<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Merry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sidles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23505</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sidles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23505</guid>
		<description>To continue the cheerful universalist  theme of the preceding posts, here is the concluding paragraph of Jonathan Israel&#039;s newly released opus, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199279227&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Enlightment Contested&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;blockquote&gt;What is conceivably `worst of all,&#039; as some alert observers have warned, is that &#039;the fashionable despair about the prospects for humankind fostered by Postmodernism could easily prove to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.&#039;  Yes, indeed.   The democratic, egalitarian, and libertarian quest of the Radical Enlightenment might very well fail in the end---or rather be defeated and overwhelmed.  But if so, this will be at least partly due to the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century failure not just of philosophy on all continents but more broadly of the humanities, and the world&#039;s universities, both in general terms and, more specifically, their failure to teach humanity about the historical origins and true character of the `modern&#039; ideas of democracy, equality, individual freedom, full toleration, liberty of expression, anti-colonialism, and our universalist secular morality based on equity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;Prof. Israel&#039;s account of the Enlightenment includes illuminating portrayals of numerous scientists and mathematicians &amp; are particularly recommended to young people who cherish---as they did---the hope and expectation that their work will make an enduring difference to a troubled world.

It&#039;s admittedly true that parsing Prof. Israel&#039;s lengthy sentences can be pretty challenging!  But one gets used to it, and their content amply rewards the effort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To continue the cheerful universalist  theme of the preceding posts, here is the concluding paragraph of Jonathan Israel&#8217;s newly released opus, <a href="http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199279227" rel="nofollow"><em>Enlightment Contested</em></a>:<br />
<blockquote>What is conceivably `worst of all,&#8217; as some alert observers have warned, is that &#8216;the fashionable despair about the prospects for humankind fostered by Postmodernism could easily prove to be a self-fulfilling prophecy.&#8217;  Yes, indeed.   The democratic, egalitarian, and libertarian quest of the Radical Enlightenment might very well fail in the end&#8212;or rather be defeated and overwhelmed.  But if so, this will be at least partly due to the late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century failure not just of philosophy on all continents but more broadly of the humanities, and the world&#8217;s universities, both in general terms and, more specifically, their failure to teach humanity about the historical origins and true character of the `modern&#8217; ideas of democracy, equality, individual freedom, full toleration, liberty of expression, anti-colonialism, and our universalist secular morality based on equity.</p></blockquote>
<p>Prof. Israel&#8217;s account of the Enlightenment includes illuminating portrayals of numerous scientists and mathematicians &amp; are particularly recommended to young people who cherish&#8212;as they did&#8212;the hope and expectation that their work will make an enduring difference to a troubled world.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s admittedly true that parsing Prof. Israel&#8217;s lengthy sentences can be pretty challenging!  But one gets used to it, and their content amply rewards the effort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23504</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 15:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23504</guid>
		<description>I would like to back-up some of the stuff I said about some people having a better opinion about one God religions (even though whether someone follows a one God or a many God religion or no religion (like myself) is a matter of complete indifference to me):

There are many websites where one can find this opinion but I went to one of my favorites:

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/09/15/no-true-believer/#comments

Comment #19 says

&quot;...Qur&#039;an also says- &#039;Whoever believes in One God, does righteous deeds and is just and reasonable, whatever he may call himself, a Jew, a Christian or a Muslim, he will be forgiven.&#039;&quot;

I won&#039;t comment on and on this any further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to back-up some of the stuff I said about some people having a better opinion about one God religions (even though whether someone follows a one God or a many God religion or no religion (like myself) is a matter of complete indifference to me):</p>
<p>There are many websites where one can find this opinion but I went to one of my favorites:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/09/15/no-true-believer/#comments" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/09/15/no-true-believer/#comments</a></p>
<p>Comment #19 says</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Qur&#8217;an also says- &#8216;Whoever believes in One God, does righteous deeds and is just and reasonable, whatever he may call himself, a Jew, a Christian or a Muslim, he will be forgiven.&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t comment on and on this any further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23503</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 08:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23503</guid>
		<description>Of course it is entirely possible that Jesus was a &quot;code name&quot; for a psychedelic mushroom cult see: John Allegro &quot;The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross&quot; 1970.

Certainly as plausible as the virgin birth business, and the even more thermodynamically challenging... rising from the dead.

