<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hidden Complexity of the Olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:14:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: el Abra &#187; The Hidden Complexity of the Olympics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42163</link>
		<dc:creator>el Abra &#187; The Hidden Complexity of the Olympics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42163</guid>
		<description>[...] Los juegos olímpicos terminaron, pero este linkito es imperdible: en el decatlón se pueden obtener...     javier &#8212; Sep 09 2008 # [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Los juegos olímpicos terminaron, pero este linkito es imperdible: en el decatlón se pueden obtener&#8230;     javier &#8212; Sep 09 2008 # [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aakash</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42162</link>
		<dc:creator>Aakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 22:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42162</guid>
		<description>Hello... I tried to &lt;a href=&quot;http://badexample.mu.nu/archives/075139.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;manually pingback&lt;/a&gt; to this entry, but it did not work, so I&#039;ll &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesssheet.com/2008/8/olympic-alchemy-michael-phelps-turning-gold-into-cash#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;have to go with the &quot;poor man&#039;s trackback&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (need to do this at several bloggers&#039; entries - among other to-dos - being stuck here in St. Paul, too drained to blog, this might be a good time for that).

Trackback from &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://uis.blogspot.com/2008_08_01_archive.html#7839340029787633568&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Not going to take it anymore&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, University Blog

&lt;blockquote&gt;- Also, for the Numb3rs-minded, you might want to check out this post, from a new weblog I just found out about (having been out-of-the-loop again, for awhile), via the Ecosystem. (I wonder where my weblog has fallen to, in that ranking.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello&#8230; I tried to <a href="http://badexample.mu.nu/archives/075139.php" rel="nofollow">manually pingback</a> to this entry, but it did not work, so I&#8217;ll <a href="http://www.businesssheet.com/2008/8/olympic-alchemy-michael-phelps-turning-gold-into-cash#comments" rel="nofollow">have to go with the &#8220;poor man&#8217;s trackback&#8221;</a> (need to do this at several bloggers&#8217; entries &#8211; among other to-dos &#8211; being stuck here in St. Paul, too drained to blog, this might be a good time for that).</p>
<p>Trackback from <strong><a href="http://uis.blogspot.com/2008_08_01_archive.html#7839340029787633568" rel="nofollow">Not going to take it anymore</a></strong>, University Blog</p>
<blockquote><p>- Also, for the Numb3rs-minded, you might want to check out this post, from a new weblog I just found out about (having been out-of-the-loop again, for awhile), via the Ecosystem. (I wonder where my weblog has fallen to, in that ranking.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cleek &#187; i Ran, i Threw, i Jumped, i Won</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42161</link>
		<dc:creator>cleek &#187; i Ran, i Threw, i Jumped, i Won</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42161</guid>
		<description>[...] win the decathlon by doing exceedingly poorly? Well, yes, but your scores would only count in the imaginary world.  Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; cleek @ 9:51 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] win the decathlon by doing exceedingly poorly? Well, yes, but your scores would only count in the imaginary world.  Filed under: Uncategorized &#8212; cleek @ 9:51 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkblogging for 24/08/08 &#171; Thoughts on music, science, politics and comics. Mostly comics.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42160</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkblogging for 24/08/08 &#171; Thoughts on music, science, politics and comics. Mostly comics.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42160</guid>
		<description>[...] Cosmic Variance talk about the use of complex numbers in scoring for the Olympics. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cosmic Variance talk about the use of complex numbers in scoring for the Olympics. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amiya Sarkar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42133</link>
		<dc:creator>Amiya Sarkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 16:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42133</guid>
		<description>The ranking system defies logic. A real super analysis on a real flop metric!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ranking system defies logic. A real super analysis on a real flop metric!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sili</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42135</link>
		<dc:creator>Sili</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42135</guid>
		<description>Thank you, but I think I&#039;ll stick with the&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.comics.com/comics/getfuzzy/archive/getfuzzy-20080820.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bucky Katt point system&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, but I think I&#8217;ll stick with the<a href="http://www.comics.com/comics/getfuzzy/archive/getfuzzy-20080820.html" rel="nofollow">Bucky Katt point system</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Science Blog Roundup &#124; Discoblog &#124; Discover Magazine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42159</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Science Blog Roundup &#124; Discoblog &#124; Discover Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42159</guid>
		<description>[...] Cosmic Variance finds a hole in the math of the decathlon: If you run slowly enough, you can guarantee [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cosmic Variance finds a hole in the math of the decathlon: If you run slowly enough, you can guarantee [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisyrose</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42127</link>
		<dc:creator>daisyrose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42127</guid>
		<description>#13 I did not get your joke - However I think you are correct in that there should be a score for  &quot;trying your best&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#13 I did not get your joke &#8211; However I think you are correct in that there should be a score for  &#8220;trying your best&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42132</link>
		<dc:creator>carl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42132</guid>
		<description>What do you mean that there aren&#039;t any Americans who are competitive in the decathlon? Brian Clay is the reigning World Champion (and if you know anything about track and field, you know that the athletes respect World Champions as much as Olympic Champions). Here&#039;s his resume:
2005 World Outdoor champion; 2008 World Indoor champion; 2008 Olympic Trials champion; 3-time USA Outdoor champion (’04, ’05, ‘08); 2004 Olympic silver medalist; Two-time World Indoor silver medalist (’04, ’06); 2000 NAIA champion; two-time NAIA LJ champion ... not to mention that Chris Huffins (recently retired) and Tom Pappas (2003 World Champion) ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean that there aren&#8217;t any Americans who are competitive in the decathlon? Brian Clay is the reigning World Champion (and if you know anything about track and field, you know that the athletes respect World Champions as much as Olympic Champions). Here&#8217;s his resume:<br />
2005 World Outdoor champion; 2008 World Indoor champion; 2008 Olympic Trials champion; 3-time USA Outdoor champion (’04, ’05, ‘08); 2004 Olympic silver medalist; Two-time World Indoor silver medalist (’04, ’06); 2000 NAIA champion; two-time NAIA LJ champion &#8230; not to mention that Chris Huffins (recently retired) and Tom Pappas (2003 World Champion) &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ewan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42125</link>
		<dc:creator>Ewan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42125</guid>
		<description>In the currently highly competitive field of Olympics posts, this one wins.  Fabulous (and educational).  Thanks!

