<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Better Planet &#187; Exxon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/tag/exxon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet</link>
	<description>DISCOVER covers environmental news from every content of the globe and every corner of the blogosphere.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Palin&#8217;s Achilles Heel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/06/palins-achilles-heel/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/06/palins-achilles-heel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/06/palins-achilles-heel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is much speculation about how Obama should go after Sarah Palin. If he goes after her resume—she was mayor of a town of 7,000, then the governor of a state of 680,000—that leaves him open to the absurd but potentially effective argument that these credentials are superior to those of a senator. If he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1838959,00.html" target="_blank">There is much speculation about how Obama should go after Sarah Palin.</a> If he goes after her resume—she was mayor of a town of 7,000, then the governor of a state of 680,000—that leaves him open to the absurd but potentially effective argument that these credentials are superior to those of a senator. If he goes after her evident backwardness or unusually conservative religious beliefs, the gun/bikini photo, the never traveled anywhere thing—well, we know how the clinging to guns and religion thing went over.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/2823953511_4126370bbe.jpg" title="Palin Family"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/09/2823953511_4126370bbe.jpg" alt="Palin Family" align="left" height="255" width="284" /></a> It seems to me you say, she thinks the melting of arctic ice isn&#8217;t caused by humans. She thinks polar bears aren&#8217;t endangered. She doesn&#8217;t think Exxon should have to pay up. All those non-radical conservatives in Colorado, Ohio, and Nevada care about this. <a href="http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/377955_palinenvir07.html">(See this recap of her record so far).</a> It&#8217;s not a personal attack, and it&#8217;s not just a reiteration of the tired McCain administration = Bush administration charge.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just a way of making the effects of her ignorance concrete. She&#8217;s not just a smiling hick in a bathing suit holding a gun by a pool. She&#8217;s a smiling hick in a bathing suit standing on a melting iceberg.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/</em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pimkie_fotos/2823953511/" target="_blank"><em>Chesi &#8211; Fotos CC</em> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/09/06/palins-achilles-heel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Speaking of Exxon, the GOP Just Threw Down For Them</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/18/speaking-of-exxon-the-gop-just-threw-down-for-them/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/18/speaking-of-exxon-the-gop-just-threw-down-for-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 22:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin Nugent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/18/speaking-of-exxon-the-gop-just-threw-down-for-them/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, congressional Republicans killed a Dem oil-drilling bill dead. Bush said earlier this week that he&#8217;d veto it if it came to his desk, so the Dems needed two-thirds of the vote and couldn&#8217;t get it. The bill would have made oil companies like the ultra-profitable Exxon explore for oil on land they&#8217;d already acquired [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/18/us/18cong.html?_r=1&amp;adxnnl=1&amp;oref=slogin&amp;adxnnlx=1216418453-wOlno+o1Knt96AIgTuv+Lg" target="_blank">Yesterday, congressional Republicans killed a Dem oil-drilling bill dead.</a> Bush said earlier this week that he&#8217;d veto it if it came to his desk, so the Dems needed two-thirds of the vote and couldn&#8217;t get it. The bill would have made oil companies like the <a href="http://ir.exxonmobil.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=115024&amp;p=irol-irhome" target="_blank">ultra-profitable Exxon</a> explore for oil on land they&#8217;d already acquired before they started drilling on un<a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/524448885_23e0b07ef3.jpg" title="Gop Vanity Plate"><img src="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/files/2008/07/524448885_23e0b07ef3.jpg" alt="Gop Vanity Plate" align="left" height="200" width="300" /></a>explored land.</p>
<p>The Republicans took an evil-looking position servicing their great donor, the energy industry. But they were able to get away with it in terms of PR fallout because all they had to do was say, &#8220;you really want to mess with where people can drill for oil when gas is at $4/gallon?&#8221; Democrats tried to get them with a &#8220;use it or lose it&#8221; motto. It&#8217;ll be interesting to see how each party tries to use the gas-prices issue to bludgeon the other this election year.</p>
<p><em>Image: flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kanaka/524448885/" target="_blank">Kanaka&#8217;s Paradise Life</a></em></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kanaka/524448885/" target="_blank"></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/betterplanet/2008/07/18/speaking-of-exxon-the-gop-just-threw-down-for-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

