<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Power women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:08:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4299</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 08:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4299</guid>
		<description>Folks, Hillary Clinton is obviously the most &lt;strike&gt;babelicious&lt;/strike&gt; beautiful of all of them. Intelligent, in possession of a social conscience, powerful, and apparently not a nut-job (definitely ruling out at least one of the other two).... what&#039;s not to like? ... :-)

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, Hillary Clinton is obviously the most <strike>babelicious</strike> beautiful of all of them. Intelligent, in possession of a social conscience, powerful, and apparently not a nut-job (definitely ruling out at least one of the other two)&#8230;. what&#8217;s not to like? &#8230; <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 07:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>Jennifer (#1) That is an excellent caption! High on the list of the best we got. I should look at all of them and award a recognition prize soon!

Maynard: The goatee observation is hilarious. I can&#039;t look at it without seeing it now...

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer (#1) That is an excellent caption! High on the list of the best we got. I should look at all of them and award a recognition prize soon!</p>
<p>Maynard: The goatee observation is hilarious. I can&#8217;t look at it without seeing it now&#8230;</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maynard Handley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4297</link>
		<dc:creator>Maynard Handley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 21:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4297</guid>
		<description>I preferred Angeline before the goatee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I preferred Angeline before the goatee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x34T92</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4296</link>
		<dc:creator>x34T92</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 17:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4296</guid>
		<description>Angelina is the only one in the picture not wearing a pearl necklace.   She&#039;s also the only one in the picture who&#039;s done full frontal nudity in a motion picture, and the only one in the picture who has any kind of integrity.  I&#039;m not sure how all these facts are related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angelina is the only one in the picture not wearing a pearl necklace.   She&#8217;s also the only one in the picture who&#8217;s done full frontal nudity in a motion picture, and the only one in the picture who has any kind of integrity.  I&#8217;m not sure how all these facts are related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>At least Hillary is  her real name, and not some diminutive girlish-sounding  nickname (apparently she is not celebrity enough to earn one of those).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Hillary is  her real name, and not some diminutive girlish-sounding  nickname (apparently she is not celebrity enough to earn one of those).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suzanne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4294</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4294</guid>
		<description>She meant Angelina... she continued by saying &quot;I wouldn&#039;t know myself, but...&quot;

I&#039;m with you serial catowner...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She meant Angelina&#8230; she continued by saying &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t know myself, but&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you serial catowner&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: serial catowner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4293</link>
		<dc:creator>serial catowner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4293</guid>
		<description>Call me old fashioned, but I liked it better when the photo would have been of Joan Baez, Jane Fonda, and Patty Hearst.  If this is progress, you can have it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Call me old fashioned, but I liked it better when the photo would have been of Joan Baez, Jane Fonda, and Patty Hearst.  If this is progress, you can have it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LuboÅ¡ Motl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4292</link>
		<dc:creator>LuboÅ¡ Motl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 12:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4292</guid>
		<description>Did Ms. Rodham meant herself when she was speaking about a beautiful celebrity? :-) That&#039;s a pretty funny comment, indeed, because it sounds so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Ms. Rodham meant herself when she was speaking about a beautiful celebrity? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  That&#8217;s a pretty funny comment, indeed, because it sounds so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4291</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4291</guid>
		<description>I meant the &quot;suit pants&quot; etc for women...
Suits appear to be the only option for men anyway, and I think men&#039;s suit styles generally look good.

