DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Vacation
Off to Camp »

World Series Poker Theorist

by JoAnne Hewett

We’ve finished with the World Cup and the big bike race across France. We’re in anticipation for the Fall season of baseball with the playoffs and world series. But, in between, is a lessor known sporting event – the World Series of Poker. The final game will be played Thursday 10 August, and one of the 9 finalists in that game is a genuine particle theorist! It’s Michael Binger who was a graduate student here at SLAC, studying under Stan Brodsky, and defended his thesis just a couple months ago. I was on his committe and can say that he did a fine job. And on Thursday he is playing at the final table at the World Series of Poker. He is coming into the final table ranked 8 out of 9 (apparently 9 people sit at the final table) with a pile of chips worth over $3 million.

This is the World Series of Poker, No-Limit Texas Hold-em Championship. Within poker circles, this is the big event. About 8700 people entered the contest, buying in with $10,000 of tournament chips, each. These 8700 card-playing studs battled it out several weeks until 9 super-players were left. Those 9 will battle it out for the championship on Thursday. And a particle theorist – from Stanford – has amassed over $3 million in chips and thus cracked the top poker playing circle. Eat your heart out Sean!

Michael Binger worked on physical renormalization schemes with applications to grand unification and split supersymmetry here at SLAC under the guidance of Stan Brodsky. Essentially, they have a unique method of describing the running of the strong coupling constant (i.e., how it changes with the energy scale it is being measured at) and found a number of qualitative differences and improvements in precision over conventional approaches when applied to calculations within grand unification theories. It’s interesting work and I’m glad somebody took a look at it.

It seems that Michael is somewhat of a novelty in the poker circles due to his physics PhD. He’s been interviewed and quoted as saying:

Michael Binger hopes to continue doing research in physics without having to run the rat-race of getting a job and impressing all the right people as he puts it. A win here at the World Series of Poker Main Event would definitely give him the freedom to do pretty much anything he wants.

I’ve never followed the world series of poker before, but now I’m rooting for a rising star and a genuinely nice person. GO, BINGER GO!!!

Update: Michael Binger finished in third place! His winnings totalled $4.123 million. He was eliminated in hand #229 at 3 AM PDT, after more than 12 hours of play. He had an Ace-10 suited pair in his hand and with a hand like that he understandably bet the store. For more details on the hand, please see Sean’s comment below (#20). All of us here at SLAC give him our heartiest congratulations!! Rumor has it he will be stopping by on Monday!

Share

August 10th, 2006 1:45 AM
in Entertainment, Sports | 26 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

26 Responses to “World Series Poker Theorist”

  1. 1.   John Baez Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 7:13 am

    Is that a picture of Michael Binger? He doesn’t look nice. But maybe that’s just his poker face.

  2. 2.   Cynthia Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 8:47 am

    I’m not surprised. After all, Bond King Bill Gross began his lofty career as a card counter in Las Vegas. Perhaps success is all about playing your cards right.;)

  3. 3.   Plato Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 9:22 am

    I wonder if Binger started off with “solitary” first?

    You know “predictability” on the outlay of cards?

  4. 4.   Sean Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 9:36 am

    Consider my heart eaten out! Go Michael! I’ll try to be there next year.

  5. 5.   Lee Sawyer Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 9:39 am

    Hey, he’s not the only particle physicist there. Josh Kalk, a grad student on the D0 experiment (and my postdoc’s husband) was also invited to the world series and sponsored by one of the online sites. Experimentalists can calculate probabilities too!

  6. 6.   Plato Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 10:11 am

    Maybe, poker has really become the “game of life” for some?

    if experimenters have free will, then so do elementary particles.-John Horton Conway

  7. 7.   Ben L Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 10:34 am

    Go Binger!

    He was my office mate in grad. school, and taught me a bit about poker. Needless to say, I’m now wishing I remembered more of what he said.

  8. 8.   Uncertain Principles Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 10:35 am

    Career Options for Theorists

    Physicist Michael Binger is one of the final nine players at the World Series of Poker.

  9. 9.   spyder Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 1:06 pm

    In addition to making the final table of the Main Event, Binger made the final table of a $1,500 buy-in event earlier in the tournament and won $100,000.

    Unfortunately he is playing against Allen Cunningham, who is regarded as one of the very finest tournament players in the world. And Allen has five times the number of chips that Michael has; though Allen is $8 million short of the table’s big pile leader. The good news is that even if Binger plays all in (and current at current level 32 the blinds and antes add up to more than half a million per hand) and loses, dropping out in ninth place, he would still take home $1.5 million on a $10,000 dollar investment buy-in. Top purse is a bit over $12 million, with the prize distribution split down to the 9th place’s $1.5m. A couple of early good hands and Michael could walk out with three to five million. How long would that take to earn in a physics department????

  10. 10.   JoAnne Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 1:07 pm

    John Baez, I thought he was just looking very, very serious. I would look serious too, if I had that much in chips sitting in front of me!

    Lee Sawyer, hmmmm – maybe this is turning into a viable career option for particle physicists! But I can’t help but point out that Michael, as a theorist, is the only particle physicist in the final game with multi-millions of dollars worth of chips!