In any case I hope the holidays and the spirit of the season brings peace to all of you and peace throughout the world.

Elliot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it is entirely possible that Jesus was a &#8220;code name&#8221; for a psychedelic mushroom cult see: John Allegro &#8220;The Sacred Mushroom and the Cross&#8221; 1970.</p>
<p>Certainly as plausible as the virgin birth business, and the even more thermodynamically challenging&#8230; rising from the dead.</p>
<p>In any case I hope the holidays and the spirit of the season brings peace to all of you and peace throughout the world.</p>
<p>Elliot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaleberg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23502</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaleberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 04:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23502</guid>
		<description>Is Christmas still celebrated as a Christian holiday? How many people still attend mass, or an alternative Christian service, on Christmas? In old New England, going to church was the only legal way to celebrate, but attendance at church has fallen dramatically since the 1950s when electrical power dispatchers could watch America come home from church on Sunday and turn on its ovens for Sunday dinner.

Of course Christianity adapted Christmas from other religions. The solstice holiday is very old, and every religion borrows and makes things up as it goes along. The very idea of a messiah is pre-Judaic, though messiah is just an adaption of the name Moses, or Moshiach in Hebrew. But where did Jews come up with the Feast of Lights, aka Hannukah? A Feast of Lights is a pretty obvious idea for a solstice holiday.

Every religion borrows and adapts. Why do Jews celebrate the solstice by eating pancakes made from an Incan tuber? Is this Atahualpa&#039;s revenge? Why did Martin Luther encourage Protestants to celebrate the season by incorporating elements of Germanic tree worship? Why was the York cathedral only cathedral in England to allow missletoe in its solstice decorations? Was it because York was an old Druid center?

Our love of the spiritual is much like our love of music. Every human society has some form of spirituality in which the individual senses themselves as part of something greater, just as every human society has some form of musical expression. We are clearly equipped with certain organs of perception and enjoyment. What better time to experience that sense of a greater power than when the sun turns its path in the sky, whether we attribute this to the gods, one god or as a simple consequence of general relativity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Christmas still celebrated as a Christian holiday? How many people still attend mass, or an alternative Christian service, on Christmas? In old New England, going to church was the only legal way to celebrate, but attendance at church has fallen dramatically since the 1950s when electrical power dispatchers could watch America come home from church on Sunday and turn on its ovens for Sunday dinner.</p>
<p>Of course Christianity adapted Christmas from other religions. The solstice holiday is very old, and every religion borrows and makes things up as it goes along. The very idea of a messiah is pre-Judaic, though messiah is just an adaption of the name Moses, or Moshiach in Hebrew. But where did Jews come up with the Feast of Lights, aka Hannukah? A Feast of Lights is a pretty obvious idea for a solstice holiday.</p>
<p>Every religion borrows and adapts. Why do Jews celebrate the solstice by eating pancakes made from an Incan tuber? Is this Atahualpa&#8217;s revenge? Why did Martin Luther encourage Protestants to celebrate the season by incorporating elements of Germanic tree worship? Why was the York cathedral only cathedral in England to allow missletoe in its solstice decorations? Was it because York was an old Druid center?</p>
<p>Our love of the spiritual is much like our love of music. Every human society has some form of spirituality in which the individual senses themselves as part of something greater, just as every human society has some form of musical expression. We are clearly equipped with certain organs of perception and enjoyment. What better time to experience that sense of a greater power than when the sun turns its path in the sky, whether we attribute this to the gods, one god or as a simple consequence of general relativity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chemicalscum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23501</link>
		<dc:creator>chemicalscum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 03:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23501</guid>
		<description>Vince - I said there is no reliable historical evidence Jesus existed.  Historians like scientists have criteria for the establishment of facts.  Normally this requires two or more independent contemporary accounts.  Other than the gospels which are themselves not contemporary accounts being written down about century or more later, there is I think only the two references to Jesus in Josephus which he wrote over a century later than the alleged events in the gospels.  Christian apologists use the Josephus reference as a an argument for historical evidence of the this existence of Jesus.  Josephus however cites no sources for his reference to Jesus and from the context he is probably repeating what he was told by Christian Jews.

Given the remarkable events described in the gospels it is surprising that there are no independent contemporary accounts that refer to them in surviving historical sources in aramaic, greek or latin.

