<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Views of the Universe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:02:38 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8674</link>
		<dc:creator>Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 10:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8674</guid>
		<description>Sean - I don&#039;t have a &#039;theory&#039; (see my page, it isn&#039;t &#039;my&#039; theory but a compilation of many people&#039;s work).  Second it is entirely fact.  It is possible to make predictions without speculation.  Don&#039;t lump real scientists with stringers by refering to &#039;theory&#039; if you use the same term for untestable guesses.  Thanks ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean &#8211; I don&#8217;t have a &#8216;theory&#8217; (see my page, it isn&#8217;t &#8216;my&#8217; theory but a compilation of many people&#8217;s work).  Second it is entirely fact.  It is possible to make predictions without speculation.  Don&#8217;t lump real scientists with stringers by refering to &#8216;theory&#8217; if you use the same term for untestable guesses.  Thanks <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8673</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:41:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8673</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rubbing tweed&quot;?  Is that what the kids are calling it these days?  *LOL*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rubbing tweed&#8221;?  Is that what the kids are calling it these days?  *LOL*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8672</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 02:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8672</guid>
		<description>Thanks Julianne - great stuff! It somehow fits my sense of humor perfectly. Nice meeting you in Chicago - hope we can repeat again before too long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Julianne &#8211; great stuff! It somehow fits my sense of humor perfectly. Nice meeting you in Chicago &#8211; hope we can repeat again before too long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julianne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8671</link>
		<dc:creator>Julianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8671</guid>
		<description>Hi Mark!  I believe that by &quot;slides in which puppets were doing twisted things&quot;, you may be referring to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcphee.com/items/11554.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Avenging Unicorn&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, one of the many fine products for sale at the local Seattle institution &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcphee.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Archie McPhee&lt;/a&gt;.   Archie McPhee carries a full line of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcphee.com/categories/meat.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bacon- and meat-related items&lt;/a&gt; (sorry Risa!),  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcphee.com/categories/action.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;unusual action figures&lt;/a&gt; (looking for a posable male nurse?  look no more!),  and other Very Strange Things &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mcphee.com/categories/weird.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.   A tremendous resource for &lt;a href=&quot;http://homepage.mac.com/cjborden/.Pictures/Photo%20Album%20Pictures/2005-10-31%2022.13.27%20-0800/Image-036917B14A9E11DA.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Halloween&lt;/a&gt;, and of course, plenary review talks.

Great time at Andy&#039;s by the way!  It was a pleasure meeting everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mark!  I believe that by &#8220;slides in which puppets were doing twisted things&#8221;, you may be referring to the <a href="http://www.mcphee.com/items/11554.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Avenging Unicorn&#8221;</a>, one of the many fine products for sale at the local Seattle institution <a href="http://www.mcphee.com" rel="nofollow">Archie McPhee</a>.   Archie McPhee carries a full line of <a href="http://www.mcphee.com/categories/meat.html" rel="nofollow">bacon- and meat-related items</a> (sorry Risa!),  <a href="http://www.mcphee.com/categories/action.html" rel="nofollow">unusual action figures</a> (looking for a posable male nurse?  look no more!),  and other Very Strange Things <a href="http://www.mcphee.com/categories/weird.html" rel="nofollow"></a>.   A tremendous resource for <a href="http://homepage.mac.com/cjborden/.Pictures/Photo%20Album%20Pictures/2005-10-31%2022.13.27%20-0800/Image-036917B14A9E11DA.jpg" rel="nofollow">Halloween</a>, and of course, plenary review talks.</p>
<p>Great time at Andy&#8217;s by the way!  It was a pleasure meeting everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The universe is the poor man&#8217;s particle accelerator &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8670</link>
		<dc:creator>The universe is the poor man&#8217;s particle accelerator &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8670</guid>
		<description>[...] Sean       &#171; New Views of the Universe &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sean       &laquo; New Views of the Universe &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8669</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8669</guid>
		<description>Shantanu--  eventually they will be, although I don&#039;t think they&#039;re up yet.

Science--  we understand that you have a theory.  Honestly you don&#039;t need to keep telling us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shantanu&#8211;  eventually they will be, although I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re up yet.</p>
<p>Science&#8211;  we understand that you have a theory.  Honestly you don&#8217;t need to keep telling us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8668</link>
		<dc:creator>Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8668</guid>
		<description>Mark, cosmic acceleration implying dark energy is based entirely on the lack of gravitational deceleration of the big bang observed in supernovae redshift.  I&#039;ll try not to test your patience, but it was predicted (based on causal GR gravity mechanism) there would be no gravitational deceleration in the big bang via October 1996 issue of Electronics World, two years before this prediction was confirmed experimentally.

