<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tasty Snark</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Perdue</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34080</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Perdue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 17:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34080</guid>
		<description>That snark may actually be a boojum ... with disastrous consequences.

A dark matter, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That snark may actually be a boojum &#8230; with disastrous consequences.</p>
<p>A dark matter, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H-I-G-G-S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34082</link>
		<dc:creator>H-I-G-G-S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34082</guid>
		<description>Let's not forget this gem, taken from the web site for Lee Smolin's book,
"The Trouble With Physics"

"...the most important book about cosmology since Steven Weinberg's 1977 volume The First Three Minutes."       Gregg Easterbrook,  Slate,    Sept. 14, 2006</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not forget this gem, taken from the web site for Lee Smolin&#8217;s book,<br />
&#8220;The Trouble With Physics&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;the most important book about cosmology since Steven Weinberg&#8217;s 1977 volume The First Three Minutes.&#8221;       Gregg Easterbrook,  Slate,    Sept. 14, 2006</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34079</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2007 05:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34079</guid>
		<description>you might find it funny to see the canon of things that scienceblogs.com has had to say about &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&#38;q=easterbrook+site:scienceblogs.com&#38;ie=UTF-8&#38;oe=UTF-8" rel="nofollow"&gt;greg easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; over the years.  you kind of wish he'd stick to football... if that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you might find it funny to see the canon of things that scienceblogs.com has had to say about <a href="http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&amp;q=easterbrook+site:scienceblogs.com&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;oe=UTF-8" rel="nofollow">greg easterbrook</a> over the years.  you kind of wish he&#8217;d stick to football&#8230; if that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34078</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34078</guid>
		<description>Easterbrook wrote:&lt;i&gt;But most experiments from the bygone golden age of physics were done at private expense, not using tax subsidies&lt;/i&gt;.

mmm. Perhaps we should examine the tax codes of yesteryear as well.  It seems that the tax rate for the very wealthy (unlike today's anemic 17% or so) was greater than 60%, and in some states closer to 75%.  These rates could be offset, and were, by tax-deductible giving, especially to the sciences and arts.  Thus the "private expense" was a useful and highly productive tax-avoidance tactic.  In those days universities would provide a vast menus of possible projects to wealthy donors suggesting how best to offload their tax debt.  Today we have to hire whole departments of development bureaucrats, competing against other universities' development departments, to find the funds for the next project, mostly to add capital to the endowment, or perhaps a wing of a building (and only rarely a science project--and almost never an art one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easterbrook wrote:<i>But most experiments from the bygone golden age of physics were done at private expense, not using tax subsidies</i>.</p>
<p>mmm. Perhaps we should examine the tax codes of yesteryear as well.  It seems that the tax rate for the very wealthy (unlike today&#8217;s anemic 17% or so) was greater than 60%, and in some states closer to 75%.  These rates could be offset, and were, by tax-deductible giving, especially to the sciences and arts.  Thus the &#8220;private expense&#8221; was a useful and highly productive tax-avoidance tactic.  In those days universities would provide a vast menus of possible projects to wealthy donors suggesting how best to offload their tax debt.  Today we have to hire whole departments of development bureaucrats, competing against other universities&#8217; development departments, to find the funds for the next project, mostly to add capital to the endowment, or perhaps a wing of a building (and only rarely a science project&#8211;and almost never an art one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tyler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34081</link>
		<dc:creator>tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/11/21/tasty-snark/#comment-34081</guid>
		<description>oh, thank Finagle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, thank Finagle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
