DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Scientists Talking to the Public
What I Believe But Cannot Prove »

LHC: Cooler Than Outer Space

by John Conway

The LHC has just passed a major milestone, by cooling one eighth of the machine to 1.9 K. Given that the temperature of outer space is about 3 K (the temperature of the cosmic microwavve background radiation), that makes the LHC very very cool indeed. The cold sector is 3.3 km long, and has over 200 of the big 2-in-1 superconducting dipole magnets in it. These are the magnets that will keep the particles going in a circle 27 km in circumference. This cooling operation has taken several months, starting in January, with many successful checks and tests along the way.

Bravo!

Share

April 10th, 2007 8:31 PM
in Science | 14 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

14 Responses to “LHC: Cooler Than Outer Space”

  1. 1.   Joseph Smidt Says:
    April 10th, 2007 at 10:41 pm

    Cool!

  2. 2.   JoAnne Says:
    April 10th, 2007 at 11:05 pm

    Yea! It’s good to hear of the progress they are making!

  3. 3.   Lab Lemming Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 5:18 am

    How do you bend a relativistic proton in a supercoooled magnet without creating a honking great gamma ray that reheats said magnet after penetrating the chamber wall? Or are the beam currents sufficiently low that there isn’t much radiation produced?

  4. 4.   Martin Arrowsmith Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 10:04 am

    Hi,

    I was wondering if any of the authors or readers of this site has read Dan Brown’s “Angels and Demons,” and has any thoughts on how Brown portrays particle physics, LHC, or antimatter. It is a work of fiction, but Brown likes to write in the beginning about how his stories are “factual,” and never makes it clear when he tips into the fiction.

    Thanks,
    -Martin

  5. 5.   Martin Arrowsmith Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 10:07 am

    I also have another question about the LHC. In the book it says to keep the particles going around in cirlces, the magnetic fields have to be turned and off in rapid succession. Do these fields have to be turned on/off just as the particles reach the proximity? If so, how did we get that accuracy?

  6. 6.   Martin Arrowsmith Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 10:15 am

    I’m sorry, one last question. For those who haven’t read the book, but would like to answer this question, please read on. It is sort of a spoiler, so please read if you don’t intend on reading the book.

    Brown states that his fictional scientists can contain antimatter by “building a reverse polarity vacuum to pull the antimatter positrons out of the accelerator before they could decay, and to separatethe particles between matter and antimatter, you could apply a magnetic field where matter arced one direction and antimatter arced opposites. To contain the matter in a canister, a magnetic field would be applied to suspend the antimatter from touching any matter.”

    Forgive my rapid comment posting, but this is the last one.

  7. 7.   Martin Arrowsmith Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 10:18 am

    My words bit me. I forgot to ask my question. It was simply, how much of that is true or realistic?

  8. 8.   Zooglea Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 10:49 am

    frío, frío…

    … así como 271º C bajo cero. Se ha conseguido en las instalaciones del Gran Colisionador de Hadrones (más conocido por sus siglas en inglés: LHC). Se trata de un acelerador de partículas situado en torno a las coordenadas 46º14’00″N y 6º…

  9. 9.   Adi Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 12:25 pm

    Martin,
    there is a web page at CERN explaining whats fact and whats fiction :
    http://public.web.cern.ch/public/Content/Chapters/Spotlight/SpotlightAandD-en.html

  10. 10.   Tom Renbarger Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 3:06 pm

    That’s very impressive. I have a hard enough time getting the little HDL-8 dewar we have here in the lab down to 2 K, I can barely imagine what it takes getting such a large apparatus cold.

    In somewhat related matter, big news (?) from MiniBoone:

    http://www.interactions.org/cms/?pid=1025099

  11. 11.   Edo Says:
    April 11th, 2007 at 5:57 pm

    @LabLemming: the beam tubes are equipped with shields to protect the cold bore. Yes, there’s a risk for heating and thus quenching the supraconductor magnets, but the amount of heat deposited has been calculated and will be absorbed by the liquid helium. Moreover, superfluid helium is an excellent heat conductor.

  12. 12.   Aaron F. Says:
    April 13th, 2007 at 10:24 am

    Errrr… you mean they’re cooling 200 big superconducting magnets just like the one that exploded during a quench test earlier this month? *eyebrows*

  13. 13.   Edo Says:
    April 13th, 2007 at 1:36 pm

    No, that one exploded over a pressure test. And it is not the same magnets: those ones have not been designed by the Fermilab ;P

  14. 14.   Ellipsis Says:
    April 14th, 2007 at 3:32 am

    Lab Lemming — that is exactly why LHC will be accelerating protons, rather than electrons, to 7 TeV *. Bremsstrahlung power is proportional to m^(-6) (where m is the mass of the accelerated particle) — see for example chapter 14-15 of Jackson, _Classical Electrodynamics_. P = (mu_0*q^2*a^2*E^6)/(6pi*m^6*c^7). Thus protons emit 10^18 times less total bremsstrahlung power than electrons.

    * as well as the fact that, for the identical reason, the power bill for a 14 TeV circular e-p collider would bankrupt the world — hence the pursuit of linear, rather than circular, colliders when higher (> 100 GeV) energies for electron and positron beams, rather than protons, are considered





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • Metaphysics Matters
      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
    • Recent Comments

      • ldj5000 on Metaphysics Matters
      • Low Math, Meekly Interacting on Metaphysics Matters
      • Charles Ames on Metaphysics Matters
      • GM on Metaphysics Matters
      • aew9 on Metaphysics Matters
      • GM on Metaphysics Matters
      • Avattoir on Metaphysics Matters
      • Brutus on Metaphysics Matters
      • Dronewatch on Metaphysics Matters
      • Jim Harrison on Metaphysics Matters
      • Physicalist on Metaphysics Matters
      • Josh on Metaphysics Matters
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us