I think one needed to understand this movement, or how the false vacuum is understood, and how the true vacuum is created.

Without this, has the idea of the Coleman-De Luccia instanton been refuted?

Yes, the proposals for new physics at high energies can yield new problems. But the fact is that there are problems with old physics and somehow it must break down at higher energies…

I don’t have to tell how confusing this stuff all is. More on name.

Why the Higher energies?

John Ellis was good enough to transform our views, to the need required in cosmological conditions? It’s there these issues although quickly dissipated, raise more questions as to the conditions for that “new physics.”

It is shown that if – and only if – “parallel universes” exist, an electroweak vacuum that is expected to have decayed since the big bang with a high probability might exist. It would neither necessarily render our existence unlikely nor could it be observed. In this special case the observation of certain combinations of Higgs-boson and top-quark masses – for which the standard model predicts such a decay – cannot be interpreted as evidence for new physics at low energy scales. The question of whether parallel universes exist is of interest to our understanding of the standard model of particle physics.

i suppose.