<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Thousand Best Popular-Science Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:00:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marion</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-93269</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 13:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-93269</guid>
		<description>As a Popular Science publisher, I have had the pleasure of working with a range of interesting writers.  However, by far the best in this field is Keith Skene, who wrote the highly aclaimed &quot;Shadows on the Cave Wall: A New Theory of Evolution.&quot;  This completely turns recent thinking on its head, and should be read in order to truely appraise the value of Richard Dawkins&#039; work, which it exposes as extremely limited.  It&#039;s a great read, and very amusing, but profoundly moving at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Popular Science publisher, I have had the pleasure of working with a range of interesting writers.  However, by far the best in this field is Keith Skene, who wrote the highly aclaimed &#8220;Shadows on the Cave Wall: A New Theory of Evolution.&#8221;  This completely turns recent thinking on its head, and should be read in order to truely appraise the value of Richard Dawkins&#8217; work, which it exposes as extremely limited.  It&#8217;s a great read, and very amusing, but profoundly moving at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-51465</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 16:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-51465</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure if it has been mentioned, but &#039;The Matter Myth&#039; by Paul Davies is good. Has anybody included David Bohm&#039;s &#039;Wholeness and the Implicate Order&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure if it has been mentioned, but &#8216;The Matter Myth&#8217; by Paul Davies is good. Has anybody included David Bohm&#8217;s &#8216;Wholeness and the Implicate Order&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-49587</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-49587</guid>
		<description>Sorry to join in so lae in the game, but here are my favorites.  All tend toward my specialty, Biology, but I have tried to make sure that all are popular, not technical.

A Short History of Nearly Everything - Bill Bryson
The Stars - H. A. Rey
Your Inner Fish - Neil Shubin
The Blind Watchmaker - Richard Dawkins
The Eighth Day of Creation - Horace Judson
The Double Helix - Watson
Chaos - Jame Gleick
The Map that Changed the World - Simon Winchester
Einstein&#039;s Cosmos - Michio Kaku
The Ancestor&#039;s Tale - Richard Dawkins
Why Big Fierce Animal are Rare - Colinaux
Animals without Backbones - Ralph Buxbaum
On Human Nature - E. O. Wilson
E=mc^2 - David Bodanis
The Edge of the Sea - Rachel Carson
The Year of the Gorilla - George Schaller
The Beak of the Finch - Jonathan Weiner
Endless Forms most Beautiful - Sean Carroll
One, Two, Three, ... Infinity - George Gamow

I grew up on Asimov, but find him dated and dull now.  I find Darwin&#039;s Origin dull stuff, too, but his later books on plants are great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry to join in so lae in the game, but here are my favorites.  All tend toward my specialty, Biology, but I have tried to make sure that all are popular, not technical.</p>
<p>A Short History of Nearly Everything &#8211; Bill Bryson<br />
The Stars &#8211; H. A. Rey<br />
Your Inner Fish &#8211; Neil Shubin<br />
The Blind Watchmaker &#8211; Richard Dawkins<br />
The Eighth Day of Creation &#8211; Horace Judson<br />
The Double Helix &#8211; Watson<br />
Chaos &#8211; Jame Gleick<br />
The Map that Changed the World &#8211; Simon Winchester<br />
Einstein&#8217;s Cosmos &#8211; Michio Kaku<br />
The Ancestor&#8217;s Tale &#8211; Richard Dawkins<br />
Why Big Fierce Animal are Rare &#8211; Colinaux<br />
Animals without Backbones &#8211; Ralph Buxbaum<br />
On Human Nature &#8211; E. O. Wilson<br />
E=mc^2 &#8211; David Bodanis<br />
The Edge of the Sea &#8211; Rachel Carson<br />
The Year of the Gorilla &#8211; George Schaller<br />
The Beak of the Finch &#8211; Jonathan Weiner<br />
Endless Forms most Beautiful &#8211; Sean Carroll<br />
One, Two, Three, &#8230; Infinity &#8211; George Gamow</p>
<p>I grew up on Asimov, but find him dated and dull now.  I find Darwin&#8217;s Origin dull stuff, too, but his later books on plants are great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42485</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42485</guid>
		<description>Some books I love:
&quot;Godel, Escher and Bach&quot;
&quot;Men of Mathematics&quot;, E. T. Bell
&quot;How to Solve It&quot;, Polya
Freakonomics,
Carl Sagan (any book of his...),
&quot;Courage to Create&quot; and &quot;Man in Search of Himself&quot; (Psychology) ,
Society of the Mind, Marvin Minsky
most recreational math books,
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some books I love:<br />
&#8220;Godel, Escher and Bach&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Men of Mathematics&#8221;, E. T. Bell<br />
&#8220;How to Solve It&#8221;, Polya<br />
Freakonomics,<br />
Carl Sagan (any book of his&#8230;),<br />
&#8220;Courage to Create&#8221; and &#8220;Man in Search of Himself&#8221; (Psychology) ,<br />
Society of the Mind, Marvin Minsky<br />
most recreational math books,<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: riemann</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42455</link>
		<dc:creator>riemann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42455</guid>
		<description>Nick R @ 77: Dawkins agrees with you. Here&#039;s a quation from his web site, http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,2890,Good-Science-Writers-Richard-Dawkins,Sandwalk,page1#216422

