<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Better Planet &#187; air pollution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/category/air-pollution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet</link>
	<description>DISCOVER covers environmental news from every content of the globe and every corner of the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What May or May Not Be Discussed in Half an Hour</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/26/what-may-or-may-not-be-discussed-in-half-an-hour/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/26/what-may-or-may-not-be-discussed-in-half-an-hour/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 00:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gasses]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/26/what-may-or-may-not-be-discussed-in-half-an-hour/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We like to avoid the gloom and doom around here, but this has to be said. The first presidential debate, about to get underway at Ole Miss as I write, will hopefully contain some kind of casual, glancing reference to the climate-change pollution stat that came out today.
 Basically, the chemicals that contribute to global [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We like to avoid the gloom and doom around here, but this has to be said. The first presidential debate, about to get underway at Ole Miss as I write, will hopefully contain some kind of casual, glancing reference to the <a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Technology/AheadoftheCurve/wireStory?id=5884934" target="_blank">climate-change pollution stat that came out today.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/2289197116_21f5f9283a.jpg" title="Ice melting"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/2289197116_21f5f9283a.jpg" alt="Ice melting" align="left" height="172" width="299" /></a> Basically, the chemicals that contribute to global warming when released into Earth&#8217;s atmosphere got released 3% more this year than last year, making the direst predictions of 2007 look optimistic.</p>
<p>But why get angry yet? Maybe one of the candidates will  say something fittingly urgent in tone. Maybe Jim Lehrer will bring it up. Or I&#8217;ll have the excuse to start smoking again that I&#8217;ve been looking for.</p>
<p><em>flickr: Image/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/36703550@N00/2289197116/" target="_blank">mind&#8217;s-eye </a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/26/what-may-or-may-not-be-discussed-in-half-an-hour/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Burying CO2 Might Help Asia Not Destroy Us</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/22/burying-co2-might-help-asia-not-destroy-us/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/22/burying-co2-might-help-asia-not-destroy-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weather]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon burying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coal-fired power plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McKinsey & Co]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/22/burying-co2-might-help-asia-not-destroy-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As pessimists on climate change are fond of reminding us, China and India are catastrophically prolific builders of coal-fired power plants these days. While we&#8217;re busy greening the Emmy Awards, they are quietly doing what they feel they need to do to provide energy for their expanding economies, more than compensating for all of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As pessimists on climate change are fond of reminding us, China and India are catastrophically prolific builders of coal-fired power plants these days. While we&#8217;re busy greening the Emmy Awards, they are quietly doing what they feel they need to do to provide energy for their expanding economies, more than compensating for all of the West&#8217;s cute anti-warming efforts by increasing the gadrillions of tons of carbon they release into our shared atmosphere. <a href="http://in.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idINLM57702920080922?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0" target="_blank">But new carbon burying tech might help them not be so destructive.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/2357915319_ebdf918fbf.jpg" title="Coal-Fired Power Plant"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/2357915319_ebdf918fbf.jpg" alt="Coal-Fired Power Plant" align="left" height="228" width="310" /></a> The consulting firm McKinsey &amp; Co has just issued a report saying that even without government funding, the technology for trapping the carbon emitted by coal plants and burying it might pay for itself by 2030. China and India probably won&#8217;t throw themselves into the new tech whole-heartedly at first, because it looks like it will add about a billion euros to the initial cost of building each new plant. But the EU has stepped up by ordering a slew of trial models built by 2015.</p>
<p>Of course, there&#8217;s the small problem of the rich West having already created a horrendous climate situation. Not the best dynamic for pressuring an ascendant China into good stewardship. We&#8217;re basically the parent that just got thrown out of Betty Ford trying to get junior to put down the vodka. I think that might have been what happened in <em>Postcards from the Edge</em>.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/20024546@N05/2357915319/" target="_blank">thewritingzone </a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/22/burying-co2-might-help-asia-not-destroy-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reclaiming the Segway from Toolness</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/10/reclaiming-the-segway-from-toolness/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/10/reclaiming-the-segway-from-toolness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bicycles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Segway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/10/reclaiming-the-segway-from-toolness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I should admit here I have not been a Segway believer. Ever since I saw Will Arnett straddle one on Arrested Development I have not been able to understand any possible use of the machine other than comic prop. I realize now that this was slightly unfair.