[I wonder whether there&#039;s some math basis for picking ten events that would make the &#039;best&#039; decathlon, and what the criteris for such would be?  Hmm.]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the currently highly competitive field of Olympics posts, this one wins.  Fabulous (and educational).  Thanks!</p>
<p>[I wonder whether there's some math basis for picking ten events that would make the 'best' decathlon, and what the criteris for such would be?  Hmm.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42126</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 01:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42126</guid>
		<description>I score this post at 1337.  That was fantastic.  Thank you for making me laugh.  I have always thought that any event that needs a judge shouldn&#039;t be an event, but it looks like every event needs a mathematical jury now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I score this post at 1337.  That was fantastic.  Thank you for making me laugh.  I have always thought that any event that needs a judge shouldn&#8217;t be an event, but it looks like every event needs a mathematical jury now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olympic Math &#171; Nine Sisters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42134</link>
		<dc:creator>Olympic Math &#171; Nine Sisters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42134</guid>
		<description>[...] Olympic&#160;Math  Thank the Science Department chair at work for this one.  If you&#8217;re patient enough to understand the math, you might get a kick out of this site. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Olympic&nbsp;Math  Thank the Science Department chair at work for this one.  If you&#8217;re patient enough to understand the math, you might get a kick out of this site. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42124</link>
		<dc:creator>Antti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42124</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I believe the world record quoted by Sean is off, the 9000 point mark was achieved already quite a few years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I believe the world record quoted by Sean is off, the 9000 point mark was achieved already quite a few years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antti</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42158</link>
		<dc:creator>Antti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42158</guid>
		<description>@ jmchez (post #2)

&quot;Wouldn’t it just be easier to compare the athlete’s performance as a fraction of the world record for that event?&quot;

In addition to the comments presented earlier in this thread (the point system should be non-linear because it becomes harder and harder to improve your result when you get better and better), there is also the almost trivial fact that world records tend to evolve in time. What happens if the world record of 100m sprint improves while the decathlon competition is still going on? Will the points from the 100m run in the decathlon race change accordingly? What happens to the old decathlon results when the world records improve later on? How can you meaningfully compare results from different decathlon competitions (necessary if one wants to talk about the world record of decathlon) if the way athletes are rewarded points has changed?

In my opinion, those issues make it impossible to base the decathlon point system to the world records of the individual events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jmchez (post #2)</p>
<p>&#8220;Wouldn’t it just be easier to compare the athlete’s performance as a fraction of the world record for that event?&#8221;</p>
<p>In addition to the comments presented earlier in this thread (the point system should be non-linear because it becomes harder and harder to improve your result when you get better and better), there is also the almost trivial fact that world records tend to evolve in time. What happens if the world record of 100m sprint improves while the decathlon competition is still going on? Will the points from the 100m run in the decathlon race change accordingly? What happens to the old decathlon results when the world records improve later on? How can you meaningfully compare results from different decathlon competitions (necessary if one wants to talk about the world record of decathlon) if the way athletes are rewarded points has changed?</p>
<p>In my opinion, those issues make it impossible to base the decathlon point system to the world records of the individual events.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Murray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42121</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42121</guid>
		<description>Thus, we get rid of alpha and x0, just keep the beta terms and *multply* the results together rather than adding them. For timed events, the betas would be negative, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thus, we get rid of alpha and x0, just keep the beta terms and *multply* the results together rather than adding them. For timed events, the betas would be negative, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Murray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42131</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 06:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42131</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve said many times to anyone who will listen: when you are dealing with stuff where negative numbers don&#039;t make sense, take a log. In the case of the decathalon, we would be talking about a weighted geometrical average. Makes far more sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said many times to anyone who will listen: when you are dealing with stuff where negative numbers don&#8217;t make sense, take a log. In the case of the decathalon, we would be talking about a weighted geometrical average. Makes far more sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42122</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42122</guid>
		<description>This post rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Gralla</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42123</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Gralla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 04:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42123</guid>
		<description>lol, gem of a post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, gem of a post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arun</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42120</link>
		<dc:creator>Arun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42120</guid>
		<description>OMG.... didn&#039;t know about this system! Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG&#8230;. didn&#8217;t know about this system! Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/comment-page-1/#comment-42119</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/19/the-hidden-complexity-of-the-olympics/#comment-42119</guid>
		<description>Maybe the solution would be to hand imaginary medals to the athletes with the greatest imaginary comaponents in their total scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the solution would be to hand imaginary medals to the athletes with the greatest imaginary comaponents in their total scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 08:38:54 -->
