<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Closing in on the Higgs Boson</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:55:29 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Emixt - Wholesale products &#187; LHC Suffers More Leaks, and Delays</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-85094</link>
		<dc:creator>Emixt - Wholesale products &#187; LHC Suffers More Leaks, and Delays</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 08:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-85094</guid>
		<description>[...] time to discover the famed Higgs Boson. If that long postulated but never observed particle is as heavy as scientists suspect, Tevatron scientists still have a shot at spotting some signs of its [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] time to discover the famed Higgs Boson. If that long postulated but never observed particle is as heavy as scientists suspect, Tevatron scientists still have a shot at spotting some signs of its [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reconciling science and religion: doomed to fail - Page 9 - Science Forums</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-80842</link>
		<dc:creator>Reconciling science and religion: doomed to fail - Page 9 - Science Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-80842</guid>
		<description>[...] since there is a continuum of possibilities as conveyed in the article supplied by InfiniteNow: Closing in on the Higgs Boson &#124; Cosmic Variance &#124; Discover Magazine .) Similarly, the exact existence of God is not yet known for sure. The only time we will ever know [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] since there is a continuum of possibilities as conveyed in the article supplied by InfiniteNow: Closing in on the Higgs Boson | Cosmic Variance | Discover Magazine .) Similarly, the exact existence of God is not yet known for sure. The only time we will ever know [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cormac O Raifeartaigh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67346</link>
		<dc:creator>Cormac O Raifeartaigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67346</guid>
		<description>isospin: I dislike the expression too. &#039;Single top quark&#039; production means production of top quark with a quark which is not anti-top -a reaction that is expected fro SM, but seen for the first time now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>isospin: I dislike the expression too. &#8216;Single top quark&#8217; production means production of top quark with a quark which is not anti-top -a reaction that is expected fro SM, but seen for the first time now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isospin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67338</link>
		<dc:creator>isospin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:53:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67338</guid>
		<description>#  QUASAR Says:
March 17th, 2009 at 11:32 am

Why do they have to delay the LHC restart up so much, anyway?

They have to cool the magnet system again to 1.9K, which will take several months.  By the way, it seems they also want to check whether there are anything else wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#  QUASAR Says:<br />
March 17th, 2009 at 11:32 am</p>
<p>Why do they have to delay the LHC restart up so much, anyway?</p>
<p>They have to cool the magnet system again to 1.9K, which will take several months.  By the way, it seems they also want to check whether there are anything else wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isospin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67336</link>
		<dc:creator>isospin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67336</guid>
		<description>I am not quite understand the news about &#039;single top quarks&#039;.  When you said “not pair produced”, how it preserves the color confinement?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not quite understand the news about &#8217;single top quarks&#8217;.  When you said “not pair produced”, how it preserves the color confinement?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: QUASAR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67335</link>
		<dc:creator>QUASAR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67335</guid>
		<description>Why do they have to delay the LHC restart up so much, anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do they have to delay the LHC restart up so much, anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Iblis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67332</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Iblis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67332</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/parodies/sam/sam.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Waiting for Dogot&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Everyone is eagerly awaiting the discovery of the Kibble boson (known colloquially as &quot;The Dog Particle&quot;), which was missed at the Fermi National Labrador. There have been speculations that it is too light to observe with available accelerators because it is really a gallstone boson, but such claims are unfunded.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/parodies/sam/sam.html" rel="nofollow">Waiting for Dogot</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Everyone is eagerly awaiting the discovery of the Kibble boson (known colloquially as &#8220;The Dog Particle&#8221;), which was missed at the Fermi National Labrador. There have been speculations that it is too light to observe with available accelerators because it is really a gallstone boson, but such claims are unfunded.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Serjeant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67168</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Serjeant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67168</guid>
		<description>Phillip: maybe a fairer comparison would be Higgs non-detection vs. Inflation tests via scalar/tensor CMB modes. I suspect you&#039;re right about the likelihood of directly detecting gravitational waves, though there may be MOND fans or Pioneer anomaly pundits (I&#039;m neither) who might take issue with your GR position. 

By the way I like the anti-spam mangling of your email address on your web page. I once asked someone to quote my email address with the word &quot;ecoli&quot; inserted, with a note &quot;please remove the anti-spam germ for a faster response&quot;. This elicited the comment &quot;astrobiology gone mad&quot;. Hmph!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phillip: maybe a fairer comparison would be Higgs non-detection vs. Inflation tests via scalar/tensor CMB modes. I suspect you&#8217;re right about the likelihood of directly detecting gravitational waves, though there may be MOND fans or Pioneer anomaly pundits (I&#8217;m neither) who might take issue with your GR position. </p>
<p>By the way I like the anti-spam mangling of your email address on your web page. I once asked someone to quote my email address with the word &#8220;ecoli&#8221; inserted, with a note &#8220;please remove the anti-spam germ for a faster response&#8221;. This elicited the comment &#8220;astrobiology gone mad&#8221;. Hmph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter Solstice Man</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67166</link>
		<dc:creator>Winter Solstice Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67166</guid>
		<description>I cannot help but imagine what the teaming masses would make of this news, expect to complain why those science geeks are focusing on some little things that don&#039;t matter and why aren&#039;t the spending their time and money on fixing the economy so we can have even bigger TVs to watch American Idol and the Bachelor with?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot help but imagine what the teaming masses would make of this news, expect to complain why those science geeks are focusing on some little things that don&#8217;t matter and why aren&#8217;t the spending their time and money on fixing the economy so we can have even bigger TVs to watch American Idol and the Bachelor with?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Helbig</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/comment-page-1/#comment-67163</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Helbig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2009/03/13/closing-in-on-the-higgs-boson/#comment-67163</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wonder what people would consider to be the bigger earthquake - non-detection of the Higgs boson or non-detection of gravitational waves?&quot;

It depends on the cause of the non-detection.  If, as I assume you mean, there is not a 
detection where theory clearly indicates there should be, then of course the non-detection
of gravitational waves would be the MUCH bigger earthquake.  We have ABSOLUTELY NO
REASON to believe the GR is not perfectly correct in the non-quantum regime.  Thus, not
finding gravitational waves would be a BIG surprise.  The Higgs, on the other hand, 
is on much shakier ground.  There isn&#039;t even a clear prediction of the mass, and we are
all sure that if it is not found where expected, then the next theory---which will sound
just as plausible---will easily account for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder what people would consider to be the bigger earthquake &#8211; non-detection of the Higgs boson or non-detection of gravitational waves?&#8221;</p>
<p>It depends on the cause of the non-detection.  If, as I assume you mean, there is not a<br />
detection where theory clearly indicates there should be, then of course the non-detection<br />
of gravitational waves would be the MUCH bigger earthquake.  We have ABSOLUTELY NO<br />
REASON to believe the GR is not perfectly correct in the non-quantum regime.  Thus, not<br />
finding gravitational waves would be a BIG surprise.  The Higgs, on the other hand,<br />
is on much shakier ground.  There isn&#8217;t even a clear prediction of the mass, and we are<br />
all sure that if it is not found where expected, then the next theory&#8212;which will sound<br />
just as plausible&#8212;will easily account for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
