<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Women in Physics, I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:21:44 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Physicists at Work and Play &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10203</link>
		<dc:creator>Physicists at Work and Play &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:14:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10203</guid>
		<description>[...] P.P.S On a more serious side-note, and in view of our discussions of women in physics not so long ago on this blog, notice how more balanced the demographic is in this subfield. Refreshing, frankly. Here&#8217;s to the future. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] P.P.S On a more serious side-note, and in view of our discussions of women in physics not so long ago on this blog, notice how more balanced the demographic is in this subfield. Refreshing, frankly. Here&#8217;s to the future. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10202</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10202</guid>
		<description>It might be of interest to you what the perspective is of a male undergraduate being introduced the woeful statistics on women in physics.

On retrospect, I realize that at USC, almost all of my friends are women.  This is true in both music and physics departments that I call home.  When I first heard about the low statistics of women in physics, I didn&#039;t believe them.  If I made a list of women physicists who have inspired me, I couldn&#039;t stop.  Perhaps on a more personal note, I find that the book (and movie) by Carl Sagan &quot;Contact&quot; was the first story to provide me a role model in physics, and it featured a female physicist.  Last semester, Dr. Johnson brought over Dr. Hewett to give an illuminated talk, and I still look back at her as an example of the kind of physicist I would like to become.  At least in my experience, women have had a significantly larger role than men in my perspectives of physicists.

Now that I know that this is not the case for the majority of my colleagues, I&#039;m somewhat appalled.  Maybe it&#039;s because I was raised after the civil rights movements, but I can&#039;t believe I live in such a biased society.  When Sheila Tobias listed off the dates when critical laws were made to equate women in our society I was shocked: it was only 30 years ago when the environment was so different!  And I admit that I feel a lot shame that I have ventured into a field that is so unwelcoming to female colleagues.

But luckily now that I see the problem I can change my environment.  Sheila Tobias&#039; suggestion of providing a gender equality group to help people who are unfairly treated is duly noted.  It is brilliantly clear to me that I must take responsibility in cultivating a welcoming environment to all people wherever I follow my studies.

All I can say is that I am amazed by the work Katie and Amy did, and I am proud to be part of a department that bore the Women in Physics Conference 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might be of interest to you what the perspective is of a male undergraduate being introduced the woeful statistics on women in physics.</p>
<p>On retrospect, I realize that at USC, almost all of my friends are women.  This is true in both music and physics departments that I call home.  When I first heard about the low statistics of women in physics, I didn&#8217;t believe them.  If I made a list of women physicists who have inspired me, I couldn&#8217;t stop.  Perhaps on a more personal note, I find that the book (and movie) by Carl Sagan &#8220;Contact&#8221; was the first story to provide me a role model in physics, and it featured a female physicist.  Last semester, Dr. Johnson brought over Dr. Hewett to give an illuminated talk, and I still look back at her as an example of the kind of physicist I would like to become.  At least in my experience, women have had a significantly larger role than men in my perspectives of physicists.</p>
<p>Now that I know that this is not the case for the majority of my colleagues, I&#8217;m somewhat appalled.  Maybe it&#8217;s because I was raised after the civil rights movements, but I can&#8217;t believe I live in such a biased society.  When Sheila Tobias listed off the dates when critical laws were made to equate women in our society I was shocked: it was only 30 years ago when the environment was so different!  And I admit that I feel a lot shame that I have ventured into a field that is so unwelcoming to female colleagues.</p>
<p>But luckily now that I see the problem I can change my environment.  Sheila Tobias&#8217; suggestion of providing a gender equality group to help people who are unfairly treated is duly noted.  It is brilliantly clear to me that I must take responsibility in cultivating a welcoming environment to all people wherever I follow my studies.</p>
<p>All I can say is that I am amazed by the work Katie and Amy did, and I am proud to be part of a department that bore the Women in Physics Conference 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Radioactive Banana &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Physicists on the spectrum?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10201</link>
		<dc:creator>Radioactive Banana &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Physicists on the spectrum?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10201</guid>
		<description>[...] Nothing inflames passions in the physics blogosphere like a mention of why are there so few women in that branch of science. (See here and here over at Cosmic Variance.) I&#8217;m still very interested in the topic myself, over eight and a half years since I left, mainly because I&#8217;m still trying to sort out all of the reasons I became a physicist and then come to terms with why I left. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nothing inflames passions in the physics blogosphere like a mention of why are there so few women in that branch of science. (See here and here over at Cosmic Variance.) I&#8217;m still very interested in the topic myself, over eight and a half years since I left, mainly because I&#8217;m still trying to sort out all of the reasons I became a physicist and then come to terms with why I left. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Black Middle Classes &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10200</link>
		<dc:creator>The Black Middle Classes &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10200</guid>
		<description>[...] Well, while we&#8217;re on the subject of under-represented groups in science (see here and here), let me raise a (perhaps) even more taboo subject by pointing out a very interesting programme on the BBC&#8217;s Radio 4 entitled &#8220;The Black Middle Class&#8221;. (Beware, the UK defintion and the USA definition of the term have some differences, but you&#8217;ll figure out pretty quickly the UK definition by listening.) A Journalist (who by the way, I gather from her comments is black, female, British, and trained as scientist) Connie St. Louis interviews several people (from schoolkids to Members of Parliament) on the issue. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Well, while we&#8217;re on the subject of under-represented groups in science (see here and here), let me raise a (perhaps) even more taboo subject by pointing out a very interesting programme on the BBC&#8217;s Radio 4 entitled &#8220;The Black Middle Class&#8221;. (Beware, the UK defintion and the USA definition of the term have some differences, but you&#8217;ll figure out pretty quickly the UK definition by listening.) A Journalist (who by the way, I gather from her comments is black, female, British, and trained as scientist) Connie St. Louis interviews several people (from schoolkids to Members of Parliament) on the issue. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James' Empty Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10199</link>
		<dc:creator>James' Empty Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:50:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10199</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Sexism in science&lt;/strong&gt;

