DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy

Posts Tagged ‘New Horizons’

Give Pluto your stamp of approval

In 2015, NASA’s New Horizons spacecraft will zip past Pluto, giving us our first close-up view of this tiny world.

The team behind the space probe have a nice idea to help raise awareness of it: make a new US Post Office stamp commemorating it. My friend Dan Durda, both an accomplished astronomer and artist, created this lovely design of the stamp:

[Click to enhadesenate. Note: the word "Forever" means the stamp is always good for first class postage, and is crossed out here to prevent forgery.]

It shows the spacecraft going by Pluto and its (relatively) freakishly large moon Charon. I like how he didn’t go for photorealism, but instead used an oil paint-like feel for it. The stamp is meant as a followup — I might even say send-up — of a US stamp issued in 1990 about Pluto that has the label "Not Yet Explored".

I like this stamp! I’d love to see it made official, too. Alan Stern, the head guy for the mission, created a petition to help that along. It takes more than just a nice stamp design to get the PO’s notice; it has to have public support as well. I signed the petition, and if you want to, please do.

I’ll note that I expect this to raise the specter of whether Pluto is a planet or not. I have some thoughts on that, and I’ll be posting again soon on that topic.


Related posts:

- Pluto has another moon!
- Find cold, distant worlds with Ice Hunters
- Pluto still may be the biggest dwarf planet
- Percy, Percy, me

Share

February 1st, 2012 11:00 AM Tags: Alan Stern, Dan Durda, New Horizons, Pluto, stamp, US Post Office
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff | 43 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Pluto has another moon!

This is pretty nifty: astronomers have discovered a fourth moon orbiting Pluto!

The tiny chunk of ice was found in Hubble images taken just a few weeks ago, and was clearly seen among the three previously known satellites:

It doesn’t have a name yet — it’s designated S/2011 P1 (or just P4 informally) — and it’s only about 13 – 34 km (8 to 21 miles) across. The size is estimated by measuring its brightness and assuming it’s icy like Pluto itself — a more reflective (white or icy) object would appear brighter than a darker object if they are the same size. Since its actual reflectivity isn’t known, the size has a wide range. But it’s still pretty dinky. For comparison, Pluto itself is 2300 km across, and its biggest moon Charon is well over 1000 km in size. I’ll note our own Moon is 3470 km across, so even Pluto is pretty small.

The thing is, in that single image above you can’t be sure if the object is a moon or a coincidentally placed background star. The solution: take a second image! That was done, clinching the moon’s identity:

See how it’s moved? Mind you, in the week or so between these two images Pluto moved substantially compared to background stars, and the moon moved along with it around the Sun at the same time it’s going around Pluto. You can see the motion of the other moons as well.

In the image, the diagonal lines are an optical effect inside the telescope itself. Pluto is very bright, so the astronomers used some processing techniques to make it appear much fainter, taking multiple images and subtracting one from the other to remove the glare of Pluto (it doesn’t work perfectly, which is why there is a black strip across the image; that blocks unwanted noisy light). I did this myself on many images when I worked on Hubble. It’s amazing how well it works, as you can see in the image above.

Mind you, Pluto was 5 billion km (3 billion miles) from Earth when this image was taken! But we’ll soon get much better pictures: the New Horizons probe will fly past the tiny world in 2015, snapping away as it does. We’ll probably learn more about Pluto in a few hours than we have since its discovery in 1930.

I wonder what they’ll name this iceball? The two moons Nix and Hydra (discovered in 2005) were named after Roman mythological characters associated with night time and Pluto. Cerberus seems like an obvious choice, but there’s already an asteroid with that name. Maybe they can change the spelling a bit to Kerberus to get around that. There’s already an asteroid named Persephone, too, if you’re curious. We’re running out of good names!

Well, whatever it’ll be called, it’s there, and we’ll see it up close in personal in just a few more years.