&lt;blockquote&gt;I am interested in the suggestion that Climbing Mount Improbable might not be an ideal title. Interested, because I regard it as the most under-rated of my books. It sells FAR fewer copies than The Blind Watchmaker although I think it is a better book. Perhaps the reason is that the title is not so good. It covers some of the same ground as The Blind Watchmaker, but -- even though it is not really for me to say -- I like to think the two chapters called &#039;The Museum of all Shells&#039; and &#039;Kaleidoscopic Embryos&#039; are genuinely novel and original, where The Blind Watchmaker is mostly popularizing stuff that is already well known to professionals. Well, as I say, it is not really for me to judge. But my own opinion is that, if anybody is thinking of reading The Blind Watchmaker, they might do better to read Climbing Mount Improbable instead. Of course, I wouldn&#039;t want to STOP anyone reading BOTH!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It should be on the list. Then again so shoud The Blind Watchmaker and The Selfish Gene. But then &lt;em&gt;The Ancestor&#039;s Tale&lt;/em&gt; is a true masterpiece and cannot be left out. Well, why don&#039;t we just write &quot;see Dawkins&quot; to the list?

And Jerry P. King&#039;s &lt;em&gt;The Art of Mathematics&lt;/em&gt; was what got my maths enthusiasm going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick R @ 77: Dawkins agrees with you. Here&#8217;s a quation from his web site, <a href="http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,2890,Good-Science-Writers-Richard-Dawkins,Sandwalk,page1#216422" rel="nofollow">http://richarddawkins.net/articleComments,2890,Good-Science-Writers-Richard-Dawkins,Sandwalk,page1#216422</a></p>
<blockquote><p>I am interested in the suggestion that Climbing Mount Improbable might not be an ideal title. Interested, because I regard it as the most under-rated of my books. It sells FAR fewer copies than The Blind Watchmaker although I think it is a better book. Perhaps the reason is that the title is not so good. It covers some of the same ground as The Blind Watchmaker, but &#8212; even though it is not really for me to say &#8212; I like to think the two chapters called &#8216;The Museum of all Shells&#8217; and &#8216;Kaleidoscopic Embryos&#8217; are genuinely novel and original, where The Blind Watchmaker is mostly popularizing stuff that is already well known to professionals. Well, as I say, it is not really for me to judge. But my own opinion is that, if anybody is thinking of reading The Blind Watchmaker, they might do better to read Climbing Mount Improbable instead. Of course, I wouldn&#8217;t want to STOP anyone reading BOTH!</p></blockquote>
<p>It should be on the list. Then again so shoud The Blind Watchmaker and The Selfish Gene. But then <em>The Ancestor&#8217;s Tale</em> is a true masterpiece and cannot be left out. Well, why don&#8217;t we just write &#8220;see Dawkins&#8221; to the list?</p>
<p>And Jerry P. King&#8217;s <em>The Art of Mathematics</em> was what got my maths enthusiasm going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42484</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 07:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42484</guid>
		<description>I second Vlad on the best Feynman books and am also glad to see Ian Stewart mentioned. He worked with Terry Pratchett and Jack Cohen on the Science of Diskworld mentioned earlier.
I&#039;d like to nominate Ian and Jack&#039;s What Does A Martian Look Like.

You can&#039;t beat Asimov&#039;s Lucky Starr seires for a tour of the solar system.

Mendelssohn - The Quest for Absolute Zero

The book that made me want to be a physicist was The Nature of Matter by Otto Frisch.

The original - Relativity by Einstein hasn&#039;t been bettered

Other non-physics ones; The Ancestors Tale is my favourite Dawkins and for maths I&#039;d second the Music of the Primes and add The Equation That Couldn&#039;t Be Solved.

phew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second Vlad on the best Feynman books and am also glad to see Ian Stewart mentioned. He worked with Terry Pratchett and Jack Cohen on the Science of Diskworld mentioned earlier.<br />
I&#8217;d like to nominate Ian and Jack&#8217;s What Does A Martian Look Like.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t beat Asimov&#8217;s Lucky Starr seires for a tour of the solar system.</p>
<p>Mendelssohn &#8211; The Quest for Absolute Zero</p>
<p>The book that made me want to be a physicist was The Nature of Matter by Otto Frisch.</p>
<p>The original &#8211; Relativity by Einstein hasn&#8217;t been bettered</p>
<p>Other non-physics ones; The Ancestors Tale is my favourite Dawkins and for maths I&#8217;d second the Music of the Primes and add The Equation That Couldn&#8217;t Be Solved.</p>
<p>phew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick R</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42410</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 03:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42410</guid>
		<description>&quot;From Here to Infinity&quot; (aka &quot;The Problems of Mathematics&quot;) by Ian Stewart

&quot;Chaos&quot; by James Gleick.

