It is far from impossible to get across the sense of it. Note that I cannot explain the motivation of others, but I can explain mine, and speculate as to the others’. I would leave out the word “likely” from what you said above, and replace it with “hoped”. I should probably do this in a proper post on the main page, but I’m going to sit back a while and not put up any long posts for a little bit, so please check back soonish for that.

Thanks for asking!

-cvj

as i am alive i tell you i dont know much of what string theory is but i do believe there is something in the air atmosphere that i can see with my own eyes .i have told my doctor that every day these squigly lines sometimes singular sometimes connected before me in the air atmosphere or how ever you want to explain it but their there evey day day. what could this be?it seems to be a conglomerent of stringy like bacteria in the air.what do i see?

Strings and No_sense?

In defense of Peter Woit, and nt that he needs it. Froma layman perspectie it was necessary to have someone stand up and reject the basis,a nd if you beingthe sacradficial lamb for such a position, well, it’s what happens when you at as the a sounding board.

So like K.C. saids people watchthis converstain going on, and from that point of view, I watch and loked for the rejection of string theory and the basis for this approach. S inthis sense it was not a journalistic ability that was coming forward but the basis of such rejection and if such views were unsupported as to the model assumption