Jesus may or may not have existed, or been a confabulation relating to several Jewish religious teachers, we just don&#039;t know - ignoramus.  However in the form he is described in the new testament he appears to acquire the attributes of the ancient Egyptian god Osiris.  So to the critical he is just another version of the ancient resurrected  gods like Osiris, Dionysus and Baldur.

A merry Pagan Christmas I say as I watch the embers of my burning Yule log fade and look at my Christmas tree filled with Pagan significance and kiss my wife under the mistletoe considered holy by the ancient Druids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince &#8211; I said there is no reliable historical evidence Jesus existed.  Historians like scientists have criteria for the establishment of facts.  Normally this requires two or more independent contemporary accounts.  Other than the gospels which are themselves not contemporary accounts being written down about century or more later, there is I think only the two references to Jesus in Josephus which he wrote over a century later than the alleged events in the gospels.  Christian apologists use the Josephus reference as a an argument for historical evidence of the this existence of Jesus.  Josephus however cites no sources for his reference to Jesus and from the context he is probably repeating what he was told by Christian Jews.</p>
<p>Given the remarkable events described in the gospels it is surprising that there are no independent contemporary accounts that refer to them in surviving historical sources in aramaic, greek or latin.</p>
<p>Jesus may or may not have existed, or been a confabulation relating to several Jewish religious teachers, we just don&#8217;t know &#8211; ignoramus.  However in the form he is described in the new testament he appears to acquire the attributes of the ancient Egyptian god Osiris.  So to the critical he is just another version of the ancient resurrected  gods like Osiris, Dionysus and Baldur.</p>
<p>A merry Pagan Christmas I say as I watch the embers of my burning Yule log fade and look at my Christmas tree filled with Pagan significance and kiss my wife under the mistletoe considered holy by the ancient Druids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23500</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 03:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23500</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I also appreciate JoAnne&#039;s, Mark&#039;s, and Risa&#039;s efforts too.  I forgot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I also appreciate JoAnne&#8217;s, Mark&#8217;s, and Risa&#8217;s efforts too.  I forgot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23499</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 02:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23499</guid>
		<description>I also think CV is a great place. A final comment on my part: Although I&#039;ve respect for all faiths, just wanted to say that I&#039;ve always felt that literal beliefs in all faiths have brought about a lot of injustice in different forms.
Oh and John Sidles&#039;s (#16) essay was a good read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think CV is a great place. A final comment on my part: Although I&#8217;ve respect for all faiths, just wanted to say that I&#8217;ve always felt that literal beliefs in all faiths have brought about a lot of injustice in different forms.<br />
Oh and John Sidles&#8217;s (#16) essay was a good read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23498</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 01:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23498</guid>
		<description>&quot;The theologically ignorant shouldn&#039;t advocate for the theologies in which they profess faith (Aquinas was certainly not &quot;early&quot; by any sense of the use of the term);&quot;

If that was aimed at me, then I&#039;m very sorry I grouped Aquinas into the &quot;early&quot; camp.  You&#039;re totally right, he&#039;s not really &quot;early&quot;.  But this slight blunder doesn&#039;t make me theologically ignorant, although I have much to learn about Christian theology and its history.  But I don&#039;t have time, since I need to learn physics. ;)

One way to love Osama is to pray for him if you&#039;re religious, and also not to kill him if he is ever captured.  But that doesn&#039;t mean that he shouldn&#039;t be caught and imprisoned, since he&#039;s a danger to many other humans, who also need our love.  Loving your enemies also means to forgive them, but that also doesn&#039;t mean we should let all criminals or fugitives go free.  I&#039;m just speaking in general terms here.

