DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Off to Camp
An Update from the Googleplex »

Liquid

by Sean Carroll

I know I’m on vacation, but this seems important: for the first time, the Department of Homeland Security has deemed an entire state of matter to be a national security risk.

Phase Diagram Alert Level

Cynical-C has more (and more).

Share

August 12th, 2006 10:52 AM
in Humor | 54 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

54 Responses to “Liquid”

  1. 1.   Dr. Free-Ride Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 11:16 am

    Please tell me I can get this on a T-shirt! (It would totally solve the problem of which smart-alecky T-shirt to wear on international flights.)

  2. 2.   Thomas Palm Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 1:43 pm

    You’d imagine the right time to do this would have been after the 2004 tsunami. Water is vicious. As an extra bonus we all consist of some 70% water so finally Bush has an argument to treat everyone as a terrorist.

  3. 3.   Pamela Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 2:00 pm

    Oh! Dr. Free-Ride is soo right! I want my T-shirt!

  4. 4.   spyder Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 2:34 pm

    I believe the new “British correspondent” on the Daily Show made this point the other night. The “terrorists” have struck a metaphoric knife into the heart of our liquid based culture and beings. We can never be free again.

  5. 5.   Bob E. Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 4:20 pm

    What state of matter is plastic (the putty-like kind you see in movies depicting explosives)?
    - Bob

  6. 6.   Sean Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 5:36 pm

    I suspect that anyone trying to sneak on an international flight sporting an irreverent phase diagram on their T-shirt would be in danger of getting hauled off for lengthy interrogation. But you’re welcome to spread the picture around.

  7. 7.   andy Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 6:51 pm

    Surely all of us agree that Dihydrogen Monoxide is a dangerous substance (it can cause death even in minute quantities if inhaled) and should be totally banned!

  8. 8.   andy Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 6:53 pm

    Clarification: LDM (Liquid Dihydrogen Monoxide).

  9. 9.   Carl Brannen Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 7:32 pm

    It is only a matter of time before strip searches are the norm and the gov is contemplating random body cavity searches.

  10. 10.   Spatulated Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 9:11 pm

    i nearly shot water through my nose when i saw this. good stuff.

  11. 11.   Thomas S. Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 10:06 pm

    What’s the alert level for BE condensates? Are they allowed as carry-ons, or must they be checked with luggage?

  12. 12.   DarkSyde Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:24 am

    Damn, I didn’t see that one coming. After I wipe the streaming coffee off my face and keyboard, I’ll have to link that one.

  13. 13.   BunBun vonWhiskers Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:40 am

    I am getting awfully tired of the bad rep that unenlightened non-scientists have been giving to “dihydrogen monoxide” (DHMO). They tell you that inhaling it can be deadly, prolonged exposure to its solid form can cause tissue damage, whatever.

    Dont fall for the hype.

    In the first place, as soon as someone calls it “dihydrogen monoxide”, you know that you are dealing with a non-scientist with an agenda. The correct scientific nomenclature is “hydrogen hydroxide”. Why do the critics call it DHMO? Because it just sounds scarier and people are more likely to liken it to carbon monoxide in their minds.

    In the second place, the dangers of hydrogen hydroxide have been greatly exagerated. Anyone who works with or deals with hydrogen hydroxide on a regular basis can eliminate most of the dangers of it with a few simple precautions. Simply by avoiding inhalation and wearing protective gear when dealing with it solid and gasseous states, you can deal with this relatively benign substance safely.

    Secondly, studies have shown that there are several animals that require hydrogen hydroxide on a regular basis in order to survive. While it is true that hydrogen hydroxide has been found in the tumors of cancer patients, many people have been exposed to hydrogen hydroxide in laboratory conditions with no ill effects. Many of the health issues surrounding hydrogen hydroxide are not even about hydrogen hydroxide, but rather other contaminants. Pure hydrogen hydroxide can be perfectly safe.

