A commenter suggests that its more important to dish out some blame than cash. While I agree with him that simply giving money to charity organizations isn’t going to solve all the problems, there are plenty of things we can do. Still, there is plenty of blame to go around, and one of the things we can do is demand accountability. It is simply remarkable that 4 years after 9/11, the nation’s ability to respond to a national emergency seems worse than ever. The incompetence of the administration in handling distasters is demonstrated both by its unwillingness to do the things necessary to prevent them, and by its “Let them eat cake” response to them.
From the Chicago Tribune, an article on how hurricane prevention has been underfunded in New Orleans:
Despite continuous warnings that a catastrophic hurricane could hit New Orleans, the Bush administration and Congress in recent years have repeatedly denied full funding for hurricane preparation and flood control. That has delayed construction of levees around the city and stymied an ambitious project to improve drainage in New Orleans’ neighborhoods.
Similarly, the Army Corps requested $78 million for this fiscal year for projects that would improve draining and prevent flooding in New Orleans. The Bush administration’s budget provided $30 million for the projects, and Congress ultimately approved $36.5 million, according to Landrieu’s office.
“I’m not saying it wouldn’t still be flooded, but I do feel that if it had been totally funded, there would be less flooding than you have,” said Michael Parker, a former Republican Mississippi congressman who headed the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers from October 2001 until March 2002, when he was ousted after publicly criticizing a Bush administration proposal to cut the corps’ budget.
An editorial “Waiting for a Leader” in yesterday’s NYT:
George W. Bush gave one of the worst speeches of his life yesterday, especially given the level of national distress and the need for words of consolation and wisdom. In what seems to be a ritual in this administration, the president appeared a day later than he was needed. He then read an address of a quality more appropriate for an Arbor Day celebration: a long laundry list of pounds of ice, generators and blankets delivered to the stricken Gulf Coast. He advised the public that anybody who wanted to help should send cash, grinned, and promised that everything would work out in the end.
Sacrifices may be necessary to make sure that all these things happen in an orderly, efficient way. But this administration has never been one to counsel sacrifice. And nothing about the president’s demeanor yesterday – which seemed casual to the point of carelessness – suggested that he understood the depth of the current crisis.
While our attention must now be on the Gulf Coast’s most immediate needs, the nation will soon ask why New Orleans’s levees remained so inadequate. Publications from the local newspaper to National Geographic have fulminated about the bad state of flood protection in this beloved city, which is below sea level. Why were developers permitted to destroy wetlands and barrier islands that could have held back the hurricane’s surge? Why was Congress, before it wandered off to vacation, engaged in slashing the budget for correcting some of the gaping holes in the area’s flood protection?
It would be some comfort to think that, as Mr. Bush cheerily announced, America “will be a stronger place” for enduring this crisis. Complacency will no longer suffice, especially if experts are right in warning that global warming may increase the intensity of future hurricanes. But since this administration won’t acknowledge that global warming exists, the chances of leadership seem minimal.
Wes Clark, guest blogging over at TPM Cafe has similar questions:
With respect to Iraq, “stay the course” is only a slogan, not a strategy. What is our strategy for success in Iraq? Where is the leadership?
The president’s own Republican party just passed an energy bill which has absolutely no effect on gas prices for now or the forseeable future, and moves us no further along the path to energy independence. Where is the leadership?
Every day American technology and manufacturing skills are sent abroad, along with American jobs. Where is the leadership?
Again, just this past week, there was at least 36 hours notice that a major hurricane was going to hit the Gulf Coast, including likely a devastating blow to New Orleans, which certainly came to pass. The President continued with his regular schedule on Monday and Tuesday in California, Arizona, and Texas to hold some staged Medicare events and enjoy more vacation time, while finally returning to the White House yesterday. The joint task force including National Guard set up by the Pentagon failed to be on the scene in New Orleans in a timely manner to stop the looting and assist in the evacuation. Where is the leadership?
Newsweek has this to say:
Beyond the poll numbers, the Bush administration faces some immediate, urgent challenges—and serious questions about its response to the disaster. For all the president’s statements ahead of the hurricane, the region seemed woefully unprepared for the flooding of New Orleans—a catastrophe that has long been predicted by experts and politicians alike. There seems to have been no contingency planning for a total evacuation of the city, including the final refuges of the city’s Superdome and its hospitals. There were no supplies of food and water ready offshore—on Navy ships for instance—in the event of such flooding, even though government officials knew there were thousands of people stranded inside the sweltering and powerless city.
