Thank you. You are welcomed. I cannot imagine such a computer, though one sees the likes of it in movies, where the computer takes on a life of its own. One of my favorites was the robot who opened his own bank account, and decided to go out and find other robots like him and he found none and lived by himself near the sea. But this http://www.poodwaddle.com/worldclock.swf that is circulating among my husband’s friends and sent to me just now, is a far cry but still something : – )))

Referring back to the title of this blog thread, “What if Time Really Exists?”, the deeper questions involve the period with which IP grants monopoly to the patent holder, versus the benefits to Arts & Sciences that it confers on society as a whole. Once computers have legal rights (inevitable when a system that passes the Turing Test has a good enough lawyer) then the whole game changes. Time really exists alright (though Sean Carroll opened a cute loophole with the uncountably infinite Hilbert Space notion) but the computers of the future, merged in ways we can’t yet describe with human beings, explore the Ideocosm dramatically faster with quantum hardware and genetic algorithm software.

http://www.outlinedepot.com/textbookoutlines.aspx?textbookid=385
If you go to Outlinedepot.com you can preview the various law school outlines on intellectual property , and purchase them. I think they cost about $ 10 per subject outline. Many schools offer their outlines and so you have a choice of outlines. The preview section will give you an idea of the writing and pedagogical style that suits your taste.
To answer your question, will require visiting those outlines and then framing them in a way that meets your expectations. It will take very much time and some cost. Maybe it may be done if circumstances permit, but otherwise this is the direction you are looking at on the net.
In a broad brush, some things you want to watch out for- (i) intellectual property rights to protect writing (books) music [ copy right] patents, trademarks, service marks (?) and of course intellectual property rights and technology (ii) intellectual property rights at international level, TRIPS – Trade Related Intellectual Property rightS and concomitant 153 states’ obligation vide TRIPS Agreement and interlinked with about 40 (?) agreements through membership of World Trade Organisation, of which it was about 120 in 1994 at inception and 153 today.

