<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congratulations!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:08:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-50193</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-50193</guid>
		<description>With only two citations, I have insufficient data to chose intelligently.  

There have been suggestions that recommendation writers on the whole have a tendency to undersell female scientists.

Looking for correlations between superlatives and gender in a list of fellows (where presumably everyone is great) might help illuminate this hypothesis.

For anyone interested in doing so, here&#039;s the 2006 list:

http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/2006-fellows.cfm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With only two citations, I have insufficient data to chose intelligently.  </p>
<p>There have been suggestions that recommendation writers on the whole have a tendency to undersell female scientists.</p>
<p>Looking for correlations between superlatives and gender in a list of fellows (where presumably everyone is great) might help illuminate this hypothesis.</p>
<p>For anyone interested in doing so, here&#8217;s the 2006 list:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/2006-fellows.cfm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/fellowships/2006-fellows.cfm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-50166</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-50166</guid>
		<description>Well, Lab Lemming, the difference in wording clearly indicates that the American Physical Society is SEXIST!  Even the bestowed title of  &quot;fellow&quot; is gender-loaded!  

Or, maybe, the difference in wording merely indicates that the writer of the first accolade is more inclined to color his (or HER) prose with superlatives, irrespective of gender, as compared to the writer of the second accolade, and both awardees are equally deserving of their awards.  

You decide!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Lab Lemming, the difference in wording clearly indicates that the American Physical Society is SEXIST!  Even the bestowed title of  &#8220;fellow&#8221; is gender-loaded!  </p>
<p>Or, maybe, the difference in wording merely indicates that the writer of the first accolade is more inclined to color his (or HER) prose with superlatives, irrespective of gender, as compared to the writer of the second accolade, and both awardees are equally deserving of their awards.  </p>
<p>You decide!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lab Lemming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49933</link>
		<dc:creator>Lab Lemming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49933</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to both.  But I was wondering:
Is there a fundamental difference in their respective contributions that cause one to be modified with &quot;outstanding&quot; and the other to be modified with &quot;her&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to both.  But I was wondering:<br />
Is there a fundamental difference in their respective contributions that cause one to be modified with &#8220;outstanding&#8221; and the other to be modified with &#8220;her&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fermi-Walker Public Transport</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49873</link>
		<dc:creator>Fermi-Walker Public Transport</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 15:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49873</guid>
		<description>Yes, congratulations to you both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, congratulations to you both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Haggard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49851</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Haggard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49851</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to you both. My sincerest hope is that this honor may inspire you to continue your valued work and to attain even higher achievements from this day forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to you both. My sincerest hope is that this honor may inspire you to continue your valued work and to attain even higher achievements from this day forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoAnne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49838</link>
		<dc:creator>JoAnne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 03:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49838</guid>
		<description>Sean will have to drag me, kicking and screaming, into grey eminence.  It&#039;s no wonder he missed my nomination last year since I show absolutely no sign of either grey or eminence.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean will have to drag me, kicking and screaming, into grey eminence.  It&#8217;s no wonder he missed my nomination last year since I show absolutely no sign of either grey or eminence.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49837</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49837</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Sean!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Sean!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spyder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49836</link>
		<dc:creator>spyder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 02:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49836</guid>
		<description>I believe this is the point where the really old curmudgeons (grey eminences) gruffly, yet passionately, release some hurumps and clang their pewter mugs of Pimms #7.  &quot;Well done, by Jove, well done,&quot; &quot;smashing good that&quot; and so forth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this is the point where the really old curmudgeons (grey eminences) gruffly, yet passionately, release some hurumps and clang their pewter mugs of Pimms #7.  &#8220;Well done, by Jove, well done,&#8221; &#8220;smashing good that&#8221; and so forth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astromcnaught</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49818</link>
		<dc:creator>astromcnaught</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 22:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49818</guid>
		<description>Wow, fantastic.  May the honours not diminish your enthusiasms for blogging!

And that &#039;grey eminence&#039; bit might just get you killed Sean.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, fantastic.  May the honours not diminish your enthusiasms for blogging!</p>
<p>And that &#8216;grey eminence&#8217; bit might just get you killed Sean.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Physics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/comment-page-1/#comment-49812</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Physics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2008/11/28/congratulations-2/#comment-49812</guid>
		<description>Whoop whoop! Big up for Conway and Hewett - congratulations. Some very nice work has come from these two. I actually got to go to a talk by John Conway at CU Boulder. He was discussing experiments at the LHC. Informative and appealing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoop whoop! Big up for Conway and Hewett &#8211; congratulations. Some very nice work has come from these two. I actually got to go to a talk by John Conway at CU Boulder. He was discussing experiments at the LHC. Informative and appealing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
