DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« got energy?
Goodies from the UK »

This Research is the Dog’s Bol@#$ks

by Mark Trodden

I must confess, I’ve never known if there is a hard and fast rule about how to insert symbols such as @,#,$ or % when one wants to write a particular word but doesn’t really want to go on record as having actually spelled it out. As a result, I’ve rarely tried it. But a story about the Ig Nobel prizes, in today’s Guardian, containing the following nugget

The medicine prize went to Greg Miller of Missouri for his invention of Neuticles – artificial replacement testicles for dogs which come in a range of sizes. Neuticles allow your pet to “retain his natural look, self-esteem and aids in the trauma associated with neutering”, says the company’s website.

is just flat out begging for this title.

The “Igs”, according to the official website, are intended to celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative — and spur people’s interest in science, medicine, and technology. This all sounds very positive, but it’s also worth pointing out that the awards, given out in Harvard’s Sanders Theatre, are also given for research that “cannot or should not be reproduced”.

The first paragraph of the Guardian article is another one of those priceless British newspaper wordings that, in terms both graphic and humorous, summarizes what this year’s Igs are all about

Ever wondered how far a penguin can fire waste from its anus? Or whether humans can swim faster in water or in sugar syrup? Perhaps even what frogs smell like when they are stressed?

It’s funnier to think about these topics knowing that the prizes are handed out by real Nobel Prize winners including, this year, physicists Shelly Glashow and Robert Wilson. You can find a complete list of the 2005 winners at the end of the Guardian article. But lest you think I’ve given you all the good stuff up front, here’s one last teaser

Agricultural history: James Watson of Massey University, New Zealand, for his scholarly study, The Significance of Mr Richard Buckley’s Exploding Trousers.

Share

October 7th, 2005 9:29 PM
in Science, Science and the Media, Words | 2 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

2 Responses to “This Research is the Dog’s Bol@#$ks”

  1. 1.   Matt B. Says:
    October 8th, 2005 at 2:17 am

    Is qbert the origin of #$!@’ing ? That’s the first place I ever saw it… or maybe it was the batman tv show…

  2. 2.   Torbjorn Larsson Says:
    October 10th, 2005 at 4:54 pm

    Sometimes where are an interesting or funny story behind the research – the Ignoble paper about herring communication by farting air was apparently prompted by submarine listening posts mistaken the sounds for russian subs.

    There is also the bloody (excuse me, bl@#dy!) obvious cathegory. One should always check facts, but how far?! I seem to remember a scientific report showing that wallmounted closets are easier to keep clean beneath than floormounted, that made national ignominy to the institute responsible.





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • jammer on Mind = Blown
      • Kaleberg on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us