DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« The Science of Blinking
What people should know »

Human Biology from Early Nuclear Testing

by Risa Wechsler

Speaking of cool science about the human eye and other things, I loved this story about the age of the body’s cells. It’s got cell biology, plant biology, and nuclear physics all rolled up into one neat result. Apparently, while most of the body’s cells regenerate on a fairly regular time period, the same is not true of the visual cortex. Here was how this was studied:

It was a dispute over whether the cortex ever makes any new cells that got Dr. Frisen looking for a new way of figuring out how old human cells really are. Existing techniques depend on tagging DNA with chemicals but are far from perfect. Wondering if some natural tag might already be in place, Dr. Frisen recalled that the nuclear weapons tested above ground until 1963 had injected a pulse of radioactive carbon 14 into the atmosphere.

Breathed in by plants worldwide and eaten by animals and people, the carbon 14 gets incorporated into the DNA of cells each time the cell divides and the DNA is duplicated. Most molecules in a cell are constantly being replaced but the DNA is not. All the carbon 14 in a cell’s DNA is acquired on the cell’s birth date, the day its parent cell divided. Hence the extent of carbon 14 enrichment could be used to figure out the cell’s age, Dr. Frisen surmised. In practice, the method has to be performed on tissues, not individual cells, because not enough carbon 14 gets into any single cell to signal its age. Dr. Frisen then worked out a scale for converting carbon 14 enrichment into calendar dates by measuring the carbon 14 incorporated into individual tree rings in Swedish pine trees.

The average age of most of the body’s cells is apparently around 10 years, though there seems to be a ton of variation: the epithelial cells that line the surface of the gut last five days, and the liver totally replaces itself in 300-500 days. And the study found the cells of the visual cortex are exactly the same age as the individual — apparently the only other cells outside of the cortex with this property are the inner lens cells of the eye and perhaps the muscle cells of the heart.

Cool method, cool result. And it’s good to know that at least something interesting came out of these above ground nuclear tests.

Share

August 4th, 2005 11:26 AM
in Science | 2 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

2 Responses to “Human Biology from Early Nuclear Testing”

  1. 1.   Suzanne Says:
    August 4th, 2005 at 12:50 pm

    … also kind of scary about the nuclear testing.

  2. 2.   Mark Hadfield Says:
    August 4th, 2005 at 6:07 pm

    The nuclear testing tracers have been useful for more than that. Observations of the penetration of C14 into the ocean have been used for calibrating and testing ocean models. These models are then used to assess (for example) how much of the CO2 released into the atmosphere by fossil fuel burning has been absorbed by the oceans (about half) and whether this will continue in future (maybe).

    The other useful class of tracers is the fluorocarbons. Another of mankind’s inadvertent global experiments!





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Metaphysics Matters
      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
    • Recent Comments

      • Ruth|erectile dysfunction in on Happy Holidays!
      • Raw on Metaphysics Matters
      • Andi Chapple on Metaphysics Matters
      • GM on Metaphysics Matters
      • Physicalist on Metaphysics Matters
      • David Brown on Metaphysics Matters
      • george briggs on Do I Not Live?
      • Sean Carroll on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David C. R. on Metaphysics Matters
      • Gene on Metaphysics Matters
      • Chris on Metaphysics Matters
      • PeteH on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us