<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Treason in Base Ten</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Ears &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16646</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Ears &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 15:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16646</guid>
		<description>[...] Sean       &#171; Treason in Base Ten &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160; High On the List of Headlines I Never Thought I&#8217;d Read &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sean       &laquo; Treason in Base Ten &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; High On the List of Headlines I Never Thought I&#8217;d Read &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro Rivero</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16645</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro Rivero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16645</guid>
		<description>#41 (and hard hardware in general): it is intriguing that industrial installations in Spain, theoretically a SI country, use  inches for pipes and similar. This is because a lot of it  is produced in UK, I guess.

Also skin (for tannery) is measured in square foots, or it was twenty years ago.  Perhaps UK controls the commerce here too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#41 (and hard hardware in general): it is intriguing that industrial installations in Spain, theoretically a SI country, use  inches for pipes and similar. This is because a lot of it  is produced in UK, I guess.</p>
<p>Also skin (for tannery) is measured in square foots, or it was twenty years ago.  Perhaps UK controls the commerce here too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushi Out of Water</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16644</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushi Out of Water</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 01:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16644</guid>
		<description>You know what&#039;s crazy?
I went to school in the 80s and we were taught nothing but the metric system. To this day I don&#039;t know the English system and that&#039;s worked in my favor. Every single year and in every single science class in college I had to know the metric system and would have a test on it and would ace it, invariably, since I had learned the metric system in 3rd grade first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what&#8217;s crazy?<br />
I went to school in the 80s and we were taught nothing but the metric system. To this day I don&#8217;t know the English system and that&#8217;s worked in my favor. Every single year and in every single science class in college I had to know the metric system and would have a test on it and would ace it, invariably, since I had learned the metric system in 3rd grade first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Iblis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16643</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Iblis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 21:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16643</guid>
		<description>Zeno #2: &lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s like the Australian farm woman who complained that her hens were laying smaller eggs ever since the country adopted the metric system.&lt;/blockquote&gt;


Michael Duff &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mentioned&lt;/a&gt; the case of a woman who was asked by a TV interviewer if she believes in Global Warming. She said: &#039;&#039;If you ask me, it&#039;s all this changing from Fahrenheit to Centigrade that&#039;s causing it&#039;&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zeno #2:<br />
<blockquote>It&#8217;s like the Australian farm woman who complained that her hens were laying smaller eggs ever since the country adopted the metric system.</p></blockquote>
<p>Michael Duff <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208093" rel="nofollow">mentioned</a> the case of a woman who was asked by a TV interviewer if she believes in Global Warming. She said: &#8221;If you ask me, it&#8217;s all this changing from Fahrenheit to Centigrade that&#8217;s causing it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Lee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16642</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 13:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16642</guid>
		<description>Luckily kgf is rarely used, otherwise the same could be said of the SI too.

Then there is the triplets of tonne (metric tonne), short ton and the long ton.

Wonder whether the short ton (2,000 lbs) is an American invention that attempts to maintain a semblance of going Metric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luckily kgf is rarely used, otherwise the same could be said of the SI too.</p>
<p>Then there is the triplets of tonne (metric tonne), short ton and the long ton.</p>
<p>Wonder whether the short ton (2,000 lbs) is an American invention that attempts to maintain a semblance of going Metric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16641</link>
		<dc:creator>Amara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 07:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16641</guid>
		<description>Ponderer of Things: &quot;A lot of machine parts are made in germany and japan... guess what system they use? etc. etc. Absolute nightmare.&quot;

And then there is Shimano, who produces bicycle parts that don&#039;t conform to anyone&#039;s unit system and for which one needs a new tool each time there is a new line of parts!