153: -
[Albania 8 September 2000 Angola 23 November 1996 Antigua and Barbuda 1 January 1995 Argentina 1 January 1995 Armenia 5 February 2003 Australia 1 January 1995 Austria 1 January 1995 Bahrain, Kingdom of 1 January 1995 Bangladesh 1 January 1995 Barbados 1 January 1995 Belgium 1 January 1995 Belize 1 January 1995 Benin 22 February 1996 Bolivia 12 September 1995 Botswana 31 May 1995 Brazil 1 January 1995 Brunei Darussalam 1 January 1995 Bulgaria 1 December 1996 Burkina Faso 3 June 1995 Burundi 23 July 1995 Cambodia 13 October 2004 Cameroon 13 December 1995 Canada 1 January 1995 Cape Verde 23 July 2008 Central African Republic 31 May 1995 Chad 19 October 1996 Chile 1 January 1995 China 11 December 2001 Colombia 30 April 1995 Congo 27 March 1997 Costa Rica 1 January 1995 Côte d'Ivoire 1 January 1995 Croatia 30 November 2000 Cuba 20 April 1995 Cyprus 30 July 1995 Czech Republic 1 January 1995 Democratic Republic of the Congo 1 January 1997 Denmark 1 January 1995 Djibouti 31 May 1995 Dominica 1 January 1995 Dominican Republic 9 March 1995 Ecuador 21 January 1996 Egypt 30 June 1995 El Salvador 7 May 1995 Estonia 13 November 1999 European Communities 1 January 1995 Fiji 14 January 1996
Finland 1 January 1995 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) 4 April 2003 France 1 January 1995 Gabon 1 January 1995 The Gambia 23 October 1996 Georgia 14 June 2000 Germany 1 January 1995 Ghana 1 January 1995 Greece 1 January 1995 Grenada 22 February 1996 Guatemala 21 July 1995 Guinea 25 October 1995 Guinea Bissau 31 May 1995 Guyana 1 January 1995 Haiti 30 January 1996 Honduras 1 January 1995 Hong Kong, China 1 January 1995 Hungary 1 January 1995 Iceland 1 January 1995 India 1 January 1995 Indonesia 1 January 1995 Ireland 1 January 1995 Israel 21 April 1995 Italy 1 January 1995 Jamaica 9 March 1995 Japan 1 January 1995
Jordan 11 April 2000 Kenya 1 January 1995 Korea, Republic of 1 January 1995 Kuwait 1 January 1995 Kyrgyz Republic 20 December 1998 Latvia 10 February 1999 Lesotho 31 May 1995 Liechtenstein 1 September 1995 Lithuania 31 May 2001 Luxembourg 1 January 1995 Macao, China 1 January 1995 Madagascar 17 November 1995 Malawi 31 May 1995 Malaysia 1 January 1995 Maldives 31 May 1995 Mali 31 May 1995 Malta 1 January 1995
Mauritania 31 May 1995 Mauritius 1 January 1995 Mexico 1 January 1995 Moldova 26 July 2001 Mongolia 29 January 1997 Morocco 1 January 1995 Mozambique 26 August 1995 Myanmar 1 January 1995 Namibia 1 January 1995 Nepal 23 April 2004 Netherlands — For the Kingdom in Europe and for the Netherlands Antilles 1 January 1995 New Zealand 1 January 1995 Nicaragua 3 September 1995 Niger 13 December 1996 Nigeria 1 January 1995 Norway 1 January 1995 Oman 9 November 2000 Pakistan 1 January 1995 Panama 6 September 1997 Papua New Guinea 9 June 1996 Paraguay 1 January 1995 Peru 1 January 1995 Philippines 1 January 1995 Poland 1 July 1995
Portugal 1 January 1995 Qatar 13 January 1996 Romania 1 January 1995 Rwanda 22 May 1996 Saint Kitts and Nevis 21 February 1996 Saint Lucia 1 January 1995 Saint Vincent & the Grenadines 1 January 1995 Saudi Arabia 11 December 2005 Senegal 1 January 1995 Sierra Leone 23 July 1995
Singapore 1 January 1995 Slovak Republic 1 January 1995 Slovenia 30 July 1995 Solomon Islands 26 July 1996 South Africa 1 January 1995 Spain 1 January 1995 Sri Lanka 1 January 1995 Suriname 1 January 1995 Swaziland 1 January 1995 Sweden 1 January 1995 Switzerland 1 July 1995 Chinese Taipei 1 January 2002 Tanzania 1 January 1995 Thailand 1 January 1995 Togo 31 May 1995 Tonga 27 July 2007 Trinidad and Tobago 1 March 1995 Tunisia 29 March 1995 Turkey 26 March 1995 Uganda 1 January 1995 Ukraine 16 May 2008 United Arab Emirates 10 April 1996 United Kingdom 1 January 1995 United States of America 1 January 1995 Uruguay 1 January 1995
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) 1 January 1995 Viet Nam 11 January 2007 Zambia 1 January 1995 Zimbabwe 5 March 1995 ]

The legal text for TRIPS agreement and others are in the website http://www.wto.org/ . Your question also crosses states borders through technology and you might wish to look at the user in any of the above 153 states or outside those 153 states, that is 42 states [ 195-153]

“While this sum involves an (uncountable) infinity of terms, its action on spin network states|Γ′is well-defined since only one term (the one in which σ maps the vertices of Γ to the vertices of Γ′ in the proper way) can be nonzero…”

And also:

Unimodular eigenvalues and linear chaos in Hilbert spaces
Journal Geometric And Functional Analysis
Publisher Birkhäuser Basel
ISSN 1016-443X (Print) 1420-8970 (Online)
Issue Volume 5, Number 1 / January, 1995
DOI 10.1007/BF01928214
Pages 1-13

PDF (722.1 KB)