 A British MP just defied possible arrest to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should admit here I have not been a Segway believer. Ever since I saw Will Arnett straddle one on Arrested Development I have not been able to understand any possible use of the machine other than comic prop. I realize now that this was slightly unfair.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/133696060_48b8181d3d.jpg" title="Segway Polo"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/133696060_48b8181d3d.jpg" alt="Segway Polo" align="left" height="231" width="302" /></a> <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article4719725.ece" target="_blank">A British MP just defied possible arrest to lead a charge of Segwayists through London</a>, trying to get the Department of Transportation in England to clarify whether they&#8217;re legal to drive on roads or not. He points out that in a dense urban area, they go faster than the average speed cars are able to move in traffic, and emit virtually nothing.</p>
<p>I guess my confusion is still this: They go 12 mph. Doesn&#8217;t a bicycle go that fast? But I guess if you don&#8217;t want to get your suit sweaty&#8230; I forget that people still go to offices in suits.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/hackaday/133696060/" target="_blank">RobotSkirts</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/10/reclaiming-the-segway-from-toolness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Playing God Possible Climate Change Solution</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/04/playing-god-possible-climate-change-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/04/playing-god-possible-climate-change-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:37:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geo-thermal engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/04/playing-god-possible-climate-change-solution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A commentary in the Guardian suggests today that we should face the reality that maybe none of the emissions control policies we&#8217;re trying to implement will do anything to stop catastrophic irreversible global warming. But facing this reality need not involve suicide, moving to Quebec City, etc.
 Geo-thermal engineering, apparently, is a possible answer of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/sep/04/climatechange.carbonemissions" target="_blank">A commentary in the Guardian suggests today that we should face the reality that maybe none of the emissions control policies we&#8217;re trying to implement will do anything to stop catastrophic irreversible global warming.</a> But facing this reality need not involve suicide, moving to Quebec City, etc.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/63744965_1019400944.jpg" title="Playing God"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/63744965_1019400944.jpg" alt="Playing God" align="left" height="389" width="295" /></a> Geo-thermal engineering, apparently, is a possible answer of last resort. Scientists everywhere agree it&#8217;s really risky, but if we had to we could potentially shoot vast quantities of certain chemical agents into the atmosphere to reflect back the sun. No, not immediately comforting. But one of the plans involves a series of yachts crossing the world. Which is at least glamorous.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/lexrex/63744965/" target="_blank">radiant guy </a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/04/playing-god-possible-climate-change-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Learning to Embrace Cement</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/03/learning-to-embrace-cement/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/03/learning-to-embrace-cement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/03/learning-to-embrace-cement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California scientist and cement obsessive has started to churn out cement that doesn&#8217;t emit much carbon.  Since we&#8217;re not going to stop the world&#8217;s population from expanding (realistically, any time soon) we should pave paradise the nice way.
 The big questions, as always, are: how much, how fast how cheap? Cement Guy claims cheaper [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/09/02/MNGD12936I.DTL" target="_blank">A California scientist and cement obsessive has started to churn out cement that doesn&#8217;t emit much carbon.  </a>Since we&#8217;re not going to stop the world&#8217;s population from expanding (realistically, any time soon) we should pave paradise the nice way.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/123644119_d9569c2b53.jpg" title="Cement truck"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/123644119_d9569c2b53.jpg" alt="Cement truck" align="left" height="177" width="312" /></a> The big questions, as always, are: how much, how fast how cheap? Cement Guy claims cheaper than the normal cement. And that making it in bulk is no problem. And that its manufacturing process can actually absorb emissions from polluters like coal power plants.</p>
<p>Cement accounts for about five percent of the carbon emissions in the world &#8212; eliminating its contribution to global warming would be the equivalent of eliminating America. Or almost eliminating China.</p>
<p>What a weird twist of fate that would be: if the way to make the world greener were to make it look more like one the post-industrial backdrops in the <em>Halo</em> games.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/billjacobus1/123644119/" target="_blank">billjacobus1 </a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/03/learning-to-embrace-cement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM Gets Shafted For Relying on SUVs and Trucks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/08/01/gm-gets-shafted-for-relying-on-suvs-and-trucks/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/08/01/gm-gets-shafted-for-relying-on-suvs-and-trucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Detroit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUVs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trucks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/08/01/gm-gets-shafted-for-relying-on-suvs-and-trucks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Detroit&#8217;s condition is not the kind of thing you want to rub your hands in bloggy schadenfreude over. Blue-collar layoffs have started turning into white-collar layoffs. And when they sell cars that do horrible things to the planet they&#8217;re just trying to give the American public what it wants.