Some here might be amused at space mission teleconferences during the mission&#039;s instrument construction and integration phase, if those missions involve instruments and spacecraft built in different countries. There are detailed discussions of nuts, bolts, screws and their tools. Sometimes these screws and tools items are given to the other teams (with the appropriate paperwork and if it doesn&#039;t involve ITAR).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ponderer of Things: &#8220;A lot of machine parts are made in germany and japan&#8230; guess what system they use? etc. etc. Absolute nightmare.&#8221;</p>
<p>And then there is Shimano, who produces bicycle parts that don&#8217;t conform to anyone&#8217;s unit system and for which one needs a new tool each time there is a new line of parts!</p>
<p>Some here might be amused at space mission teleconferences during the mission&#8217;s instrument construction and integration phase, if those missions involve instruments and spacecraft built in different countries. There are detailed discussions of nuts, bolts, screws and their tools. Sometimes these screws and tools items are given to the other teams (with the appropriate paperwork and if it doesn&#8217;t involve ITAR).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16640</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 04:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16640</guid>
		<description>Choosing units is extremely task related. I was browsing a French computer site and noticed that computer screens in the homeland of the metric system are denominated in thumbs (pouces), where a thumb is apparently computer French for an inch. (The word for a speaker seems to be the same as the word for pregnant, enceinte, but the French were always more open in discussing that sort of thing).

One good example of task specificity came up in the IEEE magazine. Why are capacitors denominated in microfarads and picofarads, but never in nanofarads? Obviously, microfarad range electronics designers work in microfarads, while picofarad range designers work with picofarads. Need a nanofarad, use a 1,000 picofarad capacitor.

As a fish egg fancier, I always wondered why did the godless (and metric) Soviet Union sold caviar in 14 ounce pounds? Their system of pressure altitudes for high flying aircraft is metric, but different from the Chinese metric pressure altitudes. Of course, low flying planes, up to 18,000 feet measure altitude based on calibrating the altimeter at takeoff using barometric pressure and known elevation, so the aircraft altitude approximates actual altitude over mean sea level. Go over 18,000 feet and its all done with millibars, and calibration be damned. So if you are flying in a small plane and your pilot says you are at 4,000 feet, those feet are not the same as the feet a jet pilot would use when announcing that the plane is at 32,000 feet.

Also, when was the last time you bought produce or meat by the ounce? My supermarket, and just about every other supermarket in these United States, sells by the pound and the hundredth. In other words, the supermarket checkout station designers have imposed a decimal based system on us, and since it was done by a business, not the government, there has been nary a squawk. Try finding a 32 fluid ounce bottle of Coke or 4/5 gallon of Scotch. It&#039;s like gasoline, sold by the gallon and the hundredth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Choosing units is extremely task related. I was browsing a French computer site and noticed that computer screens in the homeland of the metric system are denominated in thumbs (pouces), where a thumb is apparently computer French for an inch. (The word for a speaker seems to be the same as the word for pregnant, enceinte, but the French were always more open in discussing that sort of thing).</p>
<p>One good example of task specificity came up in the IEEE magazine. Why are capacitors denominated in microfarads and picofarads, but never in nanofarads? Obviously, microfarad range electronics designers work in microfarads, while picofarad range designers work with picofarads. Need a nanofarad, use a 1,000 picofarad capacitor.</p>
<p>As a fish egg fancier, I always wondered why did the godless (and metric) Soviet Union sold caviar in 14 ounce pounds? Their system of pressure altitudes for high flying aircraft is metric, but different from the Chinese metric pressure altitudes. Of course, low flying planes, up to 18,000 feet measure altitude based on calibrating the altimeter at takeoff using barometric pressure and known elevation, so the aircraft altitude approximates actual altitude over mean sea level. Go over 18,000 feet and its all done with millibars, and calibration be damned. So if you are flying in a small plane and your pilot says you are at 4,000 feet, those feet are not the same as the feet a jet pilot would use when announcing that the plane is at 32,000 feet.</p>
<p>Also, when was the last time you bought produce or meat by the ounce? My supermarket, and just about every other supermarket in these United States, sells by the pound and the hundredth. In other words, the supermarket checkout station designers have imposed a decimal based system on us, and since it was done by a business, not the government, there has been nary a squawk. Try finding a 32 fluid ounce bottle of Coke or 4/5 gallon of Scotch. It&#8217;s like gasoline, sold by the gallon and the hundredth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Iblis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16596</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Iblis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16596</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s simplest to use Planck units and express everything in terms of dimensionless numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s simplest to use Planck units and express everything in terms of dimensionless numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ponderer of Things</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ponderer of Things</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 03:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16595</guid>
		<description>I am surprised nobody weighed in on this from experimental physicist point of view.

