DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Thank You, Richard Dawkins
First Andrew Chamblin Memorial Lecture »

Awwwwwwww

by Sean Carroll

Jennifer tries to take the high road with her Valentine’s Day post. A little science, a dash of poetry, a bit of cute archeology.

But it’s all just a distraction to prevent people from noticing this picture in Nature. That’s one she’ll never live down!

Nor will I.

Share

February 14th, 2007 1:35 PM
in Personal | 15 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

15 Responses to “Awwwwwwww”

  1. 1.   adam Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 4:09 pm

    Every blog in the world should link that picture, to ensure that it’s always high in the google rankings.

  2. 2.   adam Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 4:12 pm

    I don’t know what it should be linked as, though.

  3. 3.   Jennifer Ouellette Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 5:10 pm

    Damn! My nefarious plot to deflect attention from the NATURE pic has been foiled!

  4. 4.   Jeff Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 5:11 pm

    wow. an amazingly sappy photo. really guys… but a great article! (going through that problem at this exact moment too — the wife is giving a job talk about 2000 miles north of here in about 20 minutes…)

  5. 5.   B Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 6:08 pm

    I liked the picture and the Nature article :-) What came into my mind while reading was a conversation I had 4 years ago with the women who was in charge of the administration for scholarship holders back in Frankfurt. I told her I’d move to the USA. She looked really concerned, and said bluntly: “It’s going to kill your relationship. It always does. I’ve seen it happen again and again.” Well. Three years later Stefan and I got married. He sent me the link to the Nature article earlier today – there should be more writings like this!

    Have a good day,

    B.

  6. 6.   adam Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 6:13 pm

    A few hundred bloggers linking to that page as “carebear scientists” might do the trick.

  7. 7.   Joseph Smidt Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 6:44 pm

    Great valentine’s surprise, and great article. Congradulations again to the both of you.

    Esther gave me a great surprise to: the new string theory book by Becker/Becker/Schwarz. Who could have a better wife?

  8. 8.   Jennifer Ouellette Says:
    February 14th, 2007 at 9:20 pm

    Truly, I was not responsible for the picture-inside-a-heart thing; NATURE just decided to have a little whimsical fun with the layout. And c’mon, it’s rather sweet.

    I almost contacted B and her husband for the article, except I didn’t want to only interview couples in physics. :)

  9. 9.   JoAnne Says:
    February 15th, 2007 at 3:54 am

    A little known fact is that the APS study performed almost a decade ago was inspired by my very own hopeless 2-body situation. Marc Sher is a close friend and felt compelled to do something when he heard all that had happened to me and my recent ex-spouse (all was not well at the end of a 15 year struggle for jobs) – and so Marc started a small study and discovered the tip of an iceberg.

  10. 10.   Allyson Says:
    February 15th, 2007 at 4:05 pm

    I know lots of couples who have met through Buffy fandom. Not really sure that’s a job, though.

    Maybe for you and me.

  11. 11.   Stefan Says:
    February 15th, 2007 at 4:13 pm

    I like the bubble chamber artwork very much!

    I almost contacted B and her husband for the article…

    gulp… I’m not sure if I had appreciated that kind of prominence ;-)

  12. 12.   Eugene Says:
    February 15th, 2007 at 4:14 pm

    Awwwwwwwwwwwwwww

  13. 13.   Levi Says:
    February 16th, 2007 at 8:27 am

    I liked the article a lot, once I got past the sappy pictures. Just kidding. My sense is that in math quite a few mid-major universities have been able to strengthen their departments by solving the two-body problem, when two positions are open. It’s always delicate since legally (and morally) each partner has to individually be arguably the strongest applicant for each position. When this is the case, though, the departments not only get two good mathematicians. They get two good mathematicians who stay awhile instead of immediately shopping themselves to more high powered institutions.

  14. 14.   Charlie Petit Says:
    February 16th, 2007 at 8:39 am

    Well, congratulations to you both (it says engaged, but one presumes there’s a marriage date, past or present?) . That’s one cute couple in the picture and believe me, your kids will treasure it some day. It’ll prove you’re the dorks (or whatever their term d’jour will be) they’ll love to declare you to be. A bonus is to have been led to Cocktail Party Physics, a very fine and delightfully written site.

  15. 15.   adam Says:
    February 16th, 2007 at 9:04 am

    A fair number of universities in the US are in locations where, even if the spouse of a professorial candidate isn’t themselves in academia, job opportunities can be limited. Around here, that’s probably a bigger problem than the ‘two body problem’ where both are academics.





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • jammer on Mind = Blown
      • Kaleberg on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us