But of course the American public is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Detroit&#8217;s condition is not the kind of thing you want to rub your hands in bloggy schadenfreude over. Blue-collar layoffs have started turning into white-collar layoffs. And when they sell cars that do horrible things to the planet they&#8217;re just trying to give the American public what it wants.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/08/62637136_57f612c2b4.jpg" title="Old GM Plant"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/08/62637136_57f612c2b4.jpg" alt="Old GM Plant" height="384" width="229" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-129"></span></p>
<p>But of course the American public is fickle and freaked out about gas, and so the SUVs and light trucks that used to account for 60% of GM&#8217;s sales in the USA aren&#8217;t selling like they used to. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/7695262" target="_blank">As a consequence, GM just posted its 3rd biggest quarterly loss in its history</a>. The leasing of SUVs has taken the biggest hit, because nobody wants to buy the used SUVs anymore&#8211;they&#8217;re now selling at a quarter of their original value. It is tempting to resort to karma talk here.</p>
<p>Call me a socialist, but wouldn&#8217;t it be better for everyone if making catastrophically large ski-transport vehicles was against the rules, so everybody would just stick to the fuel-efficient cars they want whenever there&#8217;s an oil crisis?  This is a pretty clear example of the free market not behaving like the benevolent god libertarians want it to be. More like a spoiled mercurial toddler or a crackhead.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/rickharris/62637136/" target="_blank"><em>Image: flickr/Rick Harris </em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/08/01/gm-gets-shafted-for-relying-on-suvs-and-trucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Update: Four Senators Tell Chief to Resign</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/30/epa-update-four-senators-tell-chief-to-resign/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/30/epa-update-four-senators-tell-chief-to-resign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Whitehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/30/epa-update-four-senators-tell-chief-to-resign/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four Democratic senators called on EPA chief Stephen Johnson to resign yesterday: Barbara Boxer of California, who is chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey. They basically accused Johnson of perjury. They also announced they&#8217;d asked Attorney General Michael [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/07/30/MN51121B60.DTL">Four Democratic senators called on EPA chief Stephen Johnson to resign yesterday:</a> Barbara Boxer of California, who is chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee, Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, and Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey. They basically accused Johnson of perjury. They also announced they&#8217;d asked Attorney General Michael Mukasey to look into prosecuting him.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/450803606_6ed58e1425.jpg" title="Pollution Sign"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/450803606_6ed58e1425.jpg" alt="Pollution Sign" align="left" height="202" width="301" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-125"></span></p>
<p>The alleged perjury took place Jan. 24th, when Johnson told Boxer&#8217;s committee he&#8217;d made an independent decision not to allow California to enact its own fuel economy standards that would have been stricter than national ones. In reality, says the former EPA administrator Jason Burnett, Johnson seemed disposed to grant California at least a partial waiver until the White House told him not to. (<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/08/cheney-tried-to-delete-climate-findings-epa-guy-says/#more-78" target="_blank">Here&#8217;s a previous post about Burnett</a>).</p>
<p>In case there&#8217;s any confusion over names: Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse is a guy from Rhode Island who wants to take Johnson down; The White House is an entity that allegedly makes Johnson dance like a little beggar child.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pingnews/450803606/" target="_blank"><em> Image: flickr/National Archives </em></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/30/epa-update-four-senators-tell-chief-to-resign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Memo Told Employees Not to Talk to Own Inspector General</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/28/epa-memo-told-employees-not-to-talk-to-own-inspector-general/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/28/epa-memo-told-employees-not-to-talk-to-own-inspector-general/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/28/epa-memo-told-employees-not-to-talk-to-own-inspector-general/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Associated Press just published an internal memo the EPA&#8217;s chief of staff sent to managers telling them to not let staffers cooperate with the agency&#8217;s own inspector general but forward the info requests to him. In addition to the inspector general, employees aren&#8217;t supposed to talk to congressional investigators (!) or reporters (no &#8220;!&#8221;).