Designing parts is a lot of hassle. Translating inches to mm and back for every part, hoping that something doesn&#039;t get messed up. Most people have no idea whether 9/64 is greater or lesser than 3/16. They might have some idea what 0.14 is compared to 0.18, though. To compound these problems, most americans are terrible with fractions. I mean, the 1/3 pound burger didn&#039;t survive simply because most people thought it was smaller than quarter-pounder!!!

Ever tried to find the correct allen wrench for a screw? Slightly smaller... Nope, slightly bigger... Maybe it&#039;s metric? Is this metric or is this english? Two sets of wrenches for everything... buying screws just to find they are the wrong size...
A lot of machine parts are made in germany and japan... guess what system they use? etc. etc. Absolute nightmare.

Mr. Machine Shop guy, here&#039;s the drawing - this M5 screw should be 1/4&quot; from one edge and 78.3 mm from another edge. Use calculator if you want to double check the numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised nobody weighed in on this from experimental physicist point of view.</p>
<p>Designing parts is a lot of hassle. Translating inches to mm and back for every part, hoping that something doesn&#8217;t get messed up. Most people have no idea whether 9/64 is greater or lesser than 3/16. They might have some idea what 0.14 is compared to 0.18, though. To compound these problems, most americans are terrible with fractions. I mean, the 1/3 pound burger didn&#8217;t survive simply because most people thought it was smaller than quarter-pounder!!!</p>
<p>Ever tried to find the correct allen wrench for a screw? Slightly smaller&#8230; Nope, slightly bigger&#8230; Maybe it&#8217;s metric? Is this metric or is this english? Two sets of wrenches for everything&#8230; buying screws just to find they are the wrong size&#8230;<br />
A lot of machine parts are made in germany and japan&#8230; guess what system they use? etc. etc. Absolute nightmare.</p>
<p>Mr. Machine Shop guy, here&#8217;s the drawing &#8211; this M5 screw should be 1/4&#8243; from one edge and 78.3 mm from another edge. Use calculator if you want to double check the numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joao Carlos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16639</link>
		<dc:creator>Joao Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16639</guid>
		<description>A triffle &quot;off-topic&quot; but just to show the persistence of Avoirdupois system. We have a little Marine Corps in Brazil (Brigade size). Of course, all the doctrine was translated from US Marine Corps. The definition of &quot;Starting Line&quot; for an Amphibious Assault was stated as &quot;1.000 yards from the beach&quot;. So we painstakingly converted those 1.000 yards to &quot;9 hundred and such meters&quot;.

When US Marine Corps started changing their mannuals to fit the metrical sistem, they simply expressed it &quot;1.000 meters from the beach&quot; (you know... a meter and a yard are so near, and a beach is never &quot;straight lined&quot;, so...)

But it&#039;s not true that &lt;b&gt;everything&lt;/b&gt; was measured into convenient &quot;dozens or scores&quot; of units. For instance, portable weapons were defined into inches/100 (.30 in rifles, and so on...)

The big problems I see are: 1 - changing all industrial standards (used for centuries, now) to metric system, when the main producers of it are used to Avoirdupois measures; 2 - People around the world are so accostumed to use Avoidupois units, followed by the metric expression (for instance: .30 caliber - 7,62mm; 1&quot; pipes - 2,56 cm) that it will not change an inch (2,56 cm) in anything...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A triffle &#8220;off-topic&#8221; but just to show the persistence of Avoirdupois system. We have a little Marine Corps in Brazil (Brigade size). Of course, all the doctrine was translated from US Marine Corps. The definition of &#8220;Starting Line&#8221; for an Amphibious Assault was stated as &#8220;1.000 yards from the beach&#8221;. So we painstakingly converted those 1.000 yards to &#8220;9 hundred and such meters&#8221;.</p>
<p>When US Marine Corps started changing their mannuals to fit the metrical sistem, they simply expressed it &#8220;1.000 meters from the beach&#8221; (you know&#8230; a meter and a yard are so near, and a beach is never &#8220;straight lined&#8221;, so&#8230;)</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s not true that <b>everything</b> was measured into convenient &#8220;dozens or scores&#8221; of units. For instance, portable weapons were defined into inches/100 (.30 in rifles, and so on&#8230;)</p>
<p>The big problems I see are: 1 &#8211; changing all industrial standards (used for centuries, now) to metric system, when the main producers of it are used to Avoirdupois measures; 2 &#8211; People around the world are so accostumed to use Avoidupois units, followed by the metric expression (for instance: .30 caliber &#8211; 7,62mm; 1&#8243; pipes &#8211; 2,56 cm) that it will not change an inch (2,56 cm) in anything&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16638</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 12:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16638</guid>
		<description>&quot;Then there is g, numerically 32.2 and 9.81, respectively in the English (I prefer that to Imperial) and SI units.

