DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« What Have You Changed Your Mind About?
Parody, or Legit? »

A Form of Not Being Sure

by Sean Carroll

I bought this print to decorate the wall of my office. I like the art, and the title is “Time’s Arrow,” so how could I resist?

Time’s Arrow by Costa

But I did have a worry: the painting clearly involved text, which I tend to think is an aesthetic mistake — it brings a depressing specificity to what should be an open-ended interpretive process. And here the resolution of the online image was too small for me to make out the words, so what if the text was completely dopey?

Now it has arrived, and here is the main text:

Living is a form of not being sure, not knowing what next or how. The moment you know how, you begin to die a little.

The artist never entirely knows. We guess; we may be wrong, but we take leap after leap in the dark.

I kind of like it.

Share

January 2nd, 2008 5:57 PM
in Arts | 15 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

15 Responses to “A Form of Not Being Sure”

  1. 1.   Supernova Says:
    January 2nd, 2008 at 7:21 pm

    The moment you know how, you begin to die a little.

    Which is to say, your wavefunction begins to collapse.

  2. 2.   Claire Says:
    January 2nd, 2008 at 8:39 pm

    Sean,

    Brilliant!

    Claire

  3. 3.   jeff Says:
    January 2nd, 2008 at 9:48 pm

    The moment you know how, you begin to die a little.
    Which is to say, your wavefunction begins to collapse.

    If the wavefunction and collapse are real, and something other than a wavefunction induces the collapse, then is the wavefunction fundamental? ;)

  4. 4.   Metal Says:
    January 2nd, 2008 at 10:04 pm

    I like the words, but not the art.

  5. 5.   chemicalscum Says:
    January 2nd, 2008 at 10:23 pm

    It is basically what Nick Bostrom was saying in the Edge – “What have you changed your mind about” articles.

  6. 6.   Alf Says:
    January 3rd, 2008 at 2:12 am

    “The artist never entirely knows. We guess; we may be wrong, but we take leap after leap in the dark.”

    Isn’t this even an accurate description of the big game i.e. science.

  7. 7.   Plato Says:
    January 3rd, 2008 at 2:23 am

    I think you loose something when you do not include the writing at the top?

  8. 8.   MedallionOfFerret Says:
    January 3rd, 2008 at 10:57 pm

    Not to upset anyone or anything like that, but I’ve seen copies of this same Costa work titled simply “Arrow”, not “Time’s Arrow”. I’m not sure Costa even put a title to it–it may be mere marketing by a copy-making company to even call it “Arrow”.

    Perhaps Costa thought of it as “Brown Coil Thingy With Arty Philosophical Text”. Doesn’t matter–I’d hang it on the wall of my office too (if I had an office).

  9. 9.   daisy rose Says:
    January 3rd, 2008 at 11:40 pm

    The surprise moment – when you say YES – the forest is open – nothing else matters . Who is this Costa guy ? – When it comes to the real thing everyone knows it when they see it. I do and of that I am sure.

  10. 10.   EJ Says:
    January 4th, 2008 at 1:33 pm

    What does the line at the top say?

  11. 11.   B Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 12:28 pm

    Random Association – it’s a Haribo Liquorice Spiral. Amusingly the website lists it as ‘benchmark of German design’, maybe I should pin a couple of them to my walls.

  12. 12.   The Almighty Bob Says:
    January 5th, 2008 at 7:03 pm

    I thought it was a spiral-torsion spring. The Victorians used them for a remarkable amount of things, and I’ve read at least one SF story that suggested they could replace the internal combustion engine…

  13. 13.   Freiddie Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Artistic, but math-lacking. It needs a few more equations etched into it (say, formula for entropy?).

  14. 14.   Antonio Says:
    January 6th, 2008 at 4:52 pm

    Sean:

    Nice post thanks. Let me comment what i feel with all these science studies that pretend to explain science (in context or not). Suppose that they find something very deep, essential to scientific knowledge production. At the same moment science will be dead (or perhaps will be converted into technology). It is impossible to know why science works, if you do it you kill it.

    The same applies to any artistic activity.

    Happy new year, and thanks for your post in this very nice blog.

  15. 15.   John Merryman Says:
    January 7th, 2008 at 2:06 pm

    But doesn’t knowing something open our minds to proportionally more questions? So that would mean we are even more alive.





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • jammer on Mind = Blown
      • Kaleberg on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us