    So the next time someone starts telling you about the dangers of “dihydrogen monoxide” feel free to point out the error of their ways. And just because I know that people will be maiking the accusation, no, I have never recieved money, good, or services from the “dihydogen monoxide” lobby for presenting my opinion.

  14. 14.   HE&OS » Blog Archive » SNARKY SCIENCE HUMOR Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:50 am

    [...] From Cosmic Variance. [...]

  15. 15.   greesyparrot Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 7:32 am

    Thomas Palm, shouldn’t that be spelled viscous?

  16. 16.   Say Lee Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 9:26 am

    Also, it’s more like 90% that our bodies are water. 70% is the extent of Earth’s surface covered by water.

    Also read the potential spectacle of using body cavities (bladder, stomach) for storing the liquid explosive ingredients for later use.

  17. 17.   Sloppy Seconds Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 10:26 am

    With Apologies to BunBun vonWhiskers:

    Protection of Civilians from Terrorists
    And the Dangers of Marijuana and Other Natural Chemicals

    Unenlightened non-scientists have been giving a bad rap to “dihydrogen monoxide” (DHMO). They tell you that inhaling it can be deadly, prolonged exposure to its solid form can cause tissue damage, whatever. It sounds suspiciously like the unscientific campaign against common, roadside-grown marijuana, and probably comes from the same sources: Unelected high officials in federal government having their first taste of power, urged on by elected officials who profess to want to “protect” citizens…but, only if reelected.

    Don’t fall for the hype.

    In the first place, as soon as someone calls it “dihydrogen monoxide”, you know that you are dealing with a non-scientist with an agenda. The correct scientific nomenclature is “hydrogen hydroxide”. Why do the critics call it DHMO? Because it just sounds scarier and people are more likely to liken it to carbon monoxide in their minds.

    In the second place, the dangers of hydrogen hydroxide have been greatly exaggerated. Anyone who works with or deals with hydrogen hydroxide on a regular basis can eliminate dangers with a few simple precautions. Avoid inhalation and wear protective gear when dealing with solid and gaseous states, and you can safely deal with this relatively benign substance.

    Studies have shown that there are several animals that require hydrogen hydroxide on a regular basis in order to survive. While it is true that hydrogen hydroxide has been found in the tumors of cancer patients, many people have been exposed to hydrogen hydroxide in laboratory conditions with no ill effects. Many of the health issues surrounding hydrogen hydroxide are not even about hydrogen hydroxide, but rather other contaminants. Pure hydrogen hydroxide can be perfectly safe.

    And, remember, this is just more of the same unscientific thinking that has led to marijuana being claimed to have “high potential for abuse,” “no currently accepted medical use,” and lacking in “accepted safety for use.” There is ample evidence to the contrary, but those who would hold citizens in fear as a political means for getting reelected are not interested in reality…only control.

    So the next time someone starts telling you about the dangers of “dihydrogen monoxide” (or marijuana) make it a point to show them the error of their ways. And just because I know that people will be making the accusation, no, I have never received money, good, or services from the “dihydogen monoxide” or “marijuana” lobbies for presenting my opinion.

    (With due props to BunBun vonWhiskers, as published at http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/08/12/liquid/)

  18. 18.   owlbear1 Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 10:29 am

    But only on Airplanes. Liquids of all types are still safe to pour together into large conainers in the middle of Airports.

  19. 19.   boomslang Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 11:03 am

    And I would just like to see the reaction on the face of a suspected terrorist after they’d been required to take a swallow of either industrial grade Hydrogen Peroxide, Concentrated Sulferic Acid or Acetone. And our fine chemically illiterate TSA’s must be thinking that all the other fluids in that trash can will do an effective job of diluting out that stuff.

  20. 20.   ogre Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 11:08 am

    Bad owlbear1, bad! You’re giving terra-ists ideas they didn’t have, like making airports go boom.