Credit: NASA, ESA, and M. Showalter (SETI institute)


Related posts:

- Ten Things You Don’t Know About Pluto
- The Unbearable Roundness of Being (about the definition of "planet")
- Pluto may still be the biggest dwarf planet
- Pluto wanders into a Messier situation

Share

July 20th, 2011 8:57 AM Tags: Hubble Space Telescope, New Horizons, Pluto
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science, Top Post | 119 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Find cold, distant worlds with Ice Hunters

In July 2015, the New Horizons probe will fly past Pluto, snapping pictures and taking data of this icy world. Whether you think Pluto is a planet or not* it’s still a fascinating object and I can’t wait to see what New Horizons sends back.

But what happens after that? The space probe will still be traveling into deep space at high speed… but space out there isn’t empty. Beyond Pluto lie the solar system’s coldest denizens, the Kuiper Belt Objects. These are lumps of ice, frozen chunks that may take millennia to circle the Sun once. We’ve identified over a thousand of these KBOs, and there are tens of thousands more waiting to be discovered. Scientists with the New Horizons mission are hoping to find one near enough to the probe’s path to plan a flyby, so we can finally see one of these things up close.

And that’s where you come in!

A new website, Ice Hunters, has been put together to help you find potential KBOs for New Horizons to visit. It’s part of the Zooniverse; a citizen science project that gets people involved in real astronomy. In this case, you can examine images from the giant Magellan and Subaru telescopes to look for targets. It’s actually not terribly hard; here’s one image I looked at:

Basically, KBOs move over time, so two images are taken some time apart. One is digitally subtracted from the other, so stars tend to go away (though they don’t erase perfectly, leaving those ugly residuals). Any whitish blobs left are things that have changed between the two images: variable stars, asteroids, cosmic rays, and, hopefully, KBOs. When you find something you simply tag it by clicking it. A circle is placed around it, and the location is logged. You can see the object I found in the image above.

Humans are pretty good at this, while computers are easily confused by the messy residuals. But just to make sure every click is saved and compared to the work of other people. The more an object is clicked, the more likely it is to be something real and worth following up. The website explains how all this works.

That’s all there is to it! You have to register to do this (unless you’re already a Zooniverse member); it’s free and easy. And who knows? You may literally be the person who finds an icy world that will get a visit from New Horizons!

New Horizons image credit: Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute (JHUAPL/SwRI)


*My opinion: defining the word "planet" is a bad bet if not impossible. If you want the longer story, check out this article I wrote for Discover Magazine.


Related posts:

- Hubble spots a chunk of ice 6.7 billion km away
- YOU can find extrasolar planets
- Voorwerp!

Share

June 21st, 2011 12:42 PM Tags: Ice Hunters, KBOs, Kuiper Belt Objects, New Horizons, Pluto, Zooniverse
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, NASA, Space | 30 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