So if it is left out inadvertently in any force calculation, one will underestimate by about 3.5 times less in the SI units. Some consolation! &quot;

Well, there is &quot;lb&quot; (pound, unit of mass) and &quot;lbf&quot; (pound-force, unit of force) and one can confuse the two.  It is hard to confuse kilograms and Newtons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Then there is g, numerically 32.2 and 9.81, respectively in the English (I prefer that to Imperial) and SI units.</p>
<p>So if it is left out inadvertently in any force calculation, one will underestimate by about 3.5 times less in the SI units. Some consolation! &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, there is &#8220;lb&#8221; (pound, unit of mass) and &#8220;lbf&#8221; (pound-force, unit of force) and one can confuse the two.  It is hard to confuse kilograms and Newtons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16637</link>
		<dc:creator>Amara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 05:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16637</guid>
		<description>In metric, there is still the SI (mks) and the Gaussian (cgs) conundrum. if one is an astro-plasma person, it&#039;s easy to forget a 1/c or (4 pi eps_0) or some such thing.

elementary charge = e = 4.8E-10 statCoulomb
current = 1 statC/sec = (1/3)E-9 ampere

Potential is statC/cm, which doesn&#039;t grok with me at all. To convert to something familiar: e(SI)/e(cgs)=3.335E-10C and multiply (3.335E-10/(4 pi eps_0) *10^2 (in meter) = 299.7, final units in Volts

bleh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In metric, there is still the SI (mks) and the Gaussian (cgs) conundrum. if one is an astro-plasma person, it&#8217;s easy to forget a 1/c or (4 pi eps_0) or some such thing.</p>
<p>elementary charge = e = 4.8E-10 statCoulomb<br />
current = 1 statC/sec = (1/3)E-9 ampere</p>
<p>Potential is statC/cm, which doesn&#8217;t grok with me at all. To convert to something familiar: e(SI)/e(cgs)=3.335E-10C and multiply (3.335E-10/(4 pi eps_0) *10^2 (in meter) = 299.7, final units in Volts</p>
<p>bleh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael D</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16636</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 04:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16636</guid>
		<description>While I tend to agree with the comments that the metric system is much easier to work with on a daily basis, and of course in science and engineering contexts, I wonder whether the cost of changing the system in the US would be worth it?

unless you go the cheap option and give everyone bumper sticks which say &quot;km = miles * 1.6&quot; then that&#039;s a lot of road signs and car speedometers to phase out...

whereas, if it were put the money into say... hybrid research or perhaps new smaller size wheels on bicycles- that would be money well spent!

--
as an aside - for some reason in australia, the metric still hasn&#039;t caught on for heights of people. &quot;oh, he&#039;s about 6ft, is so much easier than 180cm, or 1.8 m&quot;
and I also almost failed a 9th Grade math(s) test when on exchange in the US, as a question on &quot;Convert the following measurements&quot; wasn&#039;t that easy....