    Now I’ll have to duck and cover ever time some bleached blonde tosses her over-priced, designer water into the bin of things too evil to take aboard….

  21. 21.   Cynthia Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 11:35 am

    I’m elated to know that Homeland Security hasn’t deemed superfluidity of shampoo and hair gel to be “liquid threats” to airline safety.;)

  22. 22.   Sean Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 12:12 pm

    Gavin Polhemus (gavinpolhemus@comcast.net) has sent a slightly different pdf version.

  23. 23.   Ray Radlein Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 1:18 pm

    Oh, sure, the Failed Bush Administration is acting to ban an entire state of matter now — but why have they continued to ignore the dangers of plasma?

  24. 24.   Grant Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 1:48 pm

    Ask and ye shall receive:

    Liquid Threat

    If use of the second image isn’t okay, let me know and we’ll eliminate it.

  25. 25.   Gavin Polhemus Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 2:01 pm

    In my endless quest to find new ways to embarrass myself on Cosmic Variance, I misspelled “Terrorist” on my version of the phase diagram. I sent a replacement to Sean (thanks for sharing it, Sean.) If anyone wants to make a tee-shirt, this version has the Terror Alert Status font throughout (Bank Gothic).

    Gavin

  26. 26.   RichM Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 2:04 pm

    Don’t forget that DHMO can be converted to the very hazardous form known as Ice-9.

  27. 27.   Zazzle.com T-shirt Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 2:12 pm

    Grant beat me to it, but mine is nicer. Search Zazzle.com for Terror Diagram if link doesn’t work.

  28. 28.   Sean Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 2:29 pm

    Spelling mistake now fixed.

  29. 29.   Gavin Polhemus Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 2:37 pm

    Anyone who would like can use the red-yellow-orange diagram in anyway they please, no attribution necessary.

    In fact, I don’t want to explain it to anyone from the Department of Homeland Security, so make that “no attribution preferred.”

    Gavin

  30. 30.   Phil Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 4:02 pm

    Just wait until they figure out polywater.

  31. 31.   Cooking With Richard » Blog Archive » Two little friends Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:12 pm

    [...] Liquid terror, and hair gel and ipods. [...]

  32. 32.   [ stephanmantler.com ] » Blog Archive » Bruce Schneier’s Comment on Airport Security Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:16 pm

    [...] I agree: anybody thinking that banning liquids from carry-on baggage is a valid long-term safety precaution is, frankly, stupid. [...]

  33. 33.   tom-mcgee.com: the blog » Blog Roundup Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 10:42 pm

    [...] Physicist Sean Carroll’s Cosmic Variance spoofs the high state of terror alert presently being accorded to liquids. Rapped on the Head by Creationists is a devastating and hilarious indictment of the whole “intelligent design” movement, worth quoting: [...]

  34. 34.   Globalclashes Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 12:15 am

    Anticipating Terrorism

    The best article, which I read last weekend on the London thwarted terrorist plot came from Bruce Schneier. He argues that we haven’t learned to think ahead of the terrorists and that we are only reacting to their every move

  35. 35.   æ¡‘æž—å¿— » 恐怖液ä½" Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 2:49 am

    [...] [...]

  36. 36.   What You’re Doing Is Rather Desperate » Blog Archive » Deadly liquid Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 5:41 am

    [...] This one has become an instant blog classic. I’m all for safe air travel, but the authorities have got to find some sort of sensible balance, and soon. Otherwise we’ll all be travelling naked, sedated and strapped down. Or not at all. I mean, spectacles but not their cases? Ridiculous. [...]

  37. 37.   beajerry Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 9:59 am

    I’m geeky, but not enough to want that on a t-shirt.

  38. 38.   Stephen Uitti Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 10:12 am

    Comedians lamented the loss of Dan Quayle, you know, because he made their jobs so easy. Doonesbury had whole comics with verbatim quotes. But you know, you have to watch what you wish for.

    I’m hoping that one day, comedians will start writing their own material.