Working in the same lab, at the same level, as my wife for the past decade has given us a fair amount of anecdotal evidence for this. I offer here one case as an example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Sexism in science</strong></p>
<p>Working in the same lab, at the same level, as my wife for the past decade has given us a fair amount of anecdotal evidence for this. I offer here one case as an example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10198</link>
		<dc:creator>fh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10198</guid>
		<description>Lubos, why do you hate freedom?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lubos, why do you hate freedom?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10197</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10197</guid>
		<description>FP,
Motl made the claim that the market would have already made the correction, (and therefore the untapped talent pool of women is non-existent); I&#039;m saying that the correction is in process, this conference is one visible manifestation of the so-called hidden-hand of the market.
-Arun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FP,<br />
Motl made the claim that the market would have already made the correction, (and therefore the untapped talent pool of women is non-existent); I&#8217;m saying that the correction is in process, this conference is one visible manifestation of the so-called hidden-hand of the market.<br />
-Arun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10196</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10196</guid>
		<description>The thread on which the John Baez comment was made is here:
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=291</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thread on which the John Baez comment was made is here:<br />
<a href="http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=291" rel="nofollow">http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=291</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The wrong side of history &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10195</link>
		<dc:creator>The wrong side of history &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10195</guid>
		<description>[...] Here at CV we occasionally pat ourselves on the back at the high quality of some of our comment threads. So it&#8217;s only fair that we acknowledge our dismay at the depressingly consistent character of the discussions about women in science; posts by Clifford and me being just the most recent examples. What a depressing exercise to poke a finger into the turgid world of pseudo-scientific rationalizations for inequality that people will believe so that they can feel better about themselves. Among other things, it makes it nearly impossible to have a fruitful discussion about what we could realistically do about the problem; it&#8217;s as if Columbus was trying to equip his ships to voyage to the Indies and a hundred voices kept interrupting to point out that the world was flat. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Here at CV we occasionally pat ourselves on the back at the high quality of some of our comment threads. So it&#8217;s only fair that we acknowledge our dismay at the depressingly consistent character of the discussions about women in science; posts by Clifford and me being just the most recent examples. What a depressing exercise to poke a finger into the turgid world of pseudo-scientific rationalizations for inequality that people will believe so that they can feel better about themselves. Among other things, it makes it nearly impossible to have a fruitful discussion about what we could realistically do about the problem; it&#8217;s as if Columbus was trying to equip his ships to voyage to the Indies and a hundred voices kept interrupting to point out that the world was flat. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/comment-page-2/#comment-10089</link>
		<dc:creator>FP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/01/14/women-in-physics-i/#comment-10089</guid>
		<description>Arun,

you are exactly making the argument Lubos made already
&gt; The more the two fields are dominated by men, the more enticing the chance of finding additional talent among women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arun,</p>
<p>you are exactly making the argument Lubos made already<br />
&gt; The more the two fields are dominated by men, the more enticing the chance of finding additional talent among women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