The best planet pictures in the solar system

To celebrate <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">the Hive Overmind's</span> Discover Magazine's new picture gallery software, I've collected my favorite pictures of all the planets in our solar system and put them together here for your viewing awesomeness. I've also thrown in the Sun and Moon, as well as one bonus surprise at the end. Each picture has a brief description, a link to the original higher-res version, and also a link to a blog post I've written with more information.
<p>My picture choices may surprise you. I didn't just pick them for their beauty, but also for the story they tell, what happened behind the scenes, and simply because they're cool. I hope you agree. Whether you do or don't, leave a comment and link to <em>your</em> faves!</p>
<p><em>Solar system picture credit: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Planets2008.jpg" target="_blank">Wikipedia/NASA</a></em></p>There are literally millions of pictures of our nearest star, ranging  from images of it as a plain, spotless disk to incredible close-ups of  the roiling, churning surface and explosive flares. But there's  something about this image that really grabs you! <br /><br />Look to the upper right: see those shadows? Those aren't sunspots: they're the International Space Station and Space Shuttle <em>Atlantis</em> silhouetted  in front of the Sun! This image was taken by the incredible "amateur" astronomer Thierry Legault in May 2010. Because the Sun is so bright, the  exposure time is very short, freezing out the usual atmospheric  blurring. That makes the picture extremely crisp and details easy to  spot -- see for yourself in <a href="http://www.axilone.com/legault/iss_atlantis_2010.jpg" target="_blank">the super-high-res version</a>. And don't be  fooled by the apparent motionlesness of the duo: screaming above the  surface of the Earth at 8 km/sec (5 miles/sec), they transit the Sun's  face in less than a second! It took a lot of planning and good timing to  pull off this amazing picture.  <br /> <br /> Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/05/18/iss-shuttle-transit-the-sun/" target="_blank">ISS Shuttle transit the Sun</a> <br /> <br /> <em>Credit: Thierry Legault</em>Even through the best telescopes on Earth, the closest planet to the Sun is a bit blurry. Because it never strays far from our central star, Mercury is always low to the horizon at twilight and difficult to observe. That's why NASA sent <a href="http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/gallery/sciencePhotos/">the MESSENGER probe</a> to the smallest planet: to get close-up images and take all sorts of data which will help us understand this hot, dense world.   <br /><br />MESSENGER is doing a series of gravitational loop-de-loops to get to Mercury, and has passed the planet three times already. In October 2008, during its second flyby, it took this astonishing picture. It shows two prominent fresh craters on the airless planet, but also a series of vast, world-spanning rays: plumes of material ejected from an impact. Their existence had been inferred from earlier observations, but this was the first time they had been directly seen. We'll learn a whole lot more about Mercury when MESSENGER finally settles into orbit in March 2011.  <br /><br />Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/10/07/watermelon-planet/" target="_blank">Watermelon Planet</a> <br /><br /><em>Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory/Carnegie Institution of Washington</em>In 2004, <a href="http://www.badastronomy.com/fun/travelogs/venustransit2004.html" target="_blank">I was able to witness</a> an almost literally once-in-a-lifetime event: the Transit of Venus across the Sun. Because of the odd geometry of our sister planet's orbit, it crosses the Sun's face in pairs: one transit following the other after a period of about 8 years, but then no other for over a century. The last pair was in 1874 and 1882. We're in the middle of a pair right now; the last was in 2004, and the next in 2012. <br /><br />While I watched the 2004 transit myself with my own eyes, NASA's solar-observing <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_184.html" target="_blank">TRACE satellite</a> saw it as well. Pictured above, you can see the transit in visible light (top) -- scattering of sunlight by the thick atmosphere of Venus makes it look like a complete ring -- ultraviolet (bottom left) and the far UV (bottom right). Astronomers were able to learn about Venus's air during this event. Also, planets around other stars have been detected when they transit their stars, so observations like this in our own solar system give us insight into the physics of these events.  <br /><br /><em>Credit: NASA/LMSAL</em>There's nothing like a home picture, is there? <a href="http://www.esa.int/images/osiris_color_2009-11-12T12.28UTC_rot_north.png" target="_blank">This remarkable shot</a> was taken by the European Space Agency's probe <a href="http://www.esa.int/SPECIALS/Rosetta/index.html" target="_blank">Rosetta</a>, which will rendezvous with a comet in 2014. It needed a little gravitational assist to get there, so it swung by the Earth three times (and Mars once). When it was still over 600,000 km (360,000 miles) from Earth on the third pass in November 2009, it snapped this incredible picture of our home planet. It was still approaching at the time, coming in from an angle that made the Earth appear to be a thin crescent.
<p>At closest approach, Rosetta skimmed the Earth at a distance of just <em>6000 km</em> (3600 miles) above the surface! Close enough to feel the breeze from it... if it weren't for that whole "vacuum of space" stuff. As it was, the spacecraft accelerated by about 13 km/sec (8 miles/sec), enough to boost it on its way to meet up with a comet. When it arrives, it will deploy a lander that will touch down on the surface of the comet and study it up close and personal, giving us our best view yet of these objects.</p>
<p>Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/11/12/rosetta-takes-some-home-pictures/" target="_blank">Rosetta Takes some home pictures</a></p>
<p><em>Credit: ESA © 2005 MPS for OSIRIS Team MPS / UPD / LAM / IAA / RSSD / INTA / UPM / DASP / IDA</em></p>I know, the Moon's not a planet, but it's big and close and cool, and I <em>love</em> <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/Mini-RF/multimedia/erlanger_crater.html" target="_blank">this picture</a>. It shows the rim of the crater Erlanger, located almost at the Moon's north pole at a latitude of 87°. From that location the Sun is perpetually on the horizon, so the crater floor is never illuminated. The rim, however, sticks out above the rest of the surface, and can be lit up by the low Sun.
<p>The crater is about 10 km (6 miles) across, and is a candidate location for ice frozen under the surface. Scientists have recently discovered that the Moon has quite a bit of water ice trapped under the surface dust, and places like Erlanger -- which never see the warming rays of the Sun, even after billions of years -- may have huge reservoirs of water eternally frozen at their bottoms. This would make Erlanger a good place to have a lunar base: water is abundant, and solar cells along the rim would deliver power 24 hours a day -- sorry, I mean <em>655</em> hours a <em>lunar</em> day.</p>
<p>Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/08/27/lunar-boreal-halo/" target="_blank">Lunar Boreal Halo</a></p>
<p><em> Credit: NASA/GSFC/Arizona State University</em></p>Mars is smaller and colder than Earth, but it has an atmosphere. It's thin, about 1% of Earth's, but it's there. There's enough air -- mostly carbon dioxide -- to have a Martian version of weather and wind. When warm air rises off of the sunlight-heated ground there, it can punch through the cold layer and create dust devils, mini-tornadoes (the same thing happens on Earth, too).
<p>Unlike Earth, Mars is covered in sand and dust. The sand is made up of dark gray basalt, and is heavier than the much finer-grained red dust which covers it. So when a dust devil sweeps over the ground on Mars, it lifts up the red dust and blows it away, revealing the gray sand underneath. And when dozens of them do it in one region, you get <a href="http://www.uahirise.org/ESP_014426_2070" target="_blank">this incredibly beautiful Martian calligraphy</a>.</p>
<p>Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/10/15/martian-swirly/" target="_blank">Martian Swirly</a></p>
<p><em>Credit: NASA/JPL/University of Arizona</em></p>In 1997, NASA launched the Cassini spacecraft on its way to Saturn. To get there (like MESSENGER and Rosetta in the Mercury and Earth pictures in this gallery) it needed a little help. So in 2001 Cassini passed by Jupiter, stealing a little bit of Jupiter's energy and boosting itself to a higher speed. It didn't get all that close to the big planet -- 10 million kilometers (6 million miles), or 25 times the distance of the Moon from the Earth -- but its powerful cameras were able to take <a href="http://s3.amazonaws.com/ciclops_ir_2004/79_50_1.jpg" target="_blank">this stunning half-Jupiter shot</a>.