Okay, I&#039;m going to shut up now.  Sorry...
Blogs are too addictive.  But also, CV is a good blog, and I do appreciate Sean&#039;s efforts to make this blog entertaining and informative.  Congratulations on your engagement, by the way.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The theologically ignorant shouldn&#8217;t advocate for the theologies in which they profess faith (Aquinas was certainly not &#8220;early&#8221; by any sense of the use of the term);&#8221;</p>
<p>If that was aimed at me, then I&#8217;m very sorry I grouped Aquinas into the &#8220;early&#8221; camp.  You&#8217;re totally right, he&#8217;s not really &#8220;early&#8221;.  But this slight blunder doesn&#8217;t make me theologically ignorant, although I have much to learn about Christian theology and its history.  But I don&#8217;t have time, since I need to learn physics. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One way to love Osama is to pray for him if you&#8217;re religious, and also not to kill him if he is ever captured.  But that doesn&#8217;t mean that he shouldn&#8217;t be caught and imprisoned, since he&#8217;s a danger to many other humans, who also need our love.  Loving your enemies also means to forgive them, but that also doesn&#8217;t mean we should let all criminals or fugitives go free.  I&#8217;m just speaking in general terms here.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m going to shut up now.  Sorry&#8230;<br />
Blogs are too addictive.  But also, CV is a good blog, and I do appreciate Sean&#8217;s efforts to make this blog entertaining and informative.  Congratulations on your engagement, by the way.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23497</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23497</guid>
		<description>spyder, where you talking to Vince? This has happened before, it would be easier if people made clear who they were talking to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spyder, where you talking to Vince? This has happened before, it would be easier if people made clear who they were talking to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23496</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23496</guid>
		<description>spyder, I never &quot;professed&quot; faith in anything; I myself am &quot;mostly secular&quot;. Nice article though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spyder, I never &#8220;professed&#8221; faith in anything; I myself am &#8220;mostly secular&#8221;. Nice article though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23495</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23495</guid>
		<description>The theologically ignorant shouldn&#039;t advocate for the theologies in which they profess faith (Aquinas was certainly not &quot;early&quot; by any sense of the use of the term); but that said, maybe a different way to view this secular celebration of massive consumption in order to continue to facilitate the functioning of the economic infrastructure can be viewed something like this:
&lt;blockquote&gt;It&#039;s 2000 years later and they still haven&#039;t been able to kill the revolutionary message of Christmas. God knows they&#039;ve tried. The Powers That Be will never be comfortable with The Power That Is. That Power - whether you call it God, or Consciousness, or Scientific Principle - is universal and freely available to all.  That makes it subversive to centralized authority.
That&#039;s true whether you&#039;re the kind of Christian who believes Jesus is the sole path to salvation, an atheist who admires his ethical principles, a Muslim who acknowledges Jesus as a great prophet, a Hindu who sees him as an avatar of Brahman, or a Jew who considers him a great Jewish teacher.

How tough is Jesus&#039; message? Consider this: he instructed his followers to &quot;love your enemies.&quot; Now think of your enemies. Are they the secular humanists? The Godless liberals? Or are they the Fox News crowd? George Bush? Dick Cheney?

He said &quot;love them.&quot; Period.

Now think about this: Jesus has instructed you to love Osama Bin Laden, too. His orders are clear. He&#039;s told you to love Al Qaeda, and the men who beheaded Michael Berg too. You can resist them, but you have to love them. Do you call yourself a Christian? Call me back when you love Osama.

Peace on Earth. Good will toward All. Those aren&#039;t my words. They came with the season.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The rest of this quite good essay found here: http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/4176</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theologically ignorant shouldn&#8217;t advocate for the theologies in which they profess faith (Aquinas was certainly not &#8220;early&#8221; by any sense of the use of the term); but that said, maybe a different way to view this secular celebration of massive consumption in order to continue to facilitate the functioning of the economic infrastructure can be viewed something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s 2000 years later and they still haven&#8217;t been able to kill the revolutionary message of Christmas. God knows they&#8217;ve tried. The Powers That Be will never be comfortable with The Power That Is. That Power &#8211; whether you call it God, or Consciousness, or Scientific Principle &#8211; is universal and freely available to all.  That makes it subversive to centralized authority.<br />
That&#8217;s true whether you&#8217;re the kind of Christian who believes Jesus is the sole path to salvation, an atheist who admires his ethical principles, a Muslim who acknowledges Jesus as a great prophet, a Hindu who sees him as an avatar of Brahman, or a Jew who considers him a great Jewish teacher.</p>
<p>How tough is Jesus&#8217; message? Consider this: he instructed his followers to &#8220;love your enemies.&#8221; Now think of your enemies. Are they the secular humanists? The Godless liberals? Or are they the Fox News crowd? George Bush? Dick Cheney?</p>
<p>He said &#8220;love them.&#8221; Period.</p>
<p>Now think about this: Jesus has instructed you to love Osama Bin Laden, too. His orders are clear. He&#8217;s told you to love Al Qaeda, and the men who beheaded Michael Berg too. You can resist them, but you have to love them. Do you call yourself a Christian? Call me back when you love Osama.</p>
<p>Peace on Earth. Good will toward All. Those aren&#8217;t my words. They came with the season.</p></blockquote>
<p>The rest of this quite good essay found here: <a href="http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/4176" rel="nofollow">http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/4176</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23494</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23494</guid>
		<description>Vince, This topics is not of much interest to me beyond assuring equality for everyone&#039;s faith. I am glad that you think that Hinduism is as respectable as Christianity or Islam (I&#039;ve heard/read many opinions otherwise). I&#039;ve not given much thought on the role of possible God(s) in the world etc., but I do think multiple personalities would need to be involved ;-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince, This topics is not of much interest to me beyond assuring equality for everyone&#8217;s faith. I am glad that you think that Hinduism is as respectable as Christianity or Islam (I&#8217;ve heard/read many opinions otherwise). I&#8217;ve not given much thought on the role of possible God(s) in the world etc., but I do think multiple personalities would need to be involved <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23493</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23493</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have a theory that belief in God doesn&#039;t have any effect at all on how moral and virtuous you are, but does tend to make you humorless and annoying.&quot;

