DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« My Second Week in China – Beijing
You Just Gotta Love The Onion »

Survey Endorses ID in the Classroom

by JoAnne Hewett

The folks at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press conducted a poll on what is apparently one of our nation’s most pressing issues. The result: 64 percent of respondents said they were open to creationism being taught alongside evolution in public schools, while 38 percent favored replacing evolution with creationism altogether. Wow.

42% held strict creationist views, while 48% said they believed that humans had evolved over time (18% of these folks thought that evolution was guided by a supreme being).

The poll surveyed 2,000 people, giving a margin of error of 2.5%.

You can read about it here.

It’s not just Kansas anymore.

Share

August 31st, 2005 4:38 PM
in Politics, Religion, Science | 16 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

16 Responses to “Survey Endorses ID in the Classroom”

  1. 1.   iso42 Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 4:47 pm

    > It’s not just Kansas anymore.
    It never was just Kansas IMHO.

  2. 2.   Moshe Rozali Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 4:56 pm

    The slogan “let’s just be open minded” is simply irresistible. To succeed someone will need to come up with something equally simplisitic and powerful (I myself have no advertizing skills…).

  3. 3.   Josh Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 4:57 pm

    There are some really interesting implications from the results they got. I blogged a little bit at Thoughts from Kansas, and I’m sure I’ll have more to say once I look at the cross-tabs.

  4. 4.   Mark Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:01 pm

    Hi Moshe. As I often hear Lawrence Krauss say, how about “…but not so open-minded that one’s brains fall out.”?

  5. 5.   Clifford Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:02 pm

    Aah! JoAnne….while I was writing my long post you snuck in with a quicker one on the same topic! That’ll teach me to babble on and on! :-)

    -cvj

  6. 6.   The Quest for Better Science Education | Cosmic Variance Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:05 pm

    [...] [Update: JoAnne was writing a post about this at the same time I was! So you can find hers here.] [...]

  7. 7.   Clifford Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:10 pm

    JoAnne, as an “out-there” theorist I’m very proud that like you (much closer to real experiments) I also placed a line reporting the sample size and margin of error in my post on the same report. So there’s hope for me yet, eh?

    -cvj

  8. 8.   Moshe Rozali Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:10 pm

    Pretty good Mark, now if this point could be made with fewer syllables…

  9. 9.   Moshe Rozali Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:14 pm

    Actually, speaking of which Clifford, what is the political bias of the Pew research center? this usually has some bearing on the results.

  10. 10.   Joe Bolte Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:21 pm

    “Let’s be open-minded” really is irresistable. I think opponents of ID are only going to be successful if they can draw the distinction between “open-minded in the things we thoughtfully consider” and “open-minded in what we teach children.” The key question scientists need to be asking people who publically flog the ID donkey is “Just how ridiculous does a theory have to be before it’s not worth teaching in schools? If I had a theory that life was created by a flying spaghetti monster, should my ideas be taught in a science class along with Darwin and ID?” I think this is a good way to get people to focus in on exactly how the scientific method imposes a burden-of-proof, which burden is exaclty what is lacking in all these nebulous ID assertions.

  11. 11.   Jim G Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:26 pm

    Not a surprise
    > Wow
    I can’t believe how surprised you all seem to be by this survey. The results have held steady since 1982 according to the Gallup poll, says this link from the National Center for Science Education. http://www.ncseweb.org/resources/news/2004/US/724_public_view_of_creationism_and_11_19_2004.asp

  12. 12.   Moshe Rozali Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 5:47 pm

    Joe,

    Let’s save the children… now that is the spirit (they are the future, aren’t they?)

  13. 13.   Joe Bolte Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 6:00 pm

    Moshe-
    You read me like an open book. (An open book that’s not Wald.)

  14. 14.   JoAnne Says:
    August 31st, 2005 at 6:13 pm

    Clifford, Great minds blog alike!

  15. 15.   Risa Says:
    September 1st, 2005 at 12:05 am

    Jim is right, as depressing as this is, it ain’t new. I wrote about how these persistent these results have been last fall during my brief guest stint at Preposterous Universe… essentially unchanged since they started asking the question. The only difference is that we now have the president and the majority leader in favor of it…

  16. 16.   screaming-penguin.com Says:
    September 1st, 2005 at 2:42 am

    [...] posted by: cooper 01-Sep-2005 03:31 EDT The folks at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life and the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press conducted a poll on what is apparently one of our nation’s most pressing issues. The result: 64 percent of respondents said they were open to creationism being taught alongside evolution in public schools, while 38 percent favored replacing evolution with creationism altogether. Wow. 42% held strict creationist views, while 48% said they believed that humans had evolved over time (18% of these folks thought that evolution was guided by a supreme being). The poll surveyed 2,000 people, giving a margin of error of 2.5%. You can read about it here. It’s not just Kansas anymore. CV On that note, these are great! [...]





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • The Case for Naturalism
      • Avengers Assemble!
      • Astronomy at the Philadelphia Science Festival
      • Wrapping Up the Semester: Fests, Workshops and Exams
      • A Universe from Nothing?
      • PhD Comics Explains the Higgs Boson
      • What Particle Are You?
      • The Particle At the End of the Universe
      • Aiming at Different Audiences
      • Puzzles!
      • Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
      • Is Physics Among the Dysfunctional Sciences?
      • Quantum Mechanics and Decision Theory
    • Recent Comments

      • pollution on Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Fancy Frolic Of My Mind | Tidbits of My Mind on What Particle Are You?
      • The Nature of Science « The Seventh Colour on Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
      • Erravan on A Universe from Nothing?
      • James Salsman on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Truth on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Truth on Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Jerrold Alpern on The Case for Naturalism
      • Riemannium on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Michael Slezak on A Universe from Nothing?
      • Naturalism in science | Secular News Daily on The Great Debate: Science vs. Religion
      • Phillip Helbig on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us