Then there’s the speed of the Bush administration’s response to such disasters. Just one week ago the White House declared that a major disaster existed in Louisiana, specifically most of the areas (such as Jefferson Parish) that are now under water. Was the White House psychic about the disaster ahead? Not exactly. In fact the major disaster referred to Tropical Storm Cindy, which struck the state a full seven weeks earlier. That announcement triggered federal aid for the stricken areas, where the clean-up had been on hold for almost two months while the White House chewed things over.
Now, faced with a far bigger and deadlier disaster, the Bush administration faces at least two difficult questions: Was it ready to deal with the long-predicted flooding of New Orleans? And is it ready to deal with the long-predicted terrorist attack that might some day strike another of our big cities?”
Americablog says that CNN is now reporting that New Orleans has become too dangerous even for FEMA. Kevin Drum links to some background on FEMA mismanagement. This is going to get a lot worse before it gets better.
There’s no way I can keep up with all of the past and present incompetence and the disasterous effects it is having for the people of New Orleans, but lots of other people are on the case.



September 1st, 2005 at 3:19 pm
Dear Risa,
I think your comments – about the Bush administrations lack of (prior) and post response to the situation after Katrina – are quite appropriate. It was not difficult to estima the impact of Katrina on New Orleans, for example, several days before it hit the city. And what did the government do? Why did Bush find it more important to stay on vacation, instead of directing aid for the (possible) areas of emergency (and destruction)? Was it more important to keep babbling about how important the war (or “liberation” of) in Iraq is?
As far as I’ve heard, the estimated cost of Katrina is well above $ 30×10^9 (this is of course just a first estimate). In comparison, the cost of the war in Iraq is at least $ 5×10^9 per month. I suggest, that Bush cuts the war in Iraq by 6 months to help the people of New Orleans and other victims of a natural disaster…
Kasper
September 1st, 2005 at 4:00 pm
I applaud this posting, of course. It makes a lot of points in the right direction that I hadn’t yet thought of.
Nonetheless, it misses the other point that I made, which is that charity donations for Katrina lack a proper sense of proportion. Consider (a) the amount of institutional aid (insurance, FEMA, etc.) that wlil be spent in respone to Katrina. Consider (b) the amount of aid per person that goes to third-world peasants. Now compare a charity like Hurricane Housing to these. It is clearly orders of magnitude less than (a), and orders of magnitude more than (b).
So what is the real motivation? That you saw the victims on television? That they are more important because they are Americans? Surely trained scientists and mathematicians should be guided more by competent back-of-the-envelope calculations than by television footage.
As I suggested, the best compromise between emotion and reason is to give to a broader charity (such as Americares, perhaps) without earmarking the money. Hurricane Housing is too targeted to be the right choice.
September 1st, 2005 at 6:11 pm
One of the most striking aspects here is the “perfect storm” of long ignored advice, combined with political appointments to FEMA as a prelude to ending the agency altogether. And, of course, the unnecessary and mismanaged war. It’s not just that the Bushies did a few things wrong, it’s that they did EVERYTHING wrong.
Maybe Katrina didn’t happen because of global warming. But we know that storms like Katrina WILL happen because of global warming. We know that NOT planning for the future means you will be surpised when the future comes.
New Orleans isn’t the only serious situation we have, and they all require serious planning, or we’ll have a string of disasters and, eventually, a string of ruined slums where our cities used to be.
This is where you come when you’re through playing games.
September 1st, 2005 at 8:36 pm
in all the prep that americans have prepared for there is always consideration of money….i believe New Orleans and the Gov’t. never thought something of this force would happen….its a play on odds and money…i cannot even with the horrible events place blame on anyone….it happpened….just simply that….lets do all we can to help and prevent in future instead of wasting time and thoughts about what could have been prevented….i believe we should focus on what is on our plate now…and learn from that…as that is truth..and now…lets fix it …learn…no guessing…no nothing…just do…and then put our experience into play for future….deal with this now…not converse about why it happened….fix it now!
September 2nd, 2005 at 12:03 am
Why should one expect leadership from a person who was told that his country is under attack and nonetheless sat silent and still for 7 minutes. It’s just same ole, same ole.
September 2nd, 2005 at 7:41 am
What I find astonishing is that some people I’ve spoken to here are still more concerned about defending Bush+company on their handling of the Katrina disaster, rather than on the Katrina disaster itself. I guess ‘disappointing’ is a more accurate description.
The fact that Bush& Co. were initially cavalier about this hurricane doesn’t surprise me; the fact that some people still love this cavalier behavior does. Hopefully, the cavalier phase is ending damn fast. It’s obviously horrific and desperate down there.
In order to learn from this on-going crisis and prevent future repeats, we’re going to have to investigate ‘the blame’ somehow. And those that have the power and cash to act (i.e. gov’t) should have enough guts to let such investigations proceed. [Of course, that's never going to happen.]