Personally I preferred Richard Dawkins&#039;s &quot;Climbing Mount Improbable&quot; to &quot;The Blind Watchmaker&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From Here to Infinity&#8221; (aka &#8220;The Problems of Mathematics&#8221;) by Ian Stewart</p>
<p>&#8220;Chaos&#8221; by James Gleick.</p>
<p>Personally I preferred Richard Dawkins&#8217;s &#8220;Climbing Mount Improbable&#8221; to &#8220;The Blind Watchmaker&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R squared</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42483</link>
		<dc:creator>R squared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42483</guid>
		<description>Some final additions :

  older &#039;classics&#039;

  &#039;Of Stars and Men&#039; by Harlow Shapley  (1959)

  &#039;The Universe and Dr. Einstein&#039; by Lincoln Barnett  (1962)

  &#039;The ABC of Relativity&#039; by Bertrand Russell  (1962)

  &#039;Profiles of the Future&#039; by Arthur C. Clarke (1963)

  &#039;Intelligent Life in the Universe&#039; by Sagan and Shklovskii (1966)

  &#039;Red Giants and White Dwarfs, The Evolution of Stars, Planets and Life&#039;
  by Robert Jastrow (1967)

  &#039;Men Who Made a New Physics : Physicists and the Quantum Theory&#039;
  by Barbara Lovett Cline (1969)

 &#039;The Ascent of Man&#039;  by Jacob Bronowski  (1973)

 more recent goodies :

  &#039;The Quark and the Jaguar&#039;  by Murray Gell-Mann  (1994)

  &#039;Atom&#039;  by Lawrence Krauss (2001)

  &#039;Our Cosmic Habitat&#039;  by Martin Rees (2001)

  &#039;Life on a Young Planet&#039;  by Andrew Knoll  (2003)
 .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some final additions :</p>
<p>  older &#8216;classics&#8217;</p>
<p>  &#8216;Of Stars and Men&#8217; by Harlow Shapley  (1959)</p>
<p>  &#8216;The Universe and Dr. Einstein&#8217; by Lincoln Barnett  (1962)</p>
<p>  &#8216;The ABC of Relativity&#8217; by Bertrand Russell  (1962)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Profiles of the Future&#8217; by Arthur C. Clarke (1963)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Intelligent Life in the Universe&#8217; by Sagan and Shklovskii (1966)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Red Giants and White Dwarfs, The Evolution of Stars, Planets and Life&#8217;<br />
  by Robert Jastrow (1967)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Men Who Made a New Physics : Physicists and the Quantum Theory&#8217;<br />
  by Barbara Lovett Cline (1969)</p>
<p> &#8216;The Ascent of Man&#8217;  by Jacob Bronowski  (1973)</p>
<p> more recent goodies :</p>
<p>  &#8216;The Quark and the Jaguar&#8217;  by Murray Gell-Mann  (1994)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Atom&#8217;  by Lawrence Krauss (2001)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Our Cosmic Habitat&#8217;  by Martin Rees (2001)</p>
<p>  &#8216;Life on a Young Planet&#8217;  by Andrew Knoll  (2003)<br />
 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42482</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42482</guid>
		<description>I agree that Feynman should not be represented by the &quot;Surely You´re Joking&quot; which is entertaining but hardly can be classified as a popular science book. Among his other books, &quot;The Character of the Physcis Laws&quot; is great, but it is &quot;QED&quot; that represents science popularization in its purest form, free from unnecessary jokes and metaphors. May be it is not very popular among the wide public, but we are trying to make a list of the greatest books, not of the best sold ones, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Feynman should not be represented by the &#8220;Surely You´re Joking&#8221; which is entertaining but hardly can be classified as a popular science book. Among his other books, &#8220;The Character of the Physcis Laws&#8221; is great, but it is &#8220;QED&#8221; that represents science popularization in its purest form, free from unnecessary jokes and metaphors. May be it is not very popular among the wide public, but we are trying to make a list of the greatest books, not of the best sold ones, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/comment-page-1/#comment-42481</link>
		<dc:creator>Sad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/08/29/the-thousand-best-popular-science-books/#comment-42481</guid>
		<description>Hey George, I&#039;m most definitely an idiot, albeit an idiot with a yearning to understand modern science, so I just ordered your book from Amazon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey George, I&#8217;m most definitely an idiot, albeit an idiot with a yearning to understand modern science, so I just ordered your book from Amazon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
