DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Big Ears
Yard Sales! »

High On the List of Headlines I Never Thought I’d Read

by Sean Carroll

Cate Blanchett to play Bob Dylan in biopic.

Cate BlanchettBob Dylan

The resemblance is uncanny.

To be candid, Blanchett will not have to shoulder the burden all by herself; Heath Ledger, Christian Bale, and Richard Gere are among those who will portray different aspects of Dylan in the upcoming I’m Not There, due to be released next year.

Share

May 27th, 2006 11:17 AM
in Entertainment, Music | 9 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

9 Responses to “High On the List of Headlines I Never Thought I’d Read”

  1. 1.   The Human Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 11:40 am

    Is that Bob Dylan or Cesar Romero?

  2. 2.   Clifford Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 12:43 pm

    Actually, if you look closely at the key structural features of the faces (structure of nose, cheekbones)… it is not that much of a stretch. A quarter-decent makeup artist can fill in the rest trivially. She could easily play a younger, slightly more androgynous Dylan. I suspect that this is what the film-makers probably have in mind.

    -cvj

  3. 3.   spyder Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 2:57 pm

    Maybe as Cliff suggests, she can play something from the white-face and asexual period of the Rolling Thunder Review, or possibly the ’65 post-Newport electric time through the motorcycle accident time. But as for the quarter-decent makeup artiste, that would assume that such a person would be hired to make her look so much worse.

  4. 4.   Ted Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 3:06 pm

    Who cares. What a crappy post.

  5. 5.   Cynthia Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 3:26 pm

    Might the film – “I’m Not There” be the antithesis of the film – “Being There”?

  6. 6.   Richard Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 4:18 pm

    I wonder if “I’m Not There” is reference to his life-long complaint of being misunderstood and plastered with expectations from the folkies and the press. I also wonder if this is an authorized biography, and if it is, if he had control over which actors are portraying his life. I just looked at the Highway 61 Revisited cover, and it appears that Kate’s lips are a little larger than his in the early years. How are they going to hide that?

  7. 7.   Bo Says:
    May 27th, 2006 at 10:02 pm

    I appreciate the humor. However, The Sydney Morning Herald published and article, with two, different pictures, which support Cliff’s comment.

  8. 8.   Paul Valletta Says:
    May 28th, 2006 at 12:48 am

    “I’m Not There”..as a BOB fan, I make the presumption of ‘two’probable title cause’s?..Bob making the reference to:

    1)I’m not in the film of me?..actors are “me” I’m Not There?

    2)”I’m not there”..I’m NOT where a lot of expectant people/fans place me in adoration? idolized?

    Bob Dylan has always made “self” examinations, one of his major talents, “Self Porttrait” for instance?

  9. 9.   Cynthia Says:
    May 28th, 2006 at 9:50 am

    The reason I am suggesting that “I’m Not There” is the antithesis of “Being There” can be briefly summarized in the following comment… The absolute brilliance of Peter Sellers in “Being There” will contine too far out-shine the potential dullness of Cate Blanchett in “I’m Not There.” Perhaps C.V. is severely lacking in admirers of Peter Sellers!





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Metaphysics Matters
      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
    • Recent Comments

      • Andi Chapple on Metaphysics Matters
      • GM on Metaphysics Matters
      • Physicalist on Metaphysics Matters
      • David Brown on Metaphysics Matters
      • george briggs on Do I Not Live?
      • Sean Carroll on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David C. R. on Metaphysics Matters
      • Gene on Metaphysics Matters
      • Chris on Metaphysics Matters
      • PeteH on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Catholic on Metaphysics Matters
      • ldj5000 on Metaphysics Matters
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us