I wasn&#039;t trying to be funny.  Though I can be, as you&#039;ll learn if you were to ask some of my friends.  Neither was I trying to be annoying, but I was trying to argue for something.  Clearly, my analogy wasn&#039;t convincing.  But I&#039;m not sure why you find me annoying.  I was just trying to argue my point.  What&#039;s wrong with that?

Chemicalscum, I don&#039;t think there is no evidence that Jesus existed, and even if he didn&#039;t exist, Christians believe he existed and so they celebrate the event of his birth on a particular date.  Christians believe that Jesus was a really cool guy and so every year, on December 25th, they celebrate his birth.  This celebration is called Christmas.  Sure, aspects of the celebration contain pagan elements, and even the date was chosen because of a pagan celebration, but the celebration itself is for the birth of a particular man Christians believe once walked on this earth.

Chinmaya Sheth, I don&#039;t mean to be annoying or anything, but I don&#039;t think anybody thinks belief in more than one God is less respectable.  However, there were some early Christian theologians (like Thomas Aquinas) who basically tried to argue not only for God&#039;s existence (according to a certain definition of what is mean by &#039;God&#039;), but also what sort of &quot;properties&quot; can be attributed to this God, and blah blah blah basically came up with the conclusion that that God must be one.  Anyway, I&#039;m not too sure by what you mean by &quot;the Earth (not to mention the rest of the universe) is a complicated place and I don&#039;t think one God can handle all the variety.&quot;  I mean, how do the earth and the rest of the universe need to be &quot;handled&quot; by the single or multiple Gods.  You know?

Going back to the non-reliable evidence, tell that to, for example, the guys named Peter and Paul, who were crucified for delivering the message of this other guy named Jesus, who may have been a figment of their imaginations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have a theory that belief in God doesn&#8217;t have any effect at all on how moral and virtuous you are, but does tend to make you humorless and annoying.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t trying to be funny.  Though I can be, as you&#8217;ll learn if you were to ask some of my friends.  Neither was I trying to be annoying, but I was trying to argue for something.  Clearly, my analogy wasn&#8217;t convincing.  But I&#8217;m not sure why you find me annoying.  I was just trying to argue my point.  What&#8217;s wrong with that?</p>
<p>Chemicalscum, I don&#8217;t think there is no evidence that Jesus existed, and even if he didn&#8217;t exist, Christians believe he existed and so they celebrate the event of his birth on a particular date.  Christians believe that Jesus was a really cool guy and so every year, on December 25th, they celebrate his birth.  This celebration is called Christmas.  Sure, aspects of the celebration contain pagan elements, and even the date was chosen because of a pagan celebration, but the celebration itself is for the birth of a particular man Christians believe once walked on this earth.</p>
<p>Chinmaya Sheth, I don&#8217;t mean to be annoying or anything, but I don&#8217;t think anybody thinks belief in more than one God is less respectable.  However, there were some early Christian theologians (like Thomas Aquinas) who basically tried to argue not only for God&#8217;s existence (according to a certain definition of what is mean by &#8216;God&#8217;), but also what sort of &#8220;properties&#8221; can be attributed to this God, and blah blah blah basically came up with the conclusion that that God must be one.  Anyway, I&#8217;m not too sure by what you mean by &#8220;the Earth (not to mention the rest of the universe) is a complicated place and I don&#8217;t think one God can handle all the variety.&#8221;  I mean, how do the earth and the rest of the universe need to be &#8220;handled&#8221; by the single or multiple Gods.  You know?</p>
<p>Going back to the non-reliable evidence, tell that to, for example, the guys named Peter and Paul, who were crucified for delivering the message of this other guy named Jesus, who may have been a figment of their imaginations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23492</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 22:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23492</guid>
		<description>Sorry, typo in #15: line 3 should actually be  &quot;why belief in more than one God is seen somehow to be less &quot;respectable&quot; than belief in one God.&quot; Although CV is mostly secular it is somehow the only place where I end up talking about God(s) :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, typo in #15: line 3 should actually be  &#8220;why belief in more than one God is seen somehow to be less &#8220;respectable&#8221; than belief in one God.&#8221; Although CV is mostly secular it is somehow the only place where I end up talking about God(s) <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zq</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23491</link>
		<dc:creator>zq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 21:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23491</guid>
		<description>Merry Xmas, scientists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Xmas, scientists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Sidles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23490</link>
		<dc:creator>John Sidles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23490</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, a thread filled with Christmas spirit!