Unimodular eigenvalues and linear chaos in Hilbert spaces
E. Flytzanis1

(1) Athens University of Economics and Business, 76 Patission Street, 104 34 Athens, Greece

Received: 15 May 1993 Accepted: 15 October 1994

Abstract For linear operators T in a complex separable Hilbert space H we consider the problem of existence of invariant Gaussian measuresm:
mT^–1 = m. We relate the size of the unimodular point spectrum of T to mixing properties of the measure preserving transformations defined by T with respect to such invariant measures, and we draw some conclusions concerning orbit structure properties of T.
The research for this work has been supported by a grant from the Research Center (KoE) of the Athens University of Economics and Business.

“Unimodular eignevalues of linear operators in Hilbert space are usually associated with periodic or quasiperiodic orbits. We will show that this is indeed the case if they are countable. However if the unimodular point spectrum is uncountable then we will show that the orbits of the operator are also characterized by erratic behavior associated with chaotic motion. This happens because the linear transformations defined by such operators accept invariant probability measures having mixing properties in the context of ergodic theory.”

Does someone want to draw a Cosmological conclusion from this?

Books are stored in libraries, catalogued, so they can be searched by topic, specific subject matter, author, etc. Abstracts enable easy overview of the longer works.

What then would be methodologies to systematically explore the Ideocosm? How different would they be from that used by libraries?

One apparent difference between “to perfect methodologies for systematically exploring the Ideocosm in search of really great ideas” for public use versus private system of Zwicky ( not having spoken to him, nor met him, and not being called ……. [ seven letters] by him would be design of the system, made easier when ( imagine) Zwicky employs it for his own research & his area of interest is limited to his field of study.
Given that, the world has many areas of studies that humanity has come up with and more yet to come, how can there be same methodologies for different areas of studies? For example, sciences differ from social sciences & humanities & arts. Even within broad categorisation, differences would appear in the different sub fields.

How can mankind conceive of perfecting “methodologies” to cover all areas of human studies and explorations?

Who determines what ‘really great ideas” are? If that be the criteria to selection for the Ideocosm?

What is this ideocosm? The reality of nature , of the universe? Who determines what is the ideocosm? Zwicky? Based on what he collected and stored and the method he employed for himself for his limited area of study? Is that to be exponentially transferred to the whole world, whole of humanity, whole of universe, from beginning of time to end of time ( if there is a beginning and if there is an end since there is some doubt serious doubt whether time even exists)

Of what good would it do to collect and store and archive all possible ideas? Not knowing what ideas Fritz Zwicky stored and archived, and retrieved for his research use, would it not suggest a storage has to be tailored to the intended use and needs of the specific user/s? The usual general storage area is the library. Some may collect and archive many things, like a human sponge. It is said that babies before age 5 are like sponges, and they can absorb many new things easily and learning is effortless then. It is said that Sanskrit is difficult to learn but a child below 5 who lives in that environment can learn it easily and speak it then. Those who collect sort out and compartmentalise and archive, are like the before 5 babies, human sponges, brains that absorb all. http://www.amazon.com/Absorbent-Mind-Maria-Montessori/dp/0805041567 Is that one of the further along human evolutionary process/es? On a parallel tangent, I have met 2 people who have told me that when some very good meditator monks die, and are cremated, their remains, include some crystals besides the ashes and bones ( as they have been privileged by circumstances to have a few of them.) I have also read that in one book on the monk who purchased the land in Northern CA, for his temple (something like ten thousand buddhas) and before he died, he donated a part of the forest land to the monks of a different buddhist branch (something like Redwood Valley area in Northern CA). ( I just pulled out the book to get his name Hsuan Hua, city of ten thousand buddhas) These people do not collect such worldly knowledge but it seems they are different and their difference is in what forms their body so that when cremated they leave behind things that others do not.

What is the topology of the space of all mathematical theories?

Do not know

How do we make a hyperplane or hypersurface to separate the physical theories from the nonphysical theories within the space of all mathematical theories?

Do not know