 1500 light years away, yet easily visible to the naked eye; the Sun would be an invisible dot at that distance! But the nebula is churning out young stars which light up the gas, making this one of the brightest examples of stellar nurseries in our galaxy. If there are aliens in other galaxies looking our way, the Orion Nebula would be easily visible as a Milky Way landmark.<br /><br />Above the great nebula and to the left a bit, hanging down from the leftmost star (Alnitak) is a straight line of gas, excited by the star. Superposed on that is a dense, dark globule of dust and molecules in <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2008/12/27/horsehead-Nebula-Ic-434.html" target="_blank">the uncanny shape of a horse's head</a>, as if the galaxy is playing a cosmic game of chess. <br /><br />And finally, I must note the long, bluish nebulosity just to the right of Rigel at the bottom of the picture. When flipped upside-down, it becomes obvious why this is called the <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2009/11/16/witch-Head-Nebula-and-Rigel.html" target="_blank">Witch Head Nebula</a>! The resemblance to a witch is pretty amazing. Funny, too: when seen sideways it looks like a running ghost, and you'll see it sometimes called that as well. The perfect nebula for Halloween.<br /><br />Any one of these pieces of Orion are shot so beautifully by Rogelio that they would deserve to be in this list, but all together... <strong>WOW</strong>. I mean, <em>seriously</em>. I've seen Orion a bazillion times; it's up in the south after sunset all winter long, and has so many wonderful objects in it that every amateur astronomer makes it a familiar destination for the telescope. I can't tell you how many times I've observed various nebulae in it, scanned it with binoculars, or just gazed at it with my own two eyes, soaking in its pattern and colors. <br /><br />But I have never, <em>ever</em>, seen it like this. This picture has beauty, clarity, depth, sharpness, and most importantly sheer stunning <em>breadth</em> that makes it truly one of the most amazing astrophotographs I have ever seen. It's also a first: this is the first time I've picked an image by an amateur astronomer (as opposed to one from a professional observatory or spacecraft) for the number one slot. This photograph earned it.<br /><br />Congratulations to Rogelio for this incredible work of art, my Number One pick for the best Astronomy Picture of 2010. <br /><br /><strong>Get the stunning super-high-res version <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/5258701469/sizes/o/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Rogelio Andreo, used by permission</em><br />


Share

December 14th, 2010 7:01 AM Tags: asteroid, aurorae, Cassini, comet, globular cluster, Hubble Space Telescope, ISS, LRO, Lutetia, Mars, Moon, mro, Orion, planetary nebulae, Rhea, Rogelio Andreo, Rosetta, Saturn, Space Shuttle, Space Shuttle Endeavour, Sun, Titan, WISE
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Pretty pictures, Science, Space, Top Post | 113 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

A distant sparkling eruption of diamonds

Globular clusters have always been one of my favorite astronomical objects. These balls of stars — sometimes hundreds of thousands strong — are easy targets through a small telescope and are fun and beautiful to see.

But when you train a big space telescope on them, well, their beauty is magnified spectacularly:

hst_ngc6934

You really want to click that to get the very beefy 4000 x 4000 pixel (11 Mb) version. It’ll knock your socks off!

This Hubble image shows NGC 6934, an ancient ball of stars located about 50,000 light years away. Globular clusters are made of stars that are bound to each other gravitationally and orbiting the center on a myriad different paths — think of it as a beehive except with a hundred thousand bees each a million kilometers across. There are about 150 of these guys orbiting the Milky Way, each a dozen or so light years across and containing upwards of a million stars. NGC 6934 is pretty typical of its class, but its great distance dims it to near-obscurity. If it were as close as M 13 or Omega Centauri — both roughly half as far as NGC 6934 — it would be heralded as a gem of the night sky.

Globulars are old. We think they form all at once, with all the stars being born at the same time. (more…)

Share

September 27th, 2010 9:30 AM Tags: globular cluster, HST, NGC 6934
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures, Top Post | 38 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »




    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Dragon is approaching the space station
      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS
      • Obi Wan better watch his back
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station
      • Mars craters are sublime
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff



       Twitter



      Follow Me on Pinterest



       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS | Bad Astronomy
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station | Bad Astronomy
      • Mars craters are sublime | Bad Astronomy
      • OK, one more eclipse shot | Bad Astronomy
      • Saturn, surreally | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us