<p>This is actually a mosaic of 27 images! It took a 3x3 picture grid of the planet, then repeated it twice to get it through red, green, and blue filters. That way, astronomers back home could stitch them together to make this beautiful and moody true-color picture of the solar system's biggest planet. The detail on the original are incredible; you can see hundreds of small storms raging across the planet, as well as subtle colors and other features. Remember: Jupiter is 86,000 miles across, <strong>11 times</strong> the diameter of Earth! Keep that in mind when you see something in this picture that looks "small".</p>
<p>Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/01/25/cassini-ten-years-since-jupiter/" target="_blank">Cassini: ten years since Jupiter</a></p>
<p><em> Credit: NASA/JPL/SSI</em></p>By now you've probably figured out that I'm partial to crescent and gibbous (that is, more than half full) planet pictures. That's because from Earth, the only two planets we see as crescents are Mercury and Venus; the outer planets are always "full" because of the geometry of the way they're lit from our viewpoint. So there's something particularly compelling about a partially lit planet...
<p>And that's why I love <a href="http://ciclops.org/view/5773/The_Rite_of_Spring" target="_blank">this Saturn shot</a> from Cassini. Taken from high above the plane of the rings, Saturn is a little more than half full. The rings appear darker than usual, and that's because on the day before this picture was taken, Saturn experienced its spring equinox. That means the rings were pointed edge-onto the Sun. Instead of the sunlight falling <em>on</em> the rings, illuminating them, it was hitting the edge. So the rings appear dark, and with Saturn half-lit the way it is, this picture is more brooding than most cheery, well-lit pictures of the ringed planet. Sure, <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/27/the-top-ten-astronomy-images-of-2006/">the famous shot</a> of the back-lit planet with the Earth peeking between the rings is more famous, but this one has a depth and a color to it that really appeals to me.</p>
<p>Related posts:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/09/21/behold-saturn/" target="_blank">Behold Saturn!</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/12/23/top-10-astronomy-pictures-of-2007-runners-up/" target="_blank">Top 10 Astronomy Pictures of 2007: runners up</a></p>
<p><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/30-happy-birthday-cassini-thanks-for-the-killer-images" target="_blank">Happy Birthday Cassini - and thanks for the great images!</a></p>
<p><em> Credit: NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute</em></p>Uranus is a pretty interesting place. At a distance of three billion km (2 billion miles) form the Sun, it's actually visible to the naked eye under excellent conditions. But even so, we've only really begun learning about it relatively recently. Its rings were discovered in 1977, and directly seen for the first time in 1986, by the Voyager 2 probe.
<p><a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/1997/36" target="_blank">The image above</a> is from Hubble Space Telescope's NICMOS camera, which can see infrared light. It shows the planet, of course, and its rings, but also 10 of the giant planet's moons, as well as an incredible band of storms raging across the cloud tops. The colors of the clouds indicate depth: blue comes from deeper clouds (methane in the atmosphere absorbs red light-- the same reason deep water looks blue), yellow and gray from high clouds and haze, and the orange and reds from extremely high clouds. Also note the angle of the planet: it orbits the Sun tilted over "on its side", so even from Earth we can trace the rings circling all the way around the planet.</p>
<p>Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/08/23/yes-yes-rings-around-uranus-haha/" target="_blank">Yes, yes: rings around Uranus, haha</a></p>
<p><em>Credit: Erich Karkoschka (University of Arizona) and NASA </em></p>Voyager 2 passed Neptune in the late 1980s and returned awesome pictures. While the one I decided to post here may not grab you as instantly as those would have, I wanted to use it because I think it's really cool. It was taken by the New Horizons probe, a relatively small but ambitious mission that is sending the probe flying past Pluto in 2015.
<p>Pluto crosses Neptune's orbit, but due to the timings of their motion they never get very close; Pluto is in no danger of crashing into Neptune. So <a href="http://pluto.jhuapl.edu/news_center/news/031209.php" target="_blank">this picture</a> taken by New Horizons is from a long way off: 4 <em>billion</em> kilometers, in fact! Neptune actually gets closer than this to Earth sometimes... which may give you an idea of just how far away this spacecraft is. The shot shows Neptune (overexposed in the middle) as well as its frozen moon Triton. Pluto and Triton have quite a bit in common -- they're about the same size, temperature, and have the same atmospheric composition -- so this was a good practice shot for the mission. It also gives me a lot of confidence that when it does pass by Pluto, we'll get some amazing pictures.</p>
