DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy

Posts Tagged ‘LRO’

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »

Trolling the Moon

A long time ago, something really, really, really BIG hit the Moon. Hard. The explosion was huge beyond human grasp, and when it was all done, the hole it left on the Moon was 900 km (600 miles) across!

Behold, Mare Orientale:

This image was taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter’s Wide Angle Camera, and shows the entire basin. It’s located just over the edge of the Moon as seen from Earth, so we can only get hints of it when we look from home. LRO can see it in all its neck-hair-raising glory.

See all those radial features emanating outward from it? Those are crater chains: secondary impact events as huge chunks of debris hundreds of meters or even kilometers across were thrown hundreds of kilometers away by the force of the impact!

Yegads. You can see these better in an interactive pan-and-scan image that allows you to zoom in to scales of 100 meters per pixel. It’s incredible.

But looking at the central part itself, I got a funny familiar feeling. I read reddit, after all. Was the Moon… trolling us?
(more…)

Share

April 2nd, 2011 7:00 AM Tags: LRO, Mare Orientale, Moon, trollface
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Geekery, Humor, Pretty pictures | 40 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Lunar rock and roll

The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been taking extreme close-ups of the Moon since September 2009, and since that time I’ve posted dozens of these images, including shots of the Apollo landing sites, images of Earth from the Moon, craters, lava tubes, and more. But among my favorite of all these are the ones showing action, something that’s happened that you can actually see. And the best of these, I think, are from boulders rolling around on the Moon’s surface. Like this one!

lro_gassendi_boulder

[Click to embiggen and get a somewhat wider view.]

That boulder you see there is about 30 meters across — 100 feet — so it’s pretty big, the size of a house. It’s sitting inside the 110-km-wide crater Gassendi, and rolled down from the crater’s central peak. The trail is obvious, as are several smaller ones around it.

Funny– it seems obvious in retrospect (as so many things do), but I wouldn’t have predicted boulders rolling down slopes on the Moon. In my mind, even now, it’s hard to shake the prejudice that the Moon is dead, dead, dead. But it still has some activity; for example, the changing gravity it feels from the Earth as it loops around us in its elliptical orbit causes the Moon to stretch and compress. This can create seismic activity — moonquakes! And that can cause rocks to tumble downslope.

See? Obvious.

There are lots of images from LRO of this, too. Here’s one with rolling rocks and trails in Tsiolkovsky crater, and one of my all-time favorites shows a boulder that rolled down a slope and into a small crater: a lunar hole in one!

Back to that big guy up top; Gassendi was a landing target for Apollo 17 for a while, but the uncertain terrain (lunain?) made the planners decide to go elsewhere. Too bad: boulders that roll down from higher locations make it easier to get rock samples from different areas, since the rock already did the work of coming to you!

But maybe, just maybe, we’re not quite done with the Moon yet. I hope to once again see people walking on its surface, and instead of seeing pictures like this from above, we’ll have shots of astronauts living and working there, taken by their own hands.

Image credit: ASA/GSFC/Arizona State University


Related posts:

- Ash hole on the Moon
- Exquisite rubble
- One giant leap
- Gettin’ high on the Moon


Share

February 1st, 2011 7:00 AM Tags: LRO
by Phil Plait in Pretty pictures | 29 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Challenger astronauts memorialized on the Moon

Friday was the 25th anniversary of the loss of the Shuttle Orbiter Challenger, which I already wrote about as part of a post about Apollo 1 and Columbia. But I wanted to add that after that event in 1986, seven craters on the Moon were named after the astronauts:

This mosaic of LRO images is about 190 km wide, so these craters are actually quite large. Interestingly, these craters are themselves inside a much larger 524-km wide impact basin… named Apollo.

Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University

Share

January 30th, 2011 7:00 AM Tags: Challenger, craters, LRO, Moon
by Phil Plait in NASA, Pretty pictures, Space | 28 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Top Ten Astronomy Pictures of 2010 – Runners Up

When I made my Top 14 Astronomy Pictures of 2010, it was really tough cutting some out. This is a gallery of the images that, for whatever reasons, I decided to leave off. They’re still spectacular and gorgeous, though! Click on the thumbnail in the slider to go to an image, use the arrows to navigate back and forth, and click on the big image displayed below to get more info and a bigger version if available.