m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I tend to agree with the comments that the metric system is much easier to work with on a daily basis, and of course in science and engineering contexts, I wonder whether the cost of changing the system in the US would be worth it?</p>
<p>unless you go the cheap option and give everyone bumper sticks which say &#8220;km = miles * 1.6&#8243; then that&#8217;s a lot of road signs and car speedometers to phase out&#8230;</p>
<p>whereas, if it were put the money into say&#8230; hybrid research or perhaps new smaller size wheels on bicycles- that would be money well spent!</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
as an aside &#8211; for some reason in australia, the metric still hasn&#8217;t caught on for heights of people. &#8220;oh, he&#8217;s about 6ft, is so much easier than 180cm, or 1.8 m&#8221;<br />
and I also almost failed a 9th Grade math(s) test when on exchange in the US, as a question on &#8220;Convert the following measurements&#8221; wasn&#8217;t that easy&#8230;.</p>
<p>m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TorbjÃ¶rn Larsson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16635</link>
		<dc:creator>TorbjÃ¶rn Larsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 04:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16635</guid>
		<description>&quot;And don&#039;t forget electrical outlet configurations. Even if everyone on this continent agrees to be on the same power scale, Switzerland and Italy and Britain just want to be different....&quot;

It will be a long road. Looking at trains, the first standards seem to be signal systems, which is rather more hard to do than conforming road signs. It is slooowwwly coming along.

&quot;And you&#039;re saying Europeans hate us because of our units? That seems pretty superficial to me...&quot;

Dimitry didn&#039;t say hate. But it&#039;s unusual to almost always insist on bipartisan solutions instead of once or twice accept wider solutions. So I believe we think of americans as apart, and not always in a good sense.

&quot;I just don&#039;t think that it&#039;s is feasible (at this point, at least) in practice.&quot;

Eh? Others have done it. If your concern is investment, it will pay off eventually.

&quot;any other application I learned only metric units, with a few exceptions.&quot;

There are quite a few exceptions. Usually in sciences, there fundamental or anthropic values makes more sense, like Planck units or hours instead of kiloseconds. Live and let live, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And don&#8217;t forget electrical outlet configurations. Even if everyone on this continent agrees to be on the same power scale, Switzerland and Italy and Britain just want to be different&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>It will be a long road. Looking at trains, the first standards seem to be signal systems, which is rather more hard to do than conforming road signs. It is slooowwwly coming along.</p>
<p>&#8220;And you&#8217;re saying Europeans hate us because of our units? That seems pretty superficial to me&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Dimitry didn&#8217;t say hate. But it&#8217;s unusual to almost always insist on bipartisan solutions instead of once or twice accept wider solutions. So I believe we think of americans as apart, and not always in a good sense.</p>
<p>&#8220;I just don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s is feasible (at this point, at least) in practice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Eh? Others have done it. If your concern is investment, it will pay off eventually.</p>
<p>&#8220;any other application I learned only metric units, with a few exceptions.&#8221;</p>
<p>There are quite a few exceptions. Usually in sciences, there fundamental or anthropic values makes more sense, like Planck units or hours instead of kiloseconds. Live and let live, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16634</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 03:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16634</guid>
		<description>As a child, I could not *believe* there was some people using a base other than 10.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a child, I could not *believe* there was some people using a base other than 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Coward</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 02:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16633</guid>
		<description>I should point out that in REAL units, \frac{2 \hbar ^2}{m e^2} \simeq 1 (its actually 0.951... ). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=2+hbar+%5E2+over+mass+of+an+electron+over+charge+of+an+electron+squared&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Proves it.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should point out that in REAL units, \frac{2 \hbar ^2}{m e^2} \simeq 1 (its actually 0.951&#8230; ). <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;safe=off&amp;q=2+hbar+%5E2+over+mass+of+an+electron+over+charge+of+an+electron+squared&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=" rel="nofollow">Google Proves it.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Knop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16632</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Knop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16632</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Is there any evidence that the imperial system of units prohibits or limits our participation in math, science, or commerce&lt;/i&gt;

Well, there &lt;i&gt;was&lt;/i&gt; that Mars probe that crashed.  Of course, we could balem that on the commie Europeans for using the metric system....

-Rob</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Is there any evidence that the imperial system of units prohibits or limits our participation in math, science, or commerce</i></p>
<p>Well, there <i>was</i> that Mars probe that crashed.  Of course, we could balem that on the commie Europeans for using the metric system&#8230;.</p>
<p>-Rob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Say Lee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16631</link>
		<dc:creator>Say Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16631</guid>
		<description>Then there is g, numerically 32.2 and 9.81, respectively in the English (I prefer that to Imperial) and SI units.