Yes, I know I have a sexism problem here with my fashion sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant the &#8220;suit pants&#8221; etc for women&#8230;<br />
Suits appear to be the only option for men anyway, and I think men&#8217;s suit styles generally look good.</p>
<p>Yes, I know I have a sexism problem here with my fashion sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>As an aside, can I just pipe in how much I hate the power-suit look, especially suit pants, and especially in monochrome navy blue? (Angelina Jolie&#039;s outfit is stylish though.) My roommate insists that the only thing acceptable to wear to any interview of any sort is a suit (&quot;it shows you care.&quot;)  I think it shows you have no fashion sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, can I just pipe in how much I hate the power-suit look, especially suit pants, and especially in monochrome navy blue? (Angelina Jolie&#8217;s outfit is stylish though.) My roommate insists that the only thing acceptable to wear to any interview of any sort is a suit (&#8220;it shows you care.&#8221;)  I think it shows you have no fashion sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dissident</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4289</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4289</guid>
		<description>To restate what I thought was glaringly obvious, I&#039;m asking why the whole US seems to be on a first-name basis with senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, while respectfully referring to the former president by his family name. Yes, the question is rhetoric. (See? I can play the PC game too! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To restate what I thought was glaringly obvious, I&#8217;m asking why the whole US seems to be on a first-name basis with senator Hillary Rodham Clinton, while respectfully referring to the former president by his family name. Yes, the question is rhetoric. (See? I can play the PC game too! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fyodor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4288</link>
		<dc:creator>Fyodor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4288</guid>
		<description>Is there any truth to the rumor that the only place to read about physics on the web these days is at the website of Cosmopolitan Magazine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any truth to the rumor that the only place to read about physics on the web these days is at the website of Cosmopolitan Magazine?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Pro-Clinton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4287</link>
		<dc:creator>The Pro-Clinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4287</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Dissident&lt;/b&gt;: Huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Dissident</b>: Huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dissident</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4286</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 03:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4286</guid>
		<description>I wonder: when talking about the Clintons, why is it always &quot;Hillary&quot; but never &quot;Bill&quot;? Seems strangely un-PC...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder: when talking about the Clintons, why is it always &#8220;Hillary&#8221; but never &#8220;Bill&#8221;? Seems strangely un-PC&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>I know, I know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>Jennifer, trust me.  It is difficult.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jennifer, trust me.  It is difficult.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/comment-page-1/#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 02:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/09/29/power-women/#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>Sean it is *terribly* difficult being a beautiful celebrity!  Not that I would know either (hair flip), but I imagine it must be so.

I like this photo sooooooo much.  I detest reading too much into snapshots of human beings, as you know, but Angelina is simply screaming &quot;integrity&quot; here.  At first glance, arms held carefully behind her back.  Clearly not wanting to have physical contact with the grinning Condi.  Taking a deeper look, you&#039;ll notice that her posture also suggests restraint, hands tied behind her back.  She&#039;s posing against her will, a possible reflection of the morality of her co-speakers.  Eyes narrowed, mouth closed, again suggesting the presence of treacherous creatures (snakes perhaps?) in the vicinity.  I love it, love it.

Also, a note for Clifford if he is reading, that I submitted a caption for the cartoon in the New Yorker, the one where the guy and his office furniture are all floating around in space?  Here it is:  &quot;Shocked by the news, the gravity of the situation had yet to sink in.&quot;  Personally, I thought that was kind of darling, but it didn&#039;t even make the semi-finals.  :(  Next time....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean it is *terribly* difficult being a beautiful celebrity!  Not that I would know either (hair flip), but I imagine it must be so.</p>
<p>I like this photo sooooooo much.  I detest reading too much into snapshots of human beings, as you know, but Angelina is simply screaming &#8220;integrity&#8221; here.  At first glance, arms held carefully behind her back.  Clearly not wanting to have physical contact with the grinning Condi.  Taking a deeper look, you&#8217;ll notice that her posture also suggests restraint, hands tied behind her back.  She&#8217;s posing against her will, a possible reflection of the morality of her co-speakers.  Eyes narrowed, mouth closed, again suggesting the presence of treacherous creatures (snakes perhaps?) in the vicinity.  I love it, love it.</p>
<p>Also, a note for Clifford if he is reading, that I submitted a caption for the cartoon in the New Yorker, the one where the guy and his office furniture are all floating around in space?  Here it is:  &#8220;Shocked by the news, the gravity of the situation had yet to sink in.&#8221;  Personally, I thought that was kind of darling, but it didn&#8217;t even make the semi-finals.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />   Next time&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 22:12:03 -->
