DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Cosmic Variance
« In Praise of Jodrell Bank
The Dark Sector @ Google »

Cloudy with a Chance of Satellite

by Julianne Dalcanton

From the National Weather Service:

PUBLIC INFORMATION STATEMENT
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE JACKSON KY
1145 PM EST FRI FEB 13 2009

…POSSIBLE SATELLITE DEBRIS FALLING ACROSS THE REGION…

THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE IN JACKSON HAS RECEIVED CALLS THIS EVENING FROM THE PUBLIC CONCERNING POSSIBLE EXPLOSIONS AND…OR EARTHQUAKES ACROSS THE AREA. THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION HAS REPORTED TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT THESE EVENTS ARE BEING CAUSED BY FALLING SATELLITE DEBRIS. THESE PIECES OF DEBRIS HAVE BEEN CAUSING SONIC BOOMS…RESULTING IN THE VIBRATIONS BEING FELT BY SOME RESIDENTS…AS WELL AS FLASHES OF LIGHT ACROSS THE SKY. THE CLOUD OF DEBRIS IS LIKELY THE RESULT OF THE RECENT IN ORBIT COLLISION OF TWO SATELLITES ON TUESDAY…FEBRUARY 10TH WHEN KOSMOS 2251 CRASHED INTO IRIDIUM 33.

(h/t Slog)

And I can’t believe I beat Phil “Death from the Skies” Plait to this! Actual Death from the Skies!

Share

February 16th, 2009 12:14 PM Tags: satellite precipitation
in Environment, Humor | 9 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

9 Responses to “Cloudy with a Chance of Satellite”

  1. 1.   John Phillips, FCD Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    Love the title, and yes, Phil will be green :)

  2. 2.   JScarry Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 1:09 pm

    Phil would be green if the story was true. As he explains on his site, it is highly unlikely that any pieces of the satellites have fallen to earth yet.

    I’d bet the NWS is wrong about the origin of the sound and light—in fact it sounds like a thunderstorm to me.

  3. 3.   Kunnen er tòch brokstukken neerstorten?bijAstroblogs Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 2:34 pm

    [...] Bewolkt met hier en daar kans op neerstortende satellieten. Bron: Cosmic Variance. [...]

  4. 4.   Phil Plait Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 3:35 pm

    Well, I might have been green with envy, except I had a link to that bulletin in my blog yesterday. Twice. :) Go here and Here too (search on the word Kentucky).

    There is no beating me! Except with a stick. And that might be illegal.

  5. 5.   Julianne Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 3:42 pm

    Oh please — those were buried deep in your excitement over the Texas fireball (which yes, was cool). How the hell was I supposed to figure out that you’d linked to weather reports about space debris? A low blow Dr Plait. A low blow indeed.

  6. 6.   coolstar Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 4:01 pm

    Beating Phil with a stick? Where do I sign up……..

  7. 7.   Low Math, Meekly Interacting Says:
    February 16th, 2009 at 6:53 pm

    Y’mean it wudn’t aleeuns?

  8. 8.   Chaz’s Lifestream » Blog Archive » Daily Digest for 2009-02-16 Says:
    February 17th, 2009 at 6:51 am

    [...] Shared a link on Google Reader. Cloudy with a Chance of Satellite [...]

  9. 9.   Space Junk 1: Science 0 | Cosmic Variance | Discover Magazine Says:
    February 20th, 2009 at 12:28 am

    [...] Remember when that defunct Russian satellite crashed into the Iridium satellite a week or so ago? Lots of debris, some of which came down as weather? [...]





    • Cosmic Variance Cosmic Variance is a group blog by people who, coincidentally or not, all happen to be physicists and astrophysicists:
      • Daniel Holz
      • JoAnne Hewett
      • John Conway
      • Julianne Dalcanton
      • Mark Trodden
      • Risa Wechsler
      • Sean Carroll
      Our day (and night) jobs notwithstanding, the blog is about whatever we find interesting — science, to be sure, but also arts, politics, culture, technology, academia, and miscellaneous trivia. We have similar outlooks on many things, widely disparate opinions about others, and will do our best to keep the discourse reasonably elevated.
    • Recent Posts

      • How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Boycott Elsevier
      • Mind = Blown
      • Unsolicited Advice XIII: How to Craft a Well-Argued Proposal
      • Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Good News/Bad News: Nobel Edition
      • Do I Not Live?
      • Noisy Systems and Wandering Canines
      • Happy Birthday, Stephen Hawking
      • Predictions for 2012
      • A Year Well Blogged
      • Happy Holidays!
      • Last-Minute Shopping List
      • The Girl With Various Interesting Qualities
    • Recent Comments

      • David Brown on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Andrew on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • steven johnson on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Albert Z on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Phillip Helbig on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Marko on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • JoeTurpin on Your Favorite Deep, Elegant, or Beautiful Explanation
      • Valdis Kletnieks on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Bob Kirshner on A 3.8-Sigma Anomaly
      • Vince on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
      • Gizelle Janine on How To Think About Quantum Field Theory
    • Facebook

    • Archives By Date

    • Archives By Category

    • Useful Pages

      • Home
      • RSS Feed
      • Comments Feed
      • About
      • Links (Blogroll)
      • Guest Bloggers
      • Equations Using LaTeX
      • Facebook page and group
      • Twitter
      • Goodies Store
      • Google Blog Search
      • Technorati Profile
      • Bloglines citations
    • Site Meter



  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us