<p>Related post: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/13/why-king-triton-how-nice-to-see-you/" target="_blank">Why King Triton, how nice to see you</a></p>
<p><em>Credit: NASA/Johns Hopkins University  Applied Physics  Laboratory/Southwest Research Institute</em></p>I know, I know. Pluto's not a planet, blah blah blah. Well, a lot of people still hold Pluto dear in their hearts so that's a good reason to include it. And if you prefer, then think of this entry as being an example of a big <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/13/is-there-another-planet-in-the-solar-system/" target="_blank">Kuiper Belt object.</a>
<p>Either way, <a href="http://www.coelum.com/index.php?goto=news&amp;nva=2008&amp;nvm=10&amp;id=521" target="_blank">the image here</a> was an awesome achievement: amateur astronomers on Earth were able to take pictures of Pluto that actually show its moon Charon! Given that the moon wasn't discovered until 1978, by a professional astronomer using a big telescope, getting this shot really was an incredible accomplishment. Amazingly, the telescope used for this image was a 35 cm (14"), far smaller than the one used to discover Charon, and in fact this image is far superior! We've come a long, long way in the past 30 years.</p>
<p>Related posts: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/10/28/amateur-astronomers-capture-jupiter-charon/" target="_blank">Amateur astronomers capture Jupiter, Charon</a> and <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/13/ten-things-you-dont-know-about-pluto/?pid=33" target="_blank">Ten Things You Don't Know About Pluto</a></p>
<em>Charon image credit: <a href="http://www.coelum.com" target="_blank">Coelum Astronomia</a>, <a href="http://www.danielegasparri.com" target="_blank">Daniele Gasparri</a>, and <a href="http://www.astroimaging.it" target="_blank">Antonello Medugno</a></em>I can't help it, I have to throw in one more.
<p>When I was a kid, there were 9 planets. We really didn't know if other stars had planets circling them or not. Today, we now know of <em>hundreds</em> of these exoplanets, detected using various means. But it wasn't until 2008 that we finally clutched the Holy Grail: a bona fide, 100% confirmed direct image of one of these planets.</p>
<p><a href="http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2008/39/image/a/" target="_blank">The image above</a> is from the Hubble Space Telescope. It was observing the bright star Fomalhaut, which you actually can't see in the image because its light was blocked purposely so that fainter material around it could be seen (just like when you look for an airplane near the Sun and block the sunlight with your hand). The ring is a vast torus of dust leftover from the formation of the system, and we knew from its shape there might be a planet near it. And sure enough, an image from 2006 was compared to one taken in 2004, and a moving dot was found: the planet Fomalhaut b. It orbits the star at a distance of 16 billion km (10 billion miles), much farther out than Neptune is from the Sun. That's why we could see it at all; had it been much closer it would be lost in the glare of the star, a billion times brighter.</p>
<p>I love this picture (as well as another released at the same time of more planets orbiting a different star): it is solid evidence that we are learning more about our Universe everyday, and that questions we have had for centuries, for millennia, are answerable if we put our considerably clever minds to them.</p>
<p><strong>Ad astra!</strong></p>
<p>Related posts: <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/11/13/huge-exoplanet-news-items-pictures/" target="_blank">Huge exoplanet new items: pictures!</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2010/06/30/another-direct-picture-of-a-planet-orbiting-an-alien-star-confirmed/" target="_blank">Another direct picture of a  planet orbiting an alien star confirmed!</a></p>
<a title="Permanent Link to Another direct picture of a  planet orbiting an alien star confirmed!" href="../../badastronomy/2010/06/30/another-direct-picture-of-a-planet-orbiting-an-alien-star-confirmed/"></a>
<p><em>Credit: NASA, ESA, P. Kalas, J. Graham, E. Chiang, E. Kite (University of California, Berkeley), M. Clampin (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center), M. Fitzgerald (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory), and K. Stapelfeldt and J. Krist (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory)</em></p>
Share

