DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Tales From The Industry, VI
Today is Particle Accelerator Day »

Checking In

by Mark Trodden

I’m traveling right now, and so only really have time to quickly check in. As I mentioned in an earlier post, I was in England for a few days and am now on the Italian island of Ischia, at the International Conference on the CMB and the Early Universe.

I got here on Wednesday afternoon and my talk was scheduled as the second one of the conference, beginning on Thursday. However, Michael Turner, the first person scheduled, wasn’t able to make it, and I ended up speaking first. This was fine by me, since I love to get my presentation out of the way early so as to get the maximum amount of time in a relaxed frame of mind to enjoy the rest of the conference and, you know, this beautiful island.

My somewhat unwieldy assigned title was Physics of the very early Universe: what can we learn from particle collider experiments?, and I gave the usual broad overview of how, particularly when it comes to dark matter and the question of why the universe is fundamentally matter-antimatter asymmetric, colliders experiments and observational cosmology may work very well as complementary probes. Today, Bernard Sadoulet gave a very nice talk in which he discussed one of the other ways of learning about dark matter – through direct detection experiments.

My favorite talk of the conference so far (although I have enjoyed most of them) was a joint talk given by Anthony Lasenby and Mike Hobson, both from Cambridge, in which they discussed in a very pedagogical way how one performs Bayesian estimates of whether cosmological datasets prefer one particular theoretical model over another one. This is a topic somewhat far from my particular expertise, but they did such a nice job that I really came away thinking I’d learned something new and interesting.

Tonight I’m off to dinner with a few friends and then tomorrow I leave around noon, heading back to England for one night and then straight back to the U.S. on Sunday to get a day’s rest before heading to Michigan State University to give a seminar on Tuesday.

Ciao.

Share

April 21st, 2006 10:45 AM
in Travel | 3 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

3 Responses to “Checking In”

  1. 1.   Ben L Says:
    April 21st, 2006 at 1:35 pm

    Mark, do you know if the talks will be posted online?

  2. 2.   Mark Says:
    April 21st, 2006 at 5:20 pm

    Hi Ben, yes – I think they will be.

  3. 3.   Cynthia Says:
    April 22nd, 2006 at 7:06 am

    Speaking as an outsider to physics, I hope to live to see the discovery of dark matter, especially dark energy. Perhaps it is too fanciful to imagine hitting two birds with one stone. The dark energy bird (a confluent flyer) and the dark matter bird (a discrete flyer) are probably too dissimilar to be “hit with one stone.” Being dark is probably the only characteristic that these two mysterious entities have in common. Despite the reckless nature of my “bird” analogy, I wish you well on your hunt for dark matter.





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • jammer on Mind = Blown
      • Kaleberg on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us