Is there anything more magnificent than a "grand design" spiral galaxy? <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/02/take-a-moment-to-just-soak-in-a-beautiful-spiral/" target="_blank">This is NGC 6118</a>, a gorgeous galaxy 80 million light years away. It's about 100,000 light years across, the same size as the Milky Way. It's not an identical twin; <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/12/ten-things-you-dont-know-about-the-milky-way-galaxy/" target="_blank">our galaxy is a barred spiral</a>, with a hefty rectangular clump of stars in the center. Still, NGC 6118 is very similar to ours.<br /><br />It's a fantastic image, but didn't make my Top 14 cut because I liked the M51 image better, and there was more science in the M51 image as well. It was tough; this picture is really spectacular. But sometimes that's not enough to make it to the big leagues.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/02/take-a-moment-to-just-soak-in-a-beautiful-spiral/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><em><br /><br />Image credit: ESO</em>Dione and Rhea are moons of Saturn, and this Cassini spacecraft shot of them makes it look like they're some sort of giant microorganism (macroorganism? Cosmoorganism?) undergoing mitosis. <br /><br />In reality, Dione (top) is passing in front of Rhea (bottom) from Cassini's viewpoint. There are three coincidences making the pair look like one giant peanut-shaped object: 1) Dione is slightly smaller than Rhea, but closer, so they appear to be the same size in the picture; 2) they have about the same albedo (reflectivity) so shades of the moons match, blending them together better; and 3) there is a giant crater on the south end of Dione that lines up with the point where they overlap, tricking your brain into seeing the junction point as the waist of a peanut. <br /><br />As much as I love this picture, the one of Rhea on top of Titan was cooler, so that one made it into the Top 14 instead of this.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/24/dione-and-rhea-sitting-in-a-tree/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute</em>This is one of the youngest known craters on the Moon: it was violently excavated from the lunar surface on April 14, 1970! No one saw it hit, but we know it happened then because <strong>we</strong> were the ones who made it: it was formed when the upper-stage Saturn V booster from Apollo 13 slammed into the Moon!<br /><br />This Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter image has lots of hints to tell us this is where the booster hit: for one, the bright rays extending from the crater - made as dust plumes from the impact settled - indicate how young the hole is; they fade with time. The size of the crater (about 30 meters across) is what's expected from such an event. And of course, the impact point was known.<br /><br />I almost put this in the Top 14 list, but the LRO shot of the boulder that rolled into the crater tickled me more. <br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/03/29/one-of-the-newest-craters-on-the-moon/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University</em>Under any other circumstances, this gorgeous high-resolution and lushly-colored image of the Sun's surface would have easily made my Top 14 list, but was edged out by an even more phenomenal shot of our nearest star. <br /><br />Still, this is a spectacular and eerie shot: taken at a wavelength of light that picks out calcium in the Sun, you can see long ribbons of plasma, bright where they've just risen from below the surface (still hot from being deeper in the Sun) and darker where they are about to sink. You can also see a sunspot on the lower right, looking, ironically, a bit like a sunflower. Bear in mind though that the entire Earth could be engulfed in that spot!<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/11/22/sunlight-and-a-spot-of-calcium/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: National Solar Observatory/Dunn Solar Telescope/IBIS/Kevin Reardon</em>This is not a weather satellite picture: it was taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter when it was 400,000 km (240,000 miles) from Earth! It shows the fully-illuminated Earth on August 9, 2010. You can clearly see North and South America, and the cloud patterns are lovely.<br /><br />I know, it's a grayscale image and not color, but sometimes that makes a picture even more lovely; your eye isn't distracted by the different hues. And I do love shots of our home planet from space. <br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/16/from-the-moon-to-the-earth/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image Credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University</em><br /><br />No picture from the Cassini spacecraft has made me laugh out loud more than this one! It's of the icy moon Enceladus, discovered to have a series of water geysers erupting from its south pole. But the scale, orientation, and slightly-offset nature of this image makes it look like a giant spaceship trying to escape using full throttle on its rockets! <br /><br />I don't mind a little whimsy in my my Top 14 list, but the Rhea/Titan shot from Cassini was more dramatic, so this science fictional scene of Enceladus is relegated to the Runners-Up.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/01/enceladus-on-full-afterburner/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute</em>When frozen carbon dioxide - dry ice - is mixed in with sand and rock on Mars, it can disturb the ground around it when it warms up. And that means cliffs on the Red Planet are dangerous places to be in spring time: avalanches like this one are common!<br /><br />The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's HiRISE camera has spotted quite a few of these avalanches, and they're awesome each time. In this event you can see the white plume of dry ice and sand falling down the cliffside, and the huge billowing plume of dust where it hits. Look at it: you're seeing a gigantic landslide caught in the act! And the only reason I didn't pick this one for my Top 14? Because another one <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/03/breaking-martian-avalanche-caught-in-the-act/" target="_blank">made my list in 2008</a>. <br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/03/15/another-awesome-martian-avalanche/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona</em>What world is this? Surprise: it's ours. This snapshot of Earth was taken by the Japanese Akatsuki spacecraft as it headed from our planet to our sister world of Venus. The picture looks odd because it's taken in the infrared, which we're not used to seeing! One of the reasons I love this picture is that it looks an awful lot like the way planets were always shown in "Space:1999", a TV show I loved when I was a kid. Readers of a certain age will understand.<br /><br />[There is no higher-res version of this, but you can read more about it <a href="http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002508/" target="_blank">on Emily Lakdawalla's blog post at The Planetary Society</a>.]<br /><br /><em>Image credit: ISIS/JAXA</em>Why is there a giant dart board on Mars?<br /><br />Technically, this is called a terraced crater. It looks like there was a big impact a long time ago, and then a second one more recently almost dead center in the big one! But appearances can be deceiving, and in fact this crater is a puzzler. In <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/30/wham-bulls-eye/" target="_blank">the original post</a>, I wondered if perhaps the terrain explains the weird shape; a second crater to the lower right (not visible in this cropped image, but you can see it in the bigger one) looks very similar to this main crater. But it's not at all clear what's going on here; see my original post for details.