DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« Holiday Gift Suggestions
Splitting the Bill »

Science in the white house

by Daniel Holz

Rumors are all over the internet that John Holdren will be nominated to be Obama’s science advisor, and in all likelihood director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP). Holdren is a Harvard Professor of environmental policy, as well as director of the Program on Science, Technology, and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government. John HoldrenHe’s also director of the Woods Hole Research Center, and he was even chosen to give the Nobel lecture on behalf of the Pugwash Conferences. It is hard to imagine someone more qualified for the position. He has a PhD in Physics from Stanford on the stability of inhomogeneous plasmas, and has spent much of his career working on climate change and nuclear nonproliferation issues, as well as science and technology policy.

Along with Nobel Laureate Steve Chu as Department of Energy Secretary, as well as Carol Browner as Energy Czar (a newly created position), Obama is picking an absolutely fantastic group of advisors. The critical question is whether he will listen to them, and support them (both with political and economic capital) in their efforts to fix the greater scientific enterprise (as well as our planet).

Share

December 18th, 2008 6:43 PM
in Science and Politics | 6 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

6 Responses to “Science in the white house”

  1. 1.   End of the Semester; Obama’s picks, etc. « blueollie Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:59 pm

    [...] There is widespread hope that these excellent picks (in science) will continue. [...]

  2. 2.   daniel Says:
    December 19th, 2008 at 10:06 am

    I forgot to mention: It would be very powerful symbolically if Obama promoted the Science Advisor to a cabinet-level position. This would officially give science a seat at the table. We’ll find out if this happens in the Press Conference on Saturday.

  3. 3.   Ben Says:
    December 19th, 2008 at 11:16 am

    He should really shave the ghastly hair off of his face. Beards look so awful. Obama should have a no beard policy.

  4. 4.   Sili Says:
    December 20th, 2008 at 10:11 am

    This gentleman begs to differ.

  5. 5.   The end of hope | Cosmic Variance | Discover Magazine Says:
    December 20th, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    [...] address, and it was exclusively devoted to science and technology. In addition to Steve Chu and John Holdren, he has now added Harold Varmus and Eric Lander as co-chairs of the President’s Council of [...]

  6. 6.   Ben Says:
    December 23rd, 2008 at 7:41 am

    A. Lincoln’s beard was much cooler. I like how he shaved around the mouth. The effect is that his face is still open, but he gets the added advantages of keeping his chin warm and having a place to collect is cheeto crumbs.

    Our main man Holdren on the other hand has one of the “dude who’s got something to hide” beards. If you look into his eyes you can see that he is trying to infiltrate the government and institute the hirsute agenda.





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Vince on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Gizelle Janine on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us