July 1st, 2010 7:00 AM Tags: Cassini, Hubble Space Telescope, LRO, MESSENGER, Moon, mro, New Horizons, planets, Sun
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Pretty pictures | 42 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

New Horizons is a long way away

I follow the New Horizons Pluto probe Twitter feed, and recently it linked to a graphic showing where the spacecraft is right now:

nh_position_jan2010

Man, is that way out in the black. The probe is now closer to the orbit of Uranus than it is to Saturn, though both planets are over a billion kilometers away from New Horizons right now.

The solar system is frakkin’ BIG (if I may mix my colorful scifi metaphors). If you’re still not sure just how roomy things are out there, even at its current speed of 16.5 km/sec (10 miles/sec) — fast enough to cross the entire United States in five minutes — New Horizons won’t pass the orbit of Uranus until March 18, 2011, more than a year from now. Neptune’s orbit isn’t until August 24, 2014.

One thing to notice: from this point of view, planets revolve around the Sun in a counterclockwise fashion. Given the position of Pluto, you can see the two are heading for a close encounter soon. Well, for a sufficiently broad definition of "soon": July 14, 2015.

Space is big.

Share

January 14th, 2010 7:52 AM Tags: Neptune, New Horizons, Pluto, Uranus
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Space | 54 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Halfway to Pluto!

eso_pluto_surface_300Today, December 29, 2009, the New Horizons Pluto probe crosses an arbitrary but psychologically important line: it is now closer to Pluto than it is to Earth.

If there were people on board the small interplanetary probe, no doubt they’d be popping champagne. I’m sure that back on Earth, the team behind NH are pretty happy. This probe has a checkered history, having been planned, canceled, re-planned, delayed, on and on. It’s amazing it got to launch at all. But on January 19, 2006 the small, half-ton probe was sent on its way, and on July 14, 2015 it’ll sail past Pluto and its collection of moons, snapping pictures and taking data.

Today marks the official halfway point, where New Horizons has half its path already behind it. Here’s a plot of its distance to Earth (in blue) and Pluto (red) care of the New Horizons site:

newhorizons_distance

Distance in the graph is measured in Astronomical Units (a yardstick used by astronomers for convenience; it’s the distance of the Earth to the Sun, about 150 million km (93 million miles)). The distance to Earth is wiggly because the Earth goes around the Sun as New Horizons moves out, and the distance to Pluto decreases steadily as the spacecraft catches up on its journey. Where the two lines cross is where the distances are equal, and that’s now, today!

You may be wondering about the timing: New Horizons is halfway in distance to Pluto, but the mission timeline halfway point isn’t until October 16, 2010 (if I’ve done the math correctly). The probe was launched at high speed, slowed down due to the Earth’s and Sun’s gravity, picked up a kick from Jupiter in early 2007, and has been slowing ever since. Since it was moving faster before, it reached the distance halfway point before the schedule halfway point.

New Horizons is now 16.37 AU – 2.449 billion km, or 1.522 billion miles — from home. But maybe now, home is no longer Earth. Once it crossed that line today, home became deep space. Even Pluto and its moons Charon, Nix, and Hydra are only milestones for it. It won’t be stopping when it gets there; New Horizons will sail on by, continuing into deep space. It’ll become one of several other spacecraft we’ve sent out of the solar system itself, set to wander interstellar space forever.

That is, unless one day we catch up to them ourselves. I imagine in a few hundred years they’d make fine museum pieces. Or maybe, if poetry still exists in humans all those far-flung centuries from now, we’ll let those probes continue on. I rather like that idea better.

You can follow the New Horizons probe on Twitter, which is how I found out about this milestone today.

Art credit: ESO/L. Calçada

Share

December 29th, 2009 10:33 AM Tags: New Horizons, Pluto
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Space | 56 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >

Scale the solar system

Speaking of web pages showing scale (OK, it was almost two weeks ago, but still cool), BABloggee Mike Sperry reminded me of this site which shows the solar system to scale… all on one web page! The Sun is displayed when you go to the page, and you can scroll to the right to see the planets, drawn in scale both in size and distance.

The Sun is about 560 pixels wide, putting Pluto something like 2 million pixels to the right. And some people wonder why it’ll take the New Horizons mission 9 years to get to Pluto…

Share

November 24th, 2009 12:28 PM Tags: New Horizons, Pluto, scale, solar system
by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff | 56 Comments » | RSS feed | Trackback >





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us