Comments on: Volt: Jesus, Finally

By: Jack

Jack — Sat, 08 Nov 2008 02:42:52 +0000

cheap electric motor

I saw something about that on TV last night.

By: ev batteries

ev batteries — Fri, 07 Nov 2008 10:01:54 +0000

ev batteries

The TrackBack specification was created by Six Apart, who first implemented it in their Movable Type blogging software in August

By: how to make a mind film

how to make a mind film — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 21:57:00 +0000

how to make a mind film

You might want to come over and check us out at www.mindmovies.eu!

By: lead acid batteries

lead acid batteries — Thu, 06 Nov 2008 04:20:32 +0000

lead acid batteries

Good post. I am looking into these issues on my blog.

By: Eric

Eric — Tue, 04 Nov 2008 10:15:28 +0000

cheap electric motor

Definitely news worthy. I am going to link to you in my blog.

By: about us cheap flights

about us cheap flights — Fri, 31 Oct 2008 12:00:31 +0000

about us cheap flights

By: water powered cars

water powered cars — Wed, 22 Oct 2008 01:02:20 +0000

water powered cars

It is great to see a great post that is truly useful and informative. Keep them coming.

By: Jessie

Jessie — Sun, 19 Oct 2008 05:05:17 +0000

gasoline engines

Helpful to the masses! Hail Mary Mother of Jesus.

By: JayWarner

JayWarner — Fri, 26 Sep 2008 01:40:29 +0000

PTownGrad makes my desired point, whether or not intended. Large companies are NOT the best ones to develop & sell a new technology, especially one that undercuts the established engine plants that GM has. As gasoline engines go, GM’s engines are very good, and the cars they make fit certain functional markets very well - a fully ‘developed’ technology. they depend on an established market, and must make very large bets with large payoffs to even notice the effect on the corporate bottom line.

A small start-up company, perhaps with Nanosolar, could come up with something like the Volt, make a few, sell a few, adjust the technology as needed and make more. They would have a cash flow to support added development, and they would really, really care to make their baby come out ahead. They could sell to small niche markets, such as short, near-town commutes and city fleets. The real-world experience would tell the engineers how to adapt the cars to those conditions. Suppose the US Post Office accepted a small Federal incentive package to underwrite a 15% premium to buy electric vehicles for delivery (short runs). Suddenly there is a large (to these supplier companies) market, so they can flow their cash while they learn how to build better & lower unit cost vehicles.

At the risk of being catty,

You could buy a 40 mile range all electric car 15 years ago; it looked like a Corvair (which some of them were), used regular lead-acid auto batteries, and didn’t set speed records. And you maintained it yourself. The Volt will do better, in a couple years.

Maybe GM could do as well with a couple EV-1’s.

By: PTownGrad

PTownGrad — Wed, 17 Sep 2008 01:35:42 +0000

Sorry, but I believe there are actually two problems. The one you missed is that GM failed to incorporate photovoltaic cells into the Volt. If GM had looked into thin-film solar panels for the roof of the car, they could have drastically improved its range. Companies like Nanosolar have proven the cost-effectiveness of thin-film solar panels. For the minimal cost, the Volt could sit out in the company parking lot and charge from the sun during the day, rather than sucking power from the grid at night. Too bad GM, you almost hit it perfect this time. We can only hope that the Volt will still sell so that the thin-film solar roofs can be implemented on future models.