Comments on: A Good Sign http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/ Random samplings from a universe of ideas. Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:00:03 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Plato http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-12605 Plato Tue, 30 May 2006 12:26:54 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/#comment-12605 <blockquote>Inverse Brandenberger-Vafa-upgraded to brane gas cosmology?</blockquote> That's to bad.

Inverse Brandenberger-Vafa-upgraded to brane gas cosmology?

That’s to bad.

]]> By: Peter Jones http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-12604 Peter Jones Tue, 30 May 2006 12:09:03 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/#comment-12604 none none

]]> By: Plato http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-12603 Plato Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:30:58 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/#comment-12603 <i>The fundamental theoretical requirement of positive total energy is being used as an effective test of alternate theories of gravity.</i> Quote was pulled from James Nester site you linked. I tried to put myself into the frames of mind that could possibly be, and wonder. Your "alternative" and perspective in D brane scenario analysis was one of the options? If so, how so? Is this an acceptance of Veneziano question moving right along into, what came before the universe, as is, while recognizing the value of those other options as equatible focalizations? I had to know why Woit kept you apart from those other indexed stringers?:) Question/understanding is vague for sure, but for what ever morsel you have for the layman mind? The fundamental theoretical requirement of positive total energy is being used as an effective test of alternate theories of gravity.

Quote was pulled from James Nester site you linked.

I tried to put myself into the frames of mind that could possibly be, and wonder.

Your “alternative” and perspective in D brane scenario analysis was one of the options? If so, how so? Is this an acceptance of Veneziano question moving right along into, what came before the universe, as is, while recognizing the value of those other options as equatible focalizations?

I had to know why Woit kept you apart from those other indexed stringers?:)

Question/understanding is vague for sure, but for what ever morsel you have for the layman mind?

]]> By: Niku http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/comment-page-1/#comment-12602 Niku Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:35:30 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/24/a-good-sign/#comment-12602 Hello Feynman too,in Japan ,negotiated special native arrangements for himself. (mentioned in "Surely You're Joking") .You are on right path ! Hello
Feynman too,in Japan ,negotiated special native arrangements for himself. (mentioned in “Surely You’re Joking”) .You are on right path !

]]>