DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« arxiv Find: Cycling in the Throat
Unto Himself »

Jim Gray lost at sea

by Daniel Holz

Jim Gray, a major contributor to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, has gone missing. From Rich Kron:

As many of you know, our colleague Jim Gray has been missing at sea since Sunday evening. He was sailing near San Francisco in good weather. He is a
highly experienced sailor, and the boat is well-instrumented. So far no
trace has been found, despite continuing, highly intensive searches.
He has had an enormous impact on our Collaboration. He has generously spent a large fraction of his time over the last 5 years to work with us to create the SDSS. Our thoughts are with him and his family, and we hope for his safe return.

There is an effort to help with the search. Details from Alex Szalay:

We are processing hi-rez satellite images with a 0.8m resolution into 512×512 JPG tiles. They are placed on a website for visual inspection. If you have a bit of free time over the weekend, please help in inspecting a few images.
It is a long shot, but everyone is getting pretty desperate. There is additional info, and in particular other images.

A news article on the search.

Share

February 3rd, 2007 1:19 PM
in Miscellany | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

8 Responses to “Jim Gray lost at sea”

  1. 1.   spyder Says:
    February 3rd, 2007 at 2:16 pm

    the most recent story, as of two hours ago…

    “Private pilots, colleagues of Gray, and a corps of volunteers from Silicon Valley firms have stepped in to the breach, just as the Coast Guard was calling off its search after finding no sign of Tenacious, the 40-foot sailboat Gray had taken out Sunday to scatter his mother’s ashes near the Farallon Islands.”

  2. 2.   Carl Brannen Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 3:04 am

    You need to specify a scale. If the photos cover 7000 square miles, then each clickable region is about 1/60 of this or 120 square miles. Each image is about 1/256 of this or about a 0.5 square miles = 12705000 square feet. That makes each pixel about 49 feet. Picking out a ship whose longest dimension is roughly one pixel is going to require considerable luck.

    Or do the pictures cover 7000 square miles?

  3. 3.   Analyzer Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 8:28 am

    The “images” link has a reference rectangle for you to use.

  4. 4.   Joe Fitzsimons Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 8:55 am

    According to the link, it’s 0.8m resolution. The boat is about 10px*4px, from the image link.

  5. 5.   Z Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    It’s a pity there is no software to automatically search photos for this kind of thing. There are hundreds of thousands of photo images to check.

  6. 6.   zqhuang Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 4:39 pm

    Bless him.

  7. 7.   Ars Mathematica » Blog Archive » Jim Gray Missing Says:
    February 4th, 2007 at 9:53 pm

    [...] Update. Cosmic Variance has more about Gray. He was a major contributor to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. [...]

  8. 8.   jon Says:
    April 2nd, 2007 at 10:16 am

    such a genius

    cant even survice a 3 hour tour

    or be prepared with sat phone etc





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • jammer on Mind = Blown
      • Kaleberg on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us