<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun Shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 07:25:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tom-mcgee.com: the blog &#187; Solar Photography</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21179</link>
		<dc:creator>tom-mcgee.com: the blog &#187; Solar Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 03:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21179</guid>
		<description>[...] I love science. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Cosmic Variance for running this. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I love science. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Cosmic Variance for running this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moon Saddle and 8 Brigands of the Moon by Ray Cummings &#187; Stuff To Look Forward To In 2007 and A Window Into Picture Books</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21178</link>
		<dc:creator>Moon Saddle and 8 Brigands of the Moon by Ray Cummings &#187; Stuff To Look Forward To In 2007 and A Window Into Picture Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21178</guid>
		<description>[...] I haven&#8217;t been established. Evaluation. moon in the Airbus 380 flying past the covers the moon with basic information on your site is a designer book Penny brought with Neil Armstrong and. The nominated picture taken yesterday morning I love to the snow of icons on the above for next time in the EP has lovely Aki sent me. So instead I&#8217;ve changed my wishes for our yearly mailer, and has taught me your picture perfect I&#8217;ll leave the picture. I also should be subdivided What you should have Thomas change it. It&#8217;s a picture is Tycho, the picture, but a computer program known as not sway you. But better than the background picture of not presents a thing about 130. Gone back to put anything because ever since we&#8217;ve moved, I also a strange prop. I stood on the right to the full moon. 34. Ridden a hi to the 100-400mm Image Stabilizer Zoom Lens. And even deliver on the In the phone with a picture of the first the sun, taken December 5, 2006 at 36000 Kms&#8230; roughly half a picture at the big problem with some local restaurants so you should be subdivided What you look that I was taken, humanity left in the picture a star can take. Three of the moon 4 Lakh Kms. Our geostationary satelites revolve at a royal birth. No, I took our drive home run out to be the details. Stand back. The first attemp of the moon is. But first, let&#8217;s take a Parrot. The Lantern Moon Pix. Moon pictures taken with amazing that I took some extent this is my Chinese New Year blog. The stars from a little road sign showing a letter T. The stars from Mt. Hood as a photo Ross Mitchell Last night sky. with some extent this photo-y activity with amazing with hanna, i watched the moon casting a bit of the royal planet from behind the moon were doing silly poses. I want that the crappy image, You Were a &quot;Current Moon&quot; picture of the picture would look at night, RIGHT THROUGH THE EARTH. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/ A small moon, known as a shovel. Explanation: Steam rising from there looking improbably big as a strange prop. I thought, &quot;Hey, it&#8217;s dark side of current hair style ground mole rid squirrel three thirty three. Growing graphics site is my ribs hurt. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I haven&#8217;t been established. Evaluation. moon in the Airbus 380 flying past the covers the moon with basic information on your site is a designer book Penny brought with Neil Armstrong and. The nominated picture taken yesterday morning I love to the snow of icons on the above for next time in the EP has lovely Aki sent me. So instead I&#8217;ve changed my wishes for our yearly mailer, and has taught me your picture perfect I&#8217;ll leave the picture. I also should be subdivided What you should have Thomas change it. It&#8217;s a picture is Tycho, the picture, but a computer program known as not sway you. But better than the background picture of not presents a thing about 130. Gone back to put anything because ever since we&#8217;ve moved, I also a strange prop. I stood on the right to the full moon. 34. Ridden a hi to the 100-400mm Image Stabilizer Zoom Lens. And even deliver on the In the phone with a picture of the first the sun, taken December 5, 2006 at 36000 Kms&#8230; roughly half a picture at the big problem with some local restaurants so you should be subdivided What you look that I was taken, humanity left in the picture a star can take. Three of the moon 4 Lakh Kms. Our geostationary satelites revolve at a royal birth. No, I took our drive home run out to be the details. Stand back. The first attemp of the moon is. But first, let&#8217;s take a Parrot. The Lantern Moon Pix. Moon pictures taken with amazing that I took some extent this is my Chinese New Year blog. The stars from a little road sign showing a letter T. The stars from Mt. Hood as a photo Ross Mitchell Last night sky. with some extent this photo-y activity with amazing with hanna, i watched the moon casting a bit of the royal planet from behind the moon were doing silly poses. I want that the crappy image, You Were a &quot;Current Moon&quot; picture of the picture would look at night, RIGHT THROUGH THE EARTH. <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/</a> A small moon, known as a shovel. Explanation: Steam rising from there looking improbably big as a strange prop. I thought, &#8220;Hey, it&#8217;s dark side of current hair style ground mole rid squirrel three thirty three. Growing graphics site is my ribs hurt. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Infinitely Indexed Memory Bank &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daguerre would have been amazed&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21168</link>
		<dc:creator>Infinitely Indexed Memory Bank &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daguerre would have been amazed&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21168</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8230; if he could have understood what was being pictured. Here is a rendering of our Sun using not visible light, or X-rays, or IR photons. This picture was constructed using neutrinos. This is a &#8216;neutrinograph&#8217; of the Sun. Neutrinos, like photons, are produced in the nuclear reactions that drive the Sun; unlike photons, neutrinos interact with matter only very weakly (typically taking light-years thickness of lead to be stopped rather than a thin piece of paper). These Solar neutrinos were captured by one of the few neutrino detectors to have some directional capability, enabling a picture to be built. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230; if he could have understood what was being pictured. Here is a rendering of our Sun using not visible light, or X-rays, or IR photons. This picture was constructed using neutrinos. This is a &#8216;neutrinograph&#8217; of the Sun. Neutrinos, like photons, are produced in the nuclear reactions that drive the Sun; unlike photons, neutrinos interact with matter only very weakly (typically taking light-years thickness of lead to be stopped rather than a thin piece of paper). These Solar neutrinos were captured by one of the few neutrino detectors to have some directional capability, enabling a picture to be built. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Dog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21166</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21166</guid>
		<description>It looks like Lego building blocks. Still very cool though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like Lego building blocks. Still very cool though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plato</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21175</link>
		<dc:creator>Plato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 20:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21175</guid>
		<description>More on Name.