Once the prediction was confirmed experimentally, more appropriate journals like CQG, PRL, etc., still wouldn&#039;t wouldn&#039;t publish, because the mainstream had immediately put an epicycle (dark energy) into the existing (false) application of GR.  &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://cdsweb.cern.ch/search.py?recid=688763&amp;ln=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lunsford&lt;/A&gt; predicts there&#039;s no cosmological constant and that gravity doesn&#039;t have a natural coupling constant.  I think Lunsford right because this agrees with the mechanism that predicts the strength of gravity and various other things.

What &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://cdsweb.cern.ch/search.py?recid=688763&amp;ln=en&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Lunsford&lt;/A&gt; is doing is revisiting an old question.  The problem is that despite Pauli having discredited Kaluza-Klein, string theorists can still censor new work because Kaluza-Klein is quite well favoured, despite being false.  Kaluza-Klein 5-d unification of Maxwell and GR - so worshipped by stringy theorists - is spurious because Pauli showed that any covariant theory is castable in Kaluza&#039;s form, so the unification is vacuous.  Sorry if this is an unwelcome comment ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, cosmic acceleration implying dark energy is based entirely on the lack of gravitational deceleration of the big bang observed in supernovae redshift.  I&#8217;ll try not to test your patience, but it was predicted (based on causal GR gravity mechanism) there would be no gravitational deceleration in the big bang via October 1996 issue of Electronics World, two years before this prediction was confirmed experimentally.</p>
<p>Once the prediction was confirmed experimentally, more appropriate journals like CQG, PRL, etc., still wouldn&#8217;t wouldn&#8217;t publish, because the mainstream had immediately put an epicycle (dark energy) into the existing (false) application of GR.  <a HREF="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/search.py?recid=688763&amp;ln=en" rel="nofollow">Lunsford</a> predicts there&#8217;s no cosmological constant and that gravity doesn&#8217;t have a natural coupling constant.  I think Lunsford right because this agrees with the mechanism that predicts the strength of gravity and various other things.</p>
<p>What <a HREF="http://cdsweb.cern.ch/search.py?recid=688763&amp;ln=en" rel="nofollow">Lunsford</a> is doing is revisiting an old question.  The problem is that despite Pauli having discredited Kaluza-Klein, string theorists can still censor new work because Kaluza-Klein is quite well favoured, despite being false.  Kaluza-Klein 5-d unification of Maxwell and GR &#8211; so worshipped by stringy theorists &#8211; is spurious because Pauli showed that any covariant theory is castable in Kaluza&#8217;s form, so the unification is vacuous.  Sorry if this is an unwelcome comment <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shantanu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8667</link>
		<dc:creator>Shantanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 15:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8667</guid>
		<description>Are the slides of the talks going to be put on the website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the slides of the talks going to be put on the website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8666</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8666</guid>
		<description>Thanks Sean! I knew I was forgotting someone fun at our table. If Deidre is reading by any chance - sorry! It was very nice to meet you that night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Sean! I knew I was forgotting someone fun at our table. If Deidre is reading by any chance &#8211; sorry! It was very nice to meet you that night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/comment-page-1/#comment-8665</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2005/12/19/new-views-of-the-universe/#comment-8665</guid>
		<description>Damn you Mark Trodden!  I had &lt;em&gt;just&lt;/em&gt; written almost exactly the same post, only shorter and not as good.  So I&#039;ll just mention that &lt;a href=&quot;http://gravity.psu.edu/~deirdre/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Dierdre Shoemaker&lt;/a&gt; was also at Andy&#039;s with us, and the table next to us was also stocked with cosmologists (Savvas Koushiappas, Andrey Kravtsov...).  Ed Copeland would have been there if my American phone had managed to talk to his British phone.  Must have been over a dozen scientists in the joint that night, and most of them made it to Lisa&#039;s talk at 9:00 the next morning.  (True, it was Sunday, so some of them may have gone to church.)

And don&#039;t forget &lt;a href=&quot;http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2004/07/indomitable-vonski.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Von&#039;s&lt;/a&gt; advice for getting ahead in our society:  &quot;be white.&quot;  Not the most practical advice for everyone, but okay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn you Mark Trodden!  I had <em>just</em> written almost exactly the same post, only shorter and not as good.  So I&#8217;ll just mention that <a href="http://gravity.psu.edu/~deirdre/" rel="nofollow">Dierdre Shoemaker</a> was also at Andy&#8217;s with us, and the table next to us was also stocked with cosmologists (Savvas Koushiappas, Andrey Kravtsov&#8230;).  Ed Copeland would have been there if my American phone had managed to talk to his British phone.  Must have been over a dozen scientists in the joint that night, and most of them made it to Lisa&#8217;s talk at 9:00 the next morning.  (True, it was Sunday, so some of them may have gone to church.)</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t forget <a href="http://preposterousuniverse.blogspot.com/2004/07/indomitable-vonski.html" rel="nofollow">Von&#8217;s</a> advice for getting ahead in our society:  &#8220;be white.&#8221;  Not the most practical advice for everyone, but okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
