<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cult of Genius</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:03:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Discovering Feynman &#171; Brute Force Physics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-84518</link>
		<dc:creator>Discovering Feynman &#171; Brute Force Physics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-84518</guid>
		<description>[...] as mythical in the popular press as Einstein, yet he was certainly a cut above the rest.  I agree Julianne&#8217;s take on Feynman, though I had no qualms about worshiping Feynman as an undergrad.  Feynman worship in graduate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as mythical in the popular press as Einstein, yet he was certainly a cut above the rest.  I agree Julianne&#8217;s take on Feynman, though I had no qualms about worshiping Feynman as an undergrad.  Feynman worship in graduate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ANON</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81374</link>
		<dc:creator>ANON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81374</guid>
		<description>The article, in a practical sense, is very useful. thankyou.

(I&#039;m unique, therefore, statistically, I don&#039;t exist)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article, in a practical sense, is very useful. thankyou.</p>
<p>(I&#8217;m unique, therefore, statistically, I don&#8217;t exist)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for July 6th - The zeitgeist daily</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81303</link>
		<dc:creator>Flow &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daily Digest for July 6th - The zeitgeist daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 04:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81303</guid>
		<description>[...] The Cult of Genius &#8212; 9:40am via Google [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Cult of Genius &mdash; 9:40am via Google [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrFunk</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81275</link>
		<dc:creator>DrFunk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81275</guid>
		<description>Programmers might find this exploration of similar issues from some google guys interesting:  http://code.google.com/intl/es-AR/events/io/sessions/MythGeniusProgrammer.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Programmers might find this exploration of similar issues from some google guys interesting:  <a href="http://code.google.com/intl/es-AR/events/io/sessions/MythGeniusProgrammer.html" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/intl/es-AR/events/io/sessions/MythGeniusProgrammer.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81259</link>
		<dc:creator>MrP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81259</guid>
		<description>&quot;dieties&quot;... What about starting the cult of knowing how to spell &quot;deities&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;dieties&#8221;&#8230; What about starting the cult of knowing how to spell &#8220;deities&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal J. King</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81249</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal J. King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81249</guid>
		<description>144, Volodymyr:

It is not an either/or situation: Clearly hard work is necessary, and trying out different approaches is necessary. But you occasionally meet someone whose ability to attack from a variety of unexpected angles blows you away. This is not something that hard work, alone, can provide.

Aside from Feynman, I also knew a rather more obscure individual. I recall posing a question to him, concerning the existence and nature of a function f(x), that would satisfy f(f(x)) = exp(x). He immediately seized on this question and started thinking out loud; in 15 minutes he got further with it than I had in a day. The next day, I asked for a review of his first 15-minute presentation, which he covered in 5 minutes; and then proceeded to think out loud for another 15-minutes. The third day, I asked for a review of the first two days, which he covered in 5 minutes and then proceeded to go on for another 15 minutes. I gave up trying to follow him, at this point.

In this particular case, I knew that this individual actually had less mathematical background, at that time, than I did, and had never thought about the problem before. In fact, the steps that he took initially were not so different from what I was thinking about, but he took them much faster and kept going and going. He was clearly out-classing me on this topic.

In my interactions with Feynman, it was like that all the time; except that the range and variety of steps that he would consider were wilder. Actually, it wasn&#039;t discouraging, it was liberating: It was as if he were giving &quot;permission to play&quot;.