  39. 39.   Often in Error... Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 10:44 am

    Critical point?

    [...]Have we reached a critical point?

  40. 40.   Only A Matter Of Time » Panic Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 4:35 pm

    [...] So, after new terrorist attempts, we are now at a point where an entire state of matter poses an international security risk. We have become witness to the fact that security measurements are in fact degrading shadow plays to create the impression that something is done. This time so obvious that it becomes a giant laugh, and people are mostly concerned about what will follow the inevitable moment when people will have to fly naked chained to their seat…I propose hitting travellers over the head with a brick and piling them in the cargo bay (well I would prefer that way of flying anyway). So while all liquids have to be collected (by pouring them all into one container!), I have another question: What difference did it make that noone was hurt this time? Not much, did it? So I have a nice plot for a thriller in my head right now: Some terrorist boss plans attacks, and has some front men who believe they are supposed to execute them. But in fact they only have to plan and play out the preparations, because just then the boss uses his channels to inform the police. He never gets caught, only the front men. But the world panics and his goals are reached anyway…until one day some front men act autonomously and execute a plan… I can only say: As long as the authorities react as they did in the London case, almost all the goals of the terrorists have been reached. Go and read newspapers. Read serious blogs. Be informed, have an opinion, don’t panic and be angry when your rights are cut in the name of safety. [...]

  41. 41.   This is exactly what they want at {emoglasses} Says:
    August 15th, 2006 at 4:09 am

    [...] UPDATE. Three brilliant things to add: a good editorial about security and terrorism, a great blog post about fear, and the shocking truth that the TSA has outlawed an entire state of matter. {via} Filed under: politics, current events, quotes, blogs, videos   |   [...]

  42. 42.   The OpenScience Project » Terrorist states of matter Says:
    August 15th, 2006 at 8:14 am

    [...] Very funny graphic borrowed from Cosmic Variance: [...]

  43. 43.   oswald.us » Blog Archive » Scheiner’s Comments on Airline Security Says:
    August 15th, 2006 at 8:27 am

    [...] The DHS declares an entire state of matter a security risk: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/08/12/liquid/ [...]

  44. 44.   Erik Von Halle Says:
    August 15th, 2006 at 6:36 pm

    The DHMO Song
    Mark A. Mandel, © 1997_to the tune of “Battle Hymn of the Republic”
    There’s a chemical that poses deadly danger to us all
    If we don’t eliminate it, we are headed for a fall
    But our governments refuse to see the writing on the wall
    They’re going to let us die!

    CHORUS (after every verse):
    Ban dihydrogen monoxide!
    Ban dihydrogen monoxide!
    Ban dihydrogen monoxide
    Before it kills us all!

    Dihydrogen monoxide is a chemical to fear
    Uncounted thousands die of inhalation every year
    Yet the FDA allows it in our burgers, beans, and beer
    And never questions why!

    In gaseous form it’s subtle, without color, taste, or smell
    But it’s part of acid rain, and it’s a greenhouse gas as well
    It’s also found in car exhaust, which makes our cities Hell
    And dirties up the sky!

    It’s widely used by industry, and agriculture too
    They dump it on the ground or in the river when they’re through
    And from the ecosystem it gets into me and you
    Which they dare not deny!

    You’ll find dihydrogen monoxide everywhere you go
    In rivers, oceans, lakes, and streams, in air and soil and snow
    Its quantitative formula is simply H2O —
    You’ll get it if you try!

    This verse contributed by Gary McGath]
    How far DHMO has spread no one can safely tell.
    They’ve found it on Europa, and it’s on our Moon as well.
    It may well turn our Solar System to a living hell!
    It’s filling up the sky!

    This verse contributed by Erik Von Halle
    It kills the little children in the safety of their pools,
    It make the politicians always sound like fools,
    Linked to Hypothermia a death that kills and cools
    It’s going to kill us all.