In honor of which, I have composed a light-hearted Christmas essay on that contentious subject: quantum gravity.  If your post ain&#039;t filled with the Christmas spirit, don&#039;t reply!

--------

&lt;i&gt;Part - I: Alice&#039;s Christmas Adventures in Quantum Gravity&lt;/i&gt;

As a Christmas shakedown test of her quantum model order reduction codes, engineer Alice Michanikos (her family name) is running a simulation of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v430/n6997/abs/nature02658.html;jsessionid=42E8E6EA22A53B4E7B75B77884CF227B&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IBM single-spin MRFM experiment&lt;/a&gt;.

&#039;&quot;How very interesting!&quot; thinks Alice.  &quot;The mass of the cantilever is 92 picograms, the decorrelation time scale is 100 msec, and the separation of its trajectory for spin-up versus spin-down measurements on this time scale is 280 picometers.  Since the IBM team experimentally observed a mean-square spin polarization of unity (versus classical mean-square polarization of 1/3), it must be the case that quantum theories of gravity&#8212;once we finish constructing them&#8212;will support macroscopic polarizations for Schroedinger cats of this mass, this timescale, and this spatial separation.&quot;

&quot;Hmmm ... &quot; thinks Alice.  &quot;If only the gravitational theorists would be so good as provide me with a well-posed mathematical recipe, it would be quite easy for me to include the cantilever&#039;s gravitational metric in my engineering functional emulations.  The good news is, that &lt;a href=&quot;http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0608018&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bob Wald&#039;s recent preprint&lt;/a&gt; tells me in great detail how quantum fields accommodate to metrics.  Now, as a quantum system engineer, what I mainly need to know is how metrics accommodate to quantum fields.  How hard can it be?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, a thread filled with Christmas spirit!</p>
<p>In honor of which, I have composed a light-hearted Christmas essay on that contentious subject: quantum gravity.  If your post ain&#8217;t filled with the Christmas spirit, don&#8217;t reply!</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p><i>Part &#8211; I: Alice&#8217;s Christmas Adventures in Quantum Gravity</i></p>
<p>As a Christmas shakedown test of her quantum model order reduction codes, engineer Alice Michanikos (her family name) is running a simulation of the <a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v430/n6997/abs/nature02658.html;jsessionid=42E8E6EA22A53B4E7B75B77884CF227B" rel="nofollow">IBM single-spin MRFM experiment</a>.</p>
<p>&#8216;&#8221;How very interesting!&#8221; thinks Alice.  &#8220;The mass of the cantilever is 92 picograms, the decorrelation time scale is 100 msec, and the separation of its trajectory for spin-up versus spin-down measurements on this time scale is 280 picometers.  Since the IBM team experimentally observed a mean-square spin polarization of unity (versus classical mean-square polarization of 1/3), it must be the case that quantum theories of gravity&#8212;once we finish constructing them&#8212;will support macroscopic polarizations for Schroedinger cats of this mass, this timescale, and this spatial separation.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Hmmm &#8230; &#8221; thinks Alice.  &#8220;If only the gravitational theorists would be so good as provide me with a well-posed mathematical recipe, it would be quite easy for me to include the cantilever&#8217;s gravitational metric in my engineering functional emulations.  The good news is, that <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0608018" rel="nofollow">Bob Wald&#8217;s recent preprint</a> tells me in great detail how quantum fields accommodate to metrics.  Now, as a quantum system engineer, what I mainly need to know is how metrics accommodate to quantum fields.  How hard can it be?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chinmaya Sheth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23489</link>
		<dc:creator>Chinmaya Sheth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:50:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23489</guid>
		<description>Merry Christmas! or Happy Holidays!
I&#039;ve respect for everyone&#039;s faith, but being brought up in a Hindu family I&#039;ve never quite understood why belief in more than one God is seen somehow to be less &quot;respectable&quot; than belief in multiple Gods. If I were to have religious beliefs they would probably involve more than one God: the Earth (not to mention the rest of the universe) is a complicated place and I don&#039;t think one God can handle all the variety :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Merry Christmas! or Happy Holidays!<br />
I&#8217;ve respect for everyone&#8217;s faith, but being brought up in a Hindu family I&#8217;ve never quite understood why belief in more than one God is seen somehow to be less &#8220;respectable&#8221; than belief in multiple Gods. If I were to have religious beliefs they would probably involve more than one God: the Earth (not to mention the rest of the universe) is a complicated place and I don&#8217;t think one God can handle all the variety <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chemicalscum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23488</link>
		<dc:creator>chemicalscum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23488</guid>
		<description>Vince leave your Christian apologetics at home and enjoy a Pagan holiday with the rest of us.  By the way your Jim Morrison analogy is irrelevent to the argument unless you want to take up the worship or the late (we are still waiting for the resurrection) Jim Morrison http://www.thedoors.com/