I have met other great physicists, but not anyone who practically sparkled with ideas like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>144, Volodymyr:</p>
<p>It is not an either/or situation: Clearly hard work is necessary, and trying out different approaches is necessary. But you occasionally meet someone whose ability to attack from a variety of unexpected angles blows you away. This is not something that hard work, alone, can provide.</p>
<p>Aside from Feynman, I also knew a rather more obscure individual. I recall posing a question to him, concerning the existence and nature of a function f(x), that would satisfy f(f(x)) = exp(x). He immediately seized on this question and started thinking out loud; in 15 minutes he got further with it than I had in a day. The next day, I asked for a review of his first 15-minute presentation, which he covered in 5 minutes; and then proceeded to think out loud for another 15-minutes. The third day, I asked for a review of the first two days, which he covered in 5 minutes and then proceeded to go on for another 15 minutes. I gave up trying to follow him, at this point.</p>
<p>In this particular case, I knew that this individual actually had less mathematical background, at that time, than I did, and had never thought about the problem before. In fact, the steps that he took initially were not so different from what I was thinking about, but he took them much faster and kept going and going. He was clearly out-classing me on this topic.</p>
<p>In my interactions with Feynman, it was like that all the time; except that the range and variety of steps that he would consider were wilder. Actually, it wasn&#8217;t discouraging, it was liberating: It was as if he were giving &#8220;permission to play&#8221;.</p>
<p>I have met other great physicists, but not anyone who practically sparkled with ideas like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81233</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:51:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81233</guid>
		<description>This is a good description of me. Figured out in grade 10 (while sailing through high school without much effort) that Physics was it. Kept doing well until I got to advanced calculus (roughly Cal IV) and PDE. Then I dropped out of Physics and wondered what the hell I was going to do.

Thanks to a suggestion from a friend (who later became my wife), I turned to linguistics, then cognitive science, in which I&#039;m now about a year away from a PhD (and there&#039;ve been all kinds of crummy grades on the transcript along the way).

And, not that I want to contribute to the cult, but why is von Neumann not mentioned anywhere in the comments? He gets my vote as smartest man of the XXth century (he certainly made significant contributions to more fields than anyone else!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good description of me. Figured out in grade 10 (while sailing through high school without much effort) that Physics was it. Kept doing well until I got to advanced calculus (roughly Cal IV) and PDE. Then I dropped out of Physics and wondered what the hell I was going to do.</p>
<p>Thanks to a suggestion from a friend (who later became my wife), I turned to linguistics, then cognitive science, in which I&#8217;m now about a year away from a PhD (and there&#8217;ve been all kinds of crummy grades on the transcript along the way).</p>
<p>And, not that I want to contribute to the cult, but why is von Neumann not mentioned anywhere in the comments? He gets my vote as smartest man of the XXth century (he certainly made significant contributions to more fields than anyone else!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volodymyr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-81230</link>
		<dc:creator>Volodymyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-81230</guid>
		<description>What bothers me the most when I read this kind of stuff, is that there is no clear reason why the success of Feynman &amp; co. should be attributed to some innate talent rather than to hard work, and yet most people firmly believe in the former explanation. A very plausible reason for the &#039;genius&#039; of all these physicists is that when faced with challenging problems, they didn&#039;t despair like most people, and instead tried experimenting with various approaches, or temporarily switched to different problems. In fact, in many interviews, Feynman himself claimed that &#039;intelligence&#039; had nothing to do with his success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What bothers me the most when I read this kind of stuff, is that there is no clear reason why the success of Feynman &#038; co. should be attributed to some innate talent rather than to hard work, and yet most people firmly believe in the former explanation. A very plausible reason for the &#8216;genius&#8217; of all these physicists is that when faced with challenging problems, they didn&#8217;t despair like most people, and instead tried experimenting with various approaches, or temporarily switched to different problems. In fact, in many interviews, Feynman himself claimed that &#8216;intelligence&#8217; had nothing to do with his success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does One Have to Be a Genius to Do Good Science? &#171; Academic Career Links</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-69191</link>
		<dc:creator>Does One Have to Be a Genius to Do Good Science? &#171; Academic Career Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-69191</guid>
		<description>[...] The Cult of Genius at the Cosmic Variance blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Cult of Genius at the Cosmic Variance blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimGover</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/comment-page-2/#comment-68867</link>
		<dc:creator>TimGover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/02/25/the-cult-of-genius/#comment-68867</guid>
		<description>Things seemed to be easy through out my career so far, but may not be for you guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things seemed to be easy through out my career so far, but may not be for you guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