  45. 45.   Security Alerts at Andy Cunningham Says:
    August 16th, 2006 at 5:16 am

    [...] From a humourous viewpoint, it seems that an entire state of matter has been declared a security risk: Liquid | Cosmic Variance. [...]

  46. 46.   Different River » Airport Security Theater Says:
    August 17th, 2006 at 7:03 pm

    [...] And Sean at Cosmic Variance has this clever take on the whole thing: [F]or the first time, the Department of Homeland Security has deemed an entire state of matter to be a national security risk. [...]

  47. 47.   georgeland: the blog » Blog Archive » OMG! Liquids on a plane! Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 12:48 am

    [...] an entire state of matter is now suspect. with diagrams! [...]

  48. 48.   bruce hyman Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 12:28 pm

    the museum of hoaxes had a piece on this last month… “beware of hydrogen in the water”.. some of the comments on the administration’s take on this hypothetical threat are worth the time to go to the site:

    http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/hoax/weblog/comments/4270

  49. 49.   howie’s blog » liquid security risk Says:
    August 23rd, 2006 at 8:46 am

    [...] At least some people have a sense of humor. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/08/12/liquid/ [...]

  50. 50.   Paul M Says:
    August 24th, 2006 at 6:53 am

    the reality of chemistry is that it’s trivial to find two relatively harmless compounds that can be mixed to form a high explosive.

    at university I knew someone who was quite adept at making Lead Azide, a high explosive in power form made by mixing two solutions, sodium azide and lead nitrate. Although toxic, you could probably taste the ingredients without flinching or dying on the spot! Lead azide was abandoned in mining as it was so dangerous that nitroglycerine was much safer!

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_azide

    these days, you’ll probably find that trying to buy any azide compound will get funny looks at any industrial supplier!

  51. 51.   Gli arresti della scorsa settimana legati al terrorismo « shaitan Says:
    September 4th, 2006 at 5:53 am

    [...] Il Dipartimento per la Sicurezza Nazionale definisce un intero stato di materia come “rischio per la sicurezza”: http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/08/12/liquid/ [...]

  52. 52.   topicalhuman.com » Blog Archive » My round-up of some recent events Says:
    September 13th, 2006 at 8:38 am

    [...] The ban on liquids on Airline flights? The huge delays? The terrorists are winning every time the authorities introduce some additional rule ‘for our safety’ that doesn’t actually make any difference, except for scaring the hell out of us and causing havoc. [...]

  53. 53.   Rachel Says:
    October 18th, 2006 at 9:46 am

    Can you explain to me why a liquid is more likely to react than a solid???????????

  54. 54.   Arbitrary Chronological Signifiers | Cosmic Variance Says:
    December 31st, 2006 at 2:28 pm

    [...] Liquid [...]





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • The Case for Naturalism
      • Avengers Assemble!
      • Astronomy at the Philadelphia Science Festival
      • Wrapping Up the Semester: Fests, Workshops and Exams
      • A Universe from Nothing?
      • PhD Comics Explains the Higgs Boson
      • What Particle Are You?
      • The Particle At the End of the Universe
      • Aiming at Different Audiences
      • Puzzles!
      • Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
      • Is Physics Among the Dysfunctional Sciences?
      • Quantum Mechanics and Decision Theory
    • Recent Comments

      • pollution on Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Fancy Frolic Of My Mind | Tidbits of My Mind on What Particle Are You?
      • The Nature of Science « The Seventh Colour on Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit
      • Erravan on A Universe from Nothing?
      • James Salsman on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Truth on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Truth on Higgs Ripples in the Koi Pond
      • Jerrold Alpern on The Case for Naturalism
      • Riemannium on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
      • Michael Slezak on A Universe from Nothing?
      • Naturalism in science | Secular News Daily on The Great Debate: Science vs. Religion
      • Phillip Helbig on Dark Matter vs. Modified Gravity: A Trialogue
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us