|
I will just mention that this guy doesn’t really look like Brian Greene. And that I’m disappointed the word “heterotic” couldn’t be worked in there somewhere.
And also that ordinary one-dimensional strings don’t form knots in higher dimensions of space, so extra-dimensional bondage requires extended objects. So really the guy in the cartoon should probably be “Dr. Polchinski.”




February 2nd, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Strictly speaking, “ordinary” (as in, say, smooth or P. L.) strings don’t knot themselves in 3-space either.
Of course closed loops do, and yes, so do non-smooth (or non- polygonal ) strings and non-compact strings, etc.
February 2nd, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Hmmm, I thought that this cartoon was just a rip-off of the excellent ‘hyper-bondage’ xkcd cartoon in the recent xkcd vs The New Yorker cartoon-off.
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:23 pm
I don’t know what kind, but its got to be some kind of awesome when my favorite science feed mentions my favorite webcomic.
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:24 pm
I am pretty sure I have never seen the real Dr Greene in a tie, either.
February 3rd, 2009 at 11:27 am
Mouse over the red button below the comic for more compactification-related excitement.
February 3rd, 2009 at 11:48 am
“If inflation persists for more than four Planck times, consult your physician immediately.”
February 3rd, 2009 at 1:25 pm
At least there was one for the chemists today.
I don’t think I’ve ever seen orbifolds used in humour before. Pity I can’t even wrap my head round differential geometry (dispite having passed the exam once …).
Linky, since Blake isn’t tooting his own horn for some reason.
February 3rd, 2009 at 4:35 pm
He might not look like the real Brian Greene, but he definitely has an imaginary likeness.
February 9th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
That picture gives me a large hadron.