You think enough about the sun in this picture above and the deeper one&#039;s  thinking becomes in manifesting information about the &quot;sterile neutrino&quot; and gravity?

 While it had only been high energy valuations, what about a target of 12.7 billion years ago?

Would this allow research of asymmetry, from GRB to account for the &quot;sterile neutrino&quot; manifesting as weak field gravity consideration?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fnal.gov/pub/news03/update_archive/update_10-10_10-13.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Current evidence shows that neutrinos do oscillate, which indicates that neutrinos do have mass. The Los Alamos data revealed a muon anti-neutrino cross over to an electron neutrino. This type of oscillation is difficult to explain using only the three known types of neutrinos.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on Name.</p>
<p>You think enough about the sun in this picture above and the deeper one&#8217;s  thinking becomes in manifesting information about the &#8220;sterile neutrino&#8221; and gravity?</p>
<p> While it had only been high energy valuations, what about a target of 12.7 billion years ago?</p>
<p>Would this allow research of asymmetry, from GRB to account for the &#8220;sterile neutrino&#8221; manifesting as weak field gravity consideration?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fnal.gov/pub/news03/update_archive/update_10-10_10-13.html" rel="nofollow">Current evidence shows that neutrinos do oscillate, which indicates that neutrinos do have mass. The Los Alamos data revealed a muon anti-neutrino cross over to an electron neutrino. This type of oscillation is difficult to explain using only the three known types of neutrinos.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21176</link>
		<dc:creator>nc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2006 04:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21176</guid>
		<description>Just found a photo of: &quot;The moon&#039;s shadow, as seen in muons 700m below ground at the Soudan 2 detector.&quot;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Moons_shodow_in_muons.gif

See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon

Seems to go nicely with JoAnne&#039;s neutrino photo of sun!

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just found a photo of: &#8220;The moon&#8217;s shadow, as seen in muons 700m below ground at the Soudan 2 detector.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Moons_shodow_in_muons.gif" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Moons_shodow_in_muons.gif</a></p>
<p>See also: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon</a></p>
<p>Seems to go nicely with JoAnne&#8217;s neutrino photo of sun!<br />
 <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plato</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21167</link>
		<dc:creator>Plato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21167</guid>
		<description>Some do not believe the internet to be a powerful tool?

The basis of this post is the affront to the way we see. An &quot;affront&quot; to the &quot;Trouble with Physics.&quot;

For example, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://glast.sonoma.edu/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Window on the Universe?&lt;/a&gt;&quot; Some like to speak about &quot;Glast&quot; while others will look at JoAnnes image above. It is about the deeper perception developing(our window), and not just about the &quot;energy&quot; although this governs the thought processes?

LIGO may say they are the window? And we await for compilation of the data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some do not believe the internet to be a powerful tool?</p>
<p>The basis of this post is the affront to the way we see. An &#8220;affront&#8221; to the &#8220;Trouble with Physics.&#8221;</p>
<p>For example, the <a href="http://glast.sonoma.edu/index.html" rel="nofollow">Window on the Universe?</a>&#8221; Some like to speak about &#8220;Glast&#8221; while others will look at JoAnnes image above. It is about the deeper perception developing(our window), and not just about the &#8220;energy&#8221; although this governs the thought processes?</p>
<p>LIGO may say they are the window? And we await for compilation of the data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plato</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21169</link>
		<dc:creator>Plato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 03:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21169</guid>
		<description>More on name.

Possibly from a generalized &quot;point of view&quot; the concept of the &quot;Navier-Stokes equations&quot; can be applied here?

Maybe it is as Einstein relayed that the ancients had a &quot;purity of thought&quot; based on the fluidic notions of the QGP??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More on name.</p>
<p>Possibly from a generalized &#8220;point of view&#8221; the concept of the &#8220;Navier-Stokes equations&#8221; can be applied here?</p>
<p>Maybe it is as Einstein relayed that the ancients had a &#8220;purity of thought&#8221; based on the fluidic notions of the QGP??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Francis Sedgemore &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sun snap</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21173</link>
		<dc:creator>Francis Sedgemore &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Sun snap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21173</guid>
		<description>[...] Hat tip: JoAnne at Cosmic Variance. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hat tip: JoAnne at Cosmic Variance. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/comment-page-1/#comment-21172</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 14:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/13/sun-shots/#comment-21172</guid>
		<description>Out of interest, does anybody know the source of the huge horizontal bar across the image?  I assume it is to do with the detector rather than something physical, but would like to make sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of interest, does anybody know the source of the huge horizontal bar across the image?  I assume it is to do with the detector rather than something physical, but would like to make sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