<br /><br />However this weird thing formed, it's a pretty amazing image... but still edged out by the shot of sand dunes and frilly sand-slides in my Top 14 list.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/30/wham-bulls-eye/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona</em>In early June, 2010, something probably a kilometer across slamed into Jupiter's atmosphere. Ramming through the dense gas at speeds of 80 km/sec, it quickly slowed to a stop, detonating violently as all its vast kinetic energy was converted into a mind-numbing explosion which was the equivalent of <em>a million one-megaton bombs!</em><br /><br />Anthony Wesley, an accomplished amateur astronomer in Australia, not only discovered the event (which lasted mere seconds) but also caught it on video and made this color composite image of the titanic detonation. Diminished only by distance, the flash of light you can see to the lower right is the proof of the impact; if something this size were to hit the Earth it would bring terrible devastation to our planet. It would only be a fraction of the dinosaur-killer asteroid impact, but still enough to lay waste to an entire country and have global effects. It might not spell the end of humanity, but all in all I'd rather it didn't happen!<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/04/followup-jupiter-impact-video-and-a-color-picture/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Anthony Wesley</em>I've seen galaxies in all shapes: elliptical, spiral, weirdly mashed up, even rings. But NGC 4452 really threw me when I saw it. Sure, spiral galaxies are flat, so when seen on-edge they look a little weird. But this one is so narrow, far more than usual! That really threw me when I first saw it.<br /><br />One reason the galaxy looks so flat is because one of the two colors of light seen in this image is the near infrared, which tends to downplay dust and gas in the galaxy. Still, the galaxy really is quite flat, even in visible light. It's a remarkable picture, worthy of being among the best of the year, but as with the spiral at the beginning of this Runners-up list, it didn't really compare to the incredible M51 spiral galaxy image, so I left it off.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/11/08/galaxy-on-edge/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA/Hubble</em><br />Despite decades of space exploration, we've only visited a handful of comets up close. That's because most comets move on orbits that give them a high velocity when they pass the Earth, making a rendezvous difficult. But in 2010, the Deep Impact spacecraft (renamed to EPOXI) flew past the nucleus of the comet Hartley 2 and returned amazingly detailed images.<br /><br />This shot shows two views from the flyby. On the right you can see one part of the comet's peanut-shaped nucleus, and it's emitting a storm of snow - literally, ice made of water - ranging in size from snowflakes up to snowballs a few centimeters across. On the left is the longer (and in my opinion, more beautiful) view, showing the ice being jetted off the nucleus, as well as the shadow of the nucleus itself on the material it had <em>previously</em> blown off! <br /><br />As much as I love this image, I couldn't find a high-enough resolution shot of it to warrant putting it in the Top 14 (so I chose a closeup of the asteroid Lutetia instead), but I think you'll agree this is an astonishing view that we very rarely see.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/11/18/a-comet-creates-its-own-snowstorm/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UMD</em>It's not too often a bright star will be positioned close to a nearby galaxy on the sky, but there are a few examples... like HD 106381, a star which is superposed on the edge of the galaxy PGC 39058.<br /><br />But it's a coincidence: the star is 650 light years away, the galaxy 14 <em>million</em>. It's actually a pretty dinky galaxy; we can see it clearly because that's actually a relatively close distance as galaxies go. The galaxy has millions of stars, but distance takes its toll, and the star appears far, far brighter -- even though in reality the star is not even visible to the naked eye!<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res version <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/13/hubble-snaps-a-cosmic-photobomb/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA/Hubble</em>Of all the pictures I went through for my Top 14 list, this was the  toughest to leave out, because I think it evokes the most basic of human  emotions. It shows astronaut <a href="http://www.jsc.nasa.gov/Bios/htmlbios/caldwell.html" target="_blank">Tracy Caldwell Dyson</a>,  team member of Expedition 24, on board the International Space Station.  Floating in the cupola, she is wistfully gazing out on the Earth just a  day before leaving space to come home once again. <br /><br />I do so love  this picture. It represents so much: homesickness, maybe, and a hint of  sadness that her time left on the ISS is drawing to a close. But it also  represents something even more: <em>we are no longer a species bound to our planet</em>. We send people into space to live there, to work there. Amazing.<br /><br />So why didn't I include it on the Top 14 list? Mainly because of the contrast. <a href="http://twitpic.com/2sapus" target="_blank">In the original</a>,  you could barely see Dr. Dyson, because she was in shadow and the Earth  was so bright. I fiddled with the contrast a lot to get this picture to  work at all - you can just barely see her hair floating above her head -  but by doing so I made the resulting picture grainy and the colors are a  bit off. Because of that, I decided it didn't have the impact of the  others I chose for the list.<br /><br />Perhaps that was a mistake.<br /><br /><em>[UPDATE Dec. 20, 2010: My brother in law <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/24229547@N03/" target="_blank">Chris</a> found a much better version of this picture on wikipedia; someone there  adjusted it far better than I could have and in fact this is the best  version I've seen; had I know of this earlier I would've made it my #2  pick in the main list. I have updated the gallery picture here, and  added a link to the big clean version below.]</em><br /><br />It truly <em>is</em> an amazing picture. When I first saw it, in fact, I was immediately reminded of <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/03/26/someday/" target="_blank">this painting</a>,  which I wrote about on the blog with the title, "Someday". I had no  idea I'd see so similar a tableau in real life just a few months later!  We complain that we don't have jetpacks and flying cars, but let me  assure you, <em>the future is happening right now</em>.<br /><br />It's up to us to make sure that the future unfolding before us becomes the reality we want it to be.<br /><br /><em>Per ardua, ad astra</em>.<br /><br /><strong>Get the hi-res (original) version <a href="http://twitpic.com/2sapus" target="_blank">here</a>, and get a very large version cleaned up <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/95/Tracy_Caldwell_Dyson_in_Cupola_ISS.jpg" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA</em>
Share