So if it is left out inadvertently in any force calculation, one will underestimate by about 3.5 times less in the SI units. Some consolation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then there is g, numerically 32.2 and 9.81, respectively in the English (I prefer that to Imperial) and SI units.</p>
<p>So if it is left out inadvertently in any force calculation, one will underestimate by about 3.5 times less in the SI units. Some consolation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skywalkthisway</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16630</link>
		<dc:creator>skywalkthisway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16630</guid>
		<description>As someone born in the US in the early 80s, I was taught to use both units, although I&#039;m not sure when. I suspect that my science classes were taught primarily in metric units after a certain age, although I would not swear to that. Then I studied physics and astronomy, so the units I use are an interesting mishmash.

Temperature: To me, Fahrenheit temperatures make a lot of sense for some applications. In the northeastern US, the air temperatures range from 0 (or below) to 100 (or a little above) Fahrenheit. It makes it convenient for me; I judge temperature on a roughly 100-point scale (anything off that scale is either frigidly cold or extremely hot). Outside of that particular belt, of course, the temperature ranges start to look a little more odd. Similarly, body temperatures generally fluctuate about 100 (and the story about 98.6 is one I had heard before, as of course the exact conversion is obvious, but that makes it no less amusing). But for anything outside of these applications (oh, and cooking, but that&#039;s just a function of the dial on my stove), I&#039;d rather use Kelvin anyways. Incidentally, global temperature maps, with the US in Fahrenheit and the rest of the world Celsius, are deeply amusing.

Length: 6 in one hand, half a dozen in the other. In terms of determining height, feet and inches work better for me, but that&#039;s mostly because I don&#039;t have a reference for the same in centimeters. For travel distance, a mile a minute is useful but I&#039;m pretty sure we could adjust to 100 kph. And again, for really big or really small distances my scientific training kicks in and I switch to Angstroms, nanometers, microns, mm, cm, km, AU and variations on parsec.

Weight/mass: I know body weights in pounds, because that&#039;s how I grew up, but I&#039;m surprised that more Americans haven&#039;t subtly started to switch to kilograms (doesn&#039;t sound as big in those units, after all). Similarly, I&#039;m more used to pounds for lifting weights, although I don&#039;t think a change in that would be difficult. In virtually any other application, I use metric units of mass instead of Imperial units of weight.

Area and Volume: Metric all the way. The only exception, perhaps, being gas by the gallon, because that&#039;s how prices are expressed; I could certainly do things the other way with no difficulty. And on a side note, I hate cooking, partially because of the insane units of volume used (Teaspoon? Tablespoon? Can&#039;t we please just switch to ml? But I suppose a lot of secret family recipes would have to be converted...)

And of course, any other application I learned only metric units, with a few exceptions. Pressure comes more naturally to me in psi or atmospheres than MPa and GPa; I&#039;ve seen all of them, but I have less intuition for metric units. I&#039;m also kind of used to barometric pressure in inHg. Oddly, though, I&#039;d rather use large numbers of Pascal to express material strength; go figure. And my thermo class was odd; it was an engineering course, so we had to be able to use both sets of units, even down to having two sets of steam tables in the back of the book. I think they might have even used mixed units in some of the problems, which was just irritating.