  11. 11.   JoAnne Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 1:11 pm

    How long would that take to earn in a physics department????

    Syder, that’s much too depressing a calculation to perform!

  12. 12.   Hunter Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    It is all here today in Las Vegas.

  13. 13.   Murky.org » World Series of Poker - finals Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 4:46 pm

    [...] The finals of the World Series of Poker takes place today, (the hold’em finals, that is) and one of the finalists is a particle physicist from SLAC (the Stanford Linear ACcelerator). Particle Physics was my area of interest when I did my degree. [...]

  14. 14.   Elliot Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 9:32 pm

    as of latest update, final table down to 6 with Binger in 6th place.

  15. 15.   JoAnne Says:
    August 10th, 2006 at 10:03 pm

    This is nuts – I’ve been checking this poker website (that I didn’t even know existed yesterday) every 5 minutes all afternoon/evening! As of 8 PM PDT, 3 of the final players have folded, 6 are remaining, and Binger is in 5th place with $4.3 M.

  16. 16.   Carl Brannen Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 2:47 am

    Historically, physics was advanced by people who had the spare time on their hands, but becoming independently wealthy is not going to be an easy way to make a career in particle physics nowadays. The physics community generally looks down on amateurs and this is not something that is changing for the better.

    If you think that you have a tough time getting people to take you seriously as, for example, a female physicist, you should try it as an amateur. For example, arXiv did not even allow contributions except from .edu websites until recently, and they replaced that simple system with a more complicated one with the additional objective of getting rid of contributions by graduate students.

    Carl

  17. 17.   Elliot Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 3:42 am

    As of 1:40 PDT, Binger is in 3rd place and can finish no worse than 4th.

  18. 18.   Beauty Factory Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 8:38 am

    물리학과 포커, 지적능력의 세계

    World Series Pocker Theorist 얼마 ì „, Cosmic Variance에 World Series of Pocker에 출전한 Michael Binger에 대한 글이 올라왔다. Binger는 SLAC(스탠포딜 선형가속기 연구소)에서 막 박사학위 논문을 ë”"펜스한 입자물…

  19. 19.   graviton383 Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 9:09 am

    Binger ends up in 3rd place winning $4.123M! Cool!!!

  20. 20.   Sean Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 9:42 am

    You need both luck and skill to win these things. On hand number 229 (!) of the final table, with three players left, Binger raised to $1.5 million (!) with A-10 suited and was called by both of the other players. The flop came 10-6-5. Binger, with top pair and top kicker, bet $3.5 million, but eventual winner Jamie Gold moved all-in. Binger called — which he had to do in that situation, with so many chips committed and such a good hand — and Gold turned over 4-3 for a straight draw. Gold was an underdog at that point (about a 1 in 3 chance of winning), but he could afford to make the play because he had so many more chips (otherwise he wouldn’t have been in the hand with 4-3 offsuit in the first place). But the turn was a 7, giving Gold the straight. It happens.

    Congratulations!

  21. 21.   Elliot Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 10:37 am

    Seems like earlier in the night the “luck” was flowing his way however. Third place is pretty impressive.

  22. 22.   Helen Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 1:48 pm

    It is his poker face. Michael has a very gentle soul, and treats everybody with the same respect, regardless of your IQ. Congratulations Michael, and enjoy!!!

  23. 23.   Ben L Says:
    August 11th, 2006 at 2:52 pm

    Here’s an interview with Binger after he went out in 3rd.

    Way to go Binger!!

    And, as Helen said, that was definitely his game face, he’s a great guy in person. In the video they talk about how he had the best poker face at the table.

  24. 24.   Plato Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 2:11 am

    Wall St. next, one might wager? :)

  25. 25.   Adam Says:
    August 15th, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    I think Binger started off with blackjack. I took a statmech class with him in spring ’02 and he was telling me then that he was going to take some time off gradschool to play blackjack (He can count cards!).

  26. 26.   Vasilis Says:
    November 10th, 2006 at 2:20 pm

    Well, for scientists in World Series of Poker, I see your particle physicist and I raise you a computer science PhD who won the World Series.

    The prize at WSOP has gone up a heck of a lot since 2000 though. Good going Binger!





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • The Case for Naturalism
      • Avengers Assemble!
      • Astronomy at the Philadelphia Science Festival
      • Wrapping Up the Semester: Fests, Workshops and Exams
      • A Universe from Nothing?
      • PhD Comics Explains the Higgs Boson
      • What Particle Are You?
      • The Particle At the End of the Universe
      • Aiming at Different Audiences
      • Puzzles!
      • Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
      • Is Physics Among the Dysfunctional Sciences?
      • Quantum Mechanics and Decision Theory
    • Recent Comments

      • pollution on Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Fancy Frolic Of My Mind | Tidbits of My Mind on What Particle Are You?
      • The Nature of Science « The Seventh Colour on Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
      • Erravan on A Universe from Nothing?
      • James Salsman on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Truth on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Truth on Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Jerrold Alpern on The Case for Naturalism
      • Riemannium on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Michael Slezak on A Universe from Nothing?
      • Naturalism in science | Secular News Daily on The Great Debate: Science vs. Religion
      • Phillip Helbig on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us