Look at it this way. The major Pagan festivals were at midwinter and spring.  The early church tried to incorporate them so christmas and easter have pagan origins an contain pagan elements.  As for the birthday of Jesus their is no reliable historical evidence that he even existed let alone for a birth date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vince leave your Christian apologetics at home and enjoy a Pagan holiday with the rest of us.  By the way your Jim Morrison analogy is irrelevent to the argument unless you want to take up the worship or the late (we are still waiting for the resurrection) Jim Morrison <a href="http://www.thedoors.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thedoors.com/</a></p>
<p>Look at it this way. The major Pagan festivals were at midwinter and spring.  The early church tried to incorporate them so christmas and easter have pagan origins an contain pagan elements.  As for the birthday of Jesus their is no reliable historical evidence that he even existed let alone for a birth date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23487</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23487</guid>
		<description>I have a theory that belief in God doesn&#039;t have any effect at all on how moral and virtuous you are, but does tend to make you humorless and annoying.

Merry Christmas, everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a theory that belief in God doesn&#8217;t have any effect at all on how moral and virtuous you are, but does tend to make you humorless and annoying.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas, everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vince</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/comment-page-1/#comment-23486</link>
		<dc:creator>Vince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/12/24/merry/#comment-23486</guid>
		<description>There you go, Christmas and Easter have Christian origins, each holiday celebrating something that happened to Jesus.  Just because they coincide with pagan holidays, doesn&#039;t mean they have pagan origins.  If parents decide to conceive a kid at a particular time in hopes that the kid is born on the same day as Jim Morrison&#039;s birthday (they are huge fans of The Doors), and the kid IS born on Jim&#039;s birthday, this doesn&#039;t mean that future birthday celebrations has Jim Morrison origins, as though the celebration was just copied from Jim Morrison or the story of the birth of this kid is made up, and we should really be celebrating Jim Morrison&#039;s birthday if we want to stick to reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There you go, Christmas and Easter have Christian origins, each holiday celebrating something that happened to Jesus.  Just because they coincide with pagan holidays, doesn&#8217;t mean they have pagan origins.  If parents decide to conceive a kid at a particular time in hopes that the kid is born on the same day as Jim Morrison&#8217;s birthday (they are huge fans of The Doors), and the kid IS born on Jim&#8217;s birthday, this doesn&#8217;t mean that future birthday celebrations has Jim Morrison origins, as though the celebration was just copied from Jim Morrison or the story of the birth of this kid is made up, and we should really be celebrating Jim Morrison&#8217;s birthday if we want to stick to reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 17:09:16 -->
