<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is it that obvious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:29:57 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CapitalistImperialistPig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5158</link>
		<dc:creator>CapitalistImperialistPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5158</guid>
		<description>Oops! Excuse me! I thought you were the secretary.

So, you are saying this guy struck out with the old reliable &quot;like hydrodynamics for chocolate&quot; pickup line?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! Excuse me! I thought you were the secretary.</p>
<p>So, you are saying this guy struck out with the old reliable &#8220;like hydrodynamics for chocolate&#8221; pickup line?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CapitalistImperialistPig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5157</link>
		<dc:creator>CapitalistImperialistPig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 05:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5157</guid>
		<description>This blog is supposed to show that physicists are normal people?  Funny, because physicists are usually good at a lot of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is supposed to show that physicists are normal people?  Funny, because physicists are usually good at a lot of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Lopez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5156</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Lopez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5156</guid>
		<description>I used to work in the adult entertainment industry before starting over again in physics.  My wife is still in the old line of work.  Funny enough, we can still pretty much spot anyone in the biz, but now she has a pretty good nerdar as well.  (Mine&#039;s not so good.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to work in the adult entertainment industry before starting over again in physics.  My wife is still in the old line of work.  Funny enough, we can still pretty much spot anyone in the biz, but now she has a pretty good nerdar as well.  (Mine&#8217;s not so good.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clockwork</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5155</link>
		<dc:creator>clockwork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 00:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5155</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My wife can spot an astronomer from a kilometer away. It&#039;s uncanny, actually. We came up with a name for it: &quot;nerdar&quot;.&lt;/i&gt;

I think that is astounding, Phil. This proves that your wife is an astronomer.

Nerdar is good coinage.

*this whole thread is very interesting. probably the only civil place left in the blogosphere.*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My wife can spot an astronomer from a kilometer away. It&#8217;s uncanny, actually. We came up with a name for it: &#8220;nerdar&#8221;.</i></p>
<p>I think that is astounding, Phil. This proves that your wife is an astronomer.</p>
<p>Nerdar is good coinage.</p>
<p>*this whole thread is very interesting. probably the only civil place left in the blogosphere.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5154</link>
		<dc:creator>XP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5154</guid>
		<description>Citrine,

I whole heartedly agree.  I had thought I pointed to refining ones guess in the presence of actual data (note I started working with a blank slate) such as geography and  my albeit glib statement concerning subject matter during conversation, but I can see how one could miss my thinking there.   My fault for trying to rush through typing a comment...

However, as to what I see as the more crucial issue in my reply, my interest and hope remains that interest in physics has awoken in a more diverse crowd than it had been during my days of college.

Thanks for the response,
XP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citrine,</p>
<p>I whole heartedly agree.  I had thought I pointed to refining ones guess in the presence of actual data (note I started working with a blank slate) such as geography and  my albeit glib statement concerning subject matter during conversation, but I can see how one could miss my thinking there.   My fault for trying to rush through typing a comment&#8230;</p>
<p>However, as to what I see as the more crucial issue in my reply, my interest and hope remains that interest in physics has awoken in a more diverse crowd than it had been during my days of college.</p>
<p>Thanks for the response,<br />
XP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5153</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5153</guid>
		<description>citrine, very well said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>citrine, very well said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citrine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5152</link>
		<dc:creator>citrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 20:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5152</guid>
		<description>XP, making a guess about a person&#039;s line of work based on statistical considerations is one thing. Refusing to connect the dots in the presence of data pointing in a different way is another.

If someone sees JoAnne or Clifford conversing with Physicists at a Physics conference and assumes that they are there in a secretarial or janitorial capacity is a different set of circumstances than seeing either of them in a public arena and not guessing they are Physicists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>XP, making a guess about a person&#8217;s line of work based on statistical considerations is one thing. Refusing to connect the dots in the presence of data pointing in a different way is another.</p>
<p>If someone sees JoAnne or Clifford conversing with Physicists at a Physics conference and assumes that they are there in a secretarial or janitorial capacity is a different set of circumstances than seeing either of them in a public arena and not guessing they are Physicists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5151</link>
		<dc:creator>XP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5151</guid>
		<description>Just thought I&#039;d throw in my 2 cents, for whatever it is worth.   I think Devil&#039;s Advocate, while perhaps not completely correct, may have a point.  Keep in mind that I am speaking only from personal experience, which, having gotten my doctrate 12 years ago and being out of academia for nearly 10, may be somewhat outdated.

