Comments on: arxiv Find: Analysis of the Apparent Lack of Power in the CMB Anisotropy at Large Angular Scales http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/ Random samplings from a universe of ideas. Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:18:33 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: The Lopsided Universe | Cosmic Variance http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25915 The Lopsided Universe | Cosmic Variance Sun, 08 Jun 2008 20:48:15 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25915 [...] lopsidedness I’m referring to is different from the so-called axis of evil. The latter (in a cosmological context) refers to an apparent alignment of the temperature [...] [...] lopsidedness I’m referring to is different from the so-called axis of evil. The latter (in a cosmological context) refers to an apparent alignment of the temperature [...]

]]> By: Test Post « metadatta http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25900 Test Post « metadatta Sun, 01 Apr 2007 14:44:43 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25900 [...] On the opposite end of the size spectrum, Cosmic Variance recently hosted a very interesting discussion on some analysis of cosmic microwave background radiation data from WMAP (NASA’s much-publicized effort to very accurately measure the temperature of the CMB). [...] [...] On the opposite end of the size spectrum, Cosmic Variance recently hosted a very interesting discussion on some analysis of cosmic microwave background radiation data from WMAP (NASA’s much-publicized effort to very accurately measure the temperature of the CMB). [...]

]]> By: Philosophia Naturalis #8 « {metadatta} http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25897 Philosophia Naturalis #8 « {metadatta} Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:17:12 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25897 [...] On the opposite end of the size spectrum, Cosmic Variance recently hosted a very interesting discussion on some analysis of cosmic microwave background radiation data from WMAP (NASA’s much-publicized effort to very accurately measure the temperature of the CMB). [...] [...] On the opposite end of the size spectrum, Cosmic Variance recently hosted a very interesting discussion on some analysis of cosmic microwave background radiation data from WMAP (NASA’s much-publicized effort to very accurately measure the temperature of the CMB). [...]

]]> By: George Musser http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25899 George Musser Wed, 14 Mar 2007 21:49:22 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25899 Michael Longo at U Mich claims to see the axis of evil in the orientations of spiral galaxies cataloged by Sloan (astro-ph/0703325) -- what do you think? George Michael Longo at U Mich claims to see the axis of evil in the orientations of spiral galaxies cataloged by Sloan (astro-ph/0703325) — what do you think?

George

]]> By: Garth http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25911 Garth Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:19:41 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25911 When you try to correct the low-l power by adjusting for foreground contamination the problem gets worse. The deficiency is real, the question is: is it significant? Garth When you try to correct the low-l power by adjusting for foreground contamination the problem gets worse.

The deficiency is real, the question is: is it significant?

Garth

]]> By: spaceman http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25910 spaceman Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:30:11 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25910 This is a puzzling paper; it is hard, for me at least, to know what they are trying to convey. It seems this paper is suggesting the Gum Nebula and a spot near the Galactic center are responsible for the low-l power that exists in the maps. What's interesting is that when these spots are masked and the least contaminated portions of the sky are left untouched, the power is suppressed. So, the genuine primordial signiture portion of the sky (away from the galaxy) is telling us that there is vanishing power. But then why are the authors even tentatively concluding that there is no deficit of large scale power? Shouldn't the main result of their analysis be telling them precisely the opposite--that is, the power that exists is in a region where foregrounds are greatest and so any large scale power is mostly likely NOT cosmological? This is a puzzling paper; it is hard, for me at least, to know what they are trying to convey. It seems this paper is suggesting the Gum Nebula and a spot near the Galactic center are responsible for the low-l power that exists in the maps. What’s interesting is that when these spots are masked and the least contaminated portions of the sky are left untouched, the power is suppressed. So, the genuine primordial signiture portion of the sky (away from the galaxy) is telling us that there is vanishing power. But then why are the authors even tentatively concluding that there is no deficit of large scale power? Shouldn’t the main result of their analysis be telling them precisely the opposite–that is, the power that exists is in a region where foregrounds are greatest and so any large scale power is mostly likely NOT cosmological?

]]> By: spaceman http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25896 spaceman Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:47:22 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25896 When I look at the acoustic peaks in the CMB power spectrum (shown above) a question arises in my mind: how physically important are the low-l anomalies in light of the fact that the vast majority of the data points are in line with the theoretical curve in a Universe dominated by dark energy and dark matter? In other words, is it likely that these low-l anomalies are significant enough to completely overturn our coherent pciture? Perhaps we are expecting our data to fit the theoretical curve to perfection. We need to ask ourselves: is such an expectation realistic? Hardly ever in life do things turn out exactly the way we expect. The vast majority of astronomical data is consistent (the Universe is almost certainly 10-15 Gyr old, it's not too curved, it has more matter and energy than is obviously detectable); hence the name "concordance cosmology." Should cosmologists be so high and mighty as to expect that there would be no deviations from the theory at all? When I look at the acoustic peaks in the CMB power spectrum (shown above) a question arises in my mind: how physically important are the low-l anomalies in light of the fact that the vast majority of the data points are in line with the theoretical curve in a Universe dominated by dark energy and dark matter? In other words, is it likely that these low-l anomalies are significant enough to completely overturn our coherent pciture?

Perhaps we are expecting our data to fit the theoretical curve to perfection. We need to ask ourselves: is such an expectation realistic? Hardly ever in life do things turn out exactly the way we expect. The vast majority of astronomical data is consistent (the Universe is almost certainly 10-15 Gyr old, it’s not too curved, it has more matter and energy than is obviously detectable); hence the name “concordance cosmology.” Should cosmologists be so high and mighty as to expect that there would be no deviations from the theory at all?

]]> By: B http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25898 B Thu, 08 Mar 2007 14:55:58 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25898 This is really interesting, thanks for mentioning the paper. (I hardly ever check astro-ph, just too much papers there). Regarding the alignments, see also <a href="http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2006/12/anomalous-alignments-in-cosmic.html">Anomalous Alignments in the Cosmic Microwave Background</a> Sorry for the self-ad :-) PS: I've submitted this comment already twice yesterday, but it never showed up. I hope it works this time... This is really interesting, thanks for mentioning the paper. (I hardly ever check astro-ph, just too much papers there).

Regarding the alignments, see also

Anomalous Alignments in the Cosmic Microwave Background

Sorry for the self-ad :-)

PS: I’ve submitted this comment already twice yesterday, but it never showed up. I hope it works this time…

]]> By: Jack http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25914 Jack Thu, 08 Mar 2007 00:48:34 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25914 Only theorists would have this weird idea that the universe might be interesting. Experimentalists know that the most boring possibility is *always* the right one. Only theorists would have this weird idea that the universe might be interesting. Experimentalists know that the most boring possibility is *always* the right one.

]]> By: Hard-ass experimentalist http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/comment-page-1/#comment-25909 Hard-ass experimentalist Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:58:53 +0000 http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/03/05/arxiv-find-analysis-of-the-apparent-lack-of-power-in-the-cmb-anisotropy-at-large-angular-scales/#comment-25909 Only theorists would get excited about one point on a curve being two sigma off a model. Even if the lowest l mode is low, cosmic variance (Hello? Name of this blog?) means that little meaningful inference can be made based on it. Only theorists would get excited about one point on a curve being two sigma off a model. Even if the lowest l mode is low, cosmic variance (Hello? Name of this blog?) means that little meaningful inference can be made based on it.

]]>