December 20th, 2010 6:30 AM Tags: Cassini, Comet Hartley 2, comets, Dione, EPOXI, ISS, Jupiter, LRO, Mars, Moon, mro, Rhea, Saturn, spiral galaxies
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Pretty pictures, Top Post | 24 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

The Top 14 Astronomy Pictures of 2010

Use the thumbnails and arrows to browse the images, and click on the images themselves to go through to blog posts with more details and descriptions.

Every year, thousands of incredible images of the sky are taken from observatories on the ground and in space, from spacecraft, and from amateur astronomers. And it seems that the people who make these images are getting better with time, creating nothing short of art. <br /><br />And every year picking my favorites for the Top Ten list gets ridiculously harder. I fret about this each time (just as I did for the Top Tens of <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/12/15/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2009/" target="_blank">2009</a>, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/12/17/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2008/" target="_blank">2008</a>, <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/bablog/2007/12/13/top-ten-astronomy-pictures-of-2007/" target="_blank">2007</a>, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/23/top-10-astronomy-pictures-of-2007-runners-up/" target="_blank">the 2007 Runners up</a>, and <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/27/the-top-ten-astronomy-images-of-2006/" target="_blank">2006</a>). But I've never seen <em>anything</em> like 2010; I went through over 1000 pictures, and even when I was merciless it was hard to get it down to 30. The agony of picking 10 was too much.<br /><br />So to heck with it. I chose 14. Why? Well, for one thing, <em>it's my list</em>. But I also want to find images that are not only beautiful, but also tell a scientific story... as well as one that finds that spot in your brain that simply <em>pops</em> with wonder and awe.<br /><br />This year, I found so many with that quality to them! So why limit myself? Some of the ones I chose may at first seem simple, or inelegant, but I picked them because they're more than just a pretty shot. They're telling us something wonderful and fundamental about the Universe. Astronomy is one of the handful of sciences which can appeal to both our eyes and our brains... as you'll see here. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">10</span> <strong>14</strong> times over.<br /><br />Use the slider bar at the top to browse the images and get a brief description underneath, and click the big images themselves to go to a more thorough article. But whatever you do, make sure you click through to the higher-resolution versions of these images, because it's only there you'll get the full, incredible view they deserve.<br />Globular clusters are hundreds of thousands of stars packed into a tightly jammed ball, each orbiting the cluster center like a bee circling a hive. <br /><br /><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/27/a-distant-sparkling-eruption-of-diamonds/" target="_blank">NGC 6934</a> is one such globular, a single example of more than 150 that orbit our Milky Way Galaxy. It's 50,000 light years, such a great distance that its magnificence is greatly reduced, making it not much more than a fuzzy blob through most telescopes... unless you happen to have the Hubble Space Telescope at your command. Then this bustling city of stars becomes a dazzling jewel.<br /><br />This image is false color; what you see as blue is actually taken through a red filter, and what looks red is actually <em>infrared</em>. Astronomers sometimes do this with two-filter images, to help our eyes separate out the colors.<br /><br />In this case, it shows that most of the stars in the cluster are probably lower mass than the Sun, still fusing hydrogen into helium in their cores, but a few have aged to the point of becoming red giants, swelling up and cooling off. Such is the fate of our Sun in a few billion years... and studying distant globular clusters like NGC 6394 helps us understand how how our nearest star will someday die. I picked this image because it's a relatively unheard-of but beautiful cluster... and I love the way the stars look like jewels. <br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1023a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA, Hubble, NASA</em><br />The Cassini spacecraft has been orbiting Saturn since 2004, and has been featured frequently both on my blog and in these Top Ten lists. Its views of the ringed planet and moons has been nothing short of spectacular time and again.<br /><br />This shot reminds me why. The moons of Saturn orbit it almost all on the same plane, so Cassini sometimes sees them near each other in the sky. And if things play out just right, they even pass directly in front of each other.<br /><br />That's exactly <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/22/two-alien-worlds-superposed" target="_blank">what happened here</a>: icy Rhea, Saturn's second largest moon, is seen here superposed on the giant moon Titan. Despite catastrophic appearances, they were in no danger of collision: Titan was over a million kilometers from Rhea when Cassini snapped this shot. Note that Rhea is covered in craters big and small, while Titan's thick atmosphere blocks us from seeing its surface directly. Do you also see the ring of material apparently floating above Titan? That's a haze layer composed of hydrocarbons like methane, ethane, and even benzene. Titan's atmosphere is twice as thick as Earth's!<br /><br />Note also that Titan is three times larger than Rhea and is in fact comfortably bigger than the planet Mercury; it's truly one of the most aptly-named worlds in the solar system.<br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/photos/imagedetails/index.cfm?imageId=4136" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute </em>The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been circling the Moon since June 2008, taking incredibly high-resolution images of our neareast astronomical neighbor. It's photographed craters, ancient lava beds, mountains, and cliffs, but <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/05/24/lunar-boulder-hits-a-hole-in-one" target="_blank">this image</a> really stands out to me: it shows a house-sized boulder which rolled down a hill and landed inside a crater like a golf ball at a Putt-Putt course!<br /><br />The left side of the picture is a hill which goes downhill to the right. The landscape flattens out in the middle, and you can see bits of rubble and debris from landslides at the point where they meet. A billion years ago or more, something must have dislodged that gigantic rock, setting it rolling down the hill. Not being round, it bounced along in the Moon's 1/6th gravity, leaving ruts dug into the powdery surface. It slowed when it hit the flatter surface, and almost came to a stop just past that 60-meter (200 foot) crater. But it must have teetered backwards (see how that last rut goes past the rock?) and then slid down into the crater itself, where it finally came to a stop.