In my undergraduate days, although there quite a few black people in other subjects, there were none majoring in physics (though refering to the references of women in physics..there were quite a few women.  In fact, my wife is a physics doctorate I consider to be a better thinker than myself).  In my graduate days, we did have several black people in the Ph.D. program, but, none of them were African American.  The real issue which I think needs to be addressed here, is why the apparent lack of interest in the pursuit of physics within the African American community (I submit at the outset that it has nothing to do with ability)?

But going back to the subject of the post and to Devil&#039;s Advocate&#039;s point: If having nothing to go on I were forced to guess somebody&#039;s career (usually a dangerous game to begin with, since appearance is often no indication at all), as a scientist, I would use levels of probability based on sample sets with which I am familiar.  First, a relatively small set of people (in an absolute sense) go into physics, so that gets a low probability to begin with.  Second, my limited experiences suggest that relatively very few African Americans pursue a career in physics, so being an African American would cause me to drop that probability a little further (though I&#039;d be happy to be wrong).  Factors influencing a guess would, of course, include geographic location...being in a university town, or near a national lab, for example (raises the chances, obviously).  Naturally, if the person in question started talking about Boltzmann&#039;s constant or the Lorentz transformation...well that would simply collapse the wave function, so to speak :) .  Perhaps my thinking here is off..?

Now, as I said, I have been outside academia for some time, and perhaps, as I would hope, the situation for interest in physics has much improved among all communities.

cheers,
XP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought I&#8217;d throw in my 2 cents, for whatever it is worth.   I think Devil&#8217;s Advocate, while perhaps not completely correct, may have a point.  Keep in mind that I am speaking only from personal experience, which, having gotten my doctrate 12 years ago and being out of academia for nearly 10, may be somewhat outdated.</p>
<p>In my undergraduate days, although there quite a few black people in other subjects, there were none majoring in physics (though refering to the references of women in physics..there were quite a few women.  In fact, my wife is a physics doctorate I consider to be a better thinker than myself).  In my graduate days, we did have several black people in the Ph.D. program, but, none of them were African American.  The real issue which I think needs to be addressed here, is why the apparent lack of interest in the pursuit of physics within the African American community (I submit at the outset that it has nothing to do with ability)?</p>
<p>But going back to the subject of the post and to Devil&#8217;s Advocate&#8217;s point: If having nothing to go on I were forced to guess somebody&#8217;s career (usually a dangerous game to begin with, since appearance is often no indication at all), as a scientist, I would use levels of probability based on sample sets with which I am familiar.  First, a relatively small set of people (in an absolute sense) go into physics, so that gets a low probability to begin with.  Second, my limited experiences suggest that relatively very few African Americans pursue a career in physics, so being an African American would cause me to drop that probability a little further (though I&#8217;d be happy to be wrong).  Factors influencing a guess would, of course, include geographic location&#8230;being in a university town, or near a national lab, for example (raises the chances, obviously).  Naturally, if the person in question started talking about Boltzmann&#8217;s constant or the Lorentz transformation&#8230;well that would simply collapse the wave function, so to speak <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  .  Perhaps my thinking here is off..?</p>
<p>Now, as I said, I have been outside academia for some time, and perhaps, as I would hope, the situation for interest in physics has much improved among all communities.</p>
<p>cheers,<br />
XP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5150</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5150</guid>
		<description>Thanks janet! That&#039;s exactly what I think. It&#039;s not like scientists are the only people who find numbers interesting.

Thanks,

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks janet! That&#8217;s exactly what I think. It&#8217;s not like scientists are the only people who find numbers interesting.</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: janet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/comment-page-1/#comment-5149</link>
		<dc:creator>janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2005 17:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/10/12/is-it-that-obvious/#comment-5149</guid>
		<description>I would have noticed and commented on the coincidence of the date and the amount on the register, too. In fact, it&#039;s one of my annoying little habits: &quot;$15.88...Spanish Armada!&quot; I think it&#039;s mainly a symptom of being observent and able to make quick mental connections; or, with JoAnne&#039;s chocolate example, of an automatic reflext to try to figure out why. Maybe this is typical of scientists, but it&#039;s not an exclusive trait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have noticed and commented on the coincidence of the date and the amount on the register, too. In fact, it&#8217;s one of my annoying little habits: &#8220;$15.88&#8230;Spanish Armada!&#8221; I think it&#8217;s mainly a symptom of being observent and able to make quick mental connections; or, with JoAnne&#8217;s chocolate example, of an automatic reflext to try to figure out why. Maybe this is typical of scientists, but it&#8217;s not an exclusive trait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
