DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Two cheers for string theory
Science & Religion on Morning Edition tomorrow »

Do Phenomenologists Sing and Dance Better Than String Theorists?

by cjohnson

You may recall my recollection in an earlier post about the dancing of the string theorist participants of the Strings 1998 meeting in Santa Barbara, and you may have listened to the singing of the youth of the field at Strings 2005. A good time was had by all in each case, I understand.

Well, the good times continue. Last night, the participants of SUSY 2005, which is taking place in Durham (see some remarks in an earlier post) showed that they can holler and shake their collective booty too. At a barbecue in the sunny long evening, we saw a performance of the Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology (IPPP)‘s own Ceilidh band, (pronounced “Kaylee”), comprised of several physicists, their spouses and offspring, (see here for a list and more info) and joined by special guests and physicists Howie Haber on guitar, and David Lyth on fiddle, and led and smoothly MC’ed by the Institute’s director James Stirling (also on guitar).

ceilidh band

They were great! And a special shout out goes to physicist and graduate student Angelique Talbot, who seems to be able to play a whole lot of instruments, and then she was featured on vocals on a number of pieces! If that was not good enough, later, physicist Ruth Gregory stopped her fiddle playing and got a microphone and did one of several things she is extremely good at: organizing people. She is the caller (and instructor) for the various formation dances which took place, involving several of the conference participants.

ceilidh band

ceilidh band

What can I say? String Theorists, the gauntlet has been thrown down, it seems.

-cvj

Share

July 21st, 2005 10:40 AM
in Entertainment, Miscellany, Science | 4 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

4 Responses to “Do Phenomenologists Sing and Dance Better Than String Theorists?”

  1. 1.   Constructing Your Own Universe | Cosmic Variance Says:
    July 21st, 2005 at 7:49 pm

    [...] I went to an excellent colloquium yesterday at the SUSY 2005 confeence here in Durham, just before the singing and dancing I mentioned in a previous post. It was by Carlos Frenk, of the Institute for Computational Cosmology, also based here (in fact, both it and the IPPP I mentioned earlier are in the same building, the Ogden Centre for Fundamental Physics. [...]

  2. 2.   You Tube | Cosmic Variance Says:
    February 21st, 2006 at 9:05 pm

    [...] [Update: I forgot to mention that I was hoping that I might find a home video of Strings 96’s perfomance of “The Maldacena”, by 400 string theorists in unison (to the tune of “The Macarena”, but that seems to be lost forever… see here, and here, for more on that, by the way.] [...]

  3. 3.   Cosmic Dance Says:
    April 1st, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    :) I found another kind of dance here: Cosmic Dance

  4. 4.   Supersymmetry Closer To Home | Cosmic Variance Says:
    June 12th, 2006 at 6:55 pm

    [...] I wonder if there’ll be any singing and dancing, as happened last year? I do hope we get called Bawdy Strumpets again! [...]





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Metaphysics Matters
      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
    • Recent Comments

      • Andi Chapple on Metaphysics Matters
      • GM on Metaphysics Matters
      • Physicalist on Metaphysics Matters
      • David Brown on Metaphysics Matters
      • george briggs on Do I Not Live?
      • Sean Carroll on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David C. R. on Metaphysics Matters
      • Gene on Metaphysics Matters
      • Chris on Metaphysics Matters
      • PeteH on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Catholic on Metaphysics Matters
      • ldj5000 on Metaphysics Matters
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us