<br /><br />It's easy to think that the Moon is mostly dead and unchanging, but when you look more closely - really, <em>really</em> closely - you'll see evidence of a dynamic world, with subtle beauty and fascinating structures. And we've only explored a tiny fraction of it. What else is there to see in the remaining 36 million square kilometers? <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://lroc.sese.asu.edu/news/index.php?/archives/227-Hole-in-One!.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University </em><br />Whenever a new type of instrument is used to examine the skies, surprises are guaranteed. And when the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) started scanning the heavens in 2010, it returned one amazing view after another. My favorite by far <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/11/17/warm-dusty-rings-glow-around-a-weird-binary-star/" target="_blank">is this one</a>, showing NGC 1514, a dying star shedding material.<br /><br />This image, in the far-infrared, is very different than optical shots of the nebula, which show it looking more like a disk. It's not certain just why this object has these two rings, but it's likely that dust ejected from the dying star is slamming into gas previously thrown off. That older gas is most likely in an hourglass shape, common in such objects. Perhaps the dust is hitting the inside of that hourglass figure, making the rings. Maybe it's a different reason entirely. We don't know! <br /><br />And that makes me happy. Mysteries are fun, and new telescopes are bound to add to them, while solving others. WISE was designed to do a survey, which means it looked at anything and everything in the sky. A lot of what it found will have to be followed up with bigger telescopes. But until we get another powerful far-infrared telescopes, some of these weird objects will just have to wait to reveal their secrets.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/WISE/multimedia/gallery/pia13346.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em> Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/UCLA</em>This isn't a microscopic photograph of a bacterial culture! It's actually of rolling, hummocky dunes near the north pole of Mars. Taken with the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter's powerful HIRISE camera, the normally grey basaltic sand of the dunes is covered with pinkish dust literally made of rust - iron oxide.<br /><br />What makes <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/11/another-dose-of-martian-awesome/" target="_blank">this image</a> so bizarre, though, are the dark, parallel tendril-like features scattered throughout. What the heck are <em>those?</em> One clue is that they always seem to stretch downhill, as if something is flowing. Another can be found in the tendrils located left of center and down a bit: there's a fuzzy pink oval emanating from one of them. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/files/2010/01/hirise_avalanche.jpg" target="_blank">Under magnification</a>, you can see it's a dust cloud... the debris raised up after an avalanche of sand on the Martian surface!<br /><br />Those tendrils are from the darker material under the pink sand. When dry ice under the surface warms up in the summer, it disturbs and dislodges the gray basaltic sand around it. This slides downhill, creating these weird, hair-like features. It's no surprise that some people mistook them for some form of life on the Red Planet! But I don't see the need to make up fantasy-based scenarios for pictures like this one, when we can see that Mars is fantastic enough.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://hirise.lpl.arizona.edu/PSP_007962_2635" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona</em>The Sun is a common target for astronomers both professional and amateur. It's so big and bright that you can really see a lot of detail, and every year a lot of pictures of it hit the 'net. You can get jaded from them all.<br /><br />Which is why <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/10/28/the-boiling-erupting-sun/" target="_blank">Alan Friedman's solar portrait</a> blew me away when I saw it. It's actually a composite of two pictures: the outer limb of the Sun combined with a seperate shot of the Sun's disk. Not only that, he inverted the shot of the disk, essentially taking the negative. It gives the Sun a fuzzy, eerie appearance, and startled me when I saw it. I've never seen the Sun displayed in quite this way, giving it a beauty and delicacy I wouldn't thought possible. It's truly the most amazing picture of the Sun I've seen this year. And don't miss Alan's <a href="http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/not_the_great_pumpkin2.html" target="_blank">close-up shots of the limb</a>, either!<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.avertedimagination.com/img_pages/not_the_great_pumpkin.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Alan Friedman, used with permission.</em><br />I've been doing this a long time, and I've seen it all: galaxies and planets, gas clouds and moons, stars being born and stars dying... but when I saw <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/09/06/awesome-death-spiral-of-a-bizarre-star/" target="_blank">this picture</a>, I knew there were yet surprises in the sky.<br /><br />When I saw this I literally gasped out loud; I had never seen any structure in space like it. And when I read what it was, my amazement did not decrease: it's the dusty wind of a dying star. <br /><br />The object, called AFGL 3068, is a binary star, two stars in an 800-year orbit around one another. One of them is a red giant, a star near the end of its life. It's blowing off massive amounts of dark dust, which is enveloping the pair and hiding them from view. But the system's spin is spraying the material out like a water sprinkler head, causing this giant and delicate spiral pattern on the sky. And by giant, I mean giant: the entire structure is about 3 <em>trillion</em> kilometers (about 2 trillion miles) across.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/potw1020a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA/NASA &amp; R. Sahai</em>For over two centuries asteroids were just points of light in telescopes (hence the term <em>asteroid</em>, which means "starlike"). Until recently, that is: we're a spacefaring race now, and we can send our robots to sniff out these giant rocks up close... and in July, the European Space Agency probe Rosetta flew past the asteroid Lutetia, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/07/13/rosetta-sends-back-gorgeous-asteroid-closeups/" target="_blank">returning amazing close-ups of the rock</a>. <br /><br />This picture, <a href="http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002579/" target="_blank">which I borrowed from my friend Emily Lakdawalla at the Planetary Society Blog</a> (I fiddled with the contrast and brightness a bit to bring out the darker side) was taken at closest approach. Lutetia is about 130 km (80 miles) across, and is the largest asteroid we've visited. You can see it's a lumpy, battered, rock, pitted with craters. The details are stunning: giant boulders held by the weak gravity dot the surface, parallel grooves mark stress fractures in the surface (or secondary deposits of material ejected from impacts?), and shadows highlight the contours. <br /><br />We're just beginning to understand the nature of asteroids - and given that every now and again one of them pays Earth a catastrophic visit (just ask the dinosaurs) - it's good idea that we learn as much about them as we can.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.esa.int/esaMI/Rosetta/SEM44DZOFBG_0.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: ESA 2010 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS/UPD/LAM/IAA/RSSD/INTA/UPM/DASP/IDA &amp; Emily Lakdawalla</em><br />Speaking of asteroid collisions, in January 2010 the automated skywatching telescope LINEAR spotted what looked like a comet orbiting the Sun in the inner asteroid belt, just beyond the orbit of Mars. It looked decidedly odd, so Hubble was pointed at it... and what it saw was so bizarre it caused a big stir in the astronomical community: the aftermath of a violent collision between two asteroids in space!<br /><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/02/hubble-captures-picture-of-asteroid-collision/" target="_blank"><br />The picture</a> is unprecendented: an X-shaped streak of light with a dramatic 50,000-kilometer-long tail sweeping away. Apparently, an asteroid roughly 150 meters or so across - which you can see as a point of light at the upper left tip of the X - was hit at high speed by a smaller rock only a few meters across. The smaller object was vaporized by the energy of collision, which would've had the same yield as an atomic explosion!<br /><br />The tail is from sand-grain to pebble-sized debris from the explosion moving away due to pressure of sunlight, which acts like a very gentle wind on the particles. The other line of the X is probably from a piece of rubble ejected off the main rock, leaving its own trail of debris behind. Judging from changes in the debris shape over time,<a href="denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:denied:timeline: http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/P2010A2_0.html" target="_blank"> the collision probably happened in February or March 2009</a>, but the asteroid was up during the day at that time and was unobservable. It took several months to discover it, and a few more to understand what this strange object was telling us. <br /><br />Collisions like this are estimated to happen roughly once per year in the asteroid belt, but the distance makes them very hard to observe. Hopefully, as more survey telescopes come online, we'll see more of these spectacular events. <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2010/07/image/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/">NASA</a>, <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/">ESA</a>, and D. Jewitt (UCLA)</em>One glance at this picture lets you know why M51 is commonly called The Whirlpool. At 23 million light years away, it's visible through binoculars (barely; I always have a hard time spotting it), so when you point something like Hubble at it you know <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/02/revisiting-the-whirlpool/" target="_blank">you'll be getting an incredible view</a>.<br /><br />This gorgeous shot is actually a composite of four different filtered images by Robert Gendler, an accomplished astrophotographer. The original release, done in 2005, was of course beautiful, but Robert took a stab at it and was able to make it even better. <br /><br />The Whirlpool is actually two galaxies interacting with one another. The spiral galaxy is nearly face-on, and you can easily trace the magnificent arms, laced with red gas clouds forming new stars, and dark lanes of dust created when stars are born and when they die. The other galaxy is the orange blobby one, a dwarf irregular. It may have already passed through the bigger galaxy twice, and will eventually merge with it. We think all big galaxies grow by consuming smaller ones in this manner. In a few hundred million more years there won't be two galaxies left to see, just one somewhat bigger one. Our own Milky Way Galaxy probably underwent a similar event many times!<br /><br /><strong>Get the high-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1577.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /> <em>Image Credit: NASA, Hubble Heritage Team, (STScI/AURA), ESA, S. Beckwith (STScI). Additional Processing: Robert Gendler</em>There are two pictures this year that made my list that aren't strictly astronomy, but I couldn't resist. The first is this one, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/20/the-green-fire-of-the-southern-lights/" target="_blank">the aurora australis</a> - the southern counterpart to the northern lights - as seen from above by astronauts on the International Space Station. <br /><br />Charged particles from the Sun stream along the Earth's magnetic field, guided to the north and south poles, where they crash into our atmosphere and generate light. The color of the light depends on the molecule or atom hit; in this case, the green glow is due to oxygen. <br /><br />Although the particles generating the light tend to be 80 - 160 km up (50 - 100 miles), the space station is even higher. This view is also well off to the side; the astronaut who took the picture was looking at the limb of the Earth, several thousand miles away. All in all the color, perspective, and the amazing glowing stream combine to make this a lovely and decidedly unearthly photograph from space.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/scripts/sseop/photo.pl?mission=ISS023&amp;roll=E&amp;frame=58455" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA/Expedition 23</em>Space near the Sun is mostly empty, devoid of gas and stars. But travel 7500 light years in the direction of the constellation Carina and you'll slam into one of the largest and most complex star-forming regions in the galaxy: the sprawling Carina nebula. Massive stars being born there blast out radiation and winds that sculpt the surrounding material, creating weird and wonderful shapes. <br /><br />So what better way for astronomers to celebrate the Hubble Space Telescope's 20th year in orbit than to use it to take <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/04/27/hubble-celebrates-20-years-in-space-with-a-jaw-dropper/" target="_blank">a huge mosaic of Carina</a>? This astonishing portrait shows the towering pillars of gas and dust being eaten away by cosmic erosion; the narrow, focused jets of material blasting away from stars eating away at their cocoons; ribbons and sheets of compressed gas lighting up space; and the nascent stars themselves as they turn on for the first time. <br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.spacetelescope.org/images/heic1007a/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br />