Sen. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iug4JpO54gzlHe2EdnXHEGTEKreQD92726OG0" target="_blank">The Associated Press</a> just published an <a href="http://www.peer.org/docs/epa/08_28_7_gag_order.pdf" target="_blank">internal memo the EPA&#8217;s chief of staff sent to managers</a> telling them to not let staffers cooperate with the agency&#8217;s own inspector general but forward the info requests to him. In addition to the inspector general, employees aren&#8217;t supposed to talk to congressional investigators (!) or reporters (no &#8220;!&#8221;).</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/logo-epa-color.jpg" title="EPA Logo"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/logo-epa-color.jpg" alt="EPA Logo" height="298" width="298" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-122"></span></p>
<p>Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-California) pounced immediately today, saying the memo shows that the EPA&#8217;s administration have been turning the agency into &#8220;a secretive, dangerous ally of polluters, instead of a leader in the effort to protect the health and safety of the American people.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Office of the Inspector General also made a statement today, saying, basically, what the f&#8211;k, dude, you&#8217;re supposed to be on my team and this is my job:  &#8220;All EPA officials and employees are required to cooperate with OIG. This cooperation includes providing the OIG full and unrestricted access to EPA documents, records, and personnel.&#8221;</p>
<p>The managers who were sent the e-mail were in the EPA&#8217;s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, which means they&#8217;re the guys in charge of making sure pollution laws are obeyed. So basically the legal compliance people were being told not to comply with the inspector general. Which proves once and for all that these days the EPA is <em>The Office</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/28/epa-memo-told-employees-not-to-talk-to-own-inspector-general/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SUV-Trashing Blogger Seeks Suggestions, Gets Huge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/26/suv-trashing-blogger-seeks-ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/26/suv-trashing-blogger-seeks-ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SUVs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/26/suv-trashing-blogger-seeks-ideas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you no longer want to be a scourge of everything we hold dear / friend to Saudi Arabia.  You want to throw away your SUV. But how is it done? A San Franciscan named Ryan Mickle raised the question for real on a web site this month, and little by little became a web phenom.

People [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you no longer want to be a scourge of everything we hold dear / friend to Saudi Arabia.  You want to throw away your SUV. But how is it done? <a href="http://onefewer.com/" target="_blank">A San Franciscan named Ryan Mickle raised the question for real on a web site this month, and little by little became a web phenom</a>.<img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/149984720_bcc121ed38.jpg" alt="Smashed SUV" align="left" /></p>
<p><span id="more-114"></span></p>
<p>People wrote in with insults, bad suggestions (fill it with concrete, throw it in the ocean and maybe it will become a reef), and some less insane ones (find a way to donate it to people in a poor remote village somewhere who will use it efficiently, as a transport vehicle). Even if you hate PR stunts, this one poses a legit question: what are we going to do with our many, various, increasingly hated, polluting machines, given that throwing them away or burning them is so counterproductive?My suggestion (probably already voiced by somebody): take off the wheels, gut them, and turn them into stationary dwellings for homeless people, in sprawling cities where there is space for fields of dead SUVs. Which would admittedly create conglomerations resembling vast, drugs-afflicted trailer parks without toilets, yes. Let&#8217;s see you do better. <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic">Image: flickr/</span><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinsaff/149984720/" target="_blank"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic">Kevin</span></a><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kevinsaff/149984720/" target="_blank"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/149984720_bcc121ed38.jpg" alt="Smashed SUV" align="left" height="0" width="0" /><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic"> Saff </span></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/26/suv-trashing-blogger-seeks-ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beijing Tries to Clean Air Before Company Arrives</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/21/beijing-tries-to-clean-air-before-company-arrives/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/21/beijing-tries-to-clean-air-before-company-arrives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 20:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/21/beijing-tries-to-clean-air-before-company-arrives/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In LA, people can barely handle carpool lanes. I wonder what would happen here if we tried what Beijing just allegedly pulled off: a day when cars with odd-numbered plates have to stay off the road, then another day when the ones with even-numbered plates have to stay home. This was accomplished because their smog [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In LA, people can barely handle carpool lanes. I wonder what would happen here if we tried <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/07/21/asia/21beijing-traffic.php" target="_blank">what Beijing just allegedly pulled off</a>: a day when cars with odd-numbered plates have to stay off the road, then another day when the ones with even-numbered plates have to stay home. This was accomplished because their smog is actually worse than ours and they have an Olympics coming up.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/2071956413_1b2876f321.jpg" title="Beijing Traffic"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/2071956413_1b2876f321.jpg" alt="Beijing Traffic" align="left" /></a>If we tried that here, it would be one situation in which having a vanity plate would actually be worth it. (No numbers in WLD DOGZ). So for America I propose an alternate system: women are forbidden from driving one day, men the next. What better way to subject cultural stereotypes regarding driving habits to scientific rigor? Teenagers vs. old people would be next.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/zzathras777/2071956413/" target="_blank">zzanthras777 </a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/21/beijing-tries-to-clean-air-before-company-arrives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