I think in time we will switch over, as more people become fluent in both and the advantages of factors of ten become apparent to people who don&#039;t necessarily use scientific notation frequently. This could maybe be enhanced by calling them Imperial units; what red-blooded American wants to be part of an evil empire? Besides Yankees fans, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone born in the US in the early 80s, I was taught to use both units, although I&#8217;m not sure when. I suspect that my science classes were taught primarily in metric units after a certain age, although I would not swear to that. Then I studied physics and astronomy, so the units I use are an interesting mishmash.</p>
<p>Temperature: To me, Fahrenheit temperatures make a lot of sense for some applications. In the northeastern US, the air temperatures range from 0 (or below) to 100 (or a little above) Fahrenheit. It makes it convenient for me; I judge temperature on a roughly 100-point scale (anything off that scale is either frigidly cold or extremely hot). Outside of that particular belt, of course, the temperature ranges start to look a little more odd. Similarly, body temperatures generally fluctuate about 100 (and the story about 98.6 is one I had heard before, as of course the exact conversion is obvious, but that makes it no less amusing). But for anything outside of these applications (oh, and cooking, but that&#8217;s just a function of the dial on my stove), I&#8217;d rather use Kelvin anyways. Incidentally, global temperature maps, with the US in Fahrenheit and the rest of the world Celsius, are deeply amusing.</p>
<p>Length: 6 in one hand, half a dozen in the other. In terms of determining height, feet and inches work better for me, but that&#8217;s mostly because I don&#8217;t have a reference for the same in centimeters. For travel distance, a mile a minute is useful but I&#8217;m pretty sure we could adjust to 100 kph. And again, for really big or really small distances my scientific training kicks in and I switch to Angstroms, nanometers, microns, mm, cm, km, AU and variations on parsec.</p>
<p>Weight/mass: I know body weights in pounds, because that&#8217;s how I grew up, but I&#8217;m surprised that more Americans haven&#8217;t subtly started to switch to kilograms (doesn&#8217;t sound as big in those units, after all). Similarly, I&#8217;m more used to pounds for lifting weights, although I don&#8217;t think a change in that would be difficult. In virtually any other application, I use metric units of mass instead of Imperial units of weight.</p>
<p>Area and Volume: Metric all the way. The only exception, perhaps, being gas by the gallon, because that&#8217;s how prices are expressed; I could certainly do things the other way with no difficulty. And on a side note, I hate cooking, partially because of the insane units of volume used (Teaspoon? Tablespoon? Can&#8217;t we please just switch to ml? But I suppose a lot of secret family recipes would have to be converted&#8230;)</p>
<p>And of course, any other application I learned only metric units, with a few exceptions. Pressure comes more naturally to me in psi or atmospheres than MPa and GPa; I&#8217;ve seen all of them, but I have less intuition for metric units. I&#8217;m also kind of used to barometric pressure in inHg. Oddly, though, I&#8217;d rather use large numbers of Pascal to express material strength; go figure. And my thermo class was odd; it was an engineering course, so we had to be able to use both sets of units, even down to having two sets of steam tables in the back of the book. I think they might have even used mixed units in some of the problems, which was just irritating.</p>
<p>I think in time we will switch over, as more people become fluent in both and the advantages of factors of ten become apparent to people who don&#8217;t necessarily use scientific notation frequently. This could maybe be enhanced by calling them Imperial units; what red-blooded American wants to be part of an evil empire? Besides Yankees fans, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustAnotherInfidel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/comment-page-1/#comment-16629</link>
		<dc:creator>JustAnotherInfidel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/05/26/treason-in-base-ten/#comment-16629</guid>
		<description>Mr. (Dr.?) Terryn---

There will be resistance to a change from the customary system to the metric system, but I think it would take some pretty dedicated individuals to form an insurgency...

And you&#039;re saying Europeans hate us because of our units?  That seems pretty superficial to me...

fh---

Perhaps metric units are more convenient, but certainly not if all of your tools (like a mechanic) are built to accomodate another unit system.  And they certainly aren&#039;t more convenient if you&#039;ve spent your whole life using somehting different.

I agree that we should probably have the metric system in principle, I just don&#039;t think that it&#039;s is feasible (at this point, at least) in practice.

And I&#039;ve never actually torched anyone&#039;s paper---pre-med students are easy to motivate!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. (Dr.?) Terryn&#8212;</p>
<p>There will be resistance to a change from the customary system to the metric system, but I think it would take some pretty dedicated individuals to form an insurgency&#8230;</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re saying Europeans hate us because of our units?  That seems pretty superficial to me&#8230;</p>
<p>fh&#8212;</p>
<p>Perhaps metric units are more convenient, but certainly not if all of your tools (like a mechanic) are built to accomodate another unit system.  And they certainly aren&#8217;t more convenient if you&#8217;ve spent your whole life using somehting different.</p>
<p>I agree that we should probably have the metric system in principle, I just don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s is feasible (at this point, at least) in practice.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;ve never actually torched anyone&#8217;s paper&#8212;pre-med students are easy to motivate!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 17:10:01 -->