<p><em>Image credit: NASA, ESA, M. Livio and the Hubble 20th Anniversary Team (STScI)</em></p>
<br />This is the second of the two not-strictly astronomy pictures in this list, and is also taken from the International Space Station. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/02/13/twilight-of-the-shuttle/" target="_blank">It shows the Space Shuttle Orbiter <em>Endeavour</em></a> just minutes before docking with ISS. Both the ISS and Endeavour were orbiting the Earth at 8 km/sec (5 miles/sec), passing into the dark side of the Earth, essentially experiencing sunset - which they do 18 times a day!<br /><br />This image is beautiful, of course, showing the layered colors of sunset as seen from 350km (210 miles) above the Earth's surface. But this picture is also a metaphor for the Shuttle itself: this was the second-to-last mission of the <em>Endeavour</em>, and in fact the last misson for the Orbiter will be the last mission for the entire fleet: after that flight, the Space Shuttle program will be finished, the Orbiters retired, and an as-yet unnamed rocket system will take over. In the meantime, American astronauts will hitch rides on Russian rockets, as well as on the Falcon 9 rocket from the private company SpaceX, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/12/03/spacex-to-launch-dragon-capule-december-7/" target="_blank">which recently had a wonderfully successful test flight</a>. <br /><br />As for the Shuttle... the last launch of <em>Endeavour</em> is scheduled for April 2011, when it really will fly into the sunset for the last time.<br /><br /><strong>Get the higher-res version <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_1592.html" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: NASA</em>Choosing these images every year is tough, but this year there was one shot so outstanding that as soon as I saw it, I knew it would be Number One!<br /><br />This jaw-dropping picture - an insanely huge mosaic of 32 pictures taken by astrophotographer and amateur astronomer Rogelio Andreo - is Orion... <em>the whole constellation!</em> [<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/5258701469/sizes/o/" target="_blank">Here is a higher-res version</a> - 4000 x 2600 pixels! - hosted on Flickr, or <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2010/10/22/orion-from-Head-to-Toes.html" target="_blank">you can get it from his site itself</a>.] If you look carefully you'll spot the familiar stars: orange Betelgeuse in the upper left, blue-white Rigel on the lower right, and his famous three belt stars in the middle.<br /><br />If you have trouble seeing the pattern of stars, it's not surprising.  Rogelio used filters that show stars, but which also accentuate the vast amount of hydrogen gas in this part of the galaxy. The glowing nebulosity almost outshines the stars themselves!<br /><br />How about a short tour? There's a lot to see:<br /><br />At the top of the picture is the Lambda Orionis nebula, the huge red cloud straddling Orion's shoulders. The blue star roughly centered in it is Lambda Orionis itself, a massive, hot, young star that is so brilliant it's ionizing the entire nebula... which is dozens of light years across.<br /><br />Lower down, a vast red ring of gas starts just above Orion's belt and swings down to just above his knees. That's Barnard's Loop, a spherical bubble of gas formed as one massive star after another exploded deep in the heart of Orion, each sending out octillions of tons of gas at speeds of thousands of kilometers per second! This material screamed outwards, slamming into and sweeping up the ambient gas in the region. This eventually snowplowed all that material into the bubble, which is heated today and glowing due to the still-thriving massive stars inside it. The Loop is about 300 light years in diameter - 3 <em>quadrillion</em> kilometers (2 quadrillion miles)!<br /><br />In the center of the loop is perhaps the most famous gas cloud in the sky: <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2009/09/19/orions-Deep-Field--Belt-and-sword.html" target="_blank">the great Orion Nebula</a>. It's 1500 light years away, yet easily visible to the naked eye; the Sun would be an invisible dot at that distance! But the nebula is churning out young stars which light up the gas, making this one of the brightest examples of stellar nurseries in our galaxy. If there are aliens in other galaxies looking our way, the Orion Nebula would be easily visible as a Milky Way landmark.<br /><br />Above the great nebula and to the left a bit, hanging down from the leftmost star (Alnitak) is a straight line of gas, excited by the star. Superposed on that is a dense, dark globule of dust and molecules in <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2008/12/27/horsehead-Nebula-Ic-434.html" target="_blank">the uncanny shape of a horse's head</a>, as if the galaxy is playing a cosmic game of chess. <br /><br />And finally, I must note the long, bluish nebulosity just to the right of Rigel at the bottom of the picture. When flipped upside-down, it becomes obvious why this is called the <a href="http://blog.deepskycolors.com/archive/2009/11/16/witch-Head-Nebula-and-Rigel.html" target="_blank">Witch Head Nebula</a>! The resemblance to a witch is pretty amazing. Funny, too: when seen sideways it looks like a running ghost, and you'll see it sometimes called that as well. The perfect nebula for Halloween.<br /><br />Any one of these pieces of Orion are shot so beautifully by Rogelio that they would deserve to be in this list, but all together... <strong>WOW</strong>. I mean, <em>seriously</em>. I've seen Orion a bazillion times; it's up in the south after sunset all winter long, and has so many wonderful objects in it that every amateur astronomer makes it a familiar destination for the telescope. I can't tell you how many times I've observed various nebulae in it, scanned it with binoculars, or just gazed at it with my own two eyes, soaking in its pattern and colors. <br /><br />But I have never, <em>ever</em>, seen it like this. This picture has beauty, clarity, depth, sharpness, and most importantly sheer stunning <em>breadth</em> that makes it truly one of the most amazing astrophotographs I have ever seen. It's also a first: this is the first time I've picked an image by an amateur astronomer (as opposed to one from a professional observatory or spacecraft) for the number one slot. This photograph earned it.<br /><br />Congratulations to Rogelio for this incredible work of art, my Number One pick for the best Astronomy Picture of 2010. <br /><br /><strong>Get the stunning super-high-res version <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/badastronomy/5258701469/sizes/o/" target="_blank">here</a>.</strong><br /><br /><em>Image credit: Rogelio Andreo, used by permission</em><br />


Share

December 14th, 2010 7:01 AM Tags: asteroid, aurorae, Cassini, comet, globular cluster, Hubble Space Telescope, ISS, LRO, Lutetia, Mars, Moon, mro, Orion, planetary nebulae, Rhea, Rogelio Andreo, Rosetta, Saturn, Space Shuttle, Space Shuttle Endeavour, Sun, Titan, WISE
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Pretty pictures, Science, Space, Top Post | 113 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Gettin’ high on the Moon

I live less than an hour from some spectacular Rocky Mountain peaks. The view from up there is always magnificent, and when we hike we’re always curious about just how high we are. 11,500 feet? 12,000? That knowledge isn’t necessarily useful, but it’s fun.

Hiking in the Moon is a different matter. How would you know how high up you are? Well, if you had the elevation data made by the the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter you’d be all set, because then you’d know that if you were at a latitude of 5.4125° and longitude of 201.3665°, you’d be on the highest spot on the Moon!

LRO_moon_highestpoint

[Click to enelevate.]

See that red arrow? That's the spot. If you stood there, you'd be 10,786 meters (35,387 feet, about 6.7 miles) above the average lunar elevation*.

Funny, too: as soon as I saw that, my first thought — after wondering just how high up it was — was how steep the slope is there. Turns out the LRO folks wondered too, and found that a hike up to that point wouldn’t be very taxing, since the slope is about 3°. That’s a 5 meter rise for every 100 meters hiked. I do some hiking here in the Rocky Mountains, and that slope wouldn’t be too tough. On the Moon, with 1/6th gravity, it would be a snap.

Of course, the air is a bit thinner there.

According to the LRO page, this region of the Moon has such a high elevation probably due to the monster impact that formed the 2500-km-wide Aitken Basin at the Moon’s south pole. The debris piled up all over the place, and near this position would’ve been tremendous. Imagine! Several billion years ago, an asteroid perhaps 200 km (120 miles) across [200 kilometers across aiiieee!!!] plows into the Moon at a speed 30 times faster than a rifle bullet. A huge hole is excavated, and all that debris has to go somewhere. Even on the lunar equator, 2700 km (1600 miles) away, ejecta material falling piles up to depths of 10,000 meters! Incredible!

Still and all, I was trying to think of some sort of scientific use of knowing where this particular point on the Moon is. I’ll be honest: I’m not sure there is one. I mean, sure, having elevation maps is interesting and useful, and knowing where places have higher elevation can lead to insight into formation mechanisms and all that.

But knowing where the actual highest point is?

Well, maybe there isn’t scientific usefulness for it. But you know what? It’s cool. And sometimes that’s enough.

Image credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University




* There’s no water flowing on the Moon, so sea level isn’t a useful standard. Instead, the lunar geoid is used; a sort-of average shape of the Moon using its gravity as a reference (go here and scroll down to #4). Getting this shape is really hard, and I imagine the laser altimeter on LRO will be used to refine the surface maps.

Share

November 3rd, 2010 7:03 AM Tags: LRO, Moon
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures | 41 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

NASA shoots the Moon

Clearly defeated in their attempt to destroy the galaxy with a laser, NASA sets its sights somewhat closer and tries to destroy the Moon:

Moon_laser

Cooooool. Actually, while that is a laser, it’s a bit too low power to do any damage to our friendly Moon. But it does have enough to help NASA track satellites! It’s part of the Goddard Space Flight Center’s Laser Ranging Facility in Maryland. We know the speed of light very accurately, so if you ping a satellite with a laser beam you can time the pulses and very accurately determine the satellite’s position.

In this case, two beams were being used to track the position of NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, one of my favorite space missions of all time (to see why, check out this gallery of images I posted recently).

I used to work at Goddard, and I remember going to this facility once because it was a dark site from which I could try to spot a comet that happened to be passing us at the time. The laser was being used, and it was positively awe-inspiring and quite surreal to see it streaking up into the sky. And yes, they have to keep a careful eye out for airplanes and such flying past. While that beam isn’t enough to melt a satellite, it’s certainly enough to fry a pilot’s eyes!

Which is why you don’t want sharks equipped with these things. Really, that’s just asking for trouble.

Image credit: NASA

Share

September 29th, 2010 11:30 AM Tags: laser, LRO
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Pretty pictures | 32 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

« Older Entries
Newer Entries »




    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Dragon is approaching the space station
      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS
      • Obi Wan better watch his back
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station
      • Mars craters are sublime
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff



       Twitter



      Follow Me on Pinterest



       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Update: the Dragon capsule as seen by the ISS | Bad Astronomy
      • SpaceX Dragon capsule buzzed the space station | Bad Astronomy
      • Mars craters are sublime | Bad Astronomy
      • OK, one more eclipse shot | Bad Astronomy
      • Saturn, surreally | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • In The Beginning Was the Mudskipper?
      • A Flu Shot For Life
      • The Vital Chain: Why Manta Rays Need Forests
      • Tapeworms in the brain: Fearfully common
      • Lost voyages to the North Pole and more